Plain English summaries in National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded research

Similar documents
Education and Training Committee, 19 November Standards of conduct, performance and ethics communications plan

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

Innovation of communication technology to improve information transfer during handover

Practice Learning Handbook

Practice Learning Handbook

Patient/Caregiver Surveys

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Pharmaceutical Medicine

EPA RESOURCE KIT: EPA RESEARCH Report Series No. 131 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND POLICY

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

Bramcote Hills Primary School Special Educational Needs and Disability Policy (SEND) Inclusion Manager: Miss Susan Clarke

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Riding the Winds of Change: BPCI, CJR and IMPACT Act Expert Panel

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

Proposal for an annual meeting format (quality and structure)

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

Poster Presentation Best Practices. Kuba Glazek, Ph.D. Methodology Expert National Center for Academic and Dissertation Excellence Los Angeles

warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

MMC: The Facts. MMC Conference 2006: the future of specialty training

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Summarizing Webinar Protocol and Guide for Facilitators

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

University of Texas Libraries. Welcome!

5 Early years providers

Health Literacy and Teach-Back: Patient-Centered Communication. Copyright 2011 NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

Deans, Chairpersons, and Directors

Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016

Response to the Review of Modernising Medical Careers

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

TOPIC VN7 PAINTING AND DECORATING

The Multi-genre Research Project

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

e-learning Coordinator

Services for Children and Young People

You said we did. Report on improvements being made to Children s and Adolescent Mental Health Services. December 2014

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Intro to Systematic Reviews. Characteristics Role in research & EBP Overview of steps Standards

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Teaching Colorado s Heritage with Digital Sources Case Overview

ITEM: 6. MEETING: Trust Board 20 February 2008

Demystifying The Teaching Portfolio

Programme Specification

-Celebrating Your QI Success-

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Training materials on RePro methodology

Nine Steps to Building a New Toastmasters Club

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Readability tools: are they useful for medical writers?

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Director, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre

N E W S L E T T E R 3. VET Student's appearance concerns and the influence on completion rates in VET and on their success rates on the job market

The EUA and Open Access

IMSH 2018 Simulation: Making the Impossible Possible

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG RTD

Kristin Moser. Sherry Woosley, Ph.D. University of Northern Iowa EBI

Executive Guide to Simulation for Health

Constructing Blank Cloth Dolls to Assess Sewing Skills: A Service Learning Project

Writing Research Articles

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

School of Optometry Indiana University

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Planning a research project

Lærerne I centrum og fremtidens skole The Change Room Action research to promote professional development

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

Lecturing in the Preclinical Curriculum A GUIDE FOR FACULTY LECTURERS

University of Essex Access Agreement

Lower and Upper Secondary

Idsall External Examinations Policy

BUSINESS OCR LEVEL 2 CAMBRIDGE TECHNICAL. Cambridge TECHNICALS BUSINESS ONLINE CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA IN R/502/5326 LEVEL 2 UNIT 11

Transcription:

Plain English summaries in National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded research Introduction From 14 May 2014 researchers who apply for NIHR funded research will be required to produce a good quality plain English summary. In 2012 INVOLVE 1 was asked by the Department of Health to work with the NIHR Programmes and other key stakeholders to: review and develop the question and guidance for plain English summaries in NIHR funded research which are part of the Standard Application Form develop criteria and propose methods for assessing the quality of plain English summaries. The review consulted with stakeholders and a report was submitted to the Department of Health in January 2013. In July 2013 a NIHR stakeholder meeting discussed the recommendations and an implementation group was formed. Members of the group discussed the guidance with their organisations and the final guidance was agreed at the end of February 2014. This work will be assessed 12-18 months after implementation. 1 INVOLVE is a national advisory body funded by and part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It supports public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Page 1 of 5

