Metacognition. Complete the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for a quick assessment to:

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Lecturing Module

Study Group Handbook

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Assessment and Evaluation

Using Motivational Interviewing for Coaching

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

This table contains the extended descriptors for Active Learning on the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

A Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

West s Paralegal Today The Legal Team at Work Third Edition

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Lucy Calkins Units of Study 3-5 Heinemann Books Support Document. Designed to support the implementation of the Lucy Calkins Curriculum

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Software Maintenance

Case study Norway case 1

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

SMALL GROUPS AND WORK STATIONS By Debbie Hunsaker 1

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Team Report

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

9:30AM- 1:00PM JOHN PASSMORE L116

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

If we want to measure the amount of cereal inside the box, what tool would we use: string, square tiles, or cubes?

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

The College of Law Mission Statement

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

Teacher Action Research Multiple Intelligence Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom. By Melissa S. Ferro George Mason University

Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Information for Candidates

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Fearless Change -- Patterns for Introducing New Ideas

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

EQuIP Review Feedback

Vertical Teaming. in a small school

S H E A D AV I S C O L U M B U S S C H O O L F O R G I R L S

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Meta-Cognitive Strategies

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Training Staff with Varying Abilities and Special Needs

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

BSc (Hons) in International Business

CS Machine Learning

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Content. Take control of your project. Manage your ressources. Learning goals. Project. Project management

Test How To. Creating a New Test

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

San Marino Unified School District Homework Policy

T2Ts, revised. Foundations

Community Power Simulation

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

First Grade Standards

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008

Mock Trial Preparation In-Class Assignment to Prepare Direct and Cross Examination Roles 25 September 2015 DIRECT EXAMINATION

IMPROVING ICT SKILLS OF STUDENTS VIA ONLINE COURSES. Rozita Tsoni, Jenny Pange University of Ioannina Greece

WELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS!

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Study Center in Prague, Czech Republic

leading people through change

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Stacks Teacher notes. Activity description. Suitability. Time. AMP resources. Equipment. Key mathematical language. Key processes

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Managing the Classroom for Differentiating Instruction and Collaborative Practice. Objectives for today

Secondary English-Language Arts

Teaching Middle and High School Students to Read and Write Well

The Indices Investigations Teacher s Notes

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNIQUES. Teaching by Lecture

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

MATH Study Skills Workshop

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

TRAVEL TIME REPORT. Casualty Actuarial Society Education Policy Committee October 2001

UNA PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING PREP PROGRAM

Biome I Can Statements

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

Language Acquisition Chart

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Transcription:

Metacognition Metacognition is essential to successful learning because it enables individuals to better manage their cognitive skills and to determine weaknesses that can be corrected by constructing new cognitive skills. Almost anyone who can perform a skill is capable of metacognition that is, thinking about how they perform that skill. Recent research indicates that metacognitively aware learners are more strategic and perform better than unaware learners, allowing individuals to plan, sequence, and monitor their learning in a way that directly improves performance. Knowledge about cognition corresponds to what students know about themselves, strategies, and conditions under which strategies are most useful. Declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge can be thought of as the building blocks of conceptual knowledge. Regulation of cognition corresponds to knowledge about the way students plan, implement strategies, monitor, correct comprehension errors, and evaluate their learning. Complete the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for a quick assessment to: Think about your own metacognitive processes. What kinds of strategies do you use to monitor and access your own learning? Of the declarative, procedural, or conditional knowledge which are you more proficient? more inefficient? Of planning, information management, monitoring, debugging, or evaluation strategies which are you more proficient? more inefficient? * Students: After completing the inventory, contact Courtney Gurrera, Student Success Specialist at 443-412-2427 to discuss your results and strategies to improve your metacognitive awareness. literacy.kent.edu/ohioeff/resources/06newsmetacognition.doc

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) Check True or False as appropriate. Use the Scoring Guide after completing the inventory. Contact Courntey Gurrera, Student Success Specialist at 443-412-2427 to discuss strategies to increase your metacognitive awareness. 1. I ask myself periodically if I am meeting my goals. 2. I consider several alternatives to a problem before I answer. 3. I try to use strategies that have worked in the past. 4. I pace myself while learning in order to have enough time. 5. I understand my intellectual strengths and weaknesses. 6. I think about what I really need to learn before I begin a task 7. I know how well I did once I finish a test. 8. I set specific goals before I begin a task. 9. I slow down when I encounter important information. 10. I know what kind of information is most important to learn. 11. I ask myself if I have considered all options when solving a problem. 12. I am good at organizing information. 13. I consciously focus my attention on important information. 14. I have a specific purpose for each strategy I use. 15. I learn best when I know