University of Northern Iowa

Similar documents
Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine


NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

National Survey of Student Engagement

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

STUDENT APPLICATION FORM 2016

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Raw Data Files Instructions

2 2.9% % 1 1.4% % 5 7.1% % % % % % 1 1.4% %

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Shelters Elementary School

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Principal vacancies and appointments

Evaluation of Teach For America:

12-month Enrollment

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

University of Arizona

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Me on the Map. Standards: Objectives: Learning Activities:

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Frank Phillips College Student Course Evaluation Results. Exemplary Educational Objectives Social & Behavioral Science THECB

Adver sing 2012 Graduate Survey

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

Librarians of Highlights of a survey of RUL faculty. June 7, Librarians of 2023 June 7, / 11

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Best Colleges Main Survey

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Application for Admission

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Quantitative Study with Prospective Students: Final Report. for. Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Effective practices of peer mentors in an undergraduate writing intensive course

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Bellevue University Admission Application

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

What You Need to Know About Financial Aid

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

MSW Application Packet

MPA Internship Handbook AY

Spiritual and Religious Related

FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM FELLOW APPLICATION

Foothill College Summer 2016

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

Communities in Schools of Virginia

CONSISTENCY OF TRAINING AND THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Transcription:

University of Northern Iowa Graduate Program Survey 2010-2011 Office of Institutional Research By: Tim Starr, Research Assistant

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Demographics... 2 Summary of Future Plans... 12 Summary of Scholarly Activities at UNI... 16 Summary of Reasoning for Attending Graduate School... 23 Summary of Academic Experience and Skills... 36 Summary of Academic and Social Environment... 52 Appendix A... 63

Introduction to the UNI Graduate Program Survey The University of Northern Iowa s Office of Institutional Research is proud to offer to you, the Graduate Program Survey 2010-2011 Results. Throughout the year many students at UNI decided that they wanted to take a farther stride in pursuing their educational career by taking advantage of UNI s graduate programs. Included in this report you will see many reasons as to why students decided to pursue a higher level of education, how well they believe that UNI prepared them for their advanced careers, and how they feel about the campus and academic aspects in general. Throughout the Fall and Spring semesters of the 2010-2011 academic year 381 students took advantage of the graduate programs here at UNI. Throughout the year we had 259 respondents. This means that we had a response rate of 7. We hope that you enjoy the report, and please if you have any questions or comments, let us know at instrsch@uni.edu! 1

Summary of Demographics The number of respondents varied from college to college. There was a high amount of College of Education students compared to the other colleges (29%, 75 students). The second highest college (CHFA) had only 2 (53 students) of the respondents. The College of Business had the least amount of respondents, at 8% (21 students). Among the graduate program survey respondents, there was a rather large amount of females that took part in the report. The ratio is 27% Male and 73% Female. The results in the College of Business were largely male (67%), whereas the percentages of females in the other colleges were much higher than the males. The College of Humanities and Fine Arts for example is 90.57% female. The residency of the graduates is not surprising. An overwhelming 81% of respondents are Residents (192 students) and only 19% are Non-Residents (45 students). Non-Residents were in high numbers in a few colleges, the College of Business had 5 Non-Residents (out of 21), a percentage of 23.81. In the College of Natural Sciences, Non-Residents were 34.62%, which is 9 out of 28 respondents. Race/Ethnicity by respondents is an overwhelming 82% white, 8% non-residents, African Americans, Hispanics, and No response ethnicities are all at 3%, and 1% of respondents are Asian. The breakdown by college shows that the College of Education had the most White respondents, also, the most African American graduates were in this college (4). Non-Residents had most of their graduates in the College of Natural Sciences at a count of 7 (27% of respondents within the CNS). Hispanics were shown to be mostly in the College of Humanities and Fine Arts (9.43%, or 5 graduates). We could not pull demographic information for the students that neglected to insert their ID numbers. Therefore there are no columns. 2

Respondents by college Ind /Liberal, 6, 2%, 22, 9% CBA, 21, 8% CSBS, 56, 22% COE, 75, 29% CNS, 26, CHFA, 53, 2 3

