Factors affecting English listening and speaking abilities of non-english major students: taking engineering students as an example

Similar documents
Running head: METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES FOR ACADEMIC LISTENING 1. The Relationship between Metacognitive Strategies Awareness

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

DOES OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION AMONG GIFTED STUDENTS?

Monitoring Metacognitive abilities in children: A comparison of children between the ages of 5 to 7 years and 8 to 11 years

Saeed Rajaeepour Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences. Seyed Ali Siadat Professor, Department of Educational Sciences

STUDENT SATISFACTION IN PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN GWALIOR

Textbook Evalyation:

Analyzing the Usage of IT in SMEs

PREDISPOSING FACTORS TOWARDS EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE AMONG STUDENTS IN LAGOS UNIVERSITIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNSELLING

International Conference on Current Trends in ELT

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 ( 2014 ) International Conference on Current Trends in ELT

BASIC EDUCATION IN GHANA IN THE POST-REFORM PERIOD

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Teachers Attitudes Toward Mobile Learning in Korea

The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of English Article Usage in L2 Writing

Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

What do Medical Students Need to Learn in Their English Classes?

Difficulties in Academic Writing: From the Perspective of King Saud University Postgraduate Students

A STUDY ON AWARENESS ABOUT BUSINESS SCHOOLS AMONG RURAL GRADUATE STUDENTS WITH REFERENCE TO COIMBATORE REGION

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

Empirical research on implementation of full English teaching mode in the professional courses of the engineering doctoral students

Generic Skills and the Employability of Electrical Installation Students in Technical Colleges of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.

The Socially Structured Possibility to Pilot One s Transition by Paul Bélanger, Elaine Biron, Pierre Doray, Simon Cloutier, Olivier Meyer

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

The Impact of Learning Styles on the Iranian EFL Learners' Input Processing

VOL. 3, NO. 5, May 2012 ISSN Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences CIS Journal. All rights reserved.

THE IMPACT OF STATE-WIDE NUMERACY TESTING ON THE TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS

Development and Innovation in Curriculum Design in Landscape Planning: Students as Agents of Change

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): A Critical and Comparative Perspective

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Gender and socioeconomic differences in science achievement in Australia: From SISS to TIMSS

CONFERENCE PAPER NCVER. What has been happening to vocational education and training diplomas and advanced diplomas? TOM KARMEL

Application of Multimedia Technology in Vocabulary Learning for Engineering Students

ScienceDirect. Noorminshah A Iahad a *, Marva Mirabolghasemi a, Noorfa Haszlinna Mustaffa a, Muhammad Shafie Abd. Latif a, Yahya Buntat b

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

The Implementation of Interactive Multimedia Learning Materials in Teaching Listening Skills

Investigation and Analysis of College Students Cognition in Science and Technology Competitions

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

GROUP COMPOSITION IN THE NAVIGATION SIMULATOR A PILOT STUDY Magnus Boström (Kalmar Maritime Academy, Sweden)

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 237 ( 2017 )

Effect of Cognitive Apprenticeship Instructional Method on Auto-Mechanics Students

UNDERSTANDING THE INITIAL CAREER DECISIONS OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT GRADUATES IN SRI LANKA

English for Specific Purposes World ISSN Issue 34, Volume 12, 2012 TITLE:

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Alpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are:

Shelters Elementary School

The Effects of Strategic Planning and Topic Familiarity on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Written Performance in TBLT

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Enhancing Students Understanding Statistics with TinkerPlots: Problem-Based Learning Approach

Corpus Linguistics (L615)

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

A study of the capabilities of graduate students in writing thesis and the advising quality of faculty members to pursue the thesis

Running head: LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF UNIVERSITY REGISTERS 1

Algebra 2- Semester 2 Review

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

Multiple Intelligence Theory into College Sports Option Class in the Study To Class, for Example Table Tennis

Understanding Games for Teaching Reflections on Empirical Approaches in Team Sports Research

ROLE OF SELF-ESTEEM IN ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILLS IN ADOLESCENT LEARNERS

A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening

Empowering Students Learning Achievement Through Project-Based Learning As Perceived By Electrical Instructors And Students

Roya Movahed 1. Correspondence: Roya Movahed, English Department, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.

