Alignment to the Common European Framework Language Power Sample Lesson Level A (Beginner), Ages 8 11

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

MFL SPECIFICATION FOR JUNIOR CYCLE SHORT COURSE

Language Acquisition Chart

One Stop Shop For Educators

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Information for Candidates

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE BALANCED LITERACY PLATFORM

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Lower and Upper Secondary

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Language Center. Course Catalog

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Welcome to MyOutcomes Online, the online course for students using Outcomes Elementary, in the classroom.

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

EQuIP Review Feedback

University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Russian 0015: Russian for Heritage Learners 2 MoWe 3:00PM - 4:15PM G13 CL

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Applying Speaking Criteria. For use from November 2010 GERMAN BREAKTHROUGH PAGRB01

Description: Pricing Information: $0.99

RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, INTERMEDIATE LEVEL

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Initial English Language Training for Controllers and Pilots. Mr. John Kennedy École Nationale de L Aviation Civile (ENAC) Toulouse, France.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Handbook for Teachers

MERRY CHRISTMAS Level: 5th year of Primary Education Grammar:

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

The University of Salamanca, Cursos Internacionales

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

The Eaquals Self-help Guide for Curriculum and Syllabus Design Maria Matheidesz and Frank Heyworth

South Carolina English Language Arts

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 12: 9 September 2012 ISSN

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

Reading Horizons. Aid for the School Principle: Evaluate Classroom Reading Programs. Sandra McCormick JANUARY Volume 19, Issue Article 7

Bell Work Integrating ELLs

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

Making Sales Calls. Watertown High School, Watertown, Massachusetts. 1 hour, 4 5 days per week

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

ELP in whole-school use. Case study Norway. Anita Nyberg

Philosophy of Literacy. on a daily basis. My students will be motivated, fluent, and flexible because I will make my reading

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

World Languages Unpacked Content for Classical Language Programs What is the purpose of this document?

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Counseling 150. EOPS Student Readiness and Success

School Leadership Rubrics

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Transcription:

Alignment to the Common European Framework Language Power Sample Lesson Level A (Beginner), Ages 8 11 Empower English language learners to build language proficiency with this highly differentiated and rich instructional resource. Each kit in the Language Power series is anchored by a dynamic, level-appropriate text set and provides rigorous instruction in the four language domains. Listening Speaking Reading Writing Each kit includes: 30-piece themed and leveled Text Set featuring a variety of genres, subjects, and high-interest topics in print and digital formats Student Guided Practice Book (single copy; additional copies can be ordered) Teacher s Guide with lessons addressing the criterion in the Common European Framework Illustrative Scales Audio recordings of texts Parent Tip Cards in English and Spanish Digital Resources including text sets, Student Guided Practice Book pages, Parent Tip Cards, and assessment resources 1

Using the Sample Lessons Aligned to the Common European Framework What Is the Common European Framework? The Common European Framework is a language development framework that sets forth the theory and pedagogy for how language develops. It discusses in depth the language demands in career and society. Through Illustrative Scales, the framework sets forth language proficiency levels and descriptors for listening, speaking, reading, and writing and lays out what a language learner needs to be able to know and do in a breadth of areas of language and contexts. It also outlines methods and recommendations for teaching language learners. This is not just for English, but across all languages. How are the Sample Lessons Aligned? The sample lessons are meant to demonstrate how all lessons in Language Power can support instruction within the Common European Framework. The language development opportunities and language demands in the selected sample lesson shown below and on the subsequent pages are aligned to the Illustrative Scales from the Common European Framework. The Illustrative Scale categories that are addressed in each lesson part or section are annotated on the sample lesson plan. The graphic below shows a lesson part. The yellow boxes show the Illustrative Scale category and the Reference Level within that scale to which a specific lesson section aligns. It also includes the page number citation where that Illustrative Scale can be found in the Common European Framework. 2

What Are the Illustrative Scales? The Illustrative Scales are set forth as a way to measure of language proficiency in specific categories. They are designed to measure how well an individual uses language in a variety of contexts. The following is the general global scale used within each Illustrative scale category. 3

Sample Lesson, Night at the Community Center Language Power, Level A (Beginner), Ages 8 11 Vocabulary Range: A2, Has sufficient vocabulary to conduct routine, everyday transactions involving familiar situations and topics. (pg. 112) Overall Listening Comprehension: A2, Can understand enough to be able to meet needs of a concrete type provided speech is clearly and slowly articulated. (pg. 66) Overall Spoken Interaction A2, Can communicate in simple routine tasks requiring a simple direct exchange of information on familiar and routine matters to do with work and free time (pg. 74) Sustained Monologue: Describing Experiences A2, Can give short basic description of events and activities (pg. 59) Understanding a Native Speaker Interlocutor: A2, Can understand what is said clearly, slowly, and directly to him/her, provided he/she can ask for repetition or reformulation from time to time. (pg. 75) 4

Reading for Information and Argument: A2, Can identify specific information in simpler written material he/she encounters such as letters, brochures, and short newspaper articles on familiar subjects. (pg. 70) Overall Reading Comprehension: A2, Can understand short, simple texts on familiar matters of a concrete type which consist of high frequency everyday or jobrelated language. (pg. 69) Overall Oral Production: A1, Can produce simple mainly isolated phrases about people and places. (pg. 58) Listening to Announcements and Instructions: A1, Can understand instructions addressed carefully and slowly to him/her and follow short simple directions. (pg. 67) Goal-Oriented Co-operation: A1, Can understand questions, and instructions addressed carefully and slowly to him/her and follow short simple directions. Can ask people for things, and give people things. Planning: A2, Can recall and rehearse an appropriate set of phrases from his or her repertoire. (pg. 64) General Linguistic Range: A2, Can use basic sentence patterns and communicate with memorized phrases, groups of a few words and formulae about themselves and other people, what the y do places, possessions, etc. ( ) 5

Overall Written Production: A1, Can write simple isolated phrases and sentences. (pg. 61) Grammatical Accuracy: A1, Shows only limited control of a few simple grammatical structures and sentence patterns learnt repertoire. (pg. 114) Phonological Control: B1, Pronunciation is clearly intelligible even if a foreign accent is sometimes evident and occasional mispronunciations occur. (pg. 117) 6

Orthographic Control: Can copy short sentences on everyday subjects. Can write with reasonable phonetic accuracy (but not necessarily fully standard spelling) short words that are in his/her oral vocabulary. (pg. 118) Processing Text: A2, Can pick out and reproduce key words and phrases or short sentences from a short text within learner s limited competence. (pg. 96) Overall Written Production: A1, Can write simple isolated phrases and sentences. (pg. 61) 7