POLICY No PCD01 Programme/Qualification development, modification and sharing

Similar documents
Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Overview. Contrasts in Current Approaches to Quality Assurance of Universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

Programme Specification

teaching issues 4 Fact sheet Generic skills Context The nature of generic skills

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Programme Specification

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Bachelor of Engineering

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Te Hono ki Toi (Poutiriao)/ Master of Professional Creative Practice [Level 9]

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

e-learning Coordinator

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

An APEL Framework for the East of England

TK1019 NZ DIPLOMA IN ENGINEERING (CIVIL) Programme Information

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Faculty of Social Sciences

Qualification Guidance

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Programme Specification 1

Programme Specification

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Tamwood Language Centre Policies Revision 12 November 2015

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

New Program Process, Guidelines and Template

Consent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011

TRAVEL & TOURISM CAREER GUIDE. a world of career opportunities

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Certificate III in Business (BSB30115)

Qualification handbook

APAC Accreditation Summary Assessment Report Department of Psychology, James Cook University

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

VISION: We are a Community of Learning in which our ākonga encounter Christ and excel in their learning.

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

Master of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

2016 School Performance Information

Programme Specification

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Evaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

Technical Skills for Journalism

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

Programme Specification

Academic Freedom Intellectual Property Academic Integrity

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING THROUGH ONE S LIFETIME

Submission of a Doctoral Thesis as a Series of Publications

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY FACULTYOF EDUCATION THE SECONDARY EDUCATION TRAINING PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

Primary Award Title: BSc (Hons) Applied Paramedic Science PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

value equivalent 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance 5 days pw n/a n/a

Accommodation for Students with Disabilities

Lower and Upper Secondary

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Post-16 Level 1/Level 2 Diploma (Pilot)

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator

Digital Media Literacy

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

OCR Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector Qualification Units

Transcription:

POLICY No PCD01 Programme/Qualification development, modification and sharing Key evaluation questions Programme Qualification development, modification and sharing.docx How well do programmes and activities match the needs of learners and other stakeholders? How effective are governance and management in supporting educational achievement? Key Stakeholders involved in consultation: Strategic Leadership Group, Programme Approval Committee, Te Poutama: Quality, Teaching and Learning, Student Administration Unit 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to provide a framework for the development, sharing, and redevelopment of programmes of study and, where relevant, qualifications. This is to ensure that programmes of study and qualifications: Are academically sound, financially viable and fit for purpose. Are aligned to BoPP s strategic direction and to the needs of the region and learners. Meet NZQA approval and accreditation criteria. Give effect to the Bay of Plenty Tertiary Education Partnership. 2. SCOPE This policy applies to approval of all programmes of study and qualifications owned by Bay of Plenty Polytechnic, across all levels, credit values, funding types and delivery sites, and offered by Bay of Plenty Polytechnic (BoPP). 3. POLICY PRINCIPLES Quality commitment 3.1 BoPP is committed to delivering well designed and vocationally relevant programmes that offer our students valued outcomes including pathways into the workforce and/or further education and capability to contribute to their wider communities. 3.2 BoPP is committed to ensuring the polytechnic has the confidence of its regulating agencies through the excellence of its programme approval and accreditation documentation and quality assurance of its delivery. Programme development 3.3 Qualifications, programmes and/or Training Schemes developed by BoPP will meet the: BoPP Academic Statute, NZQF requirements for graduate outcomes, programme structure, credits and level 1

NZQA requirements for programme structure, learning outcomes, assessment, moderation and stakeholder support TEC/MoE requirements for funding (where appropriate) BoPP assessment of academic soundness, coherency, relevance, and transparency 3.4 Programme/Qualification documentation will use BoPP approved templates and will identify: Programme philosophy, delivery style, site and mode, and assessment approach Programme structure Rules and regulations for admission, enrolment, assessment, progression and graduation Moderation and/or monitoring to maintain academic standards Employment, vocational training and secondary school alignment pathways How the qualification/programme staircases into other qualifications Articulation, cross credit and/or credit recognition arrangements The fit with commitments to Te Waka Hourua, sustainability, globalisation and BoPP Graduate Attributes. 3.5 In developing new programmes/qualifications, developers are encouraged to benchmark the development against similar programme/qualification offerings in New Zealand and overseas as a mechanism for ensuring comparable delivery as well as identifying points of difference of BoPP offerings. 3.6 All new developments and major redevelopments must be accompanied by a completed Business Case specifying likely revenue and costs for development and delivery over a 3-year period. Stakeholder Consultation 3.7 All qualifications and programmes will be developed with input from relevant stakeholders including teaching teams, local industry, iwi and communities. Evidence of, and input from, consultation and the impact this has had on the development will be summarised in the approval documents. 3.8 Training Scheme applications may be supported by relevant feedback from stakeholders. Where the Training Scheme is not associated with an approved BoPP programme, such consultation and evidence of support is a requirement for approval. Sharing programmes with other organisations 3.9 Where BoPP enters into arrangements to collaboratively develop programmes and/or qualifications or to share already approved programmes, the arrangement will be covered by an MoA/MoU as appropriate. The agreement will specify the lead provider that will take responsibility for external approval of the programme/qualification. 3.10 Conditions covering the sharing and use of intellectual property will be specified in the MoA/MoU and must be approved by BoPP Academic Board or delegated authority and signed by the CEO or approved delegate. 2

