Accountability Sub-Report. on Diversity. Figures

Similar documents
Guide to the Program in Comparative Culture Records, University of California, Irvine AS.014

Sociology. Faculty. Emeriti. The University of Oregon 1

EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

COORDINATING COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE AFFAIRS. Minutes of Meeting --Wednesday, October 1, 2014

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

Active Learning a pathfinder guide to active learning resources Developed by Roberta (Robin) Sullivan

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WOULD THE ELIMINATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFECT HIGHLY QUALIFIED MINORITY APPLICANTS? EVIDENCE FROM CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS

University-Community Links & Participatory Action Research. Tom C. Vogt, M.A. phil., Dozent & Projektleiter

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY

UCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Office for Institutional Diversity Report

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Curriculum Vitae JOHANNA A. SOLOMON, PhD

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Building Bridges Globally

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Presentation Team. Dr. Tony Ross, Vice President for Student Affairs, CSU Los Angeles

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

All Hands on Deck! Engaging Faculty Voices to Rise Above the Storm!

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Roadmap to College: Highly Selective Schools

46 Children s Defense Fund

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

University of Southern California Hayward R. Alker Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for International Studies,

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Best Colleges Main Survey

Supplemental Focus Guide

Guide to the University of Chicago Department of Sociology Interviews 1972

Amin U. Sarkar. Cornell University/NY State United University Professions (UUP) Leadership Institute, 2001, New Paltz, New York

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

University of Toronto

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES. Rick Morgan Len Ramist

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Report from the CSWP Gender Equity Conference

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

ELLEN E. ENGEL. Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, Ph.D. - Accounting, 1997.

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

EDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

Urban Studies and Planning

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY MINUTES OF MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2008

WASC Special Visit Research Proposal: Phase IA. WASC views the Administration at California State University, Stanislaus (CSUS) as primarily

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Quantitative Study with Prospective Students: Final Report. for. Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

JAIMIE NICOLE MORSE Curriculum Vitae

University of California, Irvine - Division of Continuing Education

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

A Diverse Student Body

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

Becoming a Leader in Institutional Research

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Raising All Boats: Identifying and Profiling High- Performing California School Districts

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology Nicholas C. Kawa (co-authors: Chris McCarty, José A. Clavijo Michelangeli, and Jessica Clark)

California Science Center CALIFORNIA STATE SCIENCE FAIR 2014 Special Awards

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

Transforming Admissions. A Practical Guide to Fostering Student Diversity in Dental Schools


Associate Professor (with tenure) University of California, Davis, Agricultural and Resource Economics

Physics/Astronomy/Physical Science. Program Review

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Transcription:

Accountability Sub-Report on Diversity Figures

List of Figures FIGURE 1: University Community by Race/Ethnicity and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 FIGURE 2: University Community by Gender and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 FIGURE 3: Race/Ethnicity at UC, California and the Nation, 2008 FIGURE 4: Undergraduate Student Diversity Index from USNWR, August 2009 Rankings FIGURE 5: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index at UC, in California and in the Nation, 2008 FIGURE 6: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Member Type, October 2008 FIGURE 7: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Campus, October 2008 FIGURE 8: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 FIGURE 9: Career Staff by Gender and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 FIGURE 10: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Personnel Program, October 2008 FIGURE 11: All Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Campus, October 2008 FIGURE 12: All Staff by Gender and Campus, October 2008 FIGURE 13: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 14: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 15: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Fall 2007 FIGURE 16: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender and Discipline, Fall 2007 FIGURE 17: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 18: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Associate and Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 19: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 20: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Associate & Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 21: Graduate Academic Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 22: PhDs Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 FIGURE 23: Graduate Professional Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 24: Graduate Professional Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 FIGURE 25: Undergraduate Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 26: Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 27: Undergraduate Freshmen Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 26: Undergraduate Transfer Enrollment from California Community Colleges by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 29: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Underrepresented Minorities, Fall 1989 to 2009 FIGURE 30: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 FIGURE 31: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 FIGURE 32: Six-Year Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2002 FIGURE 33: Four-Year Graduation Rates - Entering Upper Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2004 FIGURE 34: Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 FIGURE 35: Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 FIGURE 36: Tolerant/Intolerant of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 2

FIGURE 1: University Community by Race/Ethnicity and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 University Community by Race/Ethnicity October 2008 N = 9,101 2,756 22,150 7,399 78,307 13,968 11,683 11,139 30,140 173,078 International/ 3 Ladder Rank Faculty Lecturers Other Academics SMG & MSP PSS Staff Non-career Staff Graduate Professional Students/ Health Sciences Graduate Professional Students/ General Campus Graduate Academic Students Undergraduate Students

