Language Policy. Purpose: Philosophy: Mother Tongue Support:

Similar documents
IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

Language Center. Course Catalog

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

IB Diploma Subject Selection Brochure

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

World Languages Unpacked Content for Classical Language Programs What is the purpose of this document?

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

EUROPEAN DAY OF LANGUAGES

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

NON DOD SCHOOLS PROGRAM FALL 2017

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

EAL Train the Trainer Course New dates: 31 st January 1 st February 2018

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

An Assessment of the Dual Language Acquisition Model. On Improving Student WASL Scores at. McClure Elementary School at Yakima, Washington.

Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. Administrative Officers. About the College. Mission. Highlights. Academic Programs. Sam Houston State University 1

Creating Travel Advice

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Information for Candidates

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

New Jersey Department of Education

International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme. Curriculum Handbook 2014

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

State Parental Involvement Plan

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

International Baccalaureate

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

University of Thessaloniki, Greece Marina Mattheoudakis Associate Professor School of English, AUTh

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

Benchmark Testing In Language Arts

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

English (from Chinese) (Language Learners) By Daniele Bourdaise

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Soulbus project/jamk Part B: National tailored pilot Case Gloria, Soultraining, Summary

My First Spanish Phrases (Speak Another Language!) By Jill Kalz

Language Acquisition Chart

YOUR FUTURE IN IB. Why is the International Baccalaureate a great choice for you? Mrs. Debbie Woolard IB Director Marietta High School

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme at Carey

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

Perception of Lecturer on Intercultural Competence and Culture Teaching Time (Case Study)

Linguistics. The School of Humanities

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

EDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

One Stop Shop For Educators

The Ontario Curriculum

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

ENGLISH. English PROGRAM GUIDE. Program Guide. effective for the school year

Understanding Language

Learning and Retaining New Vocabularies: The Case of Monolingual and Bilingual Dictionaries

A Study of Successful Practices in the IB Program Continuum

Special Education Program Continuum

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Transcription:

Purpose: The purpose of this document is to clarify the Jefferson/Longfellow Middle Years Programme (MYP) Language Policy. Our schools are committed to supporting multilingualism to increase intercultural understanding and international-mindedness as well as support students from various cultural and linguistic backgrounds. This policy applies to both schools and is to be communicated to, and understood by, all continuing and new teachers, students, parents, and administrators. Philosophy: In the Jefferson/Longfellow MYP, language is an essential instrument for learning, communication, and expression. Through language instruction, we encourage intercultural awareness, inquisitiveness, and an appreciation of diversity by providing students the tools needed to interpret and understand the world around them. Language is taught through different modalities: listening, speaking, reading, writing, non-verbal communication, viewing, presenting, and culture. At our schools, language development is essential to the development of international-mindedness. Because of this, we believe that every staff member of the Jefferson/Longfellow community is a teacher of language. Through the exploration of language, students become in our multilingual world. In every year of the MYP, language education occurs with the understanding that students bring unique cultural backgrounds with them to school. To meet students where they are, we endeavor to honor the mother-tongue of our students from different backgrounds in order to respect and learn about different cultures. We provide those with little or no English the opportunity to learn our language through the English Language Learning program on campus. Additionally, we differentiate instruction to meet the needs of individual students. To maintain cultural identity, however, we encourage families to continue to speak, read, and write in mother-tongue. Mother Tongue Support: Within our student population, there are bilingual students, including those whose home language is a language other than English. Included in our multilingual, multicultural staff are speakers of several languages, who are often called upon to assist as translators as needed for parent conferences. Parents and students are encouraged to speak, read, write, and develop mother tongue at home. This strengthens the child s language skills while instilling a sense of importance about his or her culture.