TIMSS ADVANCED 2015 USER GUIDE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL DATABASE. Pierre Foy

Reasons Influence Students Decisions to Change College Majors

Loudoun Scholarship Application

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Teachers development in educational systems

Sheila M. Smith is Assistant Professor, Department of Business Information Technology, College of Business, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

Accessing Higher Education in Developing Countries: panel data analysis from India, Peru and Vietnam

The Use of Statistical, Computational and Modelling Tools in Higher Learning Institutions: A Case Study of the University of Dodoma

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Australia s tertiary education sector

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES ISSN: X Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), ; 2017

Metacognitive Strategies that Enhance Reading Comprehension in the Foreign Language University Classroom

Mathematics subject curriculum

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

User Education Programs in Academic Libraries: The Experience of the International Islamic University Malaysia Students

State University of New York at Buffalo INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS PSC 408 Fall 2015 M,W,F 1-1:50 NSC 210

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Review in ICAME Journal, Volume 38, 2014, DOI: /icame

PSIWORLD Keywords: self-directed learning; personality traits; academic achievement; learning strategies; learning activties.

A Note on Structuring Employability Skills for Accounting Students

Transcription:

World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education Vol.13, No.4, 2015 2015 WIETE Factors affecting English listening and speaking abilities of non-english major students: taking engineering students as an example Zhibo Liu Qingdao Vocational and Technical College of Hotel Management Qingdao, People s Republic of China ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to explore the factors related to engineering students English listening and speaking ability. Hence, 147 engineering students were investigated by a survey questionnaire. The results of the survey were as follows: 1) there was no significant difference between male and female students in listening and speaking ability; 2) there was no significant influence of geographical factors and parental factors, such as parents education level and parents level of capacity in listening and speaking; 3) the average values of five objective factors that affect listening and speaking ability are from high to low: the social environment, English teachers, teaching resources, listening and speaking teaching materials and curriculum settings; and 4) the average value of the four subjective factors affecting listening and speaking ability were from high to low: learning attitude, learning motivation, learning method and strategy, and autonomous learning situation. INTRODUCTION With the advances of the teaching reform in college English in China, more scholars have undertaken research on the factors affecting English listening and speaking abilities from various aspects, and typically they come up with several results. For example, Lv s studies on the perception and attitudes of public speaking in English classes and found that there remain some problems or doubts, including the percentage of peer assessment being counted towards the total course grade and the validity and reliability of research [1]. Tai s study of college oral English test scores based on data mining technology puts forwards an obvious thesis that English study requires diligent training and, in particular, frequent training in spoken English [2]. Hu studied the main affective factors influencing the students English listening and speaking ability [3]. Though these studies and analyses take an active part in pushing forward the teaching of college English, they do not cover much in the current learning situation of English for engineering students. It would be quite beneficial to guide English teaching in engineering colleges and upgrade English listening and speaking skills, if the current learning situation, especially, the acquisition of listening and speaking skills, was better understood. The aim of this article is to find the related factors that affect English listening and speaking abilities of engineering students by investigating their current learning situation and undertaking multivariable research. Finally, it presents effective ways and teaching strategies for advancing English listening and speaking abilities through analysing the subjective and objective factors that influence the acquisition of English listening and speaking abilities among engineering students. THE INVESTIGATION OF CURRENT LEARNING SITUATION OF ENGLISH AMONG ENGINEERING STUDENTS It has been a problem for a long time that what the students hear in their listening practice only acts as a meaningless propagation of sound, because the basic teaching model of college English established by teachers is playing audio cassettes and students passively listening. It is difficult for students to understand the information they hear, let alone express its contents. For students, the input and output of the information through listening and speaking are closely related. Listening is the basic way to obtain language information, and speaking externalises and presents the obtained language knowledge and skills in communication. However, since the in-class time is limited, students rarely have the opportunity to take up 593

