Introduction. Target Audience. OVeRVIEW

Similar documents
Sample Goals and Benchmarks

Advanced Grammar in Use

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Linguistic Variation across Sports Category of Press Reportage from British Newspapers: a Diachronic Multidimensional Analysis

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

ELD CELDT 5 EDGE Level C Curriculum Guide LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT VOCABULARY COMMON WRITING PROJECT. ToolKit

Developing Grammar in Context

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Chapter 9 Banked gap-filling

Writing a composition

The Acquisition of English Grammatical Morphemes: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

Participate in expanded conversations and respond appropriately to a variety of conversational prompts

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Assessment and Evaluation

Course Syllabus Advanced-Intermediate Grammar ESOL 0352

Words come in categories

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

EQuIP Review Feedback

PRESENTED BY EDLY: FOR THE LOVE OF ABILITY

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

NAME: East Carolina University PSYC Developmental Psychology Dr. Eppler & Dr. Ironsmith

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

Milton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports

Adjectives tell you more about a noun (for example: the red dress ).

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Today we examine the distribution of infinitival clauses, which can be

Evaluation Off Off On On

Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1

Fluency Disorders. Kenneth J. Logan, PhD, CCC-SLP

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

L1 and L2 acquisition. Holger Diessel

Coping with Crisis Helping Children With Special Needs

Intensive English Program Southwest College

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Curriculum Vitae. Sara C. Steele, Ph.D, CCC-SLP 253 McGannon Hall 3750 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, MO Tel:

This publication is also available for download at

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Building our Profession s Future: Level I Fieldwork Education. Kari Williams, OTR, MS - ACU Laurie Stelter, OTR, MA - TTUHSC

Tracy Dudek & Jenifer Russell Trinity Services, Inc. *Copyright 2008, Mark L. Sundberg

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

ASSISTIVE COMMUNICATION

Secondary English-Language Arts

2. CONTINUUM OF SUPPORTS AND SERVICES

No Parent Left Behind

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Controlled vocabulary

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

CHILDREN ARE SPECIAL A RESOURCE GUIDE FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. From one parent to another...

CHILDREN S POSSESSIVE STRUCTURES: A CASE STUDY 1. Andrew Radford and Joseph Galasso, University of Essex

SY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits

Pyramid. of Interventions

Nancy Hennessy M.Ed. 1

GUIDE TO STAFF DEVELOPMENT COURSES. Towards your future

I. INTRODUCTION. for conducting the research, the problems in teaching vocabulary, and the suitable

Transcription:

OVeRVIEW The Syntax Handbook: Everything You Learned About Syntax... But Forgot (Second Edition) provides you with an updated and reader-friendly review of the syntactic terms most frequently encountered and used by language interventionists. With eight chapters devoted to syntactic form and five to syntactic function, plus developmental data on children s attainment of significant syntactic structures, this text was written especially for professionals concerned with language development and disorders. Exercises (with answer keys) are provided to review key vocabulary and to practice applying the information from each chapter to your work as a language interventionist. A glossary and a number of helpful appendices are also included for your convenience. This practical book simplifies syntax for the beginning university student, yet offers insight and quick reference to the seasoned professional. Target Audience People who may find this work particularly useful include: Speech-language pathologists and special educators working with individuals with language disorders Undergraduate students completing coursework in language development and disorders Graduate students completing coursework and clinical requirements for certification in speech-language pathology or special education Instructors of language development, language disorders, and other courses requiring students to have a basic understanding of syntactic structures and analysis Individuals who desire to enhance their working knowledge of syntactic forms and functions Throughout this text, we use the term language interventionist to refer to the wide array of professionals who work with children and adults exhibiting language disorders. ix

x These professionals include (but are not limited to) speech-language pathologists, special educators, general educators, and psychologists. We recognize that some of the terminology used within this text, such as client, clinical goal, and service delivery, may not represent the terms most commonly used by some of these professionals. Our choice of terms stems from our own experiences as speech-language pathologists, and hence our familiarity with the vernacular of our profession. Background Broadly speaking, syntax refers to the architecture of phrases, clauses, and sentences in a language (Shapiro, 1997, p. 254). In other words, syntax is the combination of words into sentences on the basis of rules inherent to a language. A consideration of syntax must take into account two distinct levels of analysis: syntactic form and syntactic function (Williams, 1999). Syntactic form refers to the grammatical category in which a particular word falls, which is generally independent of the word s role in a sentence. Syntactic forms are also known as the parts of speech (noun, pronoun, verb, and so on), which most of us remember learning about in elementary school, though the details of each probably escape us now. Syntactic function, on the other hand, refers to the role of a word or a group of words in relation to the rest of the elements in a phrase, clause, or sentence. Take the word apple, for instance. The word apple nearly always has the same syntactic form (i.e., noun) across different sentences, but its function can differ based on its role in a particular sentence. In the sentence The apple is rotten, apple functions as the subject. Contrast this with the function of apple in I picked the apple for you, in which apple is no longer the subject, but rather the object of the sentence. A discussion of syntactic form uses terms such as noun, pronoun, verb, adjective, and adverb. A discussion of syntactic function uses terms such as subject, object, predicate, clause, and phrase. Opdycke (1965) provides a lively rationale for students of language to understand both the parts of speech (form) as well as the parts of sentences (function): The sentence is the unit of speech, that is, of expression. The isolated word or part of speech is, in the main, a detached tool only, to be kept handy and ready for use in association or relation with other words or parts of speech.... The word the part of speech in and of itself is indeed nothing but a cold combination of letters. It usually needs the society of other words other parts of speech to give it vital spark. (p. 219) Organization This text is organized to consider both syntactic form and function. The first eight chapters (Part I) of The Syntax Handbook focus predominantly on elements of form.