Campus Language Identification: In order to promote holistic learning within the context of the International Baccalaureate, the stakeholders in the Jefferson/Longfellow MYP recognize the significance of incorporating the teaching and learning of language throughout the continuum. Because English is the primary language of instruction at both Jefferson and Longfellow, our Language and Literature classes are taught in English. Students must, therefore, meet English language requirements established by the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) standards. Upon entry into the Jefferson/Longfellow MYP, parents of students complete a language survey to identify the student's proficiencies and needs. Language proficiency is determined by the Language Proficiency Assessment Committee (LPAC) which will place the student in either an English as a Second Language (ESL) class or regular English class. The State of Texas requires that every student with a home language other than English and with limited English proficiency be provided the full support of an ESL program. New students to campus are tested using the Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey (WMLS Tests) and the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) to further determine placement and progress (SAISD Administrative Procedure E-1, 2017). If a student is placed in an ESL program, the school acknowledges the student s primary language as something other than English. In our schools, that language is usually Spanish. ESL includes intensive instruction in English through the use of second language acquisition methodologies designed to develop proficiency in the comprehension, speaking, reading, and writing of the English language. ESL courses are commensurate with the student s level of English proficiency. Bilingual education or courses taught in the student s native language may be offered when resources are available. The district provides ongoing coordination between ESL and the regular curriculum. ESL is designed to address the affective, linguistic, and cognitive level needs of limited English proficient students as follows: Affective - Limited English Proficient (LEP) students are provided instruction using second language methods in English to introduce basic concepts of the school environment which instills confidence, self-assurance, and a positive identity with cultural heritages. The program addresses the history heritage associated with both the students' home language and the United States. Linguistic - LEP students are provided intensive instruction to develop proficiency in the comprehension, speaking, reading, and composition of the English language. The instruction in academic content areas is structured to ensure that the students master the required TEKS and higher order thinking skills. Cognitive - LEP students receive instruction in English in mathematics, science, health, and social studies using second language methods.

Instruction in academic content areas is structured to ensure that students master required essential knowledge and skills as well as higher order thinking skills. The use of second language strategies or another language does not impede the awarding of credits/units toward meeting promotion requirements. Language Instruction: The Jefferson/Longfellow MYP offers a proficiency-based approach to language learning taught in six phases so that the complexity and range of language profiles that students bring to MYP classroom is acknowledged and fostered. Students come to MYP language study from various experiences. For example, MYP students may have exited from any of the five PYP language phases while other students may have completed a different language acquisition program. Conversely, students may have no prior knowledge or experience of the language to be studied in the MYP. (IB MYP Language Acquisition Guide, September 2014). Upon entering the Longfellow programme, students select a language to study and continue its study until completion of the MYP in 10 th grade. Currently language instruction is offered in Spanish, French, and Mandarin Chinese at Longfellow; Jefferson offers Spanish and French. As explained in the IB MYP Language Acquisition Guide, planning, teaching, and language acquisition skills are mapped on continuums to show clear expectations for each phase. Students develop ability to communicate appropriately and effectively in an increasing range of social, cultural, and academic contexts, and for an increasing variety of audiences and purposes. This is demonstrated by: The variety and sophistication of vocabulary and structures used. The scope of situations in which the language is used. The increasing length of text spoken, read,. The increasing complexity of text spoken, viewed, read,. The increasing variety of forms of both fiction and non-fiction handled. As students develop understanding, increasing expectations are set. Further detail is provided below in the MYP language acquisition global proficiency table. The table provides six holistic statements describing a student s achievement against the course objectives along the continuum from emergent communicator to a capable communicator to a proficient communicator. The characteristics of a communicator in each phase are explained as to what the students should be able to do by the end of the phase.