FIGURE 2: University Community by Gender and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 University Community by Gender October 2008 N = 9,101 2,756 22,150 7,399 78,307 13,968 11,683 11,139 30,140 173,078 9 7 5 3 1 4 Ladder Rank Faculty Lecturers Other Academics SMG & MSP PSS Staff Non-career Staff Graduate Professional Students/ Health Sciences Graduate Professional Students/ General Campus Graduate Academic Students Undergraduate Students

FIGURE 3: Race/Ethnicity at UC, in California and the Nation, 2008 11% Race/Ethnicity at UC, in California and the USA 4% 3% 9 7 41% 43% 65% Internation al/ 5 13% 3 1 29% 5% 34% 14% 14% 5% 7% 13% University of California California USA 5

FIGURE 4: Undergraduate Student Diversity Index from USNWR, August 2009 Rankings 0.8 Undergraduate Student Diversity Index US News & World Report August 2009 Rankings 0.7 0.6 0.64 0.64 0.60 0.65 0.69 0.62 0.59 0.60 0.66 0.68 0.54 0.54 0.5 0.4 0.47 0.41 0.39 0.43 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Riverside San Diego Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale NOTE: the first step in applying the formula is to calculate the probability that the two randomly chosen persons will be members of the same race: P R = (A 2 + B 2 + C 2 + D 2 ) where A, B, C, D are the proportions in the population of each of the four racial groups. The probability that the two persons are of the same national origin is calculated in the same manner: P N = (H 2 + N 2 ) where H and N are the proportions of Hispanics and non-hispanics respectively. The probability that the two random persons are of both the same race and national origin is calculated by multiplying their separate probabilities: P R * P N. Subtracting that figure from 1 yields the probability that the two are different on at least one of the two dimensions. Thus the diversity index is defined as: 1 - (P R * P N ). 6

FIGURE 5: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index at UC, in California and in the Nation, 2008 Diversity Index at UC, in California and the USA 11% 4% 3% 9 7 41% 43% 65% Internation al/ 5 3 1 13% 29% 5% 34% 14% 14% 5% 7% 13% University of California California USA Diversity Index.71.68.53 7

FIGURE 6: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Member Type, October 2008 University Community and Diversity Index, October 2008 International/ 8 Ladder Rank Faculty Lecturers Other Academics SMG & MSP PSS Staff Non-career Staff Graduate Professional Students/ Health Sciences Graduate Professional Students/ General Campus Graduate Academic Students Undergraduate Students Diversity Index.41.49.61.47.69.68.70.71.67.71

FIGURE 7: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Campus, October 2008 Campus Communities Diversity Index, October 2008 9 7 International/ 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz Ag & Natural Resources Office of the President Diversity Index.72.68.70.73.74.76.70.67.65.65.54.62 9

FIGURE 8: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity October 1996 to 2008 Indian 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.3 Note: The charts include all levels of career staff at the ten campuses, five medical centers, Agriculture and Natural Resources and the Office of the President. They do not include the career workforce at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 10

FIGURE 8 (continued): Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Professional & Support Staff by Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 Indian 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Career Managers & Senior Professionals by Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Indian Career Senior Management Group by Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 Indian 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.3 11

FIGURE 9: Career Staff by Gender and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Staff by Gender October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.4 12

FIGURE 9 (continued): Career Staff by Gender and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Professional & Support Staff by Gender, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Career Managers & Senior Professionals by Gender, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Career Senior Management Group by Gender, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.4 13

FIGURE 10: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Personnel Program, October 2008 Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Personnel Program October 2008 N = 7,065 17,963 14,727 35,931 346 1,151 455 5,245 9 33% 33% 37% 33% 49% 47% 48% 7 5 3 67% 67% 63% 67% 51% 53% 52% 1 Professional & Support Staff Managers & Senior Professionals and Senior Management Group 14

FIGURE 11: All Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Campus, October 2008 All Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Campus October 2008 N = 8,785 15,449 8,984 23,365 603 2,738 14,410 16,274 3,379 2,971 963 1,753 9 7 International/ 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz Ag & Natural Resources Office of the President 15

FIGURE 12: All Staff by Gender and Campus, October 2008 All Staff by Gender and Campus October 2008 N = 8,785 15,44 8,984 23,36 603 2,738 14,410 16,27 3,379 2,971 963 1,753 9 7 5 3 1 16 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz Ag & Natural Resources Office of the President

