Establishing SARA the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement

Similar documents
SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Nevada Last Updated: October 2011

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Indiana Last Updated: October 2011

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

ITEM: 6. MEETING: Trust Board 20 February 2008

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Chaffey College Program Review Report

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

PROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

THE BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ONE BROOKDALE PLAZA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11212

Evaluating Progress NGA Center for Best Practices STEM Summit

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

POLITECNICO DI MILANO

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Program Change Proposal:

State Parental Involvement Plan

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

University of Toronto

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

ANNUAL REPORT. The South Australian Law Reform Institute. 1 January December 2012

ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

Supplemental Focus Guide

Services for Children and Young People

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY MINUTES OF MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2008

NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY ESL and/or BILINGUAL ENDORSMENTS ESL and/or BILINGUAL SPECIAL EDUCATION APPROVALS

FIELD PLACEMENT PROGRAM: COURSE HANDBOOK

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools


Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Running head: FINAL CASE STUDY, EDCI Addressing a Training Gap. Final Case Study. Anna Siracusa. Purdue University

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Instituto Juan Pablo II Tecnico Especializado Holy Trinity Parish Social Justice Tithe Grant. Response to Second Round Interrogatories

Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA

5.7 Country case study: Vietnam

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

An Introduction to LEAP

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

DEPARTMENT OF ART. Graduate Associate and Graduate Fellows Handbook

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Teaching Excellence Framework

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Note on the PELP Coherence Framework

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

1. Amend Article Departmental co-ordination and program committee as set out in Appendix A.

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

KSBA Staff Review of HB 520 Charter Schools Rep. Carney - (as introduced )

Guide to the University of Chicago, Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity Records

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE STUDENT PLACEMENTOFFICE PROGRAM REVIEW SPRING SEMESTER, 2010

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Faculty Athletics Committee Annual Report to the Faculty Council November 15, 2013

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Information Sheet for Home Educators in Tasmania

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

Kaipaki School. We expect the roll to climb to almost 100 in line with the demographic report from MoE through 2016.

Executive Summary. Colegio Catolico Notre Dame, Corp. Mr. Jose Grillo, Principal PO Box 937 Caguas, PR 00725

Overview. Contrasts in Current Approaches to Quality Assurance of Universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand

Transcription:

Establishing SARA the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement

What s the problem? States and territories regulate higher education within their borders, with varying requirements for out-of-state institutions that want to do business in the state. Cross-state online education offered by colleges and universities is expanding dramatically. At present there is no alternative to each institution separately pursuing any needed approvals (state authorization) in each state and territory where it enrolls students. Consequently, thousands of institutions are required to contact and work through as many as 54 states and territories, and, sometimes, with multiple regulatory agencies in those states. That process is inefficient, costly, and not effective in supporting access to high quality distance education throughout the country. 2

Goals SARA establishes a state-level reciprocity process that will support the nation in its efforts to increase the educational attainment of its people by making state authorization: more efficient, effective, and uniform in regard to necessary and reasonable standards of practice that could span states; more effective in dealing with quality and integrity issues that have arisen in some online/distance education offerings; and less costly for states and institutions and, thereby, the students they serve. 3

Key points State laws, rules, and regulation, are remarkably diverse and the reasons for that diversity vary from state to state. An effective means of dealing with these issues requires a comprehensive national model that will serve all interested states, accommodate all sectors of higher education, and support quality. Efforts to facilitate good practice must also maintain the ability to deal with poor institutional behavior. In particular, states must be able to trust other states to carry out their responsibilities and deal with problems. 4

Who has been involved in crafting SARA? SARA was developed with input from: A broad advisory committee. Regional higher education compacts (MHEC, NEBHE, SREB, WICHE). State regulators. State Higher Education Executive Officers. Accrediting organizations. U.S. Department of Education. Institutional leaders representing all sectors of higher education. 5

The evolution of SARA Lumina Foundation provided funding to the Presidents Forum, working with the Council of State Governments (CSG), to develop a Model State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) that states could adopt to acknowledge other states work and decisions in regard to institutional authorization. Building upon the work of the Presidents Forum and CSG, the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE) advanced W-SARA in collaboration with the regional higher education compacts (SREB, MHEC, NEBHE). Combining all prior efforts and input from all stakeholders, the Commission on the Regulation of Postsecondary Distance Education, founded by SHEEO and APLU, and chaired by former Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley, issued its report: Advancing Access through Regulatory Reform: Findings, Principles, and Recommendations for the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA). Funding for national and regional implementation provided by Lumina Foundation. 6

Essential principles of SARA Voluntary for states and institutions. Acknowledges the traditional roles within higher education s accountability triad : federal government, states, and accrediting bodies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Lays out a framework for state-level reciprocity, including a governance structure, implementation by the four regional higher education compacts (MHEC, NEBHE, SREB, WICHE), a National Council for SARA to ensure comprehensive national coverage, and a financial plan to support operations. 7

Regional Compacts MHEC NEBHE WICHE SREB

Essential principles of SARA Requires states to approve their in-state institutions for SARA participation (based upon institutional accreditation and financial stability) and resolve student complaints. SARA states agree to impose no additional (non-sara) requirements on institutions from other SARA states. Open to degree-granting postsecondary institutions from all sectors: public colleges and universities; independent institutions, both non-profit and for-profit. Sets forth a reasonable, uniform set of triggers of physical presence. 9

Essential principles of SARA Preserves state approval and oversight of on-the-ground campuses. Shifts principal oversight responsibilities from the state in which the distance education is being received to the home state of the institution offering the instruction. (Host state can also work to resolve problems.) Initial funding from Lumina Foundation, eventual reliance on institutional fees paid to the National Council for SARA. 10

Issues SARA does not address Professional licensing board approval for programs leading to licensing: nursing, teacher education, psychology, etc. Online offerings provided free and beyond the scope of current regulation of the degree programs of accredited academic institutions (free, non-credit MOOCs, etc.). Non-credit instruction. 11

What s next? National Council for SARA (NC-SARA) Purposes coordination, appeals, financing, data. 21 members regional compact presidents, accreditors, regulators, state government, SHEEO, various higher education sectors. First meeting November 1, 2013. Initial consideration of by-laws. Established fees for institutional participation in SARA. Review and endorse regional SARA documents. Review application documents for states and institutions. 12

What s next? NC-SARA (continued) Institutional Fees $2,000/year for institutions with fewer than 2,500 FTE students $4,000/year for institutions between 2,500-9,999 FTE students $6,000/year for institutions with 10,000 or more FTE students SPECIAL PROVISION Institutions that join prior to September 1, 2014 will receive 18 months membership for their initial fee then continue on a 12 month renewal basis NC-SARA.org available now w/ minimal information; expanded by 12/2/2013 Uniform applications for states and institutions

What s next? Regional Compacts. Hire staff (mostly done). Regional forums WICHE December 10 in Denver MHEC January 10 in Chicago Invite states to participate (late 2013 or early 2014). Compacts review and approve states that meet SARA criteria (2014 and following). Administer SARA (2014 and following). 14

What do states need to do? Determine if the state wants to participate. Make any needed changes to statutes or rules. Identify agency(ies) to solicit and approve participation of instate institutions and resolve complaints. Identify portal agency (if needed). Adopt in-state funding model (if needed). Develop and submit SARA plan to the state s regional compact. 15

Benefits to states Expands educational offerings to state residents. Allows SARA states to focus on their home-state institutions, rather than on institutions from many other states. Maintains state regulation of on-the-ground instruction offered by out-of-state institutions. Other SARA states will help resolve complaints. (SARA states commit to resolving complaints stemming from distance education offered by their institutions.) Reduces costs for institutions, lessening this particular need to raise fees and thereby supporting affordability. No membership cost to states. 16

Benefits to institutions Enables more efficient provision of distance education to a broader market. Reduces number of other-state regulations to continually monitor and track. Reduces number of applications and individual state requirements. Reduces costs. Applications, surety bonds, agent licenses, etc. Staff (payroll and time). Reduced costs = potentially lower fees for students. 17

Benefits to students Expands access to educational offerings. Should lead to better resolution of complaints from students in SARA states. Reduces a rapidly growing institutional cost that is in one way or another passed along to students. Should enhance overall quality of distance education 18

Learn more about SARA Presidents Forum website: http://presidentsforum.excelsior.edu CSG website: http://www.csg.org/ NC-SARA website: Soon http://nc-sara.org WCET website: http://wcet.wiche.edu/advance/state-approval SHEEO website: http://www.sheeo.org/ Regional compacts MHEC http://www.mhec.org/ NEBHE http://www.nebhe.org/ SREB http://www.sreb.org/ WICHE http://www.wiche.edu/ 19