ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC PIPELINE: THREE-YEAR OUTCOMES FALL 2010 COHORT

Similar documents
Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Foothill College: Academic Program Awards and Related Student Headcount, to

Access Center Assessment Report

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

Palo Alto College. What We Have Done

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Meta-Majors at Mott Community College

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

TRANSFER INFORMATION GUIDE 2017/2018. Take the next step and earn a University of Windsor degree.

E35 RE-DISCOVER CAREERS AND EDUCATION THROUGH 2020

Educational Attainment

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Albany Technical College Overview Goals Student Success and Implementation Team Conclusion Next Steps...

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Student attrition at a new generation university

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: WHAT WORKS? WHO BENEFITS? Harry J. Holzer Georgetown University The Urban Institute February 2010

FTE General Instructions

UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM. IPEDS Completions Reports, July 1, June 30, 2016 SUMMARY

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

RADIATION THERAPY PROGRAM

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Shelters Elementary School

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Raw Data Files Instructions

A Comparison of State of Florida Charter Technical Career Centers to District Non-Charter Career Centers,

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

KARNATAKA STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY, MYSORE

Quantitative Study with Prospective Students: Final Report. for. Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois

Idaho Public Schools

BASIC EDUCATION IN GHANA IN THE POST-REFORM PERIOD

Best Practices: Career Pathways for Low Income Young Adults

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

Profile of BC College Transfer Students admitted to the University of Victoria

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology

Data Diskette & CD ROM

21 st Century Apprenticeship Models

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

Internship Program. Employer and Student Handbook

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Tulsa Community College Staff Salary Schedule (Effective July 1, 2015)

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Best Colleges Main Survey

LaGuardia Community College Retention Committee Report June, 2006

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Why Graduate School? Deborah M. Figart, Ph.D., Dean, School of Graduate and Continuing Studies. The Degree You Need to Achieve TM

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Graphic Imaging Technology II - Part two of a two-year program designed to offer students skills in typesetting, art and pasteup,

Application for Admission

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

A Diverse Student Body

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Program Review

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Freshman Admission Application 2016

The Teaching and Learning Center

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

Transcription:

ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC PIPELINE: THREE-YEAR OUTCOMES FALL 2010 COHORT Wendy Lin Amir Hayat December, 2015 IR# 15108

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 3 Methodology... 4 Findings... 5 Three-year Outcomes... 5 Three-Year Outcomes by Student Characteristics... 6 Three-Year Outcomes by Level of College Readiness... 7 Three-Year Outcomes by Ivy Tech Region... 8 Leavers by Last Term Enrolled... 9 Leavers by Academic Progress... 9 Leave Rates by Student Characteristics... 12 Survival Analysis Summary... 17 Implications/Recommendations... 19 References... 21 Appendix A Descriptive Statistics... 22 Appendix B... 34 Survival Analysis Results... 34

Executive Summary This report analyzes students in Ivy Tech Community College s 2010 ATD cohort, which includes all students whose first term of enrollment at Ivy Tech was the fall 2010 semester. Ivy Tech s first-time to college, full- and part-time, inbound transfer, degree-seeking students from the summer and fall terms of 2010 were followed for three years from their college start (n=25,180): Greater than 70 percent of all students in the cohort left Ivy Tech within three years without earning a credential, with most students leaving within the first two semester and having earned less than 15 credit hours. A little more than a third of leavers completed Writing and Reading remediation. About a quarter of leavers completed college-level English while less than a fifth completed college-level Math course at Ivy Tech. Within three years, o Earned Ivy Tech credential: 2,022 (8.0 percent) o Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech at the end of three years: 5,439 (21.6 percent) o Did not earn Ivy Tech credential, transferred: 3,986 (15.8 percent) o Did not earn Ivy Tech credential, did not transfer: 13,733 (54.5 percent) o Total Leavers (including transfers): 17,719 (70.4 percent) More than half (74.7 percent) of the students in the cohort tested into remediation in at least one subject area; while 20.1 percent tested into remediation in all three. Approximately one in five (i.e., 21.6 percent) were college-ready in all three areas. Students who were college-ready in all subject areas had a higher graduation rate (16.5 percent) and transfer-out rate (25.7 percent) compared to the overall cohort. A little more than a third did not graduate nor were they enrolled in any institutions. Students who required remediation in all subject areas were the least successful, with graduation rate of 2.1 percent and a leave rate of 77.9 percent. Half of all students who successfully completed the remedial course left Ivy Tech without completing the gateway course. Half of all students who tested program ready successfully completed the gateway course. Only 8.0 percent of students earned a credential in three years, although the percentage of students earning a credential was higher in students who tested college-ready than those who tested remedial. Leavers had poor academic performance at Ivy Tech. The majority of leavers earned a cumulative Ivy Tech GPA below 2.0. Leave rates were the highest among students with the following characteristics (at first term at Ivy Tech): o Male o Black, non-hispanic o Age 24 and under at first term at Ivy Tech o Enrolled in the School of Liberal Arts and Sciences at first term at Ivy Tech o Pell-eligible at first term at Ivy Tech o New, first-time to Ivy Tech Course outcomes during the first semester at Ivy Tech are important predictors for later success. Students who do not pass any of their first semester courses have a hazard of leaving without a credential that is about 85% higher than students who pass all of their first semester courses at Ivy Tech. Moreover, as the percentage of passed courses IR # 13138 Page 1

increases, the gap between those who passed all of their courses and those who passed some of their courses diminishes. Completing Math and English gateway courses are associated with a large reduction in the hazard of leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential: the hazard of leaving is about 58% and 51% lower, respectively, for completers, compared to non-completers. IR # 13138 Page 2

ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC PIPELINE: THREE-YEAR OUTCOMES FALL 2010 COHORT Introduction Indiana has adopted the Lumina Foundation Big Goal, which seeks to increase the percentage of the adult population with high-quality degrees, certificates, and other credentials to 60 percent by 2025. Past studies have shown Ivy Tech has an on-time completion rate below five percent for first-time, full-time, resident students. One major obstacle to degree attainment for Ivy Tech students is closing the gap between remediation and college-readiness, as many of our students are placed into remediation when they begin college. According to the Remediation: Higher Education Bridge to Nowhere report by the Complete College America, less than one in 10 community-college students who required remediation completed an associate degree within three years. This pattern is also evident in Ivy Tech students, who frequently leave early in their academic career and stop-out frequently throughout their academic career, making on-time completion extremely difficult. The Pipeline Report follows a single cohort for three years through the academic pipeline. Figure 1 depicts the academic pipeline for these students. Students entering Ivy Tech for the first time in fall of 2010 were studied, with remedial need determined through a variety of assessment options. For the purpose of this study, Students who did not complete or were no longer enrolled at Ivy Tech were categorized as leavers. Students who transferred to another institution are categorized as leavers if they did not graduate at Ivy Tech prior to transferring. The goals of the Pipeline Report are: Figure 1. Academic Pipeline for Ivy Tech Students To identify various leakage points throughout the academic pipeline to find out where and when students leave To identify characteristics of students who leave To identify, where possible, key indicators and risk factors associated with leaving using statistical models Ultimately, the results from this report will help provide a more comprehensive look at what occurs throughout a student s academic career and identify intervention points to facilitate student success. IR # 13138 Page 3

Methodology The cohort in this study included all degree-seeking students who were new to Ivy Tech in the fall 2010 semester, including both full-time and part-time students, as well as first time in college and inbound transfer students (n=25,180). The sample excluded high school students, guest students, and students from the apprenticeship program. Student demographic information, enrollment characteristics, course work information and degree information at Ivy Tech were extracted from a database maintained by Ivy Tech. Each student s demographics and enrollment characteristics such as enrollment intensity (i.e., full- versus part-time) and major, as well as the student s home region, were captured when the student first started at the college. Subsequent enrollment and external degree information were provided by the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) and Indiana Commission for Higher Education (ICHE). This report defines transfer status as any enrollment activity at an institution that is not Ivy Tech. Each student is being counted once, regardless of whether the student attended multiple institutions. Completion in this report is defined as obtaining either a credential (i.e., CT or TC) or an associate degree at any time within the three-year time span. Completion is not restricted by the 150 percent completion time frame. This allows our completion counts to include more students, particularly those that earned certificates. A leaver is characterized as a student who did not earn an Ivy Tech credential and was not enrolled at Ivy Tech in either the fall 2012 or spring 2013 semesters. The research timeframe is between the student s first term at Ivy Tech (i.e., fall 2010) and the end of the three-year period (i.e., spring semester of 2013). This report does not examine any enrollment activity that falls outside this timeframe. IR # 13138 Page 4

Findings Three-year Outcomes Figure 2. Three-year Outcomes for Fall 2010 First-time and Inbound Transfer Students Table 1. Three-year Outcomes for Fall 2010 First-time and Inbound Transfer Students # Students % Total Earned Credential 2,022 8.0% Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech * 5,439 21.6% Leavers Did not earn an Ivy Tech 3,986 15.8% Credential, Transferred Did not earn an Ivy Tech 13,733 54.5% Credential, Did not Transfer (i.e., Not Enrolled Anywhere) Total Leavers 17,719 70.4% Cohort Total 25,180 100.0% * Enrolled at Ivy Tech in fall, 2012 or spring, 2013 IR # 13138 Page 5

Figure 2 and Table 1 show the three-year outcomes for the study cohort. Within three-years, approximately eight percent completed a degree or a certificate at Ivy Tech, while 21.6 percent were still enrolled at Ivy Tech at the end of the three-year period. By contrast, 15.8 percent transferred without earning an Ivy Tech credential while 54.5 percent did not earn a credential and did not transfer, making a combined leave rate of 70.4 percent. Three-Year Outcomes by Student Characteristics Table 9-A and 10-A in the appendix present three-year outcomes broken out by student characteristics. As shown, completion rates were highest for students with the following characteristics: Enrolled in School of Nursing (34.8 percent) Earned cumulative GPA of 3 to 3.99 (23.6 percent) Age 50 to 59 (15.9 percent) Inbound transfer (13.8 percent) The highest percentage of students who are still enrolled at the end of the three-year period had the following characteristics: Earned 30 cumulative credit hours or more at Ivy Tech Hispanic (25.7 percent) Age 35 to 39 (25.4 percent) or 40 to 49 (25.2 percent) Enrolled in School of Fine Arts and Design (25.4 percent) College Ready in Math (25.0 percent) Not Pell eligible (24.9 percent) The highest percentage of students who transferred without earning an Ivy Tech credential had the following characteristics: Enrolled in School of Applied Sciences and Engineering (25.4 percent) or School of Liberal Arts and Sciences (22.3 percent) Inbound transfer (25.1 percent) Earned 15 to 29.9 (21.5 percent) or 30 to 44.9 (21.2 percent) cumulative credit hours at Ivy Tech Did not apply for financial aid (20.9 percent) The highest percentage of students who left the education system altogether (i.e., did not earn Ivy Tech credential and did not transfer) had the following characteristics: Earned cumulative GPA of 0 to 1.99 (74.6 percent) Earned 0 (86.7 percent) or 0.1 to 14.9 (74.6 percent) cumulative credit hours at Ivy Tech Enrolled in School of Technology (64.0 percent) Black, non-hispanic (61.2 percent) Age 20 to 24 (57.0 percent) Male 58.6 percent Note: the student s enrollment and demographic characteristics pertained to the student s first term at Ivy Tech. IR # 13138 Page 6

Figure 3. Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Three-year Outcomes by Level of College Readiness Three-Year Outcomes by Level of College Readiness More than half (74.7 percent) of the students in the cohort tested into remediation in at least one subject area; while 20.1 percent tested into remediation in all three areas. Approximately one in five (21.6 percent) were college-ready in all three areas. When examining three-year outcomes by level of college readiness (see Figure 3), students who were college-ready in all subject areas were the most successful, showing a much higher graduation rate and a much lower leave rate compared to other subgroups. The reverse is true for those who tested into remediation in all three areas these students have the lowest graduation rate and the highest leave rate. Students who were college-ready in all subject areas were also more likely to transfer (25.7 percent). Subtle differences can be found when comparing students who required remediation in only one subject area. Those who tested only into remedial writing displayed a higher graduation rate than students who tested only into math or reading (i.e., by approximately two to four percentage points), while leave rates are the highest among students who tested into remedial math. Success rates decreased for students IR # 13138 Page 7

needing remediation in two or more areas compared to their peers with either one remedial need or no remedial needs. As shown in figure 3, a little less than a fifth of leavers completed math remediation at Ivy Tech, while approximately 80 percent of the leavers did not. About a third of leavers completed writing and reading remediation, a quarter completed college-level English while only a very insignificant percentage completed college-level math course at Ivy Tech. Results also indicated that 68.1 percent of students who were still enrolled at Ivy Tech completed remedial math, while 31.9 percent were still pending. Similarly, approximately 26.7 percent were pending a gateway English course while 45.1 percent were pending gateway Math. Figure 4. Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Three-year Outcomes by Ivy Tech Region Three-Year Outcomes by Ivy Tech Region Figure 4 shows three-year outcomes broken out by Ivy Tech region. Regions with the highest six-year success rates are Southeast (52.6 percent), Northwest (51.0 percent) and Bloomington (50.8 percent). IR # 13138 Page 8

Approximately one quarter of students from the Richmond and Columbus regions, respectively, completed at Ivy Tech and did not transfer. The Bloomington and Central Indiana regions had the highest proportion of students transferring without completing an Ivy Tech credential, whereas Southeast had the highest proportion of students transferring with an Ivy Tech credential. Consistent with findings from past transfer studies (Lin, 2014), a considerably large proportion of students transferred before completing at Ivy Tech. This is the most apparent in the Bloomington (24.7 percent), Northwest (18.8 percent) and Central Indiana regions (18.5 percent). Leavers by Last Term Enrolled 8,000 6,000 5,513 5,901 # of Students 4,000 2,000 2,399 2,320 574 371 228 413 0 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Last Term Enrolled at Ivy Tech Figure 5 Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Last Term Enrolled at Ivy Tech Figure 5 shows the student s last term enrolled at Ivy Tech before leaving the college. Nearly two-thirds of students left after attending the first and second semester at Ivy Tech, followed by a small peak of leavers in the following fall and spring semesters. Leaver counts diminished in the last two semesters. Of note, this does not include students who stop-out for some time and then return to Ivy Tech within the research timeframe. Leavers by Academic Progress As shown in Figure 6, leavers seemed to perform poorly overall compared to graduates or students who are still enrolled, as the majority of leavers earned a cumulative Ivy Tech GPA below 2.0. This may be due to academic and financial aid restrictions for students with GPAs below this level. Most leavers also left Ivy Tech with 15 credit hours or less (see Figure 7). This is consistent with findings earlier in the study indicating that leavers tend to exit very early during the three-year period. The study also finds a notable number of leavers earning GPA of 3 to 3.99 (n= 2,646), and 1,855 earning 30 credit hours or more. These groups of students may be good candidates for outreach purposes or initiatives such as the reverse transfer. IR # 13138 Page 9

80% 60% 68.7% Leavers Degree-Earners Still Enrolled 49.1% # of Students 40% 20% 22.6% 18.0% 26.6% 41.5% 14.9% 33.9% 0% 4.8% 4.5% 0.2% 0 to 1.99 2 to 2.99 3 to 3.99 4.00 Cumulative Ivy Tech GPA 1.9% Figure 6 Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Cumulative GPA Earned at Ivy Tech for Leavers and Non-Leavers 80% 60% Leavers Degree-Earners Still Enrolled 52.0% 61.4% # of Students 40% 20% 0% 26.6% 27.7% 24.4% 24.9% 22.0% 13.4% 10.2% 9.9% 7.7% 7.5% 3.7% 2.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.8% 0 0.1 to 14.9 15 to 29.9 30 to 44.9 45 to 59.9 >=60.0 Cumulative Ivy Tech Credits Earned Figure 7 Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Cumulative Credit Hours Earned for Leavers and Non- Leavers IR # 13138 Page 10

100% 86.7% 89.1% 88.2% 92.9% 92.3% 88.2% 90.0% 75% 73.3% 68.1% 54.9% # of Students 50% 25% 13.4% 25.6% 19.3% 30.6% 36.8% 0% Completed Gateway Math Course Completed Gateway English Course Completed Remedial Math Completed Remedial Writing Completed Remedial Reading Academic Progress Leavers Degree-Earners Still Enrolled Figure 8 Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Academic Progress for Leavers and Non-Leavers Note: there are certain CT/TC programs that do not require Math or English. IR # 13138 Page 11

Leave Rates by Student Characteristics 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% All Ivy Tech Students 70.4% 15 to 19 69.2% 20 to 24 75.4% 25 to 29 71.7% Age Group 30 to 34 35 to 39 63.0% 68.8% 40 to 49 63.6% 50 to 59 62.3% 60 and over 69.7% Gender Female Male 67.3% 74.6% African American 81.1% Ethnicity Caucasian Hispanic 67.9% 66.8% Other Minority 72.4% School of Applied Sciences and Engineering 68.4% School of Business 69.4% School of Education 69.2% School of Fine Arts and Design 65.8% Divison School of Health Sciences School of Liberal Arts and Sciences 68.7% 73.9% School of Nursing 52.2% School of Public and Social Services 70.9% School of Technology 72.3% Pell Eligibility Undecided Pell Eligible Not Pell Eligible Did Not Apply for Aid 63.0% 68.4% 68.9% 72.9% Overall Ivy Tech Leave Rate: 70.4% Student Populatio n New First Time Transfer 71.2% 67.4% Figure 9 Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Rate at which Students Leave Ivy Tech by Student and Enrollment Characteristics. IR # 13138 Page 12

Figure 9 illustrates rates at which students leave Ivy Tech by demographic and enrollment characteristics, with the overall leave rate (70.4 percent) marked as a reference line. Leave rates were the highest among students with the following characteristics: Male Black, non-hispanic Age 24 and under at first term at Ivy Tech Enrolled in the School of Liberal Arts and Sciences at first term at Ivy Tech Pell-eligible at first term at Ivy Tech New, first-time to Ivy Tech In contrast, leave rates were the lowest for students who were enrolled in the School of Nursing at their first term at Ivy Tech, age 35 or older, or who were not Pell-eligible during their first term at Ivy Tech. IR # 13138 Page 13

Figure 10. Three-year Outcomes for Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students by Completion of Math Requirements. IR # 13138 Page 14

