Formation of Active Attitude for Learning and of Habits of Scientific Thinking by Project Based Team Learning at Kanazawa Institute of Technology

Similar documents
MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

Lab 1 - The Scientific Method

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Effectiveness of Electronic Dictionary in College Students English Learning

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Innovative Methods for Teaching Engineering Courses

Prototype Development of Integrated Class Assistance Application Using Smart Phone

Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Demmert/Klein Experiment: Additional Evidence from Germany

Writing Research Articles

Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

Geo Risk Scan Getting grips on geotechnical risks

Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy

CSC200: Lecture 4. Allan Borodin

Writing a composition

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening

Let s think about how to multiply and divide fractions by fractions!

Patterns for Adaptive Web-based Educational Systems

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

HEROIC IMAGINATION PROJECT. A new way of looking at heroism

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

Distributed Weather Net: Wireless Sensor Network Supported Inquiry-Based Learning

Application of Multimedia Technology in Vocabulary Learning for Engineering Students

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

GROUP COMPOSITION IN THE NAVIGATION SIMULATOR A PILOT STUDY Magnus Boström (Kalmar Maritime Academy, Sweden)

Software Security: Integrating Secure Software Engineering in Graduate Computer Science Curriculum

Language Acquisition Chart

Rule-based Expert Systems

Success Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

By Merrill Harmin, Ph.D.

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Laboratory Notebook Title: Date: Partner: Objective: Data: Observations:

A Study of Video Effects on English Listening Comprehension

Mathematics subject curriculum

Guidelines for drafting the participant observation report

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Reasons Influence Students Decisions to Change College Majors

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Name Class Date. Graphing Proportional Relationships

THE CONSENSUS PROCESS

Notes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course (Deciding What to Design) 1

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

ADDIE MODEL THROUGH THE TASK LEARNING APPROACH IN TEXTILE KNOWLEDGE COURSE IN DRESS-MAKING EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

APA Basics. APA Formatting. Title Page. APA Sections. Title Page. Title Page

Lip reading: Japanese vowel recognition by tracking temporal changes of lip shape

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Life Imitates Lit: A Road Trip to Cultural Understanding. Dr. Patricia Hamilton, Department of English

WHY SOLVE PROBLEMS? INTERVIEWING COLLEGE FACULTY ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF PROBLEM SOLVING

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Teaching a Laboratory Section

STT 231 Test 1. Fill in the Letter of Your Choice to Each Question in the Scantron. Each question is worth 2 point.

Lecturing Module

What is Thinking (Cognition)?

A Case Study: News Classification Based on Term Frequency

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

CROSS COUNTRY CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

IMPROVING ICT SKILLS OF STUDENTS VIA ONLINE COURSES. Rozita Tsoni, Jenny Pange University of Ioannina Greece

Practical Integrated Learning for Machine Element Design

On-Line Data Analytics

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

THE EFFECTS OF TEACHING THE 7 KEYS OF COMPREHENSION ON COMPREHENSION DEBRA HENGGELER. Submitted to. The Educational Leadership Faculty

Laporan Penelitian Unggulan Prodi

Keystone Algebra 1 Open Ended Practice

Space Travel: Lesson 2: Researching your Destination

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

MODULE 4 Data Collection and Hypothesis Development. Trainer Outline

Artwork and Drama Activities Using Literature with High School Students

P. Belsis, C. Sgouropoulou, K. Sfikas, G. Pantziou, C. Skourlas, J. Varnas

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)

Multimedia Courseware of Road Safety Education for Secondary School Students

TabletClass Math Geometry Course Guidebook

Spring 2012 MECH 3313 THERMO-FLUIDS LABORATORY

Human Factors Computer Based Training in Air Traffic Control

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

Report on organizing the ROSE survey in France

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

E-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Introduction to Forensics: Preventing Fires in the First Place. A Distance Learning Program Presented by the FASNY Museum of Firefighting

SURVIVING ON MARS WITH GEOGEBRA

Interpreting Graphs Middle School Science

Empowering Students Learning Achievement Through Project-Based Learning As Perceived By Electrical Instructors And Students

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND STATISTICAL TOOLS

South Carolina English Language Arts

EFYE conference Improving learning competences

MGT/MGP/MGB 261: Investment Analysis

Thesis-Proposal Outline/Template

1. M. Sc. Program objectives

Transcription:

Formation of Active Attitude for Learning and of Habits of Scientific Thinking by Project Based Team Learning at Kanazawa Institute of Technology Shigehiko Furuya, Masako Shin, Eiichi Kamei, Eiichi Sentoku Kanazawa Institute of Technology ABSTRACT Fundamental Laboratory for Creative Activity(FLCA) I,II and III with a style of project based team learning are set up as required subjects in freshman and sophomore year. These FLCA courses have four purposes. First is to make students understand a usual experimental process for solving a problem. Second is to make students accustom to scientific thinking and investigation of scientific journals for solving problems. Third is to make students keep a conventional style and several rules for scientific reports in their mind. Fourth is to train students for leadership and personal/interpersonal skills. The most characteristic features of FLCA are that students can select freely a team experiment theme within familiar phenomena encountered in their daily life and must carry out their experiment by themselves. Instructors are just adviser in these courses. These are very different from usual experimental courses in which experimental themes and methods are fixed. The class consists of 140 to 280 students and 4 to 8 instructors. Each instructor takes care of 4 to 6 teams consisted of 4 to 6 students. Moreover 6 to 12 student staffs assist the class. It was clarified from the results of the questionnaire for FLCA III that the characteristic features of FLCA were very effective for the formation of active attitude for learning and of habits of scientific thinking. The goals to be achieved in each FLCA course, the operation of class, the support system of class and an example of experiment carried out in FLCA III were also introduced. KEYWORDS active attitude, scientific thinking, project based team learning, support system Introduction Institutional goal of Kanazawa Institute of Technology (KIT) is to produce engineers who can make well-thought decisions and act on them for the benefit of mankind. This goal means competent engineers who can find out and solve important problems by themselves. Engineers like this must have sufficient scientific knowledge, habits of scientific thinking, leadership and personal/interpersonal skills. Of course, their attitude for learning and life must be active.

It is natural that freshmen do not have sufficient scientific knowledge. However, following problems besides this are very remarkable for recent freshmen at KIT: 1. They are accustomed to be given a problem and have never found out a problem by themselves. 2. Of course, they seldom think problems scientifically and have never investigated scientific journals for solving problems. 3. Their basic knowledge of high school level in physics and chemistry is vague and they are not familiar with experiments for those. 4. They cannot take their notes adequately and cannot write scientific reports logically. Namely, in order to learn smoothly subjects in their major area and reach the institutional goal, they need to improve their present various abilities and passive attitude for learning as soon as possible. From these reasons, three courses called Fundamental Laboratory for Creative Activity I,II and III (hereafter FLCA I, II and III) are set up as required subjects having purposes of improvement of freshmen s various abilities and passive attitude for learning[1][2]. These courses have a style of project based team learning over 15 weeks. FLCA I and II are set up in freshman year and FLCA III in sophomore year, respectively. Accordingly, all about 3300 students in freshman and sophomore year must attend these classes. The objective of this report is to introduce the goals, the characteristics and the operation of these courses. It has also been intended to clarify the educational effects obtained by the implementation of these courses. Goals to be achieved in the each FLCA course These FLCA courses have four purposes. First is to make students understand a usual experimental process for solving problems. Second is to make students accustom to scientific thinking and investigation of scientific journals for solving problems. Third is to make students keep in their mind conventional styles and several rules for scientific reports. Fourth is to train students for leadership and personal/interpersonal skills. Among these, the second purpose is the most important, because such attitude is necessary for students learning at university. In order to accomplish above four purposes, things needed for carrying out experiments and writing reports for experimental results were divided into 12 items. Moreover 12 items were divided into 3 pairs according to the grade of difficulty. Then each pair was distributed to the each course of FLCA I, II and III as the goals to be achieved by students, respectively. Furthermore, Leadership and personal/interpersonal skills are trained by the project based team learning in these courses. Subject matters in FLCA I are the observation of the phenomenon selected as experimental theme, safety in experiments and accuracy in measurements. FLCA II is related to the design of accurate measurement method. In FLCA III, influences of various factors on the phenomenon are evaluate quantitatively. The goals to be achieved in FLCA I is as follows: (1) Students can carry out experiment safely with sufficient caution. (2) Students can show results as values with correct units. (3) Students can describe observation results using both of drawing and sentence. (4) Students can graph experimental results and explain characteristics of results.