Programme approval 3.11 All qualifications and programmes of study must be internally approved for financial viability and resourcing by Strategic Leadership Group (SLG) and for academic quality by either Academic Board or its delegated authority. 3.12 Where a programme/qualification or components of the programme are intended for delivery off-shore, the relevant NZQA requirements must be met. 3.13 Where a student requests a programme of study towards a Certificate of Proficiency or Certificate of Personal Interest, these will meet the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) requirements, be documented on the approved form, and approved by the Academic Director. 3.14 All programmes of study must be delivered at sites approved by NZQA and, where relevant, TEC. Site approval is specific for a programme and new sites must be approved by the Academic Board or delegated authority. The Delivery Site Approval template is to be used to assess the quality of the delivery site. Modification to existing programmes 3.15 Changes to approved programmes require formal approval. The type of approval required will depend on the nature of the change to the programme. Major revisions to qualifications and/or programmes that change level, credit value or structure of the qualification or programme will require approval by Programme Approval Committee and NZQA. Minor revisions that do not alter size, level or structure will be approved by Programme Approval Committee (PAC) with notification of the approved change sent to NZQA. 3.16 Changes to the assessment structure of a course within an approved programme that does not impact on learning outcomes, level or credits may be approved by the relevant Programme Cluster Committee (PCC). Once approved the changes must be ratified by PAC. 3.17 Where approved changes impact on current students, they must be advised of the change in writing in a timely manner. Programme resting or discontinuation 3.18 Approval to rest or discontinue a programme of study/qualification must be approved through the Strategic Leadership Group, and Academic Board and be communicated to internal and external stakeholders including industry. Programmes to be discontinued will be notified to NZQA. Programme Records 3.19 Te Poutama will maintain the official Curriculum Directory for each qualification/programme offered by BoPP, including records of all approved changes, in accordance with the Public Records Act. This will contain the approved: 3

Programme Specification and Rules document Capability documents (where relevant) Course descriptors External approvals Self-Evaluations, moderation and monitoring reports Information for Marketing, and Any other documents associated with the programme including contracts for delivery, MoAs/MoUs, site accreditations etc. 3.20 SAU will be responsible for ensuring that set-up of programme data within the student management system adheres to agreed Single Data Return standards, funding and coding conventions. Marketing 3.21 A programme/qualification that has been approved internally but is awaiting approval and accreditation by NZQA may be marketed as approval pending. 3.22 All programme approval documents must include approved marketing materials to assist in the information available to prospective students. Such information must meet any requirements of external organisations such as NZQA, TEC, professional bodies and/or NZ Careers Service. LINKS TO OTHER DOCUMENTS Legislation/Rules Education Act 1989 section 249 Public Records Act, 2005 Tertiary Education Commission, Single Data Return NZQA Guidelines for applying for approval of programmes leading to New Zealand Qualifications at Levels 1-6 on the NZQF and the accreditation of organisations to provide approved programmes NZQA Criteria for the Approval and Accreditation of Degrees and Related Qualifications NZQA Training Scheme Rules NZQA Consent to assess against standards on the Directory of Assessment Standards Rules 2011 NZQA DAS listing and operational rules 2011 Related policies G06 Establishing and Maintaining Relationships with Iwi and Māori Communities RES02 Ownership, management and use of intellectual property A07 Industry, Employer and Professional groups liaison Academic Governance Terms of Reference 4

Processes and procedures PCD01.1 Business Case process PCD01.2 Programme development and approval process PCD01.3 Programme changes process PCD01.4 Delivery site approval PCD01.5 Training scheme approval process PCD01.6 Training Scheme exemptions NZQA chart Guidelines NZQA Guidelines for the approval of programmes leading to NZ Qualifications at levels 1 6 on the NZQF and the accreditation of organisations to provide approved programmes NZQA Degrees and Related Qualifications: Guidelines for Programme Approval and Accreditation to Provide Programmes NZQA Guidelines to the Training Scheme Rules 2012 NZQA changes to programme approvals NZQA Ensuring consistency of qualification outcomes,- a discussion paper January 2011 (NZQA website) G-ACAD-001 Programme design and development principles for qualifications listed on the NZQF Programme Development Strategy V1.0 paper arising from the joint workshop between Bay of Plenty Polytechnic and Waiariki Institute of Technology staff. Forms F-ACAD-041b Approval of programme curriculum template F-ACAD-048 Approval for post TRoQ programme development F-ACAD-0478a Business Case Approval for new programme development F-ACAD-052 Certificate of Proficiency Approval Request F-ACAD-037 Delivery site approval application F-ACAD-005 Training scheme approval form F-ACAD-081 Programme change request School Capability document DEFINITIONS Accreditation Consent to Assess Confirms that a provider is deemed capable of delivering an approved, programme of study leading to a qualification. A programme of study must be approved if a provider wishes to be accredited by NZQA to deliver it. A provider may seek accreditation to deliver another organisation s approved qualification and/or programme (NZQA definition - modified). Confirms that a provider is capable of assessing against standards. A provider must have consent to assess for all unit standards assessed in a course before obtaining course approval and accreditation. (NZQA definition) 5

Programme of Study An approved programme is a coherent arrangement of learning or training that is based on clear and consistent aims, content, outcomes and assessment practices, which leads to a qualification listed on the NZQF. The term programme may be used. Qualification An award recognising the successful completion of a prescribed programme of study. Valued outcomes Educational outcomes that are valued by students, iwi, industry and community and that may include pathways into the workforce, further education, capability to contribute to a wider community, being a global citizen, gaining an enjoyable tertiary experience, or increased citizenship. DOCUMENT CONTROL Approving body: Responsibility: First point of contact: Academic Board Academic Director Te Poutama First approved: February 2016 This version approved: February 2016 Applies from: February 2016 Review due: February 2019 Version no: 1.0 (replaces part of policy AC- 01) 6