Figure 11 Three-year Outcomes for Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students by Completion of Writing Requirements. IR # 13138 Page 15

Figure 12 Three-year Outcomes for Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students by Completion of Reading Requirements. IR # 13138 Page 16

Figures 10 to 12 illustrate the academic pipeline from start to finish broken out by completion of Math, Reading and Writing requirements. Key highlights from the findings include, More students tested into Math remediation (71.9 percent) than Reading (27.1 percent) or Writing remediation (33.5 percent). Leakage occurred along the academic pipeline for all students. For students requiring remediation, half of the students who passed the remedial course did not pass the gateway course. Students who tested at college-level for a subject were more likely to complete the college-level course in that subject than students who tested into a remedial course. However, even in the college-ready group, only half completed the college-level course. Finally, only a small percentage of students under either pathway (i.e., college-ready or remedial) earned a credential in three years, although the percentage of students earning a credential was higher for students who tested college-ready than those who tested remedial. It is important to note that in this context, earning a credential includes both associate degree and certificates. Students who earned multiple credentials are only counted once. Survival Analysis Summary Using survival analysis, we investigated the relationship between key student characteristics and a student leaving Ivy Tech without receiving a credential within three years of matriculation. Survival analysis is used to investigate the time until an event takes place. We found several statistically significant factors associated with leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential. In addition to the factors identified below, our model also incorporated the following student characteristics: gender, ethnicity, testing into a writing remedial course, student s division of major, student s region, and the type of credential (Associates degree versus a certificate) that the student pursued. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential within 3 years: Being Pell eligible, compared to applying for financial aid and not being Pell eligible o There are no significant differences between Pell eligible students and those who did not apply for financial aid. Students who fail or withdraw from at least one course during their first semester Factors associated with a lower likelihood of leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential within 3 years: Transferring into Ivy Tech, rather than being a first time student at Ivy Tech The more times that a student changes his major Being 25 years old or older, compared to younger students Testing into a math remedial course Testing into a reading remedial course Completing a Math gateway course Completing the English gateway course Being a part time student during the first semester IR # 13138 Page 17

Course outcomes during the first semester at Ivy Tech are important predictors for later success. Students who do not pass any of their first semester courses have a hazard of leaving without a credential that is about 85% higher than students who pass all of their first semester courses at Ivy Tech. Moreover, as the percentage of passed courses increases, the gap between those who passed all of their courses and those who passed some of their courses diminishes 1. Survival probability across time: completers and non-completers of a Math gateway course 1 More detailed survival analysis results are found in the Appendix. IR # 13138 Page 18

Survival probability across time: completers and non-completers of the English gateway course As seen above, completing Math and English gateway courses are associated with a large reduction in the hazard of leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential: the hazard of leaving is about 58% and 51% lower, respectively, for completers, compared to non-completers. Implications/Recommendations A considerable proportion of students (over 50 percent) in the cohort were lost in the educational system as they did not transfer, complete a credential nor were they found to be enrolled at any school by the end of the six-year period. Consistent with past findings, students tend to leave very early in their academic career, with most leaving with only 15 credit hours earned or less, indicating the need for interventions early in the students academic careers. In addition, examining factors which may have prompted students to exit early may provide critical guidance to retention strategies. Evaluation of Ivy Advising and Blackboard data could help provide evidence of the usefulness of such methods to track student s performance in class to help reduce early drop-out rates. An analysis of three-year outcomes for each remedial subject showed a rapid leak in the pipeline for all students. Half of all students who completed remedial coursework left Ivy Tech without completing the gateway course, and only half of all students who were college-ready in all three subject areas successfully completed the gateway course. While persistence to degree is higher for those entering college-ready, it is clear that other factors play important role in retention and success than just testing out of remediation. Finally, about one in five (21.6 percent) of the students in this study were still actively enrolled at Ivy Tech at the end of the three-year period, suggesting a traditional three-year measure of success may cover IR # 13138 Page 19

a time period that is too short to capture sufficiently the success of community college students. In fact, the average time to completion for Ivy Tech students is 16 semesters (5 years and 1 semester) from the time of first enrollment. IPEDS began collecting an 8-year graduation rate in the 2014-2015 year, which will provide us an opportunity to receive peer comparison data for this period of time. The college has implemented a number of strategies since 2010 to improve remediation success, including implementing the co-requisite model for remedial coursework, using the Accuplacer diagnostic assessment, and implementing math pathways, among the many other retention efforts that are underway. Improvements in completion rates due to these initiatives are not reflected in this current cohort analysis. The full impact of these initiatives will not be fully evident until later cohorts. IR # 13138 Page 20

References Complete College America (2012). Remediation: Higher Education's Bridge to Nowhere. Available from http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/cca%20remediation%20es%20final.pdf Lin, W. & Jones, M. (2014). Analysis of Academic Pipeline: Three-Year Outcomes. Fall 2009 Cohort. Smith, E., Holcombe, W. (2008). Traversing the Academic Pipeline. Available from http://www.fldoe.org/fcs/osas/evaluations/pdf/zoom2008-02.pdf IR # 13138 Page 21

Appendix A Descriptive Statistics Table 2-A Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Three-year Outcomes by Student Characteristics by number of students Did Not Earn Ivy Did Not Earn Ivy Earned Ivy Tech Still Enrolled at Ivy Student Characteristics* Tech Credential, Tech Credential, Total Leavers Total in Cohort Credential Tech Transferred Did not Transfer All Students 2,022 5,439 3,986 13,733 17,719 25,180 Age Group 15 to 19 570 1,986 1,576 4,154 5,730 8,286 20 to 24 491 1,322 1,359 4,206 5,565 7,378 25 to 29 279 662 439 1,948 2,387 3,328 30 to 34 191 485 257 1,233 1,490 2,166 35 to 39 162 353 155 721 876 1,391 40 to 49 206 461 154 1,011 1,165 1,832 50 to 59 109 150 38 390 428 687 60 and Over 13 20 8 68 76 109 Not Reported 1 - - 2 2 3 Gender Female 1,228 3,459 2,264 7,362 9,626 14,313 Male 776 1,945 1,702 6,273 7,975 10,696 Not Reported 18 35 20 98 118 171 Ethnicity African American 134 641 816 2,512 3,328 4,103 Caucasian 1,697 4,130 2,689 9,639 12,328 18,155 Hispanic 69 237 131 486 617 923 Other Minority 119 424 346 1,081 1,427 1,970 Not Reported 3 7 4 15 19 29 Division School of Applied Sciences 51 87 111 188 299 437 and Engineering School of Business 460 820 607 2,302 2,909 4,189 School of Education 106 352 229 800 1,029 1,487 School of Fine Arts and 36 103 49 218 267 406 Design School of Health Sciences 169 464 231 1,161 1,392 2,025 School of Liberal Arts and Sciences 251 1,126 1,176 2,715 3,891 5,268 IR # 13138 Page 22