xi The last five chapters (Part II) focus primarily on elements of function, with the newly added Chapter 13 providing an overview of complex syntax. Each chapter within these two parts is organized so as to provide: A description of key syntactic terms and structures pertinent to the chapter s content A section of Developmental Notes containing a brief description of children s attainment of the syntactic structures covered in the chapter (In these sections, we often use Roger Brown s [1973] stages of early language development as an organizational scheme for describing specific syntactic advances. Brown s seminal work organized children s major linguistic advances in the preschool period into a five-stage process.) Exercises to review the chapter s vocabulary and to tie the material covered to the process of syntactic analysis (The first several exercises in each chapter have you review key syntactic terms and concepts. The rest are application exercises, in which you apply your knowledge of syntax to activities common to the work of language interventionists.) An answer key for selected exercises (Answers to some exercises are not included, particularly those that focus on application. The answers are not always definitive, due to the dynamic nature of syntactic analysis.) Appendix A provides a useful overview of Brown s (1973) stages, as well as major syntactic advances occurring during these stages, as presented in Retherford (2000). You may find it useful to study this appendix if you are unfamiliar with Brown s stages of linguistic growth. Appendix B is a table of the major syntactic forms addressed in this book, and Appendix C is a table of the major syntactic functions covered in this text; these appendices may prove helpful when working through each chapter s exercises. A glossary of important terms is included at the end of the text for quick reference as needed. Given the overall magnitude of the topic of syntax, this text does not encompass all aspects of form and function, but rather may serve as a foundational work to broaden interventionists capabilities in using syntactic terminology and analysis within the context of service delivery. It should also be noted that theories of syntax are not addressed. Readers interested in syntactic theory should refer to Shapiro (1997) for a brief overview of this topic and to Williams (1999) for a more comprehensive discussion. Rationale Speech-language pathologists, special educators, and other professionals who provide educational services, clinical services, or both to individuals with language disorders require a sophisticated knowledge of syntax. Although many individuals exhibiting disordered language experience difficulties transcending the array of linguistic domains

xii (e.g., pragmatics, semantics, and phonology), language disorders nearly always have an adverse impact on individuals syntactic or grammatical systems. Consider, for instance, a 4-year-old child with specific language impairment (a language disorder with no known etiology). The child may speak with a telegraphic quality, such that key syntactic structures are omitted. For instance, the child might say, Me go instead of I am going, Give me cat for Give me the cat, or That girl in place of That is a girl. Analysis of the child s expressive language would suggest difficulties with using nominative pronouns (using me for I), auxiliary verbs (omitting am), verb tense inflections (go for going), articles (omitting the and a), and copular be (omitting is). This type of analysis is a commonplace activity for the language interventionist and is an important tool for preventing, identifying, and remediating language disorders. Familiarity with key syntactic structures is thus a clear requisite to being an effective language interventionist. Knowledge of syntax is required for assessing an individual s language abilities, for formulating short-term objectives and long-term educational or clinical goals, for monitoring progress, and for evaluating the outcomes of language intervention. To illustrate (using examples from the field of communication disorders), short-term clinical objectives for children or adults with language disorders may look something like this: (Child) will use the present tense copular form of be (is, am, are) in 90% of obligatory contexts given an eliciting prompt by the interventionist. (Child) will use 10 complex noun phrases joined by the conjunction and in each of six consecutive sessions given models by the interventionist. Given an array of objects, (child) will act out irreversible passive present tense sentences spoken by the interventionist with 90% accuracy. (Child) will produce a third-person regular present tense verb in 9 out of 10 trials given an eliciting prompt by the interventionist. (Child) will use articles and conjunctions during conversational speech with 80% accuracy. (Child) will use compound and complex sentences in spontaneous speech during classroom activities with 90% accuracy. (Child) will inflect verbs to denote past and future tense with 75% accuracy. Likewise, a long-term goal for a school-age child with a language disorder, as stated in the individualized education program (IEP), may emphasize the child s development of age-appropriate syntactic structures. Because syntactic terms are so frequently used to establish and monitor educational or clinical goals, language interventionists must be prepared to define and illustrate these terms for caregivers of children or adults with a language disorder so that syntactic acquisition may be facilitated in the home or caregiving environment. Likewise, language interventionists must also be able to explain the use of these terms and their reference to educational or clinical goals and intervention outcomes to other

xiii professionals, including occupational and physical therapists, psychologists, teachers, nurses, and physicians. The Syntax Handbook can help you master your understanding of important syntactic terms, making it easier for you to discuss syntactic goals and objectives with parents, caregivers, and colleagues.