Data Team Meeting Steps and Structure

Similar documents
Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Bellehaven Elementary

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

*Lesson will begin on Friday; Stations will begin on the following Wednesday*

Interpreting ACER Test Results

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Increasing Student Engagement

Gr. 9 Geography. Canada: Creating a Sustainable Future DAY 1

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Mooresville Charter Academy

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

Language Acquisition Chart

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Hokulani Elementary School

Effective Supervision: Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching

Common Performance Task Data

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Report on organizing the ROSE survey in France

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Kannapolis Charter Academy

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Using SAM Central With iread

A Study of the Effectiveness of Using PER-Based Reforms in a Summer Setting

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Business 712 Managerial Negotiations Fall 2011 Course Outline. Human Resources and Management Area DeGroote School of Business McMaster University

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Writing an Effective Research Proposal

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

Secondary English-Language Arts

Self Study Report Computer Science

PARIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL AUDIT

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Measurement. Time. Teaching for mastery in primary maths

Leader s Guide: Dream Big and Plan for Success

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

EQuIP Review Feedback

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Odyssey Writer Online Writing Tool for Students

WHI Voorhees SOL Unit WHI.3 Date

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Title: George and Sam Save for a Present By: Lesson Study Group 2

Science Fair Project Handbook

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Mathematics Success Level E

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

Clerical Skills Level I

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

Teaching a Discussion Section

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Evaluation Off Off On On

Grade 4: Module 2A: Unit 1: Lesson 3 Inferring: Who was John Allen?

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

ECE-492 SENIOR ADVANCED DESIGN PROJECT

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Kahului Elementary School

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Community Power Simulation

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

MATH 205: Mathematics for K 8 Teachers: Number and Operations Western Kentucky University Spring 2017

Person Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

A Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher

Outreach Connect User Manual

Strategic Improvement Plan

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Biome I Can Statements

Chemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

2nd Grade Media. Goal #1: Inquiry EO #1 - UBD

success. It will place emphasis on:

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Transcription:

Step 1: Collect and Chart Data Example: Team meeting examining pre-assessment data prior to focused teaching Teachers names who took assessment and higher % students and higher not likely to be at end of instructional time students already close likely to be at end of instructional time students who have far to go not likely to be intervention group in need of extensive support Betty 25 19 76% 6 Tom 27 15 55% 12 Susan 25 12 48% 13 Diane 26 16 61% 10 Totals 103 62 60% 41 Teachers must come prepared for the 60 90 minute meeting, complete with: Student papers Scoring guide or measurement scale Papers arranged from most to least Ideas about students who are and higher (strengths) Ideas about students who are not (what are their obstacles, misconceptions?) Data Team leader will: Provide table or graph with submitted data entered, complete with team totals, % Steps for entering data: Enter names Enter # who participated in assessment Enter # who are and higher Enter % who are and higher Compute totals Data Team leader will ask the following questions: What is the total percentage of [grade 6] students who are and higher? (60%) What is the total percentage of [grade 6] students who are not? (40%) Convert the 40% to actual number. (41) Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-

Step 1: Collect and Chart Data (Continued) Teachers names who took assessment and higher % students and higher not likely to be at end of instructional time students already close likely to be at end of instructional time students who have far to go not likely to be intervention group in need of extensive support Totals Enter data points: Percentage of group and higher Percentage of group not Actual number and higher Actual number not Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-2

Example: Data Team Meeting Steps and Structure Step 2: Analyze Strengths and Obstacles Strengths Clearly articulated steps Multiple problem-solving strategies used Vocabulary/math terms concise Obstacles Inability to organize ideas and steps Inability to write and verify choice of problem-solving strategies Lack of vocabulary/math terms Confusion about problem-solving strategies Examine student work that is and higher. Consider: Strengths Consistent skills Anything that stands out Examine student work that is not. Consider: Weaknesses Inconsistent skills Trends, patterns of failure to apply certain skills Misconceptions about problem-solving processes Issues related to certain subgroups, such as ELL, gender, ethnicity Students consistently rated not List findings on T-chart. Examine student work to identify strengths and obstacles. List strengths who were and higher by examining student work. List obstacles or reasons why students did not achieve proficiency. Where were there errors? Is there a trend? Are there common errors? What is preventing these students from becoming? Are there misconceptions about concepts or skills? Strengths Obstacles Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-3

Step 3: Establish Goals: Set, Review, Revise Example: Goal Statement: The percentage of grade 6 students and higher in math problem solving will increase from 32% to 75% as measured by a math performance assessment focusing on short-constructed response, administered on February 15 or 16. Goal percent 75% Current results 68% At this point, the goal has been set. What are the ramifications if the goal is changed to reflect a higher or lower outcome? Is the goal still relevant and necessary? Is this skill still considered very important? Are there other urgent needs to focus on? Is it possible to reset the goal higher? If so, is it achievable? Is the time frame too short, just right, or too long? Which students are consistently not? SMART Goal Statement: Percentage of [student group] scoring and higher in [content area] will increase from [current reality %] to [goal %] by the end of [month or quarter] as measured by [assessment tool] administered on [specific date two consecutive days]. Example: Percentage of grade 6 students scoring and higher in writing will increase from 13% to 58% by October 30 as measured by a teacher-created writing prompt assessment administered on October 30 or 31. SMART Goal #1: Percentage of scoring and higher in will increase from % to % by as measured by administered on. Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-4