communication activities, which results in their lagging ability to speaking. Therefore, listening is the most difficult part for students to adapt to, and speaking in English is the skill that they want to master at university. Influenced by the College Entrance Examination, and College English Test Band 4 and Band 6, most students learn English to deal with the examinations, so they pay too much attention to the accumulation of words and grammar. In this case, they perform well in the examination, but suffer from lagging behind in English listening and speaking abilities, thus, undermining the development of the language output ability. Students, especially engineering students, who prefer rational thinking and logical reasoning, are more likely to engage in mathematical and logical activities in science and engineering learning, rather than in foreign language learning. As far as foreign language learning is concerned, this results in them attaching much greater importance to grammatical competence rather than pragmatic competence, so they are better at English reading and writing than listening and speaking, and prefer syntax and discourse structure analysis. In addition, students have fewer chances to listen to English rather than to read, and also have few opportunities to communicate verbally in English. They get most of their language knowledge through visual means instead of through audio channels. As a result, students often encounter communication failure because of massive pragmatic mistakes. RESEARCH DESIGN Research Theme Assuming that social and psychological factors will affect the students listening and speaking skills, one still needs specific data to come to conclusions; one does not know exactly the degree of influence of each factor, nor which factor is the most influential. As a result, one generally divides the factors that affect students English listening and speaking ability into objective and subjective factors. To be more specific, objective factors include gender, region, family, social environment, courses, teachers, textbooks, learning resources, etc., whereas, subjective factors include learning interest, learning motivation, learning attitude, learning methods or strategies, autonomous learning ability, etc. A survey questionnaire was used in this study to investigate the factors that affect the English listening and speaking skills of engineering students, in order to answer the prevailing question: What are the factors that affect the English listening and speaking skills of engineering students? This is to find out whether subjective factors, such as learning interest, learning motivation, learning attitude, learning methods or strategies and self-learning ability, are correlated with their listening and speaking abilities. And also, whether objective factors, such as geographical factors, family factors, gender factors and school factors affect students English listening and speaking abilities. Finally, whether there exists a significant gender difference between boys and girls in listening and speaking abilities. Research Subjects The survey was conducted in Qingdao Vocational and Technical College of Hotel Management with 150 freshmen from three common engineering majors selected as samples: namely, Construction Engineering Management, Computer Software Technology and Engineering Project Supervisor. Questionnaires were distributed during an English class, which ensured an authentic and valid survey. 150 students took part in the survey and 147 valid questionnaires were returned. Table 1 presents specific information on the students. From the table, one can see that there was a great disparity between males and females. The boys proportion was as high as 78. 9%, and the vast majority of them were from the places below prefecture-level, including rural areas. The students from rural areas account for a third of the total number of students. Most of their parents received middle or high school education, accounting for 32.7% and 38.1%, respectively. Research Methods Quantitative research was applied in this study and data were collected through the questionnaire. The questionnaire, with a total of 50 questions (options), can be divided into two parts. The first part focuses on the personal information of students, including the major studied, gender, hometown, the education level and English skills of their parents. The second part is designed to collect information on the social environment, curriculum arrangements of English listening and speaking, use of textbooks of English listening and speaking, English teachers, teaching resources, learning attitude, learning motivation, learning methods or strategies and autonomous learning situation. The questionnaire was based on O Malley and Chamot s learning strategies questionnaire to make a measurement table, which takes into consideration the students actual situation [4]. The first part, with six options, provides multiple choice questions. The second part includes 44 questions, of which are 42 multiple choice questions and two subjective questions. Multiple choice questions are employed with a Likert five-level scale and the data from the questionnaire was analysed by using SPSS 21.0 statistics software. Reliability analysis produced a Cronbach coefficient of 0.8943, which is higher than 0.70, indicating that the questionnaire was reliable. 594