Gender by Respondents Male, 65, 27% Female, 172, 73% 4

10 Gender by College 9 8 33.33% 50.0 7 6 76.0 73.21% 90.57% 5 4 100.0 Female Male 3 66.67% 50.0 2 24.0 26.79% 9.43% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 5

Marital Status by Respondents Single with Dependents, 8, 3% Married with Dependents, 28, 12% Married, 34, 14% Single, 167, 71% 6

Marital Status by College 9 85.71% 83.02% 83.33% 8 73.08% 7 64.0 6 58.93% 5 4 Married Single Single with Dependents Married with Dependents 3 2 17.33% 17.33% 19.64% 16.67% 4.76% 9.52% 1.33% 11.32% 11.54% 5.66% 3.85% 11.54% 10.71% 10.71% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 7

Residency by Respondents Not a Resident of Iowa, 45, 19% Resident of Iowa, 192, 81% 8

10 Residency by College 9 8 7 65.38% 6 76.19% 86.67% 75.47% 85.71% 5 4 100.0 Resident Not a Resident 3 2 34.62% 23.81% 13.33% 24.53% 14.29% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 9

Race/Ethnicity by Respondents Non-Resident Alien, 18, 8% No Response, 8, 3% Hispanic, 8, 3% Asian, 2, 1% African American/Black, 6, 3% White, 195, 82% 10

Race/Ethnicity by College 10 9 9.52% 9.52% 4.0 3.77% 5.36% 4.0 5.66% 1.79% 1.33% 1.79% 1.79% 5.33% 9.43% 26.92% 16.67% 8 4.76% 1.89% 7 3.85% 6 No Response 5 Non-Resident Alien Hispanic 4 76.19% 85.33% 79.25% 69.23% 89.29% 83.33% Asian African American/Black White 3 2 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 11

Summary of Future Plans In the Graduate Program Survey, we asked the students to tell us a little bit about what they plan to do with their future. We asked them if they were going to be going to get a job, and if that job was in Iowa. If their job was not in Iowa, they were asked whether or not they would return to Iowa, if given the chance. We also asked them what their continuing education plans were. We asked them if they were planning on attending more school, and whether or not they would be attending full-time or part-time. The results of this section of the survey are included in this summary. A very large portion of students reported that they were going to be going straight into the fulltime workforce (85%). A large amount of the students that did not report going into the work force, were future further graduate or professional school students, full-time and part-time, at 9%. It is interesting to note that not a single student in the survey reported that they were going to be raising a family or joining a military service. A large amount of the students reported that their job was in the state of Iowa (89%). This means that 11% of students reported that their job was in another state. And of those 11%, 72% said that they would return to Iowa if they were given the chance (this comes to 23 students that would return and 9 students that would not return). All of this information is in the following graphs. 12

10 9 8 4.76% Principal activity upon graduation by college 1.37% 1.37% 3.85% 1.85% 1.37% 1.85% 5.0 11.54% 6.85% 7.69% 12.96% 1.37% 3.85% 7.69% 7.41% 7 6 Other Volunteer activity 5 4 95.24% 87.67% 84.62% 80.77% 75.93% 100.0 95.0 Additional undergraduate coursework Graduate or professional school, part-time Graduate or professional school, full-time Employment, part-time paid 3 Employment, full-time paid 2 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal College Unknown 13

Graduates with a job in Iowa by college 10 9 12.5 12.73% 20.0 13.33% 7.69% 8 7 6 5 4 87.5 87.27% 80.0 86.67% 100.0 100.0 92.31% Do not have a job in Iowa Have a job in Iowa 3 2 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 14

3 Graduate's plans for continuing education by college 25% 2 17.39% 15% 9.52% 18.75% 11.11% Currently applying to programs, not yet accepted 3.28% Accepted to another graduate/professional program 5% 7.69% 8.2 6.67% 9.52% 10.87% 6.25% 15