Step 3: Establish Goals: Set, Review, Revise (Continued) SMART Goal #2: Percentage of scoring and higher in will increase from % to % by the end of as measured by administered on. A new goal is set only if the original goals were not met. Met Goal: Yes No If the goal was not met, record margin short of goal Ask questions: What are the ramifications if the goal is changed to reflect a higher or lower outcome? Is the goal still relevant and necessary? Is this skill still considered very important? Are there other urgent needs to focus on? Is it possible to reset the goal higher? If so, is it achievable? Is the time frame too short, just right, or too long? Which students are consistently not? Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-5

Step 4: Select Instructional Strategies Example: Possible Instructional Strategies X Teachers will use a graphic organizer to help students show how to solve a multistep word problem using computation and graphic representation. Post the performance assessment scoring guide in the classroom. X Teachers will help students improve their ability to solve multistep word problems by having them practice at home the processes they learn in school. X Break the steps down into smaller steps and focus on each small step. Reinforce this as focused practice in class and plan homework that will require students to focus on brevity and specificity of correct response. X Compare other problem-solving strategies step by step to identify the critical point or points at which the written responses are similar or different. Present each math problem-solving strategy to students (one at a time) and have them write about each strategy. X = Instructional strategy selected by Data Team Brainstorm and discuss possible strategies using this process: Agreement: Team members brainstorm and examine effective teaching strategies and techniques (experience- and research-based) and determine which techniques, when implemented appropriately, will have the desired outcome. Refer to the list of effective teaching techniques (Marzano s Classroom Instruction That Works), to be selected from on the basis of meeting specific objectives related to student understanding of concepts and application of skills. Analyze each possible or suggested strategy in terms of impact on student learning. Consider what other teachers are implementing to cause a high degree of success; replicate effective practices. Only select strategies that teachers are responsible for. Avoid considering strategies outside your sphere of influence or immediate accountability, such as Parent needs to become more involved or Students will be enrolled in afterschool program. Have team members collaborate on choosing the one or two strategies that they all agree to implement during the next teaching period. Mark the chosen strategies with an X and give team members copies of those strategies. Model all strategies that the team has agreed upon. So that the task of modeling does not always fall to the Data Team leader, ask other team members to demonstrate a particular strategy. What will the teacher do as he or she uses this strategy? Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-6

Step 4: Select Instructional Strategies (Continued) Possible Instructional Strategies Brainstorm and discuss possible strategies: Analyze each possible or suggested strategy in terms of impact on student learning. Consider what other teachers are implementing to cause a high degree of success; replicate effective practices. Only select strategies that teachers are responsible for. Avoid considering strategies outside your sphere of influence or immediate accountability, such as Parent needs to become more involved or Students will be enrolled in afterschool program. Agreement: Have team members collaborate on choosing one or two strategies that they all agree to implement during the next teaching period. Mark the chosen strategies with an X and give team members copies of those strategies. Model all strategies that the team has agreed upon. So that the task of modeling does not always fall to the Data Team leader, ask other team members to demonstrate a particular strategy. What will the teacher do as he or she uses this strategy? Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-7

Effective Instructional Strategies Category: Achievement Gain (Percentiles): 1. Identifying similarities and differences 45 2. Summarizing and note-taking 34 3. Reinforcing effort and providing recognition 29 4. Homework and practice 28 5. Nonlinguistic representations 27 6. Cooperative learning 27 7. Setting objectives and providing feedback 23 8. Generating and testing hypotheses 23 9. Questions, cues, and advance organizers 22 Source: Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, Classroom Instruction That Works (2001). Effective Professional Practices More writing, thinking, analysis, and reading in every content area More frequent feedback (associated with improved student work ethic, motivation, and performance) Collaborative structures for analysis of data Creation and use of data teams Discussion of, review of, and focus on actual student work (helps close the learning gap for all cohort groups) Source: White, Show Me the Proof! (2005b), p. 3. Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-8

Step 5: Determine Results Indicators Results indicators complete the statement: When this strategy or these strategies are implemented, we expect to see the following evidence... and students will be able to... OR If we do, then we expect to see in student achievement. When establishing the results indicators for the chosen strategies, keep in mind: Examples: 1. Whether the strategy is actually being implemented. 2. If the strategy is having the intended effect on student learning and improved performance. Selected instructional strategies from step 4: X Teachers will use a graphic organizer to help students show how to solve a multistep word problem using computation and graphic representation. X Teachers will help students improve their ability to solve multistep word problems by having students practice at home the processes they learn in school. Suggested results indicators for these strategies: More students will be /meet instructional goal. More students will understand how to solve a multistep word problem. More students will be able to write a short-constructed-response that includes correct process steps and a correct explanation. Planning for math instruction includes a daily modeling step. Modeling of short-constructed responses in mathematics, using graphic organizers, is done on a daily basis by each team teacher. Students are able to recite each of the steps in writing a short-constructed response. Students apply a graphic organizer to short-constructed responses on independent work. Students are able to write each of the steps in a short-constructed response. Suggested results indicators Other content-area/grade-level examples: % increase appropriately applying reading comprehension skills Addition of reading intervention program for K 2 students Time devoted to math instruction increased by 15 minutes per day Students responsible for completing one science performance assessment per semester At least 10% increase in the total number of grade 7 students and higher as measured by a state writing assessment Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-9

Step 5: Determine Results Indicators (Continued) Results indicators complete the statement: When this strategy is implemented, we expect to see the following evidence.... Strategy selected in step 4: Results indicators (what your team expects to see as a result of implementing the chosen strategy; two or three are suggested): Strategy selected in step 4: Results indicators (what your team expects to see as a result of implementing the chosen strategy; two or three are suggested): Data Teams Copyright 2007 The Leadership and Learning Center 3B-10