FOR TEACHERS ONLY SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION SPANISH. Monday, June 18, :15 a.m. SCORING KEY

Similar documents
Spanish 2 INSTRUCTIONS. Segment 1

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE 2009 PRESENTATIONAL WRITING SCORING GUIDELINES SCORE DESCRIPTION TASK COMPLETION* TOPIC DEVELOPMENT* LANGUAGE USE*

General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June 2010

Lesson 2. La Familia. Independent Learner please see your lesson planner for directions found on page 43.

Holt Spanish 1 Answer Key Grammar Tutor

Dear Family, Literature

Present tense I need Yo necesito. Present tense It s. Hace. Lueve.

Making Smart Choices for Us We STOP D

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

VOCABULARY WORDS Energía Calor Sol Tierra Fila Columna Sumar Multiplicar

Curriculum Map/Unit Lesson Plan. TEACHER: Olga Unangst COURSE: Spanish Grade 1 DATES: First Trimester

How to Introduce Yourself in Advance or in Person

The Paw Print McMeans Junior High Westheimer Parkway Katy, TX 77450

CELEBRA UN POWWOW LESSON PLAN FOR GRADES 3 6

Course Outline for Honors Spanish II Mrs. Sharon Koller

Making Smart Choices for Us We STOP D

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

November 2012 MUET (800)

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE Bilingual Studies Division SPN 102 Elementary Spanish II Course Outline

Fátima Para Hoy (Spanish Edition) By Fr. Andrew Apostoli

Bot 2 Scoring Manual Download or Read Online ebook bot 2 scoring manual in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

Kent Island High School Spring 2016 Señora Bunker. Room: (Planning 11:30-12:45)

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Language Arts Levels 15 17/18

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Study Center in Santiago, Chile

Generative Second Language Acquisition & Foreign Language Teaching Winter 2009

SUBMIT APPLICATION. Submit your original application along with all academic and personal items noted above by mail or in person.

Applying Biliteracy and the Bridge to the Immersion Setting BIC Conference

Benchmark Testing In Language Arts

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Study Center in Buenos Aires, Argentina

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Children need activities which are

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Exploiting Phrasal Lexica and Additional Morpho-syntactic Language Resources for Statistical Machine Translation with Scarce Training Data

The Paw Print McMeans Junior High Westheimer Parkway

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

W O R L D L A N G U A G E S

MCAS_2017_Gr5_ELA_RID. IV. English Language Arts, Grade 5

Orange Coast College Spanish 180 T, Th Syllabus. Instructor: Jeff Brown

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

End-of-Module Assessment Task K 2

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Cambridge Preparation for the TOEFL Test. Jolene Gear Robert Gear. Fourth Edition

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Welcome to Spanish 1 preap

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

# D: Language Change for OnStar System (U.S. and Canada Only) - (Mar 31, 2015)

Universidad Alberto Hurtado. School of Education. English Pedagogy

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

2017 national curriculum tests. Key stage 1. English grammar, punctuation and spelling test mark schemes. Paper 1: spelling and Paper 2: questions

Interpreting ACER Test Results

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

End-of-Module Assessment Task

Customer Relationship Management

Creating a Test in Eduphoria! Aware

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Handbook for Teachers

END of COURSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM GUIDE

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

Grade 2 Unit 2 Working Together

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Spanish Two Expresate Familiares Y Amigos

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

VOCABULARY FOR THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT ANSWERS PDF

UASCS Summer Planning Committee

Books Effective Literacy Y5-8 Learning Through Talk Y4-8 Switch onto Spelling Spelling Under Scrutiny

Elementary students taught with Content-Based Storytelling showed significant gains in fluency, as measured by word count from timed writings.

