Middle School TPSP Assessment Rubric Overview

Similar documents
Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

EQuIP Review Feedback

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

School Leadership Rubrics

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

One Stop Shop For Educators

November 2012 MUET (800)

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

What does Quality Look Like?

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

To provide students with a formative and summative assessment about their learning behaviours. To reinforce key learning behaviours and skills that

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Vision for Science Education A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

Unpacking a Standard: Making Dinner with Student Differences in Mind

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

IDENTIFYING AND DESCRIBING HIGH QUALITY SECONDARY SCHOOL SPANISH INSTRUCTION. Greg Duncan, InterPrep Myriam Met, Consultant

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Graduate Program in Education

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

Secondary English-Language Arts

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Program Rating Sheet - University of South Carolina - Columbia Columbia, South Carolina

Tun your everyday simulation activity into research

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Teaching a Discussion Section

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Sample Performance Assessment

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Colorado Academic. Drama & Theatre Arts. Drama & Theatre Arts

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Software Maintenance

City University of Hong Kong Course Syllabus. offered by School of Law with effect from Semester A 2015/16

Short vs. Extended Answer Questions in Computer Science Exams

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Transcription:

Middle School TPSP Assessment Rubric Overview The Middle School TPSP Assessment Rubric is divided into two sections: 1) Developing and Implementing a Research Plan: The Research Process and 2) Presentation of Learning: Product and Communication. Students and teachers should use the Middle School TPSP Assessment Rubric to guide the overall development of the project, the ongoing formative assessments, and the summative assessment. The TPSP was originally developed as a pilot targeting grades, 4, 8, and exit level. Most materials have been revised to address Primary, Intermediate, Middle School, and High School/Exit grade levels, however, users may find occasional references to the pilot grades.

I. DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A RESEARCH PLAN: RESEARCH PROCESS A. Development of Questions Develops, refines, and clarifies provocative, openended questions about topic or novel problem, such that deep understanding of knowledge/skills of discipline can be conveyed Develops, refines, and clarifies interesting, openended questions about topic or novel problem, such that substantive understanding of knowledge/skills of discipline can be conveyed Develops pertinent openended questions about topic or novel problem, though inconsistent understanding of knowledge/skills of discipline may result from limited refinement and clarification of questions Develops basic questions about topic or novel problem, such that only cursory understanding or knowledge/skills of discipline can be conveyed B. Research Methodology Follows discipline-based research plan or model to engage in inquiry as a professional or practitioner in the profession or Follows discipline-based research plan or model to engage in inquiry as a novice in the profession or Follows discipline-based research plan or model, though some methodologies are generic inadequately follows research plan or model so that learning in discipline is not enhanced C. Sources of Information Uses advanced processes to access full range of relevant sources in various formats Uses standard processes to access full range of relevant sources in various formats Uses basic processes to access information sources, often choosing most obvious and basic inadequately accesses relevant sources

D. Collection of Data Selects appropriate tools from array of disciplinespecific tools/techniques to gather, record, organize, and document data as a professional or practitioner in the profession or Uses limited number of discipline-specific tools/ techniques to gather, record, organize, and document data as a novice in the Uses generic, though appropriate, research tools to gather, record, organize, and document data without creating awareness of multitude of available tools, often choosing most obvious inadequately uses generic research tools/techniques to gather, record, organize, and document data, often missing pertinent data E. Analysis and Interpretation of Data Uses advanced processes to examine data for connections across time, location, cultures, and disciplines; evaluate reliability, validity, and accuracy of findings; and suggest solutions for conflicts and disparities in data Uses standard processes to examine data for connections across time, location, cultures, disciplines; evaluate reliability and validity of findings; and identify potential conflicts and disparities in data Uses basic processes to make a few connections and note some conflicts and disparities inadequately analyzes data; forms misconceptions about content and data; and/or fails to recognize conflicts and disparities in data F. Multiple Perspectives Understands other perspectives, making own viewpoint more plausible through such considerations, and synthesizes, evaluates, and integrates multiple viewpoints Understands another perspective, reflecting on thinking of others to clarify own thinking and partially integrates multiple viewpoints Inconsistently recognizes multiple viewpoints and partially views a situation from another perspective Views a situation from only one perspective and does not acknowledge multiple viewpoints

II. PRESENTATION OF LEARNING: PRODUCT AND COMMUNICATION A. Organization Develops well-organized, sound product that evidences planning, reasoning, clarity of expression, and support of assertions with relevant details Develops organized, basically sound product that evidences planning, reasoning, clarity of expression, and support of assertions with relevant details Develops partially organized product that evidences some planning, but may lack consistent reasoning, clarity of expression, and support of assertions with relevant details Develops product that lacks organization; evidences little planning, reasoning, clarity of expression, and/ or support of assertions with relevant details B. Depth of Understanding Communicates sophisticated insights resulting from analysis of connections, patterns, and trends; carefully examines important relationships; and displays deep, well-beyondgrade-level understanding Communicates coherent analysis of connections, patterns, and trends; identifies some important relationships; and displays on or beyond grade level, substantive understanding Communicates analysis of some connections, patterns, and trends; identifies at least one important relationship; and displays minimal grade level, inconsistent understanding Misses significant connections, patterns, and trends; omits important relationships; and displays below grade level, cursory understanding

C. Impact Extends knowledge/skills of discipline to understand, how professionals work in field of study, and generates unique, plausible solutions to answer research questions and solve novel problems Applies knowledge/skills of discipline to understand a variety of new contexts, and generates creative, workable solutions to answer research questions and solve novel problems Relates knowledge/skills of discipline to understand the world around him/her, and generates routine, workable solutions to answer research questions and solve novel problems Makes few connections between knowledge/skills of discipline and personal experiences in everyday life, and lacks workable or plausible solutions to answer research questions or solve novel problems D. Delivery Uses highly effective communication techniques, including data to support assertions; clear, pertinent examples; and easy-to-follow reasoning Uses effective communication techniques, including support of assertions with some data; pertinent examples; and generally easy-to-follow reasoning Generally uses clear communication techniques, though inconclusive or irrelevant data support some assertions; some connections may be unclear; and reasoning may have gaps Uses communication techniques that prevent audience/reader/reviewer from following thinking, reasoning, and logic, and/ or inconsistently supports assertions with data E. Vocabulary of Disciplinarian Effectively integrates vocabulary of discipline to convey in-depth understandings, and communicates deep understanding of relationship between Uses vocabulary of discipline to convey substantive understandings, and communicates understanding of relationship between Uses some vocabulary of discipline to convey understandings that may be inconsistent, and communicates shallow understanding of relationship between Misuses or ignores vocabulary of discipline; conveys only cursory understandings; and does not communicate understanding of relationship between

Student Name: MIDDLE SCHOOL ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION Students and teachers should use the rubric to guide the overall development of the project as well as summative assessment. Ongoing formative assessment will provide the student with consistent feedback necessary to achieve the state goal for developing advanced level products and/or performances. Developing and Implementing a Research Plan: Research Process Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Highlights Recommendations Additional Comments Note: Make additional copies of documentation page to meet ongoing assessment needs of student.

Student Name: MIDDLE SCHOOL ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION Students and teachers should use the rubric to guide the overall development of the project as well as summative assessment. Ongoing formative assessment will provide the student with consistent feedback necessary to achieve the state goal for developing advanced level products and/or performances. Presentation of Learning: Product and Communication Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Highlights Recommendations Additional Comments Note: Make additional copies of documentation page to meet ongoing assessment needs of student.