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers Total in Cohort School of Nursing 16 6 7 17 24 46 School of Public and Social 258 647 407 1,793 2,200 3,105 Services School of Technology 249 352 180 1,389 1,569 2,170 Undecided 426 1,480 988 3,146 4,134 6,040 Not Reported - 2 1 4 5 7 Major Accounting 71 88 80 227 307 466 Accounting - Distance 20 15 13 37 50 85 Advanced Manufacturing 6 10 1 28 29 45 Agriculture 29 24 28 32 60 113 Automotive Electrical/Electron 4 1 1 13 14 19 Automotive Technology 46 80 49 392 441 567 Aviation - 6 5 8 13 19 Biotechnology 6 14 24 34 58 78 Bookkeeper 4 1-9 9 14 Brakes and Suspension 1 - - 4 4 5 Building Construction Mgmt - 10 2 11 13 23 Business Admin-Distance 23 37 37 106 143 203 Business Administration 166 364 287 1,039 1,326 1,856 Chemical Technology 2-2 11 13 15 Community Emergency Prep - - - 1 1 1 Computer Info Systems- Distance 12 27 37 114 151 190 Computer Information Systems 59 84 60 270 330 473 Computer Information Tech 55 119 55 329 384 558 Construction Technician 2 5 3 19 22 29 Construction Technology 20 30 17 105 122 172 Criminal Justice 71 215 136 635 771 1,057 Criminal Justice-Distance 13 56 50 206 256 325 Database - 1-1 1 2 Dental Assisting 6 4 1 14 15 25 Dental Hygiene 6 12 5 13 18 36 Design Technology 32 59 36 158 194 285 Design Technology-Distance 4 17 5 54 59 80 Early Childhood Education 43 136 70 338 408 587 IR # 13138 Page 23

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer IR # 13138 Page 24 Total Leavers Total in Cohort Early Childhood Educ- Distance 15 65 37 174 211 291 Education 48 151 122 288 410 609 Electrical Engineering Technology 5 12 10 39 49 66 Electrocardiography Technician 1 1 3 7 10 12 Electronics and Computer Tech 6 17 11 74 85 108 Engine Performance - - 2 13 15 15 Engineering Technology 1 17 8 17 25 43 Fine Arts 3 6 7 28 35 44 Fundamental Payroll 1 - - 1 1 2 General Liberal Studies - 1 - - 1 General Studies 175 740 809 1,864 2,673 3,588 General Studies-Distance 24 143 111 358 469 636 Health Care Support 20 130 81 283 364 514 Health Information Technology 3 26 10 51 61 90 Heating/Cooling 23 9 2 69 71 103 Homeland Security/Emergency Mg 1 - - - 1 Hospitality Administration 57 112 66 323 389 558 Human Resources Management 2 7 3 8 11 20 Human Services 50 119 74 295 369 538 Human Services-Distance 10 38 23 102 125 173 Imaging Sciences 1 - - - 1 Industrial Electrician 7 6 3 21 24 37 Industrial Technology 81 78 32 301 333 492 Information Security 1 1 - - 2 Interior Design 4 9 5 16 21 34 Java Programming - - 1-1 1 Kinesiology 2 2 7 15 22 26 Lib Arts - 1 - - 1 Liberal Arts 51 241 255 492 747 1,039 Library Technical Asst- 6 17 8 20 28 51 Distanc Logistics Management 1 3 1 5 6 10 Machine Tool - 2 1 8 9 11

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer IR # 13138 Page 25 Total Leavers Total in Cohort Machine Tool Technology - 3-5 5 8 Manufactng Prod&Oper Distance - 3 1 8 9 12 Manufacturing Operations - 2-5 5 7 Manufacturing/Industrial Tech 1 - - 2 2 3 Mechanical Engineering Tech 6 7 32 35 67 80 Medical Assisting 91 235 84 574 658 984 Medical Laboratory 7 6 1 11 12 25 Technology Microsoft Cert Applicatn Specl 1-3 6 9 10 Mortuary Sciences 1 2 3 7 10 13 Network Administration 3 4 2 10 12 19 Nursing 9 4 4 11 15 28 Office Administration 35 49 24 96 120 204 Office Administration- 6 11 3 20 23 40 Distance Ophthalmic Technology - - - 1 1 1 Paralegal 17 36 18 73 91 144 Paralegal Studies-Distance 24 27 15 79 94 145 Paramedic Science 5 4 4 24 28 37 Patient Care 1 3 3 20 23 27 PC Support and - - - 2 2 2 Administration Pharmacy Technician 4 8 12 42 54 66 Phlebotomy Technician 11 10 9 48 57 78 Physical Therapy Assisting 3 11 4 16 20 34 Power Train 1 - - 2 2 3 Practical Nursing 7 2 3 6 9 18 Pre-Engineering 2 11 7 15 22 35 Professional Communication 1 2 1 1 2 5 Public Safety 8 25 14 53 67 100 Radiation Therapy - 1 1 3 4 5 Radiologic Technology - - 1 2 3 3 Respiratory Care - 1-2 2 3 Routing and Switching - - - 2 2 2 Surgical Technology 1 - - 1 1 2 Sustainable Energy 9 1 2 14 16 26 Systems Security - 1-5 5 6