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Graduate Program in Education

Legal English/ Inglés Jurídico

Greeley-Evans School District 6 French 1, French 1A Curriculum Guide

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

Pre-Conference Handbook

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

SPANISH FOR MASTERY 3 PDF

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

Transcription:

FOR TEACHERS ONLY SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION SPANISH Monday, June 18, 2001 9:15 a.m. SCORING KEY Mechanics of Rating Use only red ink or red pencil in rating proficiency examination papers. Do not attempt to correct the student s work by making insertions or changes of any kind. Use checkmarks [ ] to indicate incorrect or omitted answers in Parts 2 and 3. Do not place a checkmark beside a correct answer. Record the credit for each part and subpart in the appropriate credit box on the student s answer sheet. Record the total examination score (the sum of the credits the student received for each part) in the appropriate space in the box in the upper right corner of the answer sheet. Check carefully for mechanical errors (e.g., addition). Using a calculator might be helpful. Write your initials clearly in the appropriate space on the answer sheet. Part 1 Directions for administering and rating the student s oral communication performance are contained in the New York State Education Department publication Second Language Proficiency Examinations: Modern Languages, Teacher s Manual, Part 1: Speaking. In the spaces provided on the answer sheet, record the credits for Parts 1a and 1b as reported to the principal. Part 2 Allow a total of 40 credits, two credits for each of the following: 2a 2b 2c 1..2.. 6..2.. 11..3.. 16..2.. 2..1.. 7..4.. 12..1.. 17..1.. 3..3.. 8..1.. 13..2.. 18..4.. 4..3.. 9..4.. 14..4.. 19..1.. 5..1.. 10..2.. 15..4.. 20..3.. Part 3 Allow a total of 20 credits, two credits for each of the following: 3a 3b 21..3.. 24..2.. 27..4.. 29..2.. 22..4.. 25..3.. 28..2.. 30..1.. 23..1.. 26..1.. Copyright 2001 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ALBANY, NEW YORK 12234 [OVER]

SLP SPANISH continued Part 4 The primary purpose of this part is for the student to demonstrate the ability to write in the target language using the four functions of language as the vehicle for communication. These functions of language are: socializing, getting others to adopt a course of action, getting and providing information, and expressing personal feelings about a given topic. Instructions concerning the rating of Part 4 are included in the publication Second Language Proficiency Examinations, Directions for Administering and Scoring. In this part, students are to choose two of the three tasks provided and write a note of at least 30 words in the target language to achieve a specified communication purpose. A word is defined as a letter or collection of letters, surrounded by space, that in the target language is comprehensible and contributes to the development of the task. This definition applies even when words are grammatically incorrect. When counting words, please note that names of people are not to be counted. Place names and brand names from the target culture count as one word (all other places and brand names are disregarded), and contractions are counted as one word. In addition, salutations and closings are counted, as well as commonly used abbreviations in the target language. Each note is worth a maximum of five credits and must be rated according to the writing rubric for Part 4, which is provided below. This writing rubric measures the dimensions of purpose/task, vocabulary, structure/conventions, and word count on a zero-to-four scale for each dimension. A writing checklist is also provided for use in rating student responses. The writing checklist requires reference to the full writing rubric for the definitions of each dimension at each level and is not intended as a substitute for the writing rubric. After rating the student s response for each dimension, the scores for the four dimensions must be added, resulting in a total raw score for the response. The conversion chart must be applied to that total raw score so that the proper credit is given to the student for the question. For example, if a student received a performance level score of 3 on the dimension of purpose/task, a score of 2 on the dimension of vocabulary, a score of 2 on the dimension of structure/conventions, and a score of 4 on the dimension of word count, the student s total raw score would equal 11 (the sum of the four performance level scores). According to the conversion chart, a raw score of 11 represents a converted score of 4 credits for the question. The conversion chart for Part 4 is shown below: Part 4 Conversion Chart Total Raw Score 14 16 11 13 8 10 5 7 2 4 0 1 Total Credits 5 4 3 2 1 0 After each of the two questions has been scored, the two converted scores must be added together to determine the total Part 4 score. This total Part 4 score should be entered in the lower box of the last page of the student answer booklet and also under the Credit Earned section for Part 4, on the upper right corner of the first page of the student answer booklet.

