English Language Learners and the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Disciplinary Literacy: An Instructional Exemplar

Similar documents
Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

Understanding Language

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Quality Teaching for English Learners (QTEL) Impact Study

EQuIP Review Feedback

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Bell Work Integrating ELLs

Academic Language: Equity for ELs

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Grade 4: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 4 Word Choice: Using Academic Vocabulary to Apply for a Colonial Trade Job

An Asset-Based Approach to Linguistic Diversity

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Growing Gifted Readers. with Lisa Pagano & Marie Deegan Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

New Ways of Connecting Reading and Writing

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Danielle Dodge and Paula Barnick first

Oakland Schools Response to Critics of the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy Are These High Quality Standards?

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

Kindergarten Lessons for Unit 7: On The Move Me on the Map By Joan Sweeney

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Fountas-Pinnell Level P Informational Text

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Patricia Velasco, Ed.D. Bilingual Education Program Queens College, CUNY November 1, 2016

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

South Carolina English Language Arts

Grade 3: Module 1: Unit 3: Lesson 5 Jigsaw Groups and Planning for Paragraph Writing about Waiting for the Biblioburro

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

Language Acquisition Chart

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Classroom Activities/Lesson Plan

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Travis Park, Assoc Prof, Cornell University Donna Pearson, Assoc Prof, University of Louisville. NACTEI National Conference Portland, OR May 16, 2012

CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING: ENG 200H-D01 - Spring 2017 TR 10:45-12:15 p.m., HH 205

#MySHX400 in Your Classroom TEACHING MODULE What s your Shakespeare story?

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Grade Band: High School Unit 1 Unit Target: Government Unit Topic: The Constitution and Me. What Is the Constitution? The United States Government

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Going back to our roots: disciplinary approaches to pedagogy and pedagogic research

Mercer County Schools

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

Rottenberg, Annette. Elements of Argument: A Text and Reader, 7 th edition Boston: Bedford/St. Martin s, pages.

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

Close Up. washington, Dc High School Programs

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Renae Townsend G21 PBL Project

Office: Colson 228 Office Hours: By appointment

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

Grade 3: Module 2B: Unit 3: Lesson 10 Reviewing Conventions and Editing Peers Work

Co-teaching in the ESL Classroom

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

Transcription:

English Language Learners and the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Disciplinary Literacy: An Instructional Exemplar George C. Bunch, University of California, Santa Cruz (gbunch@ucsc.edu) Susan Pimentel, Student Achievement Partners (spimentel@studentsachieve.net) Aída Walqui, WestEd (awalqui@wested.org) Lydia Stack, ESL/EFL Consultant (lstack@mac.com) Martha Castellón, Stanford University (mcastel@stanford.edu) English Language Arts Workgroup Understanding Language Initiative December 6, 2012

Logistics and Webinar Norms Tina Cheuk will be moderating the chat box on the lower right hand corner. Please type your questions in that box during the session and/or in Q & A. ALL participants will be on MUTE for the presentations. The webinar will be recorded and archived on our website. PowerPoint presentation will posted after the webinar.

Goals of the Understanding Language Initiative 1. Engage in a healthy public dialogue around what the CCSS and NGSS imply for English Language Learners (ELLs). 2. Develop exemplars of what CCSS and NGSSaligned instruction looks like, to be used as strategic tools by districts (and others). 3. Develop a vibrant, inquisitive, engaging online community: Web: ell.stanford.edu Twitter: ELLStanford Facebook: Understanding Language You Tube: Understanding Language

Plan for this Webinar Realizing opportunities for ELLs in CCSS English Language Arts Standards An exemplar pilot ELA unit demonstrating shifts in approaching language, language learning, and instruction for ELLs (developed for Understanding Language by Aída Walqui and WestEd in collaboration with the UL ELA team) Feedback from teachers who have reviewed and/or taught the unit Questions, comments, and discussion