FIGURE 13: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions 9 Percent of Faculty 7 5 3 1 International Indian Universitywide AAU Public AAU Private UC and Comparison Institutions 9 Percent of Faculty 7 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 7.2 Note: The Association of Universities (AAU) is a nonprofit association of 60 U.S. and two Canadian preeminent public and private research universities; six UC campuses are members (Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Barbara). 17

FIGURE 14: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions 9 7 Percent of Faculty 5 3 1 Universitywide AAU Public AAU Private UC and Comparison Institutions 9 Percent of Faculty 7 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 7.4 18

FIGURE 15: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Fall 2007 Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, October 2007 N = 201 307 312 1,877 1,405 139 1,132 267 1,141 2,248 International Indian Education Other Health Science Other Professional Arts & Humanities Social Science Law Life Science (STEM) Business Medicine Physical Science & Math (STEM) Note: Other Health includes all health science fields other than medicine, such as dentistry, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, public health and veterinary medicine. Other Professional includes interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary fields, as well as fields such as architecture, communications, divinity, library and information science, public policy and social welfare. 19

FIGURE 16: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender and Discipline, Universitywide, Fall 2007 Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender and Discipline, October 2007 N = 201 307 312 1,877 1,405 139 1,132 267 1,141 2,248 20 Education Other Health Science Other Professional Arts & Humanities Social Science Law Life Science (STEM) Business Medicine Physical Science & Math (STEM)

FIGURE 17: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline Universitywide, 2004-2005 to 2007-08 New Appointments Assistant Professors N = 164 511 156 113 210 9 7 5 3 Not URM URM 1 National UC Hiring Availability Professional National UC Hiring Availability Humanities and Social Sciences National UC Hiring Availability Life Sciences (STEM) 19% 12% 12% 6% 8% 1 7% 6% 8% 6% National UC Hiring Availability Physical Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Computer, Math, Engineering (STEM) * Professional excludes Law (JD) and Health Sciences 21

FIGURE 18: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Associate and Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 N = UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline Universitywide 2004-05 to 2007-08 Associate and Full Professors 62 233 68 49 103 9 7 5 3 Not URM URM 1 14% 5% National UC Hiring Availability Professional 1 12% National UC Hiring Availability Humanities and Social Sciences * Professional excludes Law (JD) and all Health Sciences 7% 6% 5% 4% 6% 2% National UC Hiring Availability Life Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Physical Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Computer Science, Math, Engineering (STEM) 22

FIGURE 19: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Gender and Discipline Universitywide, 2004-05 to 2007-08 New Appointments Assistant Professors N = 164 511 156 113 210 9 7 5 3 63% 47% 58% 35% 54% 43% 34% 29% 22% 26% 1 National UC Hiring Availability Professional National UC Hiring Availability Humanities and Social Sciences National UC Hiring Availability Life Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Physical Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Computer Science, Math, Engineering (STEM) *Professional excludes Law (JD) and all Health Sciences 23

FIGURE 20: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Associate & Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 N = U.C. Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Gender and Field Universitywide, 2004-05 to 2007-08 New Appointments Associate and Full Professors 62 233 68 49 103 9 7 5 3 39% 51% 35% 49% 1 National UC Hiring Hiring Professsional National UC Hiring Hiring Humanities and Social Sciences * Professional excludes Law (JD) and all Health Sciences 29% 26% 18% 18% National UC Hiring Hiring Life Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Hiring Physical Sciences (STEM) 9% National UC Hiring Hiring Computer Science, Math, Engineering (STEM) 24

FIGURE 21: Graduate Academic Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Graduate Academic Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide, 2006-07 N = 728 2,061 4,091 13,140 9 7 5 3 1 25

FIGURE 22: PhDs Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 PhDs Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline Universitywide, 2006-07 9 7 5 3 1 N = 22 28 65 71 156 155 522 776 18% 18% 22% 17% 9% 13% 19% 11% 17% 21% 14% 22% 25% 27% 36% 27% 18% 23% 18% 33% 28% 32% 23% 55% 43% 48% 47% 23% 23% 28% 22% Arts & Humanities Social Sciences & Interdisciplinary Life Sciences (STEM) Physical Sciences, Math & Engineering (S ) 26

FIGURE 23: Graduate Professional Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Graduate Professional Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide Fall 2008 N = 663 1,708 6,070 9,057 9 7 5 3 1 27