The goals to be achieved in FLCA II is as follows: (1) Students can observe and measure accurately characteristics of a phenomenon. (2) Students can use appropriately experimental instruments and apparatuses. (3) Students can describe intelligibly experimental methods. (4) Students can gather proper information about the experimental theme by the investigation of literatures on their experiment theme. The goals to be achieved in FLCA III is as follows: (1) Students can find out the factors which influence a phenomenon and can plan the appropriate experiments to clarify the influence of various factors on the phenomenon. (2) Students can design proper and accurate experimental methods. (3) Students can apply their experience and scientific knowledge to the consideration of experimental results. (4) Students can make a brief report with standard style consisted of introduction, samples used and measurements, results, discussion, summary and references. Characteristics and operation of FCLA courses The most characteristic features of these courses are that students can select freely a team experimental theme and must carry out their experiment by themselves as a rule. In this point of view, FLCA is different from usual experimental courses in which experimental themes and methods are fixed. However when considering the present abilities of students as mentioned above, the experimental themes related to familiar phenomena encountered in their daily life such as drying process of laundry, baking process of pan cake, cooking process of spaghetti etc. are recommended to students. These kinds of experiment themes work effective in the increase of students motivation for carrying out of their experiment, because students are interested in and know well the phenomenon selected as experimental theme. Experimental theme has to be admitted by instructors. Only simple or difficult themes are rejected at this time. Moreover, they never force experiment themes, samples to be used and measurement methods on students. Apparently instructors behave just as adviser in these courses. However, in order to guide the experiment to right direction, it is very important that they watch always progress of students experiment and give diligently their adequate suggestions to students. As an example, subjects and related students activities in each week for FLCA III are tabulated in Table 1. As shown in this table, this course is divided into seven parts such as determination of team theme, establishment of experimental model, establishment of experimental and measurement methods, poster presentation for experimental method established, quantitative estimation of influences of various factors on a phenomenon, preparation of experimental report and oral presentation. In these courses, students have usually two assignments such as drawing up of the experimental plan for next week and investigation of literatures on their experiment theme. In addition to those, student sometimes must send in the part of their experimental report such as introduction, experimental, and results and discussion. Instructors read assignments and the part of their report, give their comments to students and correct the part of their report. The classes consist of 140 to 280 students and 4 to 8 instructors. Each instructor takes care of 4 to 6 teams consisted of 4 to 6 students. Moreover, 6 to 8 student staffs assist the class.

These large classes are managed without any difficulties by means of several systems such as a lending/return service system for experimental apparatuses and data bases of utilizable apparatuses and of basic theories of high school level in physics and chemistry[3]. This lending/return service system is the system that student stuffs prepare apparatuses required for the students experiment before the time for class, according to the request of students. Hence, students must request those by the day before their class, in order to operate smoothly this system. Maintenance, cleaning and regulation of the apparatuses and the experimental room are also student staffs role as well as teaching students how to use apparatuses. Team themes selected by students include many different things. Following is an example of theme in FLCA Ⅲ. It is titled Method not to Get Wet with Rain. The purpose of this team was to clarify the effect of an umbrella in rain, because they got wet with rain, even though they put up their umbrella. This team made a simple model by which rainfall could be reappeared in laboratory. Then they observed how people got wet with rain using the model and found that important 6 factors which influenced on getting wet were average rainfall, wind velocity, height and angle putting up umbrella, and size and shape of umbrella. As the results of trial and error, they made the final experimental model shown in Figure 1 in which polyurethane sponge was used as a person. This model consists of two parts such as the rainfall part which moves in connection with the moving velocity of the sponge and the rectifier part of wind. The rainfall and the velocity of wind in this model are changeable respectively. The amount of getting wet can evaluate quantitatively from the weight of rainfall absorbed in the sponge. They carried out their experiment using this model and deduced their conclusion for method not to getting wet with rain. Table 1 Subjects and related students activities in each week for FLCA III Week Subjects Students Activities 1 To determine team theme within familiar phenomena encountered in Determination of team theme 2 daily life through the discussion in the team. 3 Establishment of reappearance of the selected phenomenon in a laboratory 4 and observation of the phenomenon 5 Test of quantitative estimation methods of influences of 6 factors on the 6 phenomenon To establish simple experimental model for the phenomenon. To clarify experimentally 6 factors which influence the phenomenon To establish methods by which influences of 6 factors on the phenomenon can be estimated quantitatively. To select and prepare proper apparatuses. 7 Preparation of poster presentation To prepare the poster for presentation after summarizing results. 8 Poster presentation 9 10 11 12 13 Quantitative estimation of influences of factors on the phenomenon by means of the improved experimental method 14 Preparation of the experimental report 15 Oral presentation To listen to presentations. To consider improvements of experimental methods through discussions for useful comments in the poster presentation. To estimate quantitatively influences of factors on the phenomenon after confirming the reappearance of the phenomenon and the precision of measurement values for the improved experimental method. To prepare the experimental report consisted of introduction, experimental, results, discussion, summary and references.