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers Total in Cohort Therapeutic Massage 7 10 6 37 43 60 Undeclared 426 1,480 988 3,146 4,134 6,040 Visual Communication 29 88 37 174 211 328 Visual Programming - 4 1 12 13 17 Web Management - 4-5 5 9 Welding 6 15 7 78 85 106 Pell Eligibility Pell Eligible 1,140 3,509 2,416 10,066 12,482 17,131 Not Pell Eligible 636 1,298 980 2,308 3,288 5,222 Did Not Apply for Aid 246 632 590 1,359 1,949 2,827 Student Population Description New First Time 1,293 4,447 2,663 11,498 14,161 19,901 Transfer 729 992 1,323 2,235 3,558 5,279 Cumulative Hours Earned 0-6 176 1,188 1,364 1,370 0.1 to 14.9 1 555 1,440 7,777 9,217 9,773 15 to 29.9 75 1,445 1,256 3,064 4,320 5,840 30 to 44.9 200 1,509 643 684 1,327 3,036 45 to 59.9 504 1,194 248 137 385 2,083 >=60.0 1,242 730 99 44 143 2,115 Not reported - - 124 839 963 963 GPA Range 0 to 1.99 4 1,228 1,294 7,406 8,700 9,932 2 to 2.99 537 2,257 1,068 2,121 3,189 5,983 3 to 3.99 1,389 1,846 1,141 1,505 2,646 5,881 4 92 102 183 674 857 1,051 Not reported - 6 300 2,027 2,327 2,333 College Preparedness Math Remedial Only 1,289 3,240 2,754 9,112 11,866 16,395 College Ready in Math 733 2,199 1,232 4,621 5,853 8,785 Reading Remedial Only 2,015 5,419 3,966 13,673 17,639 25,073 College Ready in Reading 7 20 20 60 80 107 IR # 13138 Page 26

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers Total in Cohort Writing Remedial Only 1,996 5,383 3,946 13,598 17,544 24,923 College Ready in Writing 26 56 40 135 175 257 Math and Writing Remedial 1,907 4,838 3,703 11,950 15,653 22,398 Math and Reading Remedial 1,973 5,134 3,821 12,905 16,726 23,833 Writing and Reading Remedial 2,003 5,383 3,956 13,633 17,589 24,975 Remediation in All Three 1,915 4,431 3,417 10,354 13,771 20,117 College Ready 1,124 4,366 2,585 11,654 14,239 19,729 Region R# 1 Northwest 148 527 439 1,224 1,663 2,338 R# 2 North Central 100 422 240 1,002 1,242 1,764 R# 3 Northeast 180 646 451 1,676 2,127 2,953 R# 4 Lafayette 215 372 318 1,048 1,366 1,953 R# 5 Kokomo 115 280 139 652 791 1,186 R# 6 East Central 233 486 308 1,550 1,858 2,577 R# 7 Terre Haute 87 292 213 707 920 1,299 R# 8 Central Indiana 271 990 817 2,348 3,165 4,426 R# 9 Richmond 55 172 68 424 492 719 R#10 Columbus 116 243 117 598 715 1,074 R#11 Southeast 89 141 82 338 420 650 R#12 Southwest 161 290 188 748 936 1,387 R#13 Sellersburg 125 230 183 600 783 1,138 R#14 Bloomington 127 348 423 818 1,241 1,716 * Student characteristic at entry term ** Enrolled at Ivy Tech in fall, 2012 or spring, 2013 IR # 13138 Page 27

Student Characteristics* Table 3-A Fall 2010 First-Time and Inbound Transfer Students: Three-year Outcomes by Student Characteristics by percent of students Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech** Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers All Students 8.0% 21.6% 15.8% 54.5% 70.4% Age Group 15 to 19 6.9% 24.0% 19.0% 50.1% 69.2% 20 to 24 6.7% 17.9% 18.4% 57.0% 75.4% 25 to 29 8.4% 19.9% 13.2% 58.5% 71.7% 30 to 34 8.8% 22.4% 11.9% 56.9% 68.8% 35 to 39 11.6% 25.4% 11.1% 51.8% 63.0% 40 to 49 11.2% 25.2% 8.4% 55.2% 63.6% 50 to 59 15.9% 21.8% 5.5% 56.8% 62.3% 60 and Over 11.9% 18.3% 7.3% 62.4% 69.7% Not Reported 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% Gender Female 8.6% 24.2% 15.8% 51.4% 67.3% Male 7.3% 18.2% 15.9% 58.6% 74.6% Not Reported 10.5% 20.5% 11.7% 57.3% 69.0% Ethnicity African American 3.3% 15.6% 19.9% 61.2% 81.1% Caucasian 9.3% 22.7% 14.8% 53.1% 67.9% Hispanic 7.5% 25.7% 14.2% 52.7% 66.8% Other Minority 6.0% 21.5% 17.6% 54.9% 72.4% Not Reported 10.3% 24.1% 13.8% 51.7% 65.5% Division School of Applied Sciences 11.7% 19.9% 25.4% 43.0% 68.4% and Engineering School of Business 11.0% 19.6% 14.5% 55.0% 69.4% School of Education 7.1% 23.7% 15.4% 53.8% 69.2% School of Fine Arts and Design 8.9% 25.4% 12.1% 53.7% 65.8% IR # 13138 Page 28

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech** Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred IR # 13138 Page 29 Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers School of Health Sciences 8.3% 22.9% 11.4% 57.3% 68.7% School of Liberal Arts and 4.8% 21.4% 22.3% 51.5% 73.9% Sciences School of Nursing 34.8% 13.0% 15.2% 37.0% 52.2% School of Public and Social 8.3% 20.8% 13.1% 57.7% 70.9% Services School of Technology 11.5% 16.2% 8.3% 64.0% 72.3% Undecided 7.1% 24.5% 16.4% 52.1% 68.4% Not Reported 0.0% 28.6% 14.3% 57.1% 71.4% Major Accounting 15.2% 18.9% 17.2% 48.7% 65.9% Accounting - Distance 23.5% 17.6% 15.3% 43.5% 58.8% Advanced Manufacturing 13.3% 22.2% 2.2% 62.2% 64.4% Agriculture 25.7% 21.2% 24.8% 28.3% 53.1% Automotive Electrical/Electron 21.1% 5.3% 5.3% 68.4% 73.7% Automotive Technology 8.1% 14.1% 8.6% 69.1% 77.8% Aviation 0.0% 31.6% 26.3% 42.1% 68.4% Biotechnology 7.7% 17.9% 30.8% 43.6% 74.4% Bookkeeper 28.6% 7.1% 0.0% 64.3% 64.3% Brakes and Suspension 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 80.0% Building Construction Mgmt 0.0% 43.5% 8.7% 47.8% 56.5% Business Admin-Distance 11.3% 18.2% 18.2% 52.2% 70.4% Business Administration 8.9% 19.6% 15.5% 56.0% 71.4% Chemical Technology 13.3% 0.0% 13.3% 73.3% 86.7% Community Emergency Prep 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Computer Info Systems- Distance 6.3% 14.2% 19.5% 60.0% 79.5% Computer Information Systems 12.5% 17.8% 12.7% 57.1% 69.8% Computer Information Tech 9.9% 21.3% 9.9% 59.0% 68.8% Construction Technician 6.9% 17.2% 10.3% 65.5% 75.9% Construction Technology 11.6% 17.4% 9.9% 61.0% 70.9% Criminal Justice 6.7% 20.3% 12.9% 60.1% 72.9% Criminal Justice-Distance 4.0% 17.2% 15.4% 63.4% 78.8% Database 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% Dental Assisting 24.0% 16.0% 4.0% 56.0% 60.0% Dental Hygiene 16.7% 33.3% 13.9% 36.1% 50.0%