Cross-Cutting Foundations (ell.stanford.edu) Language and the Common Core Standards (L. van Lier and A. Walqui) What is the Development of Literacy the Development of? (G. Hull & E. Moje) What Does Text Complexity Mean for English Learners and Language Minority Students? (L. Wong Fillmore & C. J. Fillmore) Instruction for Diverse Groups of English Language Learners (A. Walqui & M. Heritage)

Content-Area Foundations (ell.stanford.edu) Realizing Opportunities for English Learners in the Common Core English Language Arts and Disciplinary Literacy Standards (G. Bunch, A. Kibler, and S. Pimentel) Mathematics, the Common Core, and Language: Recommendations for Mathematics Instruction for ELLs (J. Moschkovich) Language Demands and Opportunities in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards for ELLs (H. Quinn, O. Lee, and G. Valdés)

Realizing Opportunities for ELs in the ELA and Disciplinary Literacy Standards (Bunch, Kibler, Pimentel) ELs should not be removed from the challenges set out in the standards, but rather supported in meeting them. ELs can meaningfully participate in instruction through imperfect language. Instruction must build on and build students existing resources (L1, background knowledge, interests and motivations), precisely in order to expand them. Instruction must immerse students in meaningmaking language and literacy activities with both micro- and macro- scaffolding (Schleppegrell & O Hallaron, 2011).

Comments from Susan Pimentel Instructional shifts called for by the Standards: Complexity: Regular practice with complex texts Evidence: Reading, writing, speaking, and listening grounded in evidence from literary and informational texts Knowledge: Building knowledge through contentrich nonfiction

A Pilot ELA Exemplar (ell.stanford.edu/teaching_resources/ela) Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts A Unit Developed for the Understanding Language initiative by WestEd s Teacher Professional Development Program Unit Authors: Aída Walqui, Nanette Koelsch, and Mary Schmida In Collaboration with Understanding Language s English Language Arts Working Group: George C. Bunch (Chair), Martha Inez Castellón, Susan Pimentel, Lydia Stack, and Aída Walqui

Theoretical and Pedagogical Shifts in the Design and Enactment of Learning (Walqui) FROM A CONCEPTUALIZATION OF à TO UNDERSTANDING Language acquisition as an individual process à Language acquisition as apprenticeship in social contexts Language as structures or functions à Language as action, subsuming structure and function (Ellis & Larsen Freeman, 2010; van Lier & Walqui,2012) L2 acquisition as a linear and progressive process aimed at accuracy, fluency, and complexity Individual (isolated) ideas or texts as the center of instruction à Non linear and complex developmental process aimed at comprehension and communication à Attention to ideas in their interrelatedness, and teaching units as clusters of lessons that are interconnected by purpose and/or theme

Shifts (continued) Use of simple and/or simplified texts Use of activities that pre-teach the content or simply help students get through texts Identifying discrete structural features of language Traditional grammar as a starting point Objectives stated as dichotomies (e.g. content and language objectives) à Use of complex, amplified texts à Activities that scaffold students development and autonomy à Exploration of how language is purposeful and patterned to do its particular rhetorical work à Multimodal grammar to support students understandings of texts visual, spatial, gestural, audio, and linguistic meanings à Objectives revolve around ways of engaging students in disciplinary practices highlighting ideas and language responsive to purpose and audience

LESSON 2 Persuasion in Historical Context: The Gettysburg Address Gettysburg Address LESSON 1 Advertising in the Contemporary World: An Introduction to Persuasive Texts Can you live with dirty water? UNIT Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Persuasive Texts LESSON 3 Ethos, Logos, & Pathos in Civil Rights Movement Speeches MLK I Have a Dream Robert Kennedy On the Death of Martin Luther King George Wallace The Civil Rights Movement: Fraud, Sham, and Hoax LESSON 5 Putting it Together: Analyzing and Producing Persuasive Text The Girl who Silenced the World for Five Minutes LESSON 4 Persuasion as Text: Organizational, Grammatical, and Lexical Moves in Barbara Jordan s All Together Now Barbara Jordan All Together Now

