Action Plan for Science

Similar documents
Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Creative Media Department Assessment Policy

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Archdiocese of Birmingham

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Ferry Lane Primary School

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Archdiocese of Birmingham

School Improvement Plan

Newlands Girls School

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

Eastbury Primary School

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

First Line Manager Development. Facilitated Blended Accredited

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Putnoe Primary School

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Trainee Handbook PGCE 3-7 & PGCE Primary Education 2017/18

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

Oasis Academy South Bank

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Subject Inspection in Technical Graphics and Design and Communication Graphics REPORT

Strategy for teaching communication skills in dentistry

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Charlton Kings Infants School

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Feedback, Marking and Presentation Policy

St Matthew s RC High School

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

Qualification handbook

DFE Number: 318/3315 URN Number: Headteacher: Mrs C. Moreland Chair of Governors: Mrs. D. Long

EQuIP Review Feedback

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

The Keele University Skills Portfolio Personal Tutor Guide

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

Launching GO 4 Schools as a whole school approach

Consent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

Summary: Impact Statement

Pupil Premium Impact Assessment

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

School Complaints Policy

Leo de Beurs. Pukeoware School. Sabbatical Leave Term 2

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

NTU Student Dashboard

Using research in your school and your teaching Research-engaged professional practice TPLF06

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Knowle DGE Learning Centre. PSHE Policy

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Mathematical Misconceptions -- Can We Eliminate Them? Phi lip Swedosh and John Clark The University of Melbourne. Introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

R01 NIH Grants. John E. Lochman, PhD, ABPP Center for Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems Department of Psychology

Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE

VIA ACTION. A Primer for I/O Psychologists. Robert B. Kaiser

POLICY ON THE ACCREDITATION OF PRIOR CERTIFICATED AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

I. Standards for Promotion A. PROFESSOR

Transcription:

Action Plan for Science - Objective 1 To make more effective use of our assessment results and procedures to ensure a greater percentage of pupils will reach age expected attainment in science at the end of Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. Desired Outcome To ensure that children who are not making sufficient progress are quickly identified and provision made for them to reach age expected outcomes by the end of each academic year. 1. To analyse the progress made by all children at the end of each term. All children will have made 3 points or more of progress and Use of assessment grids D Clegg K S McCrossan Dec Mar July 2. To ensure staff are aware of children who are not making sufficient progress and to support them to raise these children s attainment. A greater percentage of children in each cohort will be at age expected in science. We will have successfully closed the gap where necessary in the attainment of identified children. The tracking and assessment grids will be fit for purpose. Lesson observations Work scrutiny Discussions with staff K Dec Mar July 3. To ensure all staff are making accurate use of the tracking grids to inform planning to move all children forward. Moderation Staff Meetings Staff discussions Work scrutiny K All Staff Dec Mar July

Action Plan for Science - Objective 2 To ensure all staff annotate science work in a way that supports assessment for learning. Desired Outcome Annotated work will clearly show how children are attaining against the assessment criteria for a lesson or activity. 1. To share effective examples of annotated science work. 2. To moderate examples of annotated assessments being made within each key stage. Science work will be annotated correctly and aid in making judgements about the standard of work produced. Teacher assessments will be consistent. The assessments made in school will be shown to be robust. Judgements made of children below, at age and beyond age expected will have been moderated. assessment portfolio and staff meeting. Through feedback from staff. assessment portfolio and staff meeting. Class teachers. November January 3. To develop an annotation portfolio to show examples of good practise. A portfolio of assessed work for science will have been produced and used by teachers to standardise their judgements. appraisal process. - spent with teachers in key stages. A selection of work from each year group of a child with scores 1, 2 and 3.

Action Plan for Science - Objective 3 To embed staff expertise in probing pupils understanding through the use of effective questioning. Desired Outcomes Teachers will make better use of a range of higher order questions. The children will be encouraged to have a deeper understanding of concepts. Pupils will demonstrate increased levels of resilience, confidence and independence when they tackle challenging activities. Teachers will systematically and effectively check pupils understanding throughout lessons, anticipating where they may need to intervene and do so with notable impact on the quality of learning. Key Questions - How do we ensure children are motivated and engaged by the questions adults pose? Do staff effectively plan questions which enable them to assess children s understanding of what is being taught? Do responses to questions lead to appropriate intervention? Rationale The work we have undertaken on this over the past 3 years has had a positive impact on learning and the headteacher wants this to remain a focus so as to embed questioning into teaching and learning and has chosen the science subject leader to do this. 1. To monitor planning and to share effective practise. 2. Mrs to lead a staff meeting on the use questions to probe pupils understanding. 3. To use lesson observations and drop ins to identify how teachers can improve their Effective planning will have been shared. Higher order questions will be evident in all planning. Assessment for Learning will be evident in planning. I.e. Staff will effectively plan questions which enable them to assess children s understanding of what is being taught. Staff will effectively plan questions which enable them to assess children s understanding of what is being taught. Teachers will systematically and effectively check pupils understanding throughout lessons, anticipating where Through monitoring of planning. observations. Through Appraisal Records Subject Action Plan for Science and by Half Day supply Leadership Supply Cover Karen Moody September - Then ongoing

Action Plan for Science - questioning skills. they may need to intervene and do so with notable impact on the quality of learning. Teachers will have a greater understanding of how to improve their practise. Children will have a deeper understanding of concepts. More lessons will contain outstanding features. Children will be motivated and engaged by the questions adults pose. MTP s will contain quality key questions. Staff will have an improved understanding of the impact effective questioning has on learning. (I.e. Teachers professional knowledge and understanding will have improved.) The children will be encouraged to have a deeper understanding of concepts. Pupils will demonstrate increased levels of resilience, confidence and independence when they tackle challenging activities. the governor responsible for Science. H.T s Report to Governors Through interviews with children. 4. To ensure the good practise developed last year is embedded into the schools approach to teaching and learning. Subject Action Plan for Science and by the governor responsible for Science. Through Appraisal Records observations. Leadership 5. To ensure teachers make better use of a range of higher order questions. Leadership Karen Moody Summer Term

Action Plan for Science - Objective 4 To develop the scientific literacy of children. Desired Outcomes For children to be able to engage with the language of argument by participating effectively in rational discussion. For the children to be able to learn to justify their own ideas as well as make informed and confident challenges to the ideas of others. Teacher s knowledge and understanding of scientific literacy will have improved. 1. To share the I Can Explain resources with staff. 2. For staff to trial the I Can Explain resources with groups of children. 3. To improve the teachers ability to develop scientific literacy within lessons. Staff will understand the basic principles behind the teaching materials. Teacher s knowledge and understanding of scientific literacy will have improved. Children will have developed the ability to work as an effective member of a group. (Collaboration) Children will explain and justify their ideas clearly. Children will have had opportunities to explore their wrong ideas. Teachers will have developed a range of strategies which will enable children to give rational explanations and to make cognitive gains in science through group talk activities. appraisal process. Through discussions with staff. observations and drop ins. observations and drop ins. I Can Explain Resources - 100 Science Lessons INSET Day All staff Locality Head Teachers September Autumn Term Spring Term 27.02.17 The I Can Explain Resources are funded by the Primary Science Teaching Trust. The Southbourne Locality of Schools hope to use their INSET Day on 27.02.17 to develop the scientific literacy of children across the locality. It is hoped that teachers from across the locality will be trained to fully understand the importance of this approach and use it to develop their understanding and expertise in the teaching of science.