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech** Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred IR # 13138 Page 30 Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers Design Technology 11.2% 20.7% 12.6% 55.4% 68.1% Design Technology-Distance 5.0% 21.3% 6.3% 67.5% 73.8% Early Childhood Education 7.3% 23.2% 11.9% 57.6% 69.5% Early Childhood Educ- Distance 5.2% 22.3% 12.7% 59.8% 72.5% Education 7.9% 24.8% 20.0% 47.3% 67.3% Electrical Engineering Technol 7.6% 18.2% 15.2% 59.1% 74.2% Electrocardiography Technician 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 58.3% 83.3% Electronics and Computer Tech 5.6% 15.7% 10.2% 68.5% 78.7% Engine Performance 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% Engineering Technology 2.3% 39.5% 18.6% 39.5% 58.1% Fine Arts 6.8% 13.6% 15.9% 63.6% 79.5% Fundamental Payroll 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% General Liberal Studies 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% General Studies 4.9% 20.6% 22.5% 52.0% 74.5% General Studies-Distance 3.8% 22.5% 17.5% 56.3% 73.7% Health Care Support 3.9% 25.3% 15.8% 55.1% 70.8% Health Information Technology 3.3% 28.9% 11.1% 56.7% 67.8% Heating/Cooling 22.3% 8.7% 1.9% 67.0% 68.9% Homeland Security/Emergency Mg 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hospitality Administration 10.2% 20.1% 11.8% 57.9% 69.7% Human Resources Management 10.0% 35.0% 15.0% 40.0% 55.0% Human Services 9.3% 22.1% 13.8% 54.8% 68.6% Human Services-Distance 5.8% 22.0% 13.3% 59.0% 72.3% Imaging Sciences 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Industrial Electrician 18.9% 16.2% 8.1% 56.8% 64.9% Industrial Technology 16.5% 15.9% 6.5% 61.2% 67.7% Information Security 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Interior Design 11.8% 26.5% 14.7% 47.1% 61.8% Java Programming 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Kinesiology 7.7% 7.7% 26.9% 57.7% 84.6% Lib Arts 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Liberal Arts 4.9% 23.2% 24.5% 47.4% 71.9%

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech** Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred IR # 13138 Page 31 Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers Library Technical Asst- Distanc 11.8% 33.3% 15.7% 39.2% 54.9% Logistics Management 10.0% 30.0% 10.0% 50.0% 60.0% Machine Tool 0.0% 18.2% 9.1% 72.7% 81.8% Machine Tool Technology 0.0% 37.5% 0.0% 62.5% 62.5% Manufactng Prod&Oper Distance 0.0% 25.0% 8.3% 66.7% 75.0% Manufacturing Operations 0.0% 28.6% 0.0% 71.4% 71.4% Manufacturing/Industrial Tech 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% Mechanical Engineering Tech 7.5% 8.8% 40.0% 43.8% 83.8% Medical Assisting 9.2% 23.9% 8.5% 58.3% 66.9% Medical Laboratory Technology 28.0% 24.0% 4.0% 44.0% 48.0% Microsoft Cert Applicatn Specl 10.0% 0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0% Mortuary Sciences 7.7% 15.4% 23.1% 53.8% 76.9% Network Administration 15.8% 21.1% 10.5% 52.6% 63.2% Nursing 32.1% 14.3% 14.3% 39.3% 53.6% Office Administration 17.2% 24.0% 11.8% 47.1% 58.8% Office Administration- Distance 15.0% 27.5% 7.5% 50.0% 57.5% Ophthalmic Technology 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Paralegal 11.8% 25.0% 12.5% 50.7% 63.2% Paralegal Studies-Distance 16.6% 18.6% 10.3% 54.5% 64.8% Paramedic Science 13.5% 10.8% 10.8% 64.9% 75.7% Patient Care 3.7% 11.1% 11.1% 74.1% 85.2% PC Support and Administration 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Pharmacy Technician 6.1% 12.1% 18.2% 63.6% 81.8% Phlebotomy Technician 14.1% 12.8% 11.5% 61.5% 73.1% Physical Therapy Assisting 8.8% 32.4% 11.8% 47.1% 58.8% Power Train 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% Practical Nursing 38.9% 11.1% 16.7% 33.3% 50.0% Pre-Engineering 5.7% 31.4% 20.0% 42.9% 62.9% Professional Communication 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% Public Safety 8.0% 25.0% 14.0% 53.0% 67.0% Radiation Therapy 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 80.0% Radiologic Technology 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Respiratory Care 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7%