Figure 1. Experimental model. Consideration of Educational effect of FLCA courses In Table 2, contents of the questionnaire which was used the survey for students abilities and attitude after FLCA III course are shown. Each question in the questionnaire has two types of answers such as yes or no except for the question 5 having three types of answers. Furthermore, percentages of each answer to each question in Table 2 are given in Figure 2. As can be seen in Figure 2, 78% of students enjoy their experiment. In addition to this, 80% of students answered that they played their role in the process of team experiment. These facts suggest that students take part positively in the team experiment with their pleasure. This also means the change in their learning posture from passive to active. Moreover, it is obvious from the answers to the question 5 that 74% of students set up the working hypothesis based on some evidences. On the other hand, it is clear from the answers to question 3 that students are not good at investigation of literatures on their experiment theme. As a reason for this, it is considered that students in sophomore year still do not have the sufficient knowledge of technical terms on their theme and of scientific journals to be investigated. As the educational effect in FLCA III course, the apparent change of students attitude for learning from passive to active was observed. Namely, increasing the interest in their theme, the investigation of scientific journals on the theme changed into more concrete one and their thinking also changed into more logical and scientific one. Furthermore, they used instruments by their own efforts according to manuals for the usage of instruments and made their experimental apparatuses by themselves without any experience of handwork. Thus, it is clear that most students attitude for learning changes desirably, if opportunity to think problems scientifically by themselves is provided. As mentioned above, students can select freely the team experiment theme within familiar phenomena encountered in their daily life and must carry out their experiment by themselves in FLCA courses. This method for the selection of experiment theme is effective in the increase of students motivation for carrying out of their experiment, because students are interested in their theme and know well the phenomenon selected by them. Besides this, carrying out of their experiment by themselves is also effective in the formation of their active attitude for learning and of their habits of scientific thinking. Because if they do not investigate literatures related their experiment and do not think about their experiment based on those, their experiment does not proceed to right direction. From these reasons, it is considered that students attitude for learning changes gradually passive to active and their habits of scientific thinking is also formed gradually in the learning process of three FLCA courses.

Question number Table 2 Contents of the questionnaire for the experiment in FLCA III course.. Question Answer 1 Could you enjoy the experiment? A1 2 Could you played your role in the team, A1 when the experiment is carried out? 3 Are you good at investigation of literatures A1 on the experiment theme? 4 Was scientific information investigated useful A1 for carrying out the experiment? 5 Based on the principle and A1 What reason did you set up the working the law related the theme hypothesis based on? Based on observation A3 Without knowing why 1 2 3 4 A1 A3 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage of each answer Figure 2. Percentages of answers from students to each question in the questionnaire However, it should be took notice that these courses have educational effect only when students find their pleasure for thinking the theme scientifically with their continuous high motivation. In order to make students attitude change like this, it is important that instructors enjoy the experiments and the scientific thinking on the themes with students. Because students are apt to lose their interest in their theme, when instructors are indifferent to their experiment and do not give any suggestions to them. On the contrary to this, when instructors think that their theme is very interesting and give proper suggestions to them, students carry out eagerly their experiment with interest and pleasure. Namely, it is necessary in this type of learning that instructors try to find out interesting point in their experiment, watch always progress of their experiment and give diligently adequate advices to students. REFERENCES

[1] Setsuo IWATA et al., Improvement of Global Skills using a Comprehensive Learning Session in a Creative Experiments Class, Proceedings of 2010 Japanese Society for Engineering Education Annual conference, 2010, pp 28-29. [2] Kenji HAMABE et al., Basic Scholastic Ability Improvement by Self-Actualization-type Active Learning Lessons in Creative Experimental Course, Proceedings of 2010 Japanese Society for Engineering Education Annual conference, 2010, pp 30-31. [3] Takashi YOSHIMOTO et al., Construction of a Database for Supporting Fundamental lab for Creative Activity, Proceedings of 2011 Japanese Society for Engineering Education Annual conference, 2011, pp 124-125. Biographical Information Dr. Shigehiko Furuya is an Associate Professor of Academic Foundations Programs Practical Engineering Education Program at Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ishikawa, Japan. He specializes in Practical Engineering Education Program. Dr.Masako Shin is a lecturer of Academic Foundations Programs Practical Engineering Education Program at Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ishikawa, Japan. She specializes in Practical Engineering Education Program. Dr. Eiichi Kamei is a Professor of Academic Foundations Programs Practical Engineering Education Program at Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ishikawa, Japan. He specializes in Practical Engineering Education Program. Dr.Eiichi Sentoku is a Professor and Chair of Practical Engineering Education Program at Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ishikawa, Japan. He specializes in Practical Engineering Education Program. Corresponding author Dr. Shigehiko FURUYA Kanazawa Institute of Technology 7-1 Ohgigaoka noichi Ishikawa, Japan 921-8501 +81-76-248-1100 furuya@neptune.kanazawa-it.ac.jp