3 Moments in the Reading of the Gettysburg Address PREPARING LEARNERS Task 1 Jigsaw Project: Era Envelope Clarifying Bookmark Base Group Share Wordle Partner Share with Round Robin INTERACTING WITH TEXT TEXT Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Close Reading Reading in Four Voices Literary Devices Dyad Wordle, Part II EXTENDING UNDERSTANDING Vocabulary Review Jigsaw In Our Own Words Task 8 Task 9 Task 10 WestEd, Quality teaching for English Learners, 2012

Jigsaw Project: Sourcing BASE GROUP Heterogeneous groups work together preparing for specialized work 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 EXPERT GROUP Handout 1 Handout 2 Handout 3 In more homogeneous groups, students develop expertise on each of the writers. They then share this knowledge with peers in base group BASE GROUP 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Participants share content of their readings and get ready to put it all together in preparation for joint reading

Scaffolding is Contingent: (Walqui & van Lier, 2010) Example: The Era Envelope Minimal: Table of 3 gets the envelope and 3 notetakers and one copy of each of the readings. Students read each text individually, annotate their organizers, and rotate readings. Discussion happens at the end Moderate: Jigsaw project reading and sharing of 3 pieces Maximal: First reading is read by teacher and students working together. A combination of partners fills in components in the chart. Second reading may or may not be read this way

Interacting with the Text Close Reading (with option for teacher to read the text aloud) Guiding Questions (examples) Para. 1: Lincoln refers to our fathers creating a new nation. Who is he referring to here? Para. 2: When Lincoln refers to a nation so conceived and dedicated, to which phrase in Paragraph One is he referring? How do you know? Para. 3: What does Lincoln mean when he states that the living must be dedicated to the unfinished work of the dead soldiers? Which lines in the speech tell the living what their unfinished work is?

Extending Understanding Vocabulary review jigsaw In Our Own Words Each student pair translates one or two lines of the Gettysburg Address into modern-day, colloquial English Sentences are displayed on large strips of paper and connected to constitute the entire address

Feedback from Teachers The unit is rigorous, exciting, innovative, and engaging. Wonderful demonstration of how ELs can engage with complex texts; texts are well chosen. Unit has high expectations for all ELs. The unit, with its spiraling framework, illustrates the major shifts embodied by the new standards. Love the emphasis on student-centered learning, e.g. students taking the lead through group work.

Feedback from Teachers Excellent alignment between unit and the new standards. This is an exemplar that shows how to develop and scaffold a unit to ensure ALL students engage in rigorous intellectual activity as they develop English language proficiency. As an educator, this unit provides me with an overview of what the Common Core is really all about; meaningful learning and real-world application of common standards.

Guidelines for ELA Materials Development (http://ell.stanford.edu/teaching_resources/ela) Begin with a potent set of a few key Standards, engaging with these standards in integrated and recursive ways. Create multiple pathways that promote high levels of access to, engagement with, and achievement of the Standards. Select texts that provide various kinds of text complexity, and prioritize which aspects to focus on. Activate and build on students background knowledge without foreclosing opportunities to engage with texts. Provide opportunities for students to write for different audiences and purposes. Utilize different participation structures. Focus on language as a resource for making meaning.

Continuing the conversation... Questions, comments, discussion Feel free to contact us with questions or comments: UnderstandingLanguage@stanford.edu George C. Bunch, University of California, Santa Cruz (gbunch@ucsc.edu) Susan Pimentel, Student Achievement Partners (spimentel@studentsachieve.net) Aída Walqui, WestEd (awalqui@wested.org) Lydia Stack, Independent Consultant (lstack@mac.com) Martha Castellón, Executive Director, Understanding Language, Stanford University (mcastel@stanford.edu)

References Ellis, N. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.) (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Language Learning, 59, Supplement 1. van Lier, L., & Walqui, A. (2012, January). How teachers and educators can most usefully and deliberately consider language. Paper presented at the Understanding Language Conference, Stanford, CA. Walqui, A. & van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English Learners. A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco: WestEd. Walqui, A., & Heritage, M. (2012, January). Instruction for diverse groups of English language learners. Paper presented at the Understanding Language Conference, Stanford, CA.