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech** Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred IR # 13138 Page 32 Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers Routing and Switching 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Surgical Technology 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% Sustainable Energy 34.6% 3.8% 7.7% 53.8% 61.5% Systems Security 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 83.3% 83.3% Therapeutic Massage 11.7% 16.7% 10.0% 61.7% 71.7% Undeclared 7.1% 24.5% 16.4% 52.1% 68.4% Visual Communication 8.8% 26.8% 11.3% 53.0% 64.3% Visual Programming 0.0% 23.5% 5.9% 70.6% 76.5% Web Management 0.0% 44.4% 0.0% 55.6% 55.6% Welding 5.7% 14.2% 6.6% 73.6% 80.2% Pell Eligibility Pell Eligible 6.7% 20.5% 14.1% 58.8% 72.9% Not Pell Eligible 12.2% 24.9% 18.8% 44.2% 63.0% Did Not Apply for Aid 8.7% 22.4% 20.9% 48.1% 68.9% Student Population Description New First Time 6.5% 22.3% 13.4% 57.8% 71.2% Transfer 13.8% 18.8% 25.1% 42.3% 67.4% Cumulative Hours Earned 0 0.0% 0.4% 12.8% 86.7% 99.6% 0.1 to 14.9 0.0% 5.7% 14.7% 79.6% 94.3% 15 to 29.9 1.3% 24.7% 21.5% 52.5% 74.0% 30 to 44.9 6.6% 49.7% 21.2% 22.5% 43.7% 45 to 59.9 24.2% 57.3% 11.9% 6.6% 18.5% >=60.0 58.7% 34.5% 4.7% 2.1% 6.8% Not reported 0.0% 0.0% 12.9% 87.1% 100.0% GPA Range 0 to 1.99 0.0% 12.4% 13.0% 74.6% 87.6% 2 to 2.99 9.0% 37.7% 17.9% 35.5% 53.3% 3 to 3.99 23.6% 31.4% 19.4% 25.6% 45.0% 4 8.8% 9.7% 17.4% 64.1% 81.5% Not reported 0.0% 0.3% 12.9% 86.9% 99.7% College Preparedness Math Remedial Only 7.9% 19.8% 16.8% 55.6% 72.4%

Student Characteristics* Earned Ivy Tech Credential Still Enrolled at Ivy Tech** Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Transferred Did Not Earn Ivy Tech Credential, Did not Transfer Total Leavers College Ready in Math 8.3% 25.0% 14.0% 52.6% 66.6% Reading Remedial Only 8.0% 21.6% 15.8% 54.5% 70.4% College Ready in Reading 6.5% 18.7% 18.7% 56.1% 74.8% Writing Remedial Only 8.0% 21.6% 15.8% 54.6% 70.4% College Ready in Writing 10.1% 21.8% 15.6% 52.5% 68.1% Math and Writing Remedial 8.5% 21.6% 16.5% 53.4% 69.9% Math and Reading Remedial 8.3% 21.5% 16.0% 54.1% 70.2% Writing and Reading Remedial 8.0% 21.6% 15.8% 54.6% 70.4% Remediation in All Three 9.5% 22.0% 17.0% 51.5% 68.5% College Ready 5.7% 22.1% 13.1% 59.1% 72.2% Region R# 1 Northwest 6.3% 22.5% 18.8% 52.4% 71.1% R# 2 North Central 5.7% 23.9% 13.6% 56.8% 70.4% R# 3 Northeast 6.1% 21.9% 15.3% 56.8% 72.0% R# 4 Lafayette 11.0% 19.0% 16.3% 53.7% 69.9% R# 5 Kokomo 9.7% 23.6% 11.7% 55.0% 66.7% R# 6 East Central 9.0% 18.9% 12.0% 60.1% 72.1% R# 7 Terre Haute 6.7% 22.5% 16.4% 54.4% 70.8% R# 8 Central Indiana 6.1% 22.4% 18.5% 53.1% 71.5% R# 9 Richmond 7.6% 23.9% 9.5% 59.0% 68.4% R#10 Columbus 10.8% 22.6% 10.9% 55.7% 66.6% R#11 Southeast 13.7% 21.7% 12.6% 52.0% 64.6% R#12 Southwest 11.6% 20.9% 13.6% 53.9% 67.5% R#13 Sellersburg 11.0% 20.2% 16.1% 52.7% 68.8% R#14 Bloomington 7.4% 20.3% 24.7% 47.7% 72.3% * Student characteristic at entry term ** Enrolled at Ivy Tech in fall, 2012 or spring, 2013 IR # 13138 Page 33

Appendix B Survival Analysis Results Cox Proportional Hazard Model for Outcome: Leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential Factor Hazard Ratio P Value Transferring into Ivy Tech, rather than being a first time student at Ivy Tech 0.85 < 0.01 The more times that a student changes his major 0.51 < 0.01 Being 25 years old or older, compared to younger students 0.96 < 0.05 Testing into a math remedial course 0.93 < 0.01 Testing into a reading remedial course 0.93 < 0.01 Completing a Math gateway course 0.42 < 0.01 Completing English gateway course 0.49 < 0.01 Being a part time student during the first semester 0.95 < 0.01 Being Pell eligible, compared to applying for financial aid and not being Pell eligible 1.07 < 0.01 Not passing any courses during the first semester at Ivy Tech, compared to passing all courses 1.85 < 0.01 Passing 1% to 34% of one s courses during the first semester at Ivy Tech, compared to passing all courses 1.4 < 0.01 Passing 35% to 67% of one s courses during the first semester at Ivy Tech, compared to passing all courses 1.18 < 0.01 Passing 68% to 99% of one s courses during the first semester at Ivy Tech, compared to passing all courses 1.06 < 0.01 IR # 13138 Page 34

Survival Analysis Methodology Survival analysis is used to investigate the time until an event takes place. In this project, we use the Cox Proportional Hazard model to estimate the hazard, or likelihood, of leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential. For each independent variable in our model, we estimate the hazard ratio. A hazard ratio greater than one suggests that the factor is associated with a greater likelihood of leaving Ivy Tech without a earning credential, while a hazard ratio of less than one suggests that the factor is associated with a lower likelihood of leaving Ivy Tech without a credential. A hazard ratio equal to one indicates that the factor has no significant relationship with leaving Ivy Tech without a credential. In the table on the previous page, we present the hazard ratios for key variables that have a statistically significant relationship with a student leaving Ivy Tech without earning a credential. In addition to the factors in this table, we also controlled for the following characteristics: gender, ethnicity, testing into a writing remedial course, student s division of major, student s region, and the type of credential (Associates degree versus a certificate) that the student pursued. After excluding from the analysis students who had missing data for key variables in the analysis, there were 25,168 students in our survival analysis dataset. IR # 13138 Page 35