Table 1: Basic information on students. Frequency Percentage Gender Male 116 78.9 Female 31 21.1 Major Construction Engineering Management 50 34 Engineering Project Supervisor 50 34 Computer Software Technology 47 32 Region of hometown First-tier city 3 2 Provincial capital 17 11.6 Prefecture-level city 42 28.6 County-level city 36 24.5 Rural area 49 33.3 Parents education Doctor or Master 0 0 level Bachelor or junior college 40 27.2 High school 48 32.7 Junior school 56 38.1 Primary school or below 3 2 RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Academic Performance of English Listening and Speaking Table 2 shows that 147 students took part in the survey (some variables are less than 147 because of the default value). The academic performance of listening and speaking in the final examination in the second semester of 2013-2014 was adopted in the analysis (the academic performance, which is sincere and valid, represents the learning situation of one year for the freshmen). Table 2: Academic performance of English listening and speaking. Construction Engineering Management Engineering Project Supervisor Computer Software Technology Variable Number Average SD Number Average SD Number Average SD Listening 50 17.52 3.13 50 13.48 4.64 47 15.7447 3.08903 Speaking 50 8.54 1.27 50 8.58 0.76 47 8.4468 0.90430 Total score 25.56 5.08 22.52 4.75 24.2340 3.09426 The test questions were from the question bank of the Department. The listening test, with wireless broadcast, was conducted under strict invigilation, and different parts of the papers were marked by different teachers in an enclosed environment. As for the speaking test, there were two examiners in a group, and the topic was selected by a draw. The final score was the average of the respective score given by two examiners. Three typical majors, Construction Engineering Management, Engineering Project Supervisor and Computer Software Technology, were selected. In the examination, the listening part comprised 20 points of the total score, while the speaking part was 10 points. The two parts make up 30 points in the whole examination. The Influence of Objective Factors In this article, the author discusses the objective factors that affect students listening and speaking skills in two parts. In the first part, the author discusses the influence of uncontrollable natural factors including gender, hometown and family, which exert on students listening and speaking skills, while the second part focuses on the influence of nonnatural factors, such as social environment, English teachers, teaching resources, textbooks and curriculum for students listening and speaking skills. The data show that most students generally agree with various objective factors affecting their English listening and speaking skills. The Influence of Natural Factors Natural factors that affect students English listening and speaking skills include gender, geographical origin, family and other variables. Apart from gender, geographical origin, family and other variables can be scored between 0 and 5; the higher the score is, the more advanced is the place that the student comes from or the higher is their parents education level. Details are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3 shows that there was no significant difference between boys and girls in the overall score of listening and speaking. The average total scores were 24.08 and 24.19, respectively. 595