FIGURE 24: Graduate Professional Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 Graduate Professional Degrees by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, Universitywide, 2006-07 9 7 5 3 1 N = 71 138 173 336 599 894 1,115 1,622 15% 13% 13% 15% 11% 32% 21% 26% 12% 15% 22% 4% 13% 1 12% 17% 22% 25% 21% 9% 12% 34% 4% 5% 18% 13% 9% 5% 5 11% 11% 33% 11% 11% 18% 17% 13% 11% 16% 8% 41% 15% 27% 8% 13% 22% 13% Other Professional Other Health Medicine Law Education Business 28

FIGURE 25: Undergraduate Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions 9 7 International 5 3 1 9 7 5 3 1 Universitywide AAU Public Total AAU Private Total UC and Comparison Institutions Indian Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 4.3 Note: Universitywide data exclude San Francisco, which has no undergraduates. The Association of Universities (AAU) is a nonprofit association of 60 U.S. and two Canadian preeminent public and private research universities; six UC campuses are members (Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Barbara). 29

FIGURE 26: Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions Universitywide AAU Public AAU Private UC and Comparison Institutions 9 7 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego Santa Barbara Santa Cruz May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 4.5 U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale 30

FIGURE 27: Undergraduate Freshman Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Undergraduate Freshmen Enrollment by Race, Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide Fall 2008 N = 1,392 6,683 14,071 11,214 9 7 5 3 1 31

FIGURE 28: Undergraduate Transfer Enrollment from California Community Colleges by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Undergraduate Transfer Enrollment from California Community Colleges by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Universitywide, Fall 2008 N = 334 1,997 3,520 4,481 9 7 5 3 1 32

FIGURE 29: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Underrepresented Minorities, Fall 1989 to 2009 The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Underrepresented Minorities Fall 1989 to 2009 48.4% 46.9% 45.5% Percentage of California Public 45.1% 43.9% 44.4% High School Graduates that are 42.8% Underrepresented Minorities 41.8% 40.7% 40.9% 40.2% 39.1% 39.4% 38.3% 38.7% 38. 36.8% 35.1% 33.5% 31.5% 29.6% 24. 25.1% 21.3% 20.2% 20.1% 19.4% 19.2% 19.3% 18.2% Percentage of New UC Freshmen from California Public Schools that are Underrepresented Minorities 17.9% 17.4% 15.3% 15.8% 16.8% 18.2% 18.7% 18.7% 17.2% 19.2% 20.1% 22. 8.2% 12.1% 14.2% 17. 17.5% 17.8% 18.1% 20.8% 21.6% 24.1% 24.4% 23.9% 23.7% 23.6% 24.1% 25.3% 26.3% 24.3% 23.2% 22.8% 23.3% The Gap (difference) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 May Accountability Report Indicator 3.2 33

FIGURE 30: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Students Fall 1989 to 2009 Percentage of California Public High School Graduates that are 7.6% 7.4% 7.3% 7.2% 7.3% 7.5% 7.4% 7.5% 7.7% 7.5% 7.4% 7.2% 7.1% 7.2% 7.3% 7.4% 7.6% 7.4% 7.4% 7.3% 7.2% 5.7% 4.5% 4.2% 4.1% 4.3% 4.1% 4. Percentage of New UC Freshmen from California Public Schools that are 3.6% 3.7% 3. 2.9% 3. 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% 2.8% 3. 3.1% 3.9% 3.6% 3.8% 2.9% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.4% 3.4% 3.9% 4. 4.5% 4.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.6% The Gap (difference) 4.6% 4.3% 3.8% 3.4% 3.4% 1.9% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 34

FIGURE 31: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Students Fall 1989 to 2009 38.7% 40.4% Percentage of California Public High School Graduates that are 29.6% 30. 28.7% 27.1% 30.3% 30.5% 32. 31. 32.6% 32.9% 34.5% 33.6% 35.6% 37. 36.2% 36.9% 23.3% 25.3% 21.2% 15.4% 14.6% 14. 13.9% 14.3% 15.1% 15.1% 14.6% 15. 13.2% 13.3% 13. 11.7% 12.4% 13.2% 13.7% Percentage of New UC Freshmen from California Public Schools that are 6.6% 9.4% 11.4% 13.9% 14.3% 14.6% 14.9% 17. 17.5% 19.3% 19.6% 19.4% 19.2% 19.1% 19.6% 20.3% The Gap (difference) 16.5% 15.7% 21.3% 19.7% 19.7% 17.9% 19. 19. 20.7% 19.7% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 35

