Anatomy & Physiology 3 (BHS106A) Details Overview of assessment requirements 1 Quizzes Weight: 30% Due date: Weeks 4, 6 & 10 Each Quiz will open Friday at midday and close the following Friday at midday and an allocated time is allowed for each quiz. Topic: Each quiz will cover topics of the previous weeks (please see details below) One attempt only is allowed. Students are responsible for ensuring they have internet access at the time they complete the quiz. Quiz A 30 minutes Format: 20 multiple choice questions Topics covered: Week 1, 2, 3 and 4 topics Weightage: 10% of overall term grade Quiz B 30 minutes Format: 20 multiple choice questions Topics covered: Week 5 and 6 topics Weightage: 10% of overall term grade Quiz C 30 minutes Format: 20 multiple choice questions Topics covered: Week 7, 8, 9 and 10 topics Weightage: 10% of overall term grade 2 Weight: Due date: Length: Topic: Digital Presentation 30% Week 8 5 minutes Students will prepare a five (5) minute digital presentation based on any one topic from Anatomy and Physiology 3 BHS106A. This may involve producing a recorded video or voice over power point presentation etc. on your chosen topic. Refer to the digital presentation marking rubric document for further details. Please take careful note of the topic that you may have done in Anatomy and Physiology 2 (BHS104A) and see that it is not repeated as it will involve losing marks. V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 1
3 Theory Exam Weight: 40% Due date: End of trimester period Length: 90 minutes + 10 minutes reading time Topic: Written Exam where students will demonstrate theoretical knowledge of digestive, urinary, endocrine, reproductive (male and female) system, embryology, metabolism, nutrition, and fluid electrolyte balance and acidbase homeostasis. This exam may include short and long answer, multiple choices; fill in the blank, diagrams and labeling questions. V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 2
2: Digital Presentation Instructions Students are to choose a topic or one aspect of a concept from week s 1 7 content that they are interested in and prepare a 5 minute presentation that includes audio and visual components. It is recommended students: Video themselves presenting a topic and upload the video file, OR Prepare a power point presentation and do a voice over the slides Technical skills are not a requirement of this assessment. Please do not use specialized software such as Articulate, Camtasia or Prezi. Your lecturer needs to be able to easily view and hear your presentation in order to be able to mark it. There is a YouTube video that shows you how to do a simple voice over on a power point presentation. The address is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uk4cu7uobm Save the file as First name Last name. The presentation should play with both the audio and video as a complete presentation. If it cannot be played with both audio and video components then you will end up losing marks for that component of presentation. Blackboard Tips are also available on how to upload your file for both Windows and Mac users For all queries around the upload of your presentation please contact the Learning Portal Coordinator at Student Services. There is a +/- 10% for the time limit and like a word count this must be adhered to or penalties may apply. A minimum of five references are recommended with two of them from peer reviewed journals. Referencing must be in accordance with the Academic Writing Guide. Students should also refer to the attached Wiki Marking Rubric Document when preparing their presentations. V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 3
BHS106 2: Digital Presentation Marking Rubric Student name: Introduction (3 marks) Needs Work (0-1) Good (1.5-2) Excellent (2.5-3) Introduction not included or the topic and purpose were not clear. Introduced the topic & purpose in an effective manner. Introduced the topic in a way that immediately engaged the audience and communicated the purpose of the presentation effectively Delivery (3 marks) The narrator sounded like he or she read from a script. The pace of delivery interfered with the audience s ability to understand the content. The delivery suggested that the narrator has not practiced the piece and appeared ill prepared. The delivery pace was inconsistent throughout the presentation. The narrator sounded comfortable and appeared to have practiced the piece several times. The delivery pace was appropriate. Words were often not clearly articulate. Grammatical errors interfered with the ability to understand the piece. Words were not always clearly articulated. Incorrect grammar was used in some places throughout the presentation. Words were clearly articulated. Correct grammar was consistently used. Quality of presentation (6 marks) The majority of the presentation contained distracting, background noise. Transitions between different parts of the presentation were not smooth Volume was acceptable, no background noise. Transitions between different parts of the presentation were not smooth Completely smooth transitions throughout the presentation. Appropriate volume. Presentation met the required length (5 minutes) Referencing Copyright notices/ format (3 marks) Presentation significantly exceeded or was shorter than 5 minutes The graphics and images presented don t relate to the audio and distracted from the presentation content (0-2) Not in accordance with the APA guidelines Copyright infringement was evident Presentation was marginally longer or shorter than the required 5 minutes The graphics and images presented related to the audio and enhanced the content being communicated (3-4) Some formatting errors in references No evidence of copyright infringement Graphics and images significantly engaged the audience and enhanced the key points by aiding the explanation of difficult concepts (5-6) Referencing free from errors, complete and according to APA guidelines No evidence of copyright infringement Images not correctly referenced or provided References in some places were omitted All images and appropriate texts were correctly referenced V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 4