Summary of Scholarly Activities at UNI There were many students who took advantage of research opportunities here at the University. Many students (138, 53%) completed original research within their respective field of study. Students from the College of Humanities and Fine Arts and the College of Education took advantage of this opportunity the most at 68% and 56%, respectively. All of the students that were listed under the category of Individual /Liberal completed original research. There were many other questions we asked the students about their research, and just a few of those accomplishments are listed here. In the College of Natural Sciences, 27% submitted original research. And 15% of the students within the College of Natural Sciences published original research. Also in the CNS, 38% of the students reported presenting or performing their creative work for professional review. 42% of the CNS graduates reported that they presented research at a professional conference. 38% of the CHFA reported that they too presented research at professional conferences. Many of the colleges have a high amount of students that said they completed a practicum or internship in a professional setting. The college with the highest percentage was the CSBS, with 63%. The college with the lowest percentage of completed practicums and internships was the CNS, with 27%. 16

10 Percent completed original research by college 100.0 9 8 7 6 67.92% CBA COE 56.0 CHFA 5 4 50.0 42.86% 45.45% CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 3 33.33% 2 17

18% Percent published original research by college 16% 15.38% 14% 12% COE CHFA CNS 8% 8.0 7.55% CSBS 6% 4% 4.55% 2% 1.79% 18

45% Creative work presented/performed for professional review by college 4 38.46% 35% 3 25% 2 15% 18.67% 18.87% 18.18% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS 9.52% 10.71% 5% 19

45% Presented research at a professional conference by college 4 42.31% 35% 37.74% 3 25% COE CHFA 2 22.67% 23.21% CNS CSBS 15% 5% 4.55% 20

3 Participated in other ways in regional or national professional society by college 28.3 25% 24.0 2 18.18% CBA COE 15% 15.38% 14.29% CHFA CNS CSBS 5% 4.76% 21

7 Completed a practicum or internship in a professional setting by college 6 62.5 59.09% 5 52.0 52.83% 47.62% 4 3 26.92% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS 2 22

Summary of Reasoning for attending Graduate School In our survey we included six reasons for going to graduate school and we asked the graduates to rate their reason for attending graduate school based on these reasons. They were rated from a 1 ( Low ) to a 4 ( High ). We then asked the graduates to rate how satisfied they were with attending graduate school based on these same reasons. Advancement or promotion in a career you had already begun Entry into a new career Preparation for further graduate education Personal growth/fulfillment Intellectual stimulation To learn new intellectual/technical skills relevant to my career. The results clearly show that some of the reasons are much more important to this group of graduates than other reasons. For example, Personal Growth/Fulfillment is extremely important to these graduates, because an overwhelming 94% of respondents answered High or Medium-High for this reason. Intellectual Stimulation is also a very important reason for attending graduate school, with 88% of respondents answering High or Medium-High for this reason as well. Another highly important reason is Learning new intellectual/technical skills. 9 of students rated this as High or Medium-High. Based on the survey, it is very obvious which reasons the students got the most satisfaction from. Personal Growth/Fulfillment, Intellectual Stimulation, and Learning new intellectual/technical skills relevant to their careers are the most satisfactory reasons, with percentages of 92%, 89% and 89% respectively. The three other reasons are still very high, but many of them include a large percentage of Not Applicable. The next few pages show graphs that show these data. 23

10 Reason for attending Graduate School by college: Advancement or promotion in a career already started 9 8 7 37.5 57.14% 53.19% 50.0 44.19% 44.44% 6 6.25% 80.0 5 4 3 31.25% 17.46% 4.26% 10.0 10.64% 20.0 16.28% 13.95% 11.11% 16.67% High Medium-High Low-Medium Low 2 9.52% 25.0 15.87% 31.91% 20.0 25.58% 20.0 27.78% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 24

10 Reason for attending Graduate School by college: Entry into a new career 9 8 27.78% 40.91% 33.33% 38.89% 7 50.75% 53.33% 61.7 6 22.22% 16.67% 5 13.64% 22.22% High Medium-High 4 27.78% 17.91% 22.22% 16.67% Low-Medium Low 3 2 22.22% 16.42% 8.89% 14.93% 15.56% 45.45% 21.28% 8.51% 8.51% 33.33% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 27.78% 11.11% 25

Reason for attending Graduate School by college: Preparation for further graduate education 10 6.25% 9 19.35% 21.05% 20.0 18.75% 27.91% 29.41% 8 43.18% 7 6 18.75% 22.58% 15.79% 18.6 20.0 17.65% 5 4 17.74% 2.27% 15.91% 21.05% 13.95% 17.65% High Medium-High Low-Medium Low 3 56.25% 60.0 2 40.32% 38.64% 42.11% 39.53% 35.29% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 26