FIGURE 32: Six-Year Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2002 Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Universitywide Fall 2002 68% 78% 71% 76% 82% 87% 81% 85% 1 3 5 7 9 36

FIGURE 33: Four-Year Graduation Rates - Entering Upper Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2004 Graduation Rates for Entering Upper Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Universitywide Fall 2004 77% 83% 84% 89% 85% 86% 87% 1 3 5 7 9 37

FIGURE 34: Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, Universitywide, 2006-07 Undergraduate Degrees by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline Universitywide, 2006-07 N = 618 341 2,704 1,883 7,318 6,017 7,866 6,734 9 21% 16% 12% 9% 22% 23% 26% 22% 7 5 3 1 66% 1 4% 59% 11% 13% 53% 25% 1 3 64% 1 4% 49% 11% 16% 53% 16% 5% 43% 14% 21% Arts and Humanities Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary, and Other Life Sciences (STEM) Physical Sciences, Math, and Engineering (STEM) 38

FIGURE 35: Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 Students of My Ethnicity Are Respected on This Campus % Responding "Somewhat Agree", "Agree", or "Strongly Agree" Universitywide, 2008 84% 89% 75% 76% 89% 93% 81% 87% 83% 84% 87% 58% 63% International Total 39

FIGURE 35 (continued): Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree" Berkeley Campus 64% 85% 87% 69% 64% 86% 92% 86% 81% 74% 85% 82% Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree Davis Campus 95% 96% 91% 88% 89% 9 87% 88% 76% 7 39% 58% International Total International Total Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree Irvine Campus Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree Los Angeles Campus 67% 7 88% 93% 73% 76% 85% 88% 83% 83% 63% 78% 84% 88% 56% 56% 9 85% 7 71% 92% 9 88% 82% 79% 87% 84% International Total International Total 40

FIGURE 35 (continued): Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 71% Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree Riverside Campus 83% 91% 89% 9 86% 86% 82% 76% 88% 81% 93% 88% 85% Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree San Diego Campus 65% 79% 88% 71% 67% 92% 88% 87% 81% 74% 83% 86% 81% 58% International Total International Total 57% Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree" Santa Barbara Campus 96% 91% 9 88% 83% 82% 79% 77% 43% 69% 71% 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.35 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Santa Cruz Campus 3.10 2.27 2.18 2.36 2.14 1.93 1.91 2.45 2.04 2.09 2.07 International Total 1.00 * * International Total 41

FIGURE 36: Tolerant/Intolerant of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide 2008 5.00 1=Tolerant 6=Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.45 2.49 2.24 2.15 2.16 2.03 2.04 1.95 2.21 2.11 2.26 2.11 2.14 2.04 1.00 International Total 42

FIGURE 36 (continued): Tolerant/Intolerant of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Berkeley Campus 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerant/Intolerant of Diversity Davis Campus 5.00 5.00 1= Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.82 2.62 2.28 2.19 2.06 1.99 2.00 2.00 2.07 1.90 1.89 1.98 1.96 1.74 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.95 2.18 2.18 2.06 2.04 2.09 1.93 1.88 1.96 1.81 1.72 2.18 1.99 1.91 1.00 International Total 1.00 International Total 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Irvine Campus 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Los Angeles Campus 5.00 5.00 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.15 2.54 2.40 2.36 2.23 2.29 2.13 2.04 2.78 2.38 2.32 2.19 2.27 2.14 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.67 2.49 2.43 2.19 2.44 2.33 2.09 2.00 2.01 1.98 2.04 1.98 1.98 2.06 1.00 International Total 1.00 International Total 43

FIGURE 36 (continued): Tolerant/Intolerant of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Riverside Campus 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity San Diego Campus 5.00 5.00 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.39 1.85 1.84 1.70 2.56 2.33 2.01 1.99 1.90 1.90 1.93 1.94 1.89 1.84 1 = tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.42 2.35 2.42 2.31 2.22 2.23 2.14 2.33 2.49 2.48 2.26 2.30 2.26 1.00 International Total 1.00 International Total 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Santa Barbara Campus 6.00 Campus Climate: Undergraduate Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Santa Cruz Campus 5.00 5.00 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.52 3.07 2.42 2.22 2.59 2.34 2.14 1.92 2.27 2.02 2.67 2.50 2.29 2.10 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.35 3.10 2.18 2.27 2.36 2.14 1.93 1.91 2.45 2.04 2.09 2.07 1.00 International Total 1.00 * * International Total 44