SLP SPANISH continued The writing rubric and checklist for Part 4 are shown below: Part 4 Writing Rubric Note that a zero can be given in any of the dimensions when the student s performance falls below the criteria described for the performance level of 1. Performance Level Dimension 4 3 2 1 Purpose/Task Satisfies the task, con- Satisfies the task; con- Satisfies the task; con- Makes at least one nects all ideas to nections are implied with nections may be unclear statement which satistask/purpose, and few irrelevancies. with some irrelevancies. fies the task. Remaining exhibits a logical and statements are irrelecoherent sequence of vant to the task. ideas throughout. Vocabulary Utilizes a wide variety of Utilizes a wide variety of Utilizes vocabulary, Utilizes limited vocabuvocabulary that vocabulary relevant to some of which is inaccu- lary, most of which is expands the topic in the the topic in rate or irrelevant to the inaccurate or irrelevant statement/question to statements/questions to task. to the task. include nouns, verbs, include nouns, verbs, and/or adjectives, as and/or adjectives, as appropriate to the task. appropriate to the task. Structure/ Exhibits a high degree Exhibits some control of Exhibits some control of Demonstrates little con- Conventions of control of structure/ structure/conventions: structure/conventions: trol of structure or conconventions: subject/verb subject/verb vention, or errors subject/verb agreement agreement impede overall compreagreement noun/adjective noun/adjective hensibility of passage. noun/adjective agreement agreement agreement correct word order correct word order correct word order spelling spelling spelling Errors do not hinder Errors do hinder overall Errors do not hinder overall comprehensibility comprehensibility of the overall comprehensibility of the passage. passage. of the passage. Word Count Uses 30 or more com- Uses 25 29 compre- Uses 20 24 compre- Uses 15 19 compreprehensible words in tar- hensible words in target hensible words in target hensible words in target get language that con- language that contribute language that contribute language that contribute tribute to the develop- to the development of to the development of to the development of the ment of the task. the task. the task. task. Part 4 Writing Checklist Please refer to the full writing rubric for definitions of each level. Note that a zero can be given in any of the dimensions when the student s performance falls below the criteria described for the performance level of 1. Question No. Question No. Dimension Performance Level 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 0 Purpose/Task Satisfies the task Connects ideas to task/purpose Exhibits a logical and coherent sequence of ideas Vocabulary Incorporates a range of nouns, verbs, and/or adjectives, as appropriate to task Uses relevant and accurate words Structure Subject/verb agreement Noun/adjective agreement Correct word order Spelling Word Count 30+ 25 20 15 <15 30+ 25 20 15 <15 Comprehensible 29 24 19 29 24 19 In target language Contributes to the development of the task

SLP SPANISH concluded Part 4 A sample of a five-credit response for each question in Part 4 follows: 31 Hola! Estoy en Madrid con mi familia. Me encanta esta ciudad. Hoy vamos a visitar el Museo del Prado. Caminamos mucho por la ciudad. El hotel está cerca de muchos lugares interesantes. Hay buenos restaurantes y muchas tiendas aquí. Fui al Corte Inglés y compré muchos recuerdos. 32 Querida Marta, Quieres ir conmigo al Parque Central para un picnic? Mis amigos y yo vamos el dos de julio, a la una vamos a preparar les hamburguesas, los perros calientes y las papas. Podemos jugar al fútbol en el parque. Si hace mal tiempo, vamos al parque el cuatro de julio. 33 Yo vivo en la ciudad de Nueva York. Mi ciudad es muy grande. Hace buen tiempo en el verano y mucho frío en el invierno. Voy al Parque Central para montar en bicicleta. Cómo es Madrid? Qué haces en el tiempo libre?

Part 4 4a Students have been directed to write two notes in Spanish of at least 12 words each to achieve a specified communication purpose. Each note is worth three credits. Rate each note as follows: Read the entire note to determine whether the purpose has been achieved. If the purpose has been achieved and the note consists of at least 12 comprehensi-

ble words (not including date, salutation, and closing), give three credits. If the purpose has been achieved but the note consists of fewer than 12 comprehensible words (not including date, salutation, and closing), give two credits. If the purpose has not been achieved (regardless of the number of words used), give no credit. A sample of acceptable responses follows: 4b Students have been directed to write two lists in Spanish of four items each on specified topics. Each list is worth two credits, 1 / 2 credit for each comprehensible and appropriate item. One-word items must not be proper names. Rate each list by awarding 1 / 2 credit for each comprehensible and appropriate item on the list. Place a checkmark [ ] next to incomprehensible and/or inappropriate items that should receive no credit. A sample of acceptable responses follows: