Current Grammar. Our grammar has several types of rules, which are organized roughly as in (1): Transformations Form Rules.

Similar documents
Constraining X-Bar: Theta Theory

Argument structure and theta roles

Syntax Parsing 1. Grammars and parsing 2. Top-down and bottom-up parsing 3. Chart parsers 4. Bottom-up chart parsing 5. The Earley Algorithm

Basic Syntax. Doug Arnold We review some basic grammatical ideas and terminology, and look at some common constructions in English.

Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

1/20 idea. We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21. based on assigned readings. so you ll be ready to discuss them in class

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

Som and Optimality Theory

Introduction to HPSG. Introduction. Historical Overview. The HPSG architecture. Signature. Linguistic Objects. Descriptions.

The presence of interpretable but ungrammatical sentences corresponds to mismatches between interpretive and productive parsing.

Universal Grammar 2. Universal Grammar 1. Forms and functions 1. Universal Grammar 3. Conceptual and surface structure of complex clauses

Theoretical Syntax Winter Answers to practice problems

Chapter 4: Valence & Agreement CSLI Publications

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

An Introduction to the Minimalist Program

Case government vs Case agreement: modelling Modern Greek case attraction phenomena in LFG

Underlying and Surface Grammatical Relations in Greek consider

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & SOCIAL STUDIES

Derivational: Inflectional: In a fit of rage the soldiers attacked them both that week, but lost the fight.

Derivations (MP) and Evaluations (OT) *

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

Parsing of part-of-speech tagged Assamese Texts

LING 329 : MORPHOLOGY

Control and Boundedness

Developing a TT-MCTAG for German with an RCG-based Parser

CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Long-distance wh-movement. Long distance wh-movement. Islands. Islands. Locality. NP Sea. NP Sea

Some Principles of Automated Natural Language Information Extraction

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

Words come in categories

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

ON THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS

SOME MINIMAL NOTES ON MINIMALISM *

"f TOPIC =T COMP COMP... OBJ

Construction Grammar. University of Jena.

UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first

Update on Soar-based language processing

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

Citation for published version (APA): Veenstra, M. J. A. (1998). Formalizing the minimalist program Groningen: s.n.

Korean ECM Constructions and Cyclic Linearization

Tibor Kiss Reconstituting Grammar: Hagit Borer's Exoskeletal Syntax 1

Multiple case assignment and the English pseudo-passive *

Applications of memory-based natural language processing

Prediction of Maximal Projection for Semantic Role Labeling

Natural Language Processing. George Konidaris

The subject of adjectives: Syntactic position and semantic interpretation

THE SHORT ANSWER: IMPLICATIONS FOR DIRECT COMPOSITIONALITY (AND VICE VERSA) Pauline Jacobson. Brown University

Language acquisition: acquiring some aspects of syntax.

Compositional Semantics

Pseudo-Passives as Adjectival Passives

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

Type-driven semantic interpretation and feature dependencies in R-LFG

LNGT0101 Introduction to Linguistics

Program in Linguistics. Academic Year Assessment Report

Authors note Chapter One Why Simpler Syntax? 1.1. Different notions of simplicity

Chapter 3: Semi-lexical categories. nor truly functional. As Corver and van Riemsdijk rightly point out, There is more

LTAG-spinal and the Treebank

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Modeling full form lexica for Arabic

An Interactive Intelligent Language Tutor Over The Internet

A Computational Evaluation of Case-Assignment Algorithms

Dependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations *

Interfacing Phonology with LFG

Advanced Grammar in Use

Hans-Ulrich Block, Hans Haugeneder Siemens AG, MOnchen ZT ZTI INF W. Germany. (2) [S' [NP who][s does he try to find [NP e]]s IS' $=~

Lexical phonology. Marc van Oostendorp. December 6, Until now, we have presented phonological theory as if it is a monolithic

5 Minimalism and Optimality Theory

A Usage-Based Approach to Recursion in Sentence Processing

The Syntax of Coordinate Structure Complexes

Feature-Based Grammar

Chapter 1 The functional approach to language and the typological approach to grammar

Aspectual Classes of Verb Phrases

Focusing bound pronouns

Second Language Acquisition of Complex Structures: The Case of English Restrictive Relative Clauses

The Structure of Relative Clauses in Maay Maay By Elly Zimmer

Intension, Attitude, and Tense Annotation in a High-Fidelity Semantic Representation

The Strong Minimalist Thesis and Bounded Optimality

Hindi-Urdu Phrase Structure Annotation

Construction Grammar. Laura A. Michaelis.

Agree or Move? On Partial Control Anna Snarska, Adam Mickiewicz University

cambridge occasional papers in linguistics Volume 8, Article 3: 41 55, 2015 ISSN

Towards a Machine-Learning Architecture for Lexical Functional Grammar Parsing. Grzegorz Chrupa la

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

Disharmonic Word Order from a Processing Typology Perspective. John A. Hawkins, U of Cambridge RCEAL & UC Davis Linguistics

Ch VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS.

On Labeling: Principle C and Head Movement

Parallel Evaluation in Stratal OT * Adam Baker University of Arizona

On the Notion Determiner

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

The building blocks of HPSG grammars. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) HPSG grammars from a linguistic perspective

Switched Control and other 'uncontrolled' cases of obligatory control

A is an inde nite nominal pro-form that takes antecedents. ere have

Intervention in Tough Constructions * Jeremy Hartman. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

THE INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGE TEACHING

Negation through reduplication and tone: implications for the LFG/PFM interface 1

Hindi Aspectual Verb Complexes

Proof Theory for Syntacticians

arxiv:cmp-lg/ v1 16 Aug 1996

cmp-lg/ Jul 1995

A Framework for Customizable Generation of Hypertext Presentations

Transcription:

Ling 121, Syntax Current Grammar 1. Organization Our grammar has several types of rules, which are organized roughly as in (1): (1) Phrase Structure Rules Deep Structure Lexicon Transformations Form Rules Surface Structure DEEP STRUCTURE is the representation that is the result of PHRASE STRUCTURE RULES and LEXICAL INSERTION. TRANSFORMATIONS apply, one by one, to derive new structures. The FORM RULES also apply (at some point in the derivation) to add morphological features to some of the elements. The structure that is the result of applying all the applicable transformations and the form rules is called SURFACE STRUCTURE. DEEP STRUCTURE interfaces with the Semantic Component. Thus, transformations do not change meaning. SURFACE STRUCTURE is the input to the phonology; hence, everything needs to be in the right order and all necessary morphological information must be in place by Surface Structure. Remember that Deep Structures do not always correspond to grammatical sentences - sometimes obligatory transformations and/or form rules need to apply. Also, Surface structures do not have to conform to the Phrase Structure Rules the Transformation may move things around, etc., in a way that would not have been directly generated by the Phrase Structure Rules.

2. Phrase Structure Rules (2) S {NP, CP} VP NP {(DP) (AP) N (PP), pn, Name} DP {D, NP Poss} VP {(V m ) (V have ) (V b-a ) V (NP) (AP) (PP) (CP) or- VP {PP, Adv} PP P NP AP (Int) A CP C S 3. Lexical Entries Lexical entries contain everything that is idiosyncratic to particular lexical items. This includes the phonological shape (which we represent with the standard English spelling), idiosyncratic morphological information (e.g. irregular verb forms, plurals, etc.), the syntactic category (N, V, P, etc.), subcategorization, and lexical semantics (what the word means). We are particularly interested one aspect of the a verb s meaning - the list of participants (SEMANTIC ROLES) entailed to occur with any use of the verb. This is the who did what to whom part of the semantics. For example, any event denoted with the verb eat will entail an eater and an eatee : (3) eat, V, [ (NP)] (eater, eatee) Note that eat subcategorizes for an optional NP. Nevertheless, any sentence that uses eat will entail an eatee, even if I t is not expressed syntactically. Also note that eat subcategorizes for one phrase (NP), but there are two semantic roles in the argument structure. This is because one of its semantic roles is assigned to the subject (and verbs do not subcategorize for subjects - they can only subcategorize for sisters). By subject I mean the NP that is the daughter of the S-node. In general, verbs have one more semantic role than the number of subcategorized arguments. Here are some possibilities: (4) a. faint, V, [ ] (fainter) b. see, V, [ NP] (seer, thing) 2

c. fall, V, [ (PP)] (thing, location) d. send, V, [ NP (PP)] (sender, thing, location) e. put, V, [ NP PP] (putter, thing, location) f. be V, [ {NP, PP, AP}] (x, y) [note: the two arguments are equate in some way, or the AP or PP s denotation is predicated to subject] g. believe V, [ CP] (experiencer, proposition) PASSIVE, RAISING,and EXTRAPOSITION obligatory, if the CP is CP for h. be likely V, [ ] (proposition) i. be unlikely V, [ ] (proposition) j. seem V, [ ] (proposition) RAISING and EXTRAPOSITION obligatory k. be obvious V, [ ] (proposition) RAISING not allowed l. like V, [ {NP, CP}] (experiencer, theme) m. be eager V, [ {NP, CP for }] (experiencer, theme) n. want V, [ {NP, CP for }] (experiencer, theme) The lexical entries in (4h-k) have a single proposition semantic role this ensures that these verbs require CP subjects at deep structure Extraposition can later move this CP to the VP. 3

Once Extraposition applies, the structural description for Raising is met, so Raising can apply as well, except be obvious in (4k) has a lexical specification saying that Raising is not allowed; this prevents examples like (5) from being generated: (5) * The book is obvious to be interesting. The verb seem in (4j) specifies that both Extraposition and Raising is required. This means that if a CP for is chosen, the result will be a Raising construction (6a); if CP that is chosen, there must be an Extraposition construction (6b). The deepstructre CP subject must move by surface structe, so (7a-b) are not possible. (7c) shows that Raising is obligator if there is a CP for. (6) a. The book seems to be interesting. b. It seems that the book is interesting. (7) a. * For the book to be interesting seems. b. * That the book is interesting seems. c. * It seems for the book to be interesting. The verb believe (4g) takes a CP object at deep structure; if there is a CP that, this can remain in object position by surface structure (8a). If believe is passivized, the CP moves to subject position (8b), and then Extraposition is possible (8c). However, if a CP for is chosen, then The CP must passivize, and then both Extraposition and Raising must apply (8d). The ungrammatical examples in in (9) show that a passivized believe, with a CP for, behaves in a manner similar to seem. (8) a. Everyone believes that the book is interesting. b. That the book is interesting is believed by everyone. c. It is believed by everyone that the book is interesting. d. The book is believed by everyone to be interesting (9) a. * Everyone believes for the book to be interesting. b. * For the book to be interesting is believed by everyone. c. * It is believed by everyone for the book to be interesting. The verbs in (4l-n) have CP objects; when the CP is a CP for, Equi is required when the matrix and embedded subjects are co-referential: (10) a. We are eager for the children to win the race. b. The children are eager to win the race. In order to hook up semantic roles with syntactic structures, we assume the following linking rules: 4

(11) LINKING RULES a. Associate the first semantic role with the subject of the sentence. b. Associate any remaining semantic roles with the verb s (subcategorized) sisters, left to right. These linking rules apply as part of the interface between Deep Structure and the semantic interpretation. This establishes who did what to whom in order to feed into the semantic component. Transformations may move things around, delete things, etc., but the who did what to whom will have already been established. When a verb associates a semantic role with a phrase, it imposes SELECTIONAL RESTRICTIONS on that phrase, according to the type of semantic role. For example the SEER role entails animate, sentient entities. Hence, (12a) is a good sentence while (12b) is bizarre: (12) a. The kids saw the movie. (note: # is used to b. # The table saw the movie. indicate bizarre ) Other semantic roles, such as THING, do not require animate nor sentient entiies: (13) a. The kids saw Kim. animate THING ok b. The kids saw the movie. inanimate THING ok (14) a. The kid fell off the slide. animate THING ok b. The book fell off the slide. animate THING ok The lexical entry in (4f) ensures that seem will take CP subjects at Deep Structure. Raising verbs, like seem, have clausal subjects at Deep Structure, but the embedded subject can raise to the matrix subject position by Surface Structure. Hence, in a Raising construction, the Surface Structure subject will not receive a semantic role from the matrix verb. This is in contrast with Equi verbs, which have non-clausal subjects at Deep Structure, and whose surface subjects do receive a semantic role from the matrix verb. Keep these facts firmly in mind when thinking about the difference between Raising and Equi. 4. Transformations and Form Rules Transformations alter phrase structure; that is, they delete things, insert things, and move things around. The result is a new phrase structure. Again, note that the output of a transformation does not need to abide by the phrase structure rules. Transformations consist of a STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION (SD), which identifies what kinds of structure a transformation can apply to, and a STRUCTURAL CHANGE (SC), which says how the phrase structure is to be changed. 5

(15) PASSIVE: (optional) NP X V {NP, CP} Y SD: 1 2 3 4 5 SC: 4 2 V b--b +3 0/ 5 + [ PP by 1] This transformation applies to any sentence that begins with and NP, perhaps followed by some auxiliaries, then a verb and an immediately following NP (or CP). It moves the NP (or CP) from its position after the verb to the subject position, it adds the auxiliary V b-b before the verb, and builds a PP that contains the preposition by and the NP that was the old subject. This new PP becomes a sister to the last element in Y (indicated by + ) Transformations can be optional or obligatory. Form rules (also known as morpho-syntactic rules) express generalizations about the form that a category has (= the way it is pronounced) depending on where it is located in constituent structure. Among the phenomena handled by these rules are subject-verb agreement, and verb forms. Form rules add a morphological feature or features to a category depending on a category that is immediately adjacent to it. These rules have one of the forms shown below: (16) a. X X [A] / Y b. X X [A] / Y Later, the morphology interprets the features as instructions for how (the words in) this category should be pronounced. Form rules are obligatory. Form rules cannot alter phrase structure; they cannot delete or add structure. They can only add morphological features. 5. The Organization of Transformations and Form Rules Since our phrase structure rules create Deep Structures with embedded clauses, we have a possibility that there may be more than one S-node in a structure From the Deep Structure that underlies (11a), the following sentences may emerge: (17) a. Max believed that Pat wrote letters. b. Max believed that letters were written by Pat. c. That Pat wrote letters was believed by Max. d. That letters were written by Pat was proven by max. (17a): no PASSIVE anywhere (17b): PASSIVE in the embedded clause (17c): PASSIVE in the main clause (17d): PASSIVE in the embedded and main clauses 6

Therefore, we will assume that transformation may apply in both embedded and main clauses. The way this is assumed to happen is as follows: (18) CYCLIC APPLICATION a. First, go through the list of CYCLIC TRANSFORMATIONS and FORM RULES, in order, in the embedded clause. b. Then go up to the next clause up and go through the list all over again. In this way, the transformations apply CYCLICALLY; that is, each clause defines a CYCLE in which the ordered list of transformations is applied. Thus, in (17b) passive applies only in the embedded clause on the first cycle; in (17c) it is skipped in the embedded clause (it is an optional transformation), but is applied in the main clause on the second cycle. In (17d) it is applied in the embedded clause on the first cycle, then again when its turn comes around on the second, main-clause cycle. For the purpose of cyclic applications embedded clause may be either a CP or an S. Also, we will assume that transformations are LOCAL; that is, they cannot reach into an embedded clause unless explicitly sanctioned. We implement this with the LOCALITY CONSTRAINT in (19): (19) LOCALITY CONSTRAINT: In a transformation, no variable may contain a clause-boundary. This means that unless a clause boundary is explicitly mentioned in the structural description of a transformation, the transformation will be clause-bounded. So transformations like PASSIVE are clause bounded, but RAISING and EQUI, which explicitly mention a CP-boundary, operate across two clauses. One exception to (19) is the unbounded, non-local WH-MOVEMENT transformation, which can apply across multiple clauses. The transformations and form rules are arranged in an ordered list. Once a Deep Structure is created, we simply go down the list and see which rules can apply. If a transformation can apply then we apply it (if it is optional we may apply it or not), creating a new structure. Then we continue down the list. The Form Rules come at the end of the CYCLIC TRANSFORMATIONS those that apply on each cycle. There are two POST-CYCLIC TRANSFORMATIONS that don t apply until the end of the last (main clause) cycle. After all transformations have been considered, the result is a Surface Structure. Any Surface Structure our grammar can produce is predicted to correspond to a grammatical sentence. Anything that our grammar does not generate is predicted to be ungrammatical. 7

Current Transformations and Form Rules Here is the list of current transformation and form rules in order of application. CYCLIC TRANSFORMATIONS TO-PLACEMENT: (OBLIGATORY) [ CP for {NP, CP} (V m ) X SD: 1 2 3 4 SC: 1 2 [V M to] 4 PASSIVE: (OPTIONAL) NP X V {NP, CP} Y SD: 1 2 3 4 5 SC: 4 2 V B-B +3 0/ 5 + [ PP BY 1] AGENT DELETION: (optional) X V be-pass Y [ PP by someone/something] SD: 1 2 3 4 SC: 1 2 3 0/ EQUI: (obligatory) NP i X V [ CP C for NP i Y SD: 1 2 3 4 5 6 SC: 1 2 3 0/ 0/ 6 THERE-INSERTION: (optional) NP[ α pers, β num] X be PP Y SD: 1 2 3 4 5 SC: [there] pn [α pers, β num] 2 3 + 1 4 5 EXTRAPOSITION: (optional for some verbs; obligatory for others) CP VP SD: 1 2 SC: [it pn ] NP 2 # 1 ( # means daughter of ) 8

RAISING: (optional for some verbs; obligatory for others) [it] X V [C for NP VP] Y SD: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SC: 5 2 3 0/ 0/ 6 7 Condition: term 1 is a pleonastic, term 3 contains a RAISING-verb FORM RULES: (obligatory) These all apply in a block during the relevant cycle. V V [past] or [present] / NP V V [α person, β number] / NP [α person, β number] V V [BARE] / V m V V [-EN] / V have V V [-ING] / V b-a V V [-EN] / V b-b WH-MOVEMENT: (obligatory) X (wh) Y SD: 1 2 3 SC: 2+1 0/ 3 Note: wh stands an XP with a wh-cord in it SAI: (obligatory if term 1 is present, otherwise optional) (wh) NP Aux X SD: 1 2 3 4 SC: 1 3 + 2 0/ 3 Note: Aux stands for V m, V have, V b-a, V b-b, and main verb be 9