10 Reason for attending Graduate School by college: Personal growth and fulfillment 9 8 38.89% 7 65.67% 66.67% 62.5 66.67% 6 82.22% 5 100.0 High Medium-High Low-Medium 4 50.0 Low 3 2 26.87% 28.57% 29.17% 33.33% 5.56% 5.56% 13.33% 5.97% 6.25% 4.44% 4.76% 1.49% 2.08% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 27

Reason for attending Graduate School by college: Intellectual stimulation 10 9 8 27.78% 35.29% 7 49.25% 52.38% 53.19% 60.0 6 72.09% 5 44.44% High Medium-High Low-Medium 4 Low 58.82% 3 38.81% 38. 36.17% 20.0 2 22.22% 16.28% 5.56% 8.96% 6.98% 4.76% 8.51% 2.99% 4.65% 4.76% 2.13% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 5.88% 28

Reason for attending Graduate School by college: To learn new intellectual or technical skills relevant to my career 10 9 8 44.44% 7 64.71% 52.24% 57.14% 53.33% 60.0 6 77.78% 5 High Medium-High 4 38.89% Low-Medium Low 3 40.3 33.33% 31.11% 2 35.29% 11.11% 40.0 4.48% 2.99% 4.44% 4.76% 11.11% 6.67% 4.76% 4.44% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 16.67% 29

How satisfied are you regarding by college: Advancement or promotion in a career already started 10 9 20.0 8 35.29% 32.61% 7 50.0 56. 50.0 50.0 6 17.65% 19.57% 40.0 High 5 Medium-High 4 3 5.88% 11.76% 26.56% 9.76% 20.0 4.88% 2.44% 5.0 8.7 4.35% 20.0 11.11% 11.11% 5.56% Low-Medium Low N/A 2 29.41% 4.69% 3.13% 15.63% 26.83% 25.0 34.78% 20.0 22.22% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 30

10 How satisfied are you regarding by college: Entry into a new career 9 8 31.25% 44.78% 22.73% 43.48% 33.33% 27.78% 7 57.14% 6 12.5 27.27% 16.67% 22.22% High 5 4 3 25.0 26.87% 16.67% 13.64% 9.09% 28.26% 27.78% Medium-High Low-Medium Low N/A 2 18.75% 12.5 8.96% 4.76% 4.76% 19.4 16.67% 27.27% 8.7 4.35% 15.22% 50.0 22.22% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 31

10 How satisfied are you regarding by college: Preparation for further graduate education 9 20.0 8 33.33% 29.03% 47.5 30.0 34.78% 29.41% 7 5.88% 6 5 4 16.67% 27.78% 27.42% 9.68% 12.5 5.0 25.0 5.0 10.0 26.09% 8.7 40.0 23.53% 5.88% High Medium-High Low-Medium Low N/A 3 12.9 17.5 10.87% 2 30.0 40.0 35.29% 22.22% 20.97% 17.5 19.57% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 32

10 How satisfied are you regarding by college: Personal growth and fulfillment 9 8 7 55.56% 52.38% 60.0 6 75.38% 80.49% 70.21% 77.78% High 5 Medium-High Low-Medium 4 Low N/A 3 33.33% 20.0 2 38.89% 20.0 5.56% 4.62% 7.32% 9.76% 2.44% 9.52% 4.76% 23.4 4.26% 2.13% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 11.11% 11.11% 33

10 How satisfied are you regarding by college: Intellectual stimulation 9 20.0 8 42.86% 7 61.11% 63.08% 60.87% 6 80.49% 40.0 75.0 High 5 Medium-High Low-Medium 4 Low N/A 3 2 22.22% 26.15% 47.62% 32.61% 20.0 6.25% 11.11% 12.2 9.23% 4.76% 5.56% 7.32% 1.54% 4.76% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 34