Table 3: Statistical table of groups of male and female. Group statistics Score Question 1 N Average SD SE mean Listening Male 116 15.52 4.02 0.373 Female 31 15.81 4.20 0.754 Speaking Male 116 8.56 0.99 0.092 Female 31 8.39 1.02 0.184 Total Score Male 116 24.08 4.61 0.428 Female 31 24.19 4.47 0.802 In Table 4, the Levene homogeneity test of variance shows that the significant probability (Sig.) of two variables are 0.460 and 0.437, respectively, higher than 0.05, which shows that the variances of the two variables in each group is equal. At same time, values of Sig. (double sided) are greater than 0.05, suggesting that there is no significant difference between boys and girls in their academic performance of listening and speaking. Table 4: Independent sample test between male and female groups. Levene test of variance equations T test of mean equations F Sig t df Sig (both sides) Listening Equal variance 548 460 353 145 725 Unequal variance 344 45.75 733 Speaking Equal variance 519 473 860 145 391 Unequal variance 844 46.14 403 Total Equal variance 514 475 125 145 901 score Unequal variance 128 48.46 899 Table 5 indicates that the F value of region, parents education level and their English proficiency is 1.38, 1.16 and 0.90, respectively, and Sig. value is 0.157, 0.310 and 0.573, respectively. The fact that all significant levels are greater than 0.05 indicates that there is no significant difference in academic performance concerning factors, such as region, family factors including parents educational level and their English proficiency. Table 5: Test result of single factor variance (ANOVA). Sum of squares df Mean square F Sig. Region Between groups 27.25 17 1.60 1.38 0.157 Within groups 149.94 129 1.16 Total 177.18 146 Education level of parents English proficiency of parents Between groups 13.84 17 814 1.16 0.310 Within groups 90.87 129 704 Total 104.71 146 Between groups 14.18 17 834 0.90 0.573 Within groups 119.29 129 925 Total 133.46 146 It can be seen natural factors, including gender, region, family and other variables, do not exert much influence on the academic performance of a student s English listening and speaking. Though this conclusion is different from research conclusions of other scholars, it probably reflects the English learning features of engineering students to some extent. The Influence of Non-natural Factors In the questionnaire, there were five variables, which concerned non-natural factors affecting the English listening and speaking ability of students. The top mark for each variable is five. The higher the score is, the greater influence it will exert on students. Descriptive statistics (in Table 6) show that the mean value of the five variables, which are the objective factors influencing the listening and speaking skills, can be arranged from high to low in this order: social environment (M = 3.87), English teachers (M = 3.85), teaching resources (M = 3.48), textbooks of listening and speaking (M = 3.45) and the curriculum (M = 3.16). All the value of variables surpass the critical value (mean value M > 3.00), which explains that students agree with the influence of objective factors on the listening and speaking skills, and attach greatest importance to social environment in the influence considering future career and the demand of social development. The following factors are teachers vocational skills and professional level and, then, the teaching resources available and curriculum. 596

Table 6: Descriptive statistics. N Average SD Curriculum arrangement 147 3.16 0.340 Textbooks of listening and speaking 146 3.45 0.459 English teachers 147 3.85 0.694 Teaching resources 147 3.48 0.567 Social environment 147 3.87 0.528 The Influence of Subjective Factors Most of the students agreed that influences on their English listening and speaking skills was exerted by subjective factors. In the questionnaire, subjective factors were four of the variables. The top mark for each variable is five. The higher the score, the greater the influence it will exert on the students. Descriptive statistics (in Table 7) show that the mean value of the four variables, which are the subjective factors influencing the listening and speaking skills can be arranged from high to low in this order: learning attitude (M = 3.95), learning motivation (M = 3.61), learning methods and strategies (M = 3.58), the autonomous learning situation (M = 2.71). Except for autonomous learning, the values of the rest of the variables exceed the critical value (mean value M > 3.00). Table 7: Descriptive statistics. N Average SD Learning attitude 147 3.95 0.681 Learning motivation 147 3.61 0.500 Learning methods and strategies 146 3.58 0.584 Independent learning 146 2.71 0.597 As for the learning attitude (M = 3.95), most students have a strong desire to improve their English listening and speaking skills. As for the learning motivation (M = 3.61), the students have clear learning motivation. As for the learning method and strategies (M = 3.58), most students consider that their own learning methods and strategies need further adjustment and improvement. As for the autonomous learning (M = 2.71), M < 3.00 indicates that most students think they could have done better in terms of active learning, which requires further improvement. CONCLUSIONS It can be seen that in the research variables, there are two main groups of factors that affects students English listening and speaking skills: the subjective factors and the objective factors. The subjective factors include learning attitude, learning methods and strategies, and autonomous learning ability; and the objective factors include social demand, teachers vocational skills and teaching resources, etc. REFERENCE 1. Lv, X., Peer assessment of perception and attitudes in public speaking English classes. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ., 11, 4, 445-449 (2013). 2. Tai, Y., Analysis of college oral English test scores based on data mining technology. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ., 11, 3, 180-185 (2013). 3. Hu, J., A case study on the affective factors in influencing students English listening and speaking abilities. J. of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences (Social Science Edn.), 33, 2, 136-140 (2013). 4. O Malley, J.M. and Chamot, A.U., Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1990). 597