Content (10 marks) Irrelevant or inappropriate content was used which detracted from the purpose of the presentation Some of the information presented was inaccurate and no scientific vocabulary was used The presentation abruptly concluded and or no conclusion was provided at all The content was not engaging and or uninformative Presentation contained some creative elements. Relevant and appropriate content was included in the presentation The information presented was accurate and where appropriate, scientific vocabulary was used The presentation reached a natural conclusion but a clear summary was not provided at the end The content was not was especially engaging but reasonably informative. Presentation reflects a high level of creativity and original thought which enhanced the overall presentation Content reflects a high level of understanding of the scientific concepts involved. All information is relevant, accurate and concise. Scientific terminology is clearly explained and enhances the quality of the presentation The presentation included a clear summary at the end The content was extremely engaging and inspired the audience to ask questions. Total /25 Comments: V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 5
Policy & Procedures This course is delivered and administered in accordance with Think policies and procedures. These are available online from the THINK Education Group website: http://www.think.edu.au/aboutthink/think-quality/our-policies Key policies and procedures relating to your studies are: Policy and Procedure Academic Progression Policy and Procedure Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure Attendance Monitoring Policy and Procedure Access and Equity Policy and Procedure Deferral Policy and Procedure Withdrawal Policy and Procedure Grievance Policy and Procedure submission All assignments are either submitted online via learning management system (Moodle) or via Student Services reception, as specified by the lecturer on the learning management system. Assignments received at Student Services reception are date stamped and then passed on to the lecturer for marking. All assignments must include a signed plagiarism declaration, which is included on the official assignment cover sheet available online at http://www.think.edu.au/about-think/think-quality/ourpolicies or outside Student Services reception. return Assignments will be returned within 14 days of the due date. Assignments are either returned in class (for those submitted in hardcopy) or by email (for those submitted online). Assignment extensions All applications for extension must be received prior to the due date, unless there are extenuating circumstances which prevent this. Students will be contacted and informed of the outcome of their application for an extension. Please note that assignments received after the due date without an extension will incur a loss of 10% of the available marks per day for up to 5 days, after 5 days the assignment will no longer be accepted and will receive a mark of zero. Acceptable reasons for applying for an extension include: Medical grounds Unforeseen work commitments Other circumstances outside the student s control Documentary evidence supporting the extension application must be provided. V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 6
Plagiarism Students must comply with the Think policy on plagiarism and academic misconduct, which is outlined in the Think: Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. Plagiarism is the act of using the ideas or writings of another without acknowledging the source. The following instances would be considered plagiarism: Work that is directly copied not enclosed in quotation marks and inappropriately referenced. This applies to whole paragraphs, sentences and significant parts of sentences. If direct quotes are not used but ideas are summarised and the source of the ideas are not acknowledged by referencing them appropriately Where an idea which has been expressed elsewhere is used or developed without acknowledging the author with appropriate referencing It is the student s responsibility to: read and understand the Think policy on plagiarism and academic misconduct read, understand and use the relevant referencing system refrain from any actions that could be deemed plagiarism and academic misconduct sign the plagiarism declaration form on the assignment cover sheet seek help from appropriate sources if required and refer to the academic skills unit available on Moodle for all students (details below). make themselves aware of all the assessment requirements and meet all deadlines Academic skills support There is an academic skills unit available on Moodle which is run by THINK CLASS: Centre for learning and academic skills support. The following topics are covered in this unit: time management introduction to academic language understanding your assignment or analysing the brief working in teams giving presentations report writing essay writing critical thinking note taking skills paragraphing literature reviews research skills plagiarism and paraphrasing referencing V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 7
Grading system All higher education units of study assessed within each course are graded according to the following criteria and grading scales: High Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth relevant research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. The recommended academic referencing system is used consistently and accurately at all times. Distinction D 75-84 Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth relevant research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. The recommended academic referencing system is used consistently and accurately with minimal errors. Credit C 65-74 Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. Competent use of the recommended academic referencing system is evident. Pass P 50-64 Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. Use of the recommended academic referencing system is evident. Fail F 49 or less A Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points. Use of the recommended academic referencing system is not evident. V8.5 August 2016 Think: Colleges Pty Ltd -Page: 8