10 How satisfied are you regarding by college: Learning new intellectual or technical skills relevant to your career 9 8 47.62% 40.0 7 6 72.22% 69.23% 80.49% 65.96% 62.5 5 High Medium-High Low-Medium 4 40.0 N/A 33.33% 3 2 22.22% 18.46% 7.69% 5.56% 4.62% 14.63% 2.44% 2.44% 9.52% 23.4 2.13% 9.52% 8.51% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 12.5 6.25% 35

Summary of Academic Experiences and Skills In this section of the survey, students are asked many questions pertaining to how well UNI has prepared them for many challenges that they will encounter outside of the university. These challenges include; how well they will be prepared to plan projects, defining problems, solving problems, conducting themselves in a professional manner, making decisions, working as a team, and many other questions. The results for this section show that the graduates felt very prepared for their life outside of UNI. All of the questions returned with 8 or more respondents saying Excellent or Good in their preparedness for these challenges. One of the more outstanding questions was Defining Problems. A total of 9 of students said that they were either Excellent or Good at defining problems. In the following pages you will see many graphs that show these data. 36

How well has UNI prepared you for: Planning projects by college 10 9 20.0 8 45.59% 47.83% 36.36% 40.82% 50.0 7 58.82% 6 Excellent 5 4 70.0 32.61% 27.27% 44.9 Good Average Fair Can't Evaluate 3 47.06% 23.53% 2 27.27% 50.0 5.0 5.0 5.88% 1.47% 15.22% 2.17% 2.17% 4.55% 4.55% 14.29% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 11.76% 5.88% 37

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Defining problems by college 9 8 30.0 22.73% 33.33% 37.5 7 54.41% 54.35% 59.18% 6 Excellent 5 4 65.0 63.64% 50.0 50.0 Good Average Fair Can't Evaluate 3 30.43% 38.24% 32.65% 2 5.0 7.35% 8.7 4.35% 2.17% 9.09% 4.55% 8.16% 16.67% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 12.5 38

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Solving problems by college 9 8 45.0 33.33% 38.89% 7 55.22% 60.87% 54.55% 61.22% 6 Excellent 5 Good Average 4 50.0 44.44% Fair Can't Evaluate 3 50.0 27.27% 2 41.79% 30.43% 28.57% 5.0 2.99% 4.35% 18.18% 8.16% 16.67% 11.11% 4.35% 5.56% 2.04% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 39

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Learning new things by college 9 20.0 8 35.0 7 71.64% 69.57% 59.09% 65.31% 62.5 6 Excellent 5 Good Average 4 55.0 80.0 Fair Poor 3 18.18% 12.5 2 25.37% 23.91% 26.53% 18.75% 22.73% 10.0 2.99% 4.35% 2.17% 8.16% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 6.25% 40

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Thinking creatively by college 9 15.0 31.82% 8 47.06% 50.0 7 6 68.89% 61.22% 60.0 5 60.0 31.82% Excellent Good Average 4 Fair Can't Evaluate 3 41.18% 20.0 37.5 28.57% 2 22.22% 31.82% 25.0 11.76% 2.22% 4.44% 2.22% 4.55% 10.2 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 12.5 41

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Bringing information and ideas together from different areas by college 9 8 35.0 36.36% 7 58.82% 57.14% 60.0 6 73.91% 68.75% Excellent 5 4 60.0 40.91% Good Average Fair Poor 3 2 33.82% 10.87% 36.73% 40.0 12.5 13.64% 5.0 7.35% 13.04% 2.17% 9.09% 6.12% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 42

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Using research skills by college 9 22.73% 8 46.94% 40.0 7 60.0 60.29% 56.25% 69.57% 6 5 45.45% Excellent Good Average 4 24.49% 12.5 Fair Poor 3 2 25.0 27.94% 15.0 8.82% 1.47% 1.47% 17.39% 18.18% 4.35% 2.17% 13.64% 28.57% 60.0 25.0 6.52% 6.25% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 43

How well has UNI prepared you for: Conducting yourself in a professional manner by college 10 9 13.64% 8 40.0 7 60.0 66.18% 65.22% 63.27% 62.5 6 54.55% Excellent 5 Good Average 4 40.0 Fair Poor 3 2 40.0 25.0 15.22% 22.73% 24.49% 12.5 7.35% 1.47% 10.87% 2.17% 6.52% 9.09% 12.24% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 25.0 44