MYP language acquisition global proficiency table Emergent Communicator Capable communicator Proficient Communicator Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Emergent in phase 1 respond to simple phrases, statements and questions. They identify basic messages, facts, opinions, feelings and ideas presented in oral, visual language, and demonstrate comprehension in simple oral phrases. They convey basic in a limited range of everyday situations, using oral and language appropriate to a very limited range of begin to be aware that language use is connected to a purpose and an audience. Emergent in phase 2 respond to simple spoken texts. They identify messages, facts, opinions, feelings and ideas presented in oral, visual language, and demonstrate comprehension in short oral and form. They interact to share in a limited range of familiar situations, using basic language appropriate to a limited range of are aware that language varies according to purpose and audience. Capable in phase 3 respond to a limited variety of spoken and texts. They understand specific, main ideas and some detail presented in oral, visual and language, and demonstrate comprehension in a limited range of oral forms. They engage in conversation and write structured text to express ideas, opinions and experiences in a range of familiar and some unfamiliar situations, in a limited range of understand that they can speak Capable in phase 4 respond to a variety of spoken and texts. They interpret specific, main ideas and some detail presented in complex oral, visual and language, draw conclusions and recognize implied attitudes in texts read and viewed. They engage in conversation and write structured text to share informative and organized ideas on topics of personal interest and global significance, in a range of can communicate substantial Proficient in phase 5 analyse specific, ideas, opinions and attitudes presented in oral, visual and language. They draw conclusions, infer and recognize implied attitudes. They respond and react to questions and ideas in a range of spoken, visual texts. They engage actively in conversations in social and some academic situations to contribute substantial containing relevant and focused ideas supported by examples and illustrations. They organize Proficient in phase 6 evaluate the important, details and ideas presented in spoken, and visual language in social and academic analyse the, draw conclusions and make inferences about ideas, attitudes implied in a wide range of spoken, visual texts. They engage actively in conversations in social and academic situations to contribute substantial and give detailed analysis and explanation. They organize and ideas

and write in different ways for different purposes and audiences. containing relevant and developed ideas and justified opinions on events, experiences and some concepts explored in class. They identify aspects of format and style, and speak and write with a clear sense of audience and purpose. and ideas into a clear and effective structure to express understanding and opinions on topics of personal interest and global significance. They interpret and are able to adapt aspects of format, register and style of language. logically and effectively to communicate understanding, perspectives to a wide range of audiences, and for a variety of social and academic purposes. (IB MYP Language Acquisition Guide, September 2014) There are many paths to further language study. MYP language acquisition courses are developed assuming students will continue to either the Jefferson s DP classes or further formal language study. For example, Jefferson/Longfellow students transition smoothly from MYP language acquisition courses in phases 1 to 6 into the Jefferson Diploma Programme. Some of these middle school students will be qualified to start in group 2 courses while others may be placed in group 1 courses at the high school level upon admission. Instructional Strategies and Practices: The primary language of instruction is English. Teachers support the development and acquisition of oral language through the following strategies, among others: 1. Language taught through the curriculum 2. Differentiated instruction 3. Multi-sensory stimulus 4. Eliciting prior knowledge 5. Making connections 6. Modeling 7. Cooperative learning 8. Trans-disciplinary skills (reading, speaking, writing, and listening)

Parental Support: Parents are included in the language development of children through the following practices and resources, among others: Reading Response and reading logs Newsletters or Flyers distributed to the parents in English and Spanish Bilingual Parent Liaison Campus Literacy Night Parent Volunteers Assessment: Student language development is assessed based on the district guidelines and campus assessment policy. Professional Development: International Baccalaureate Primary Years and Middle Years Programme category trainings Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Cultural Diversity Language integration training Communicating the policy: Campus website Letters Student/parent handbook Staff handbook Family events Reviewing the Policy: The Language Policy is reviewed annually at the beginning of the year by the Jefferson/Longfellow MYP stakeholders. Amendments to the policy will be considered, especially based on IB policy changes, school district policy changes, changes in the school community, or changes in community needs.

Resources: International Baccalaureate Organization (April 2008). Guidelines for Developing a School Language Policy. Accessed August 29, 2017 from www.ibo.org. International Baccalaureate Organization (May 2014). MYP: From Principles into Practice. Accessed August 28, 2017 from www.ibo.org. International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme Subject Brief -- Language acquisition http://www.ibo.org/globalassets/digital-tookit/brochures/myp-brief_language-acquisition_2015.pdf Learning in a Language Other than Mother Tongue in IB Programme. Accessed August 24, 2017 from http://xmltwo.ibo.org/publications/migrated/productionapp.ibo.org/publication/84/part/1/chapter/1.html San Antonio Independent School District Policy E-1 Bilingual. Accessed August 24 from http://nova.saisd.net/storage/uploads/policies/e1_revised_8_2_2014.pdf