Master of Science in Management

Similar documents
Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for Foundation Year

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Guiding Subject Liaison Librarians in Understanding and Acting on User Survey Results

D direct? or I indirect?

A Systematic Approach to Programmatic Assessment

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

National Survey of Student Engagement

Program Assessment and Alignment

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

What can I learn from worms?

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Using LibQUAL+ at Brown University and at the University of Connecticut Libraries

Pakistan Engineering Council. PEVs Guidelines

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Graduate Program in Education

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

EQuIP Review Feedback

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Assessment Method 1: RDEV 7636 Capstone Project Assessment Method Description

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Summary results (year 1-3)

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

PTK 90-DAY CRASH COURSE CALENDAR

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Sample Performance Assessment

Oregon Institute of Technology Computer Systems Engineering Technology Department Embedded Systems Engineering Technology Program Assessment

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Science Fair Project Handbook

The College of Law Mission Statement

Grade 3 Science Life Unit (3.L.2)

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS BUS 261 BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Cindy Rossi January 25, 2014

Unit 3 Ratios and Rates Math 6

CERTIFICATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CONTINUING EDUCATION. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group:

Strategic Planning Summer Working Group Report Revenue and Reputation Enhancements through Short Course and Certificate Program Activity August, 2015

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

Getting Started in Developing the Portfolio

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

Background Information. Instructions. Problem Statement. HOMEWORK INSTRUCTIONS Homework #3 Higher Education Salary Problem

Teaching and Assessing Professional Skills in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Plattsburgh City School District SIP Building Goals

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Programme Specification

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

Standard IV: Students

Critical Decisions within Student Learning Objectives: Target Setting Model

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Transcription:

Master of Science in Management Program / Student Learning Outcomes: What Will I Learn? Select an outcome statement to see the related measures and results. Graduates of the Master of Science in Management will be able to: 1. Formulate sustainable solutions to practical management problems encountered in a complex global environment. 2. Evaluate different methods and strategies used to develop individuals and manage teams in multiple settings. 3. Analyze how different functional areas within a business organization affect its strategic direction. 4. Apply project management tools and techniques in a business environment. 5. Create sustained and coherent arguments to summarize work for both internal (e.g., management, peers, subordinates) and external audiences. 6. Develop and ethical argument that challenges existing assumptions or prevailing practices in a business environment. 7. Generate solutions to business problems through the use of information technologies. 8. Integrate theory and practice for the purpose of strategic analysis. 9. Evaluate individual strengths and weaknesses with the desire to update skills and continually improve.

Assessment Methodology Metrics, Assessments, and Levels of Achievement The table below provides a brief overview of the measures selected to assess program outcomes for the Master of Science in Management. Assessment of program outcomes includes both direct and indirect measures. Benchmarks have been established to differentiate between three levels of program outcome achievement (highly achieved, meets standard, and needs improvement). These three levels of achievement are color coded and used in the section below to indicate the level of achievement for each measure, for each learning outcome. Metric Type Direct Measures Indirect Measures Assessments Capstone Course Exit Alumni Post-graduation Alumni Metrics The percentage of the BUS 599 students who receive a satisfactory rating or higher on the rubric criteria aligned with each program outcome. The mean of the graduates' perceptions of their achievement of the related program outcomes (on a 6-pt Likert-type scale). The mean of the graduates' perceptions of their achievement of the related program outcomes (on a 6-pt Likert-type scale). Highly Achieved 85% Mean 5% Meets Standard 70-84% 4.0-4.99 Needs Improvement < 70% Mean < 4 Note: The results of the one year post-graduation survey are used as a reference to provide a longitudinal perspective on students' attainment of program (student) outcomes. Key:

Program Outcome Achievement Results May 2015 Term to March 2016 Term Program / Student Learning Outcome 1 Formulate sustainable solutions to practical management problems encountered in a complex global environment. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Appropriateness and Justification of Areas of Change (M5A1) 100% Exit Program / Student Learning Outcome 2 Evaluate different methods and strategies used to develop individuals and manage teams in multiple settings. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Reflection on Self in the Chosen Role (M2A1) 95% n = 20 Exit Program / Student Learning Outcome 3 Analyze how different functional areas within a business organization affect its strategic direction.

BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Analysis of Concepts Compare and Contrast (M5A1) 96% Exit Program / Student Learning Outcome 4 Apply project management tools and techniques in a business environment. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Reflection on Self as Manager (M3A1) 89% n = 19 Exit Program / Student Learning Outcome 5 Create sustained and coherent arguments to summarize work for both internal (e.g., management, peers, subordinates) and external audiences. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Description and Details of Organization (M7A1) 100% Exit

Program / Student Learning Outcome 6 Develop an ethical argument that challenges existing assumptions or prevailing practices in a business environment. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Analysis of Ethical Issues in Case Scenario (M4A2) 94% n = 16 Exit Program / Student Learning Outcome 7 Generate solutions to business problems through the use of information technologies. 81% BUS 599: The entire rubric for M6A1 Exit

Program / Student Learning Outcome 8 Integrate theory and practice for the purpose of strategic analysis. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Application and Connections of Theories and Concepts (M5A1) 76% Exit Program / Student Learning Outcome 9 Evaluate individual strengths and weaknesses with the desire to update skills and continually improve. BUS 599 Rubric Criteria: Reflection on Self as a Manager (M3A1) 100% n = 19 Exit There were not enough responses to the Exit and One-year postgraduate surveys during FY2016 (need a minimum of 5 responses).