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Upholding ethical standards by college 9 20.0 8 45.0 31.82% 7 67.65% 60.87% 61.22% 68.75% 6 Excellent 5 45.45% 60.0 Good Average Fair 4 Poor Can't Evaluate 3 2 55.0 26.47% 5.88% 19.57% 6.52% 6.52% 18.18% 2.17% 4.35% 4.55% 28.57% 10.2 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 12.5 45

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Adapting to change by college 9 30.0 22.73% 20.0 8 7 52.94% 58.7 57.14% 62.5 6 40.0 Excellent 5 50.0 Good Average Fair 4 60.0 Poor Can't Evaluate 3 2 38.24% 19.57% 10.87% 9.09% 30.61% 40.0 25.0 5.0 5.0 8.82% 6.52% 2.17% 2.17% 13.64% 4.55% 12.24% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 12.5 46

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Working under pressure by college 9 31.82% 8 40.0 40.0 7 6 61.76% 67.39% 57.14% 75.0 Excellent 5 40.91% 20.0 Good Average 4 Fair Can't Evaluate 3 2 60.0 32.35% 19.57% 18.18% 32.65% 40.0 12.5 4.41% 1.47% 2.17% 8.7 2.17% 9.09% 10.2 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 12.5 47

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Making decisions by college 9 22.73% 8 7 45.0 55.88% 50.0 48.98% 40.0 62.5 6 Excellent 5 54.55% 20.0 Good Average 4 Fair Can't Evaluate 3 55.0 35.29% 32.61% 40.82% 25.0 2 40.0 8.82% 8.7 18.18% 6.52% 2.17% 4.55% 10.2 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 12.5 48

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Working independently by college 9 8 45.0 38. 40.0 7 67.65% 63.04% 66.67% 68.75% 6 Excellent 5 20.0 Good Average 4 47.62% Fair Can't Evaluate 3 45.0 17.39% 2 26.47% 22.92% 40.0 18.75% 10.0 5.88% 15.22% 2.17% 2.17% 9.52% 4.76% 10.42% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 12.5 49

10 How well has UNI prepared you for: Working with people of diverse backgrounds by college 9 20.0 8 7 35.0 54.41% 65.22% 45.45% 50.0 20.0 68.75% 6 Excellent 5 30.0 Good Average Fair 4 40.0 Poor 3 26.47% 10.87% 40.91% 35.42% Can't Evaluate 2 25.0 15.22% 18.75% 5.0 4.35% 5.0 16.18% 1.47% 4.35% 1.47% 13.64% 8.33% 6.25% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 6.25% 6.25% 50

How well has UNI prepared you for: Working as a team by college 10 9 8 35.0 36.36% 40.0 51.06% 7 64.71% 65.22% 68.75% 6 Excellent 5 4 55.0 36.36% Good Average Fair Can't Evaluate 3 2 23.53% 13.04% 4.35% 13.64% 31.91% 60.0 12.5 10.0 10.29% 1.47% 17.39% 9.09% 4.55% 17.02% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 51

Summary of Academic and Social Environment This section of the survey includes how the students felt about the academic and social areas of their graduate college career. This includes how they felt about their courses during their graduate studies, how they felt about the instructors in these courses, and whether or not they would recommend their graduate program to a prospective graduate student. The results from this section were expected. Only 8% of the students that completed the survey believed that their courses were not intellectually demanding. Only 5% of the students that took the survey believed that their graduate learning was not cumulative over a series of courses within their program. Only 4% of students believed that their instructors were not intellectually stimulating. 6% of the students that completed the survey felt like the quality of graduate teaching at UNI is not excellent. Only 5% of students believed that the graduate faculty was not committed with advancing student learning. 3% of the students that completed the survey believed that no faculty members showed an active interest in their educational or career goals. 8% of students believed that their courses were not readily available when they wanted to take them. The following graphs will show you this information, along with a few other questions. 52

Most of the graduate courses I took at UNI were intellectually demanding by college 10 9 21.74% 8 33.82% 34.78% 47.73% 7 60.0 56.25% 6 5 56.52% 100.0 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree 4 58.82% 60.87% Not sure 3 45.45% 30.0 37.5 2 21.74% 10.0 5.88% 6.82% 1.47% 4.35% 6.25% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 53