Appendix A: Guidance for researchers on completing the plain English summary section of the NIHR Standard Application Form The importance of a plain English summary A plain English summary is a clear explanation of your research. Many reviewers use this summary to inform their review of your funding application. They include clinicians and researchers who do not have specialist knowledge of your field as well as members of the public. If your application for funding is successful, the summary will be used on National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and other websites. A good quality plain English summary providing an easy to read overview of your whole study will help: those carrying out the review (reviewers and board and panel members) to have a better understanding of your research proposal inform others about your research such as members of the public, health professionals, policy makers and the media the research funders to publicise the research that they fund. If we feel that your plain English summary is not clear and of a good quality then you may be required to amend your summary prior to final funding approval. It is helpful to involve patients / carers / members of the public in developing a plain English summary. Word length to be completed by individual programme Content When writing your summary consider including the following information where appropriate: aim(s) of the research background to the research design and methods used patient and public involvement dissemination. The plain English summary is not the same as a scientific abstract - please do not cut and paste this or other sections of your application form to create the plain English summary. Further guidance on writing in plain English is available online at NIHR Make it clear www.involve.nihr.ac.uk/makeitclear. For further support and advice on writing a plain English summary, please contact your local Research Design Service (where applicable). www.nihr.ac.uk/research/pages/researchdesignservice.aspx Page 2 of 5

Appendix B: Guidance for researchers on producing a plain English summary in a NIHR funding application available online at NIHR Make it clear. Writing a plain English summary in your National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funding application The importance of a plain English summary A plain English summary is a clear explanation of your research. Many reviewers use this summary to inform their review of your funding application. They include clinicians and researchers who do not have specialist knowledge of your field as well as public reviewers. If your application for funding is successful, the summary will be used on NIHR and other websites. A good quality plain English summary providing an easy to read overview of your whole study will help: those carrying out the review (reviewers and board and panel members) to have a better understanding of your research proposal inform others about your research such as members of the public, health professionals, policy makers and the media the research funders to publicise the research that they fund. Getting your summary right now will save you time later. Use this summary as a foundation to build and adapt as your research develops. Consider the audience and what information they will need. The summary is important. If it is felt that your plain English summary is not clear and of a good quality then you may be required to amend your summary prior to final funding approval. Please also read the guidance for writing a plain English summary provided by the NIHR Research Programme that you are applying to. It is helpful to involve patients / carers / members of the public in developing a plain English summary. Word length Individual NIHR Programmes will have different requirements for word length - some will be 300 words and others may be up to 750 words. The information will be available in their guidance for applicants. What to include in your plain English summary When writing the summary consider including the following information where appropriate: Aim(s) of the research What are you aiming to find out? How will patients / carers / members of the public and services benefit from your research - either directly or in the longer term? Page 3 of 5

Background to the research Why does this research need to be done now? What is the scale of the issue? For example: - How many patients / members of the public are affected? - What are the costs to services? Design and methods used What design and methods have you chosen and why? Who are your participants? (if appropriate) Patient and public involvement How have patients / the public been involved in developing this research to date? How will patients / the public be involved in the conduct / management of the research? Dissemination Who will the findings be communicated to and how? How to write a plain English summary The people who will read your summary will be an interested audience, but are not necessarily specialists. Therefore write your summary with this audience in mind, for example at the same level as an article in a newspaper. There are a few simple rules for writing in plain English. In summary these are: avoid wherever possible using jargon, abbreviations and technical terms if you have to use them provide a clear explanation avoid complicated English or uncommon words use active not passive phrases, for example say we will do it rather than it will be done by us keep sentences short think about the order and structure break up the text, for example use bullet lists ask patients / carers / colleagues to read a draft to find out if anything is unclear. The plain English summary is not the same as a scientific abstract - please do not cut and paste this or other sections of your application form to create the plain English summary. For further support and advice on writing a plain English summary, please contact your local Research Design Service (where applicable). www.nihr.ac.uk/research/pages/researchdesignservice.aspx Page 4 of 5

Appendix C: Plain English summary guidance for reviewers and board and panel members (to be included in their guidance and / or feedback form) The plain English summary is intended for an interested audience, who are not necessarily specialists. The summary should be written at roughly the same level as an article in a newspaper. With this in mind, please comment on the following: i) Does the plain English summary give a clear explanation of the research? Does it help you carry out your review? If not, why not? Is the language used appropriate and clear? If not, where are there problems? Are scientific terms, abbreviations and jargon explained? If not, which terms need explanation? ii) If this research is funded, the plain English summary will be published on a variety of websites, without the rest of this application form. Could this plain English summary be used on its own to describe the proposed research? If not, what further information is needed? Further information for researchers on how to write a plain English summary and what to include in a summary is available online at NIHR Make it clear www.involve.nihr.ac.uk/makeitclear Page 5 of 5