The graduate learning experience was cumulative over a series of courses in the graduate program by college 10 9 8 45.0 45.59% 39.13% 40.0 7 62.79% 53.33% 6 81.25% 5 4 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Not sure 3 50.0 51.47% 56.52% 60.0 2 27.91% 44.44% 5.0 1.47% 1.47% 9.3 4.35% 2.22% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 54

Most of the graduate instructors were intellectually stimulating by college 10 9 8 45.0 44.12% 39.13% 41.3 7 65.91% 62.5 6 80.0 5 4 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Not sure 3 50.0 50.0 52.17% 54.35% 2 34.09% 31.25% 5.0 4.41% 8.7 1.47% 4.35% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 6.25% 55

10 The overall quality of graduate teaching at UNI is excellent by college 9 8 40.0 34.78% 40.0 48.53% 7 56.82% 56.25% 6 80.0 5 4 56.52% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Not sure 3 60.0 39.71% 57.78% 2 38.64% 37.5 8.82% 2.27% 8.7 2.94% 2.27% 2.22% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 6.25% 56

10 The graduate faculty I had contact with were committed to advancing student learning by college 9 8 7 65.0 56.72% 60.87% 51.11% 6 75.0 75.0 Strongly Agree 5 100.0 Agree Disagree 4 Strongly Disagree Not sure 3 2 35.0 40.3 18.18% 34.78% 48.89% 18.75% 2.27% 1.49% 2.27% 1.49% 2.27% 4.35% 6.25% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 57

10 At least one faculty member showed an active interest in my educational or career goals by college 9 8 7 62.22% 6 75.0 76.47% 79.55% 82.61% 80.0 76.47% 5 4 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Not sure 3 2 37.78% 25.0 19.12% 18.18% 13.04% 20.0 23.53% 1.47% 2.94% 2.27% 4.35% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 58

10 Most of the courses in my graduate program were readily available when I wanted to take them by college 9 8 7 55.0 63.24% 65.22% 55.56% 6 77.27% 75.0 Strongly Agree 5 100.0 Agree Disagree 4 Strongly Disagree Not sure 3 2 30.0 10.0 29.41% 15.91% 4.41% 4.55% 5.0 1.47% 1.47% 2.27% 21.74% 8.7 4.35% 33.33% 11.11% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 18.75% 6.25% 59

10 The UNI community encourages the examination of diverse and controversial ideas in its graduate programs by college 9 20.0 8 7 35.0 45.59% 54.55% 47.83% 46.67% 68.75% 6 Strongly Agree 5 60.0 Agree Disagree 4 3 45.0 45.59% 27.27% 34.78% 42.22% Strongly Disagree Not sure 2 10.0 5.0 4.41% 5.0 4.41% 11.36% 4.55% 2.27% 4.35% 13.04% 6.67% 4.44% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 25.0 6.25% 60

10 I believe I have received a high quality graduate education from UNI by college 9 20.0 8 34.78% 7 60.0 55.88% 48.89% 68.18% 68.75% 6 5 4 80.0 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Not sure 3 2 35.0 36.76% 25.0 65.22% 48.89% 25.0 5.0 2.94% 4.41% 4.55% 2.27% 2.22% CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 6.25% 61

I would recommend my graduate program to a prospective student by college 10 9 20.0 8 7 6 65.0 61.76% 72.73% 50.0 54.55% 68.75% Strongly Agree 5 60.0 Agree Disagree 4 Strongly Disagree Not sure 3 40.91% 40.91% 2 30.0 35.29% 18.18% 25.0 5.0 1.47% 1.47% 9.09% 4.55% 4.55% 2.27% 2.27% 20.0 CBA COE CHFA CNS CSBS Ind /Liberal 6.25% 62

Appendix A

UNI Graduate Program Survey May 2011 CONGRATULATIONS on your graduation! Your responses to this survey will be used for program improvement and will not be linked in any way to your records. Individual responses to this survey will be confidential. Survey findings will be reported in aggregate only. Please complete all six sections. Please fill in the response circle completely. Use only black or blue ink or dark pencil to complete the survey. Section 1: Background Information Student ID Number 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Section 2: Plans Following Graduation What is MOST LIKELY to be your PRINCIPAL activity upon graduation? 1 Employment, full-time paid 2 Employment, part-time paid 3 Graduate or professional school, full-time 4 Graduate or professional school, part-time 5 Additional undergraduate coursework 6 Military service 7 Volunteer activity (e.g., Peace Corps) 8 Starting or raising a family Other, please specify: 9 Office of Institutional Research 319-273-3050 If employed, please provide the following details: (individual responses will be kept confidential) Job Title Name of Employing Organization City State Annual Salary ($) Start Date Is this job in the state of Iowa? 1 Yes 2 No If not, would you return to Iowa in the future if given the chance? 1 Yes 2 No Section 3: Plans for Further Education What are your continuing education plans? 1 2 3 4 Accepted to another graduate/professional program Currently applying to programs, not yet accepted Accepted to an undergraduate program None Will you be attending: 1 2 Full-time Part-time If pursing further education, please provide the following details: Institution Name City State Area of study Intended Degree Start Date Section 4: Scholarly and Academic Activities at UNI Please mark each of the following activities that you experienced or participated in during your graduate education at UNI. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Completed original research Submitted original research for publication Published original research Creative work presented/performed for professional review Presented research at a professional conference Participated in other ways in regional or national professional society Completed a practicum or internship in a professional setting 64 Please complete both sides of the survey.

Below are some reasons for going to graduate school. Shade in the appropriate circle for how important that reason was to you. Low High 1 2 3 4 Advancement or promotion in a career you had already begun 1 2 3 4 Entry into a new career 1 2 3 4 Preparation for further graduate education 1 2 3 4 Personal growth/fulfillment 1 2 3 4 Intellectual stimulation 1 2 3 4 To learn new intellectual/technical skills relevant to my career Using the same reasons, shade in the appropriate circle for how satisfied you feel about achieving that goal through your graduate experience at UNI. Low High NA 1 2 3 4 0 Advancement or promotion in a career you had already begun 1 2 3 4 0 Entry into a new career 1 2 3 4 0 Preparation for further graduate education 1 2 3 4 0 Personal growth/fulfillment 1 2 3 4 0 Intellectual stimulation 1 2 3 4 0 To learn new intellectual/technical skills relevant to my career Section 5: Educational Experiences and Skills Think about your future/career goals. Using the scale on the left, please rate how well UNI has prepared you for. Planning projects 1 2 3 4 5 0 Defining problems 1 2 3 4 5 0 Solving problems 1 2 3 4 5 0 Learning new things 1 2 3 4 5 0 Thinking creatively 1 2 3 4 5 0 Bringing information/ideas together from different areas Poor Fair Average Good Excellent Cannot Evaluate 1 2 3 4 5 0 Using research skills 1 2 3 4 5 0 Conducting yourself in a professional manner 1 2 3 4 5 0 Upholding ethical standards 1 2 3 4 5 0 Adapting to change 1 2 3 4 5 0 Working under pressure 1 2 3 4 5 0 Making decisions 1 2 3 4 5 0 Working independently 1 2 3 4 5 0 Working with people of diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5 0 Working as a team 1 2 3 4 5 0 Section 6: Academic and Social Environment Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. Most of the graduate courses I took at UNI were intellectually demanding. Most of my graduate instructors were intellectually stimulating. My graduate learning experience was cumulative over a series of courses in my program. The overall quality of graduate teaching at UNI is excellent. The graduate faculty I had contact with were committed to advancing student learning. At least one graduate faculty member showed an active interest in my educational/career goals. Most of the courses in my graduate program were readily available when I wanted to take them. The UNI community encourages the examination of diverse and controversial ideas in its graduate programs. I believe I have received a high quality graduate education from UNI. I would recommend my graduate program to a prospective graduate student. Please list the name(s) of any faculty who have had a positive influence on your development as a student at UNI. Please list the name(s) of any staff members who have had a positive influence on your development as a student at UNI. Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Not Sure 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 Section 7: Faculty and Staff Recognition Faculty Name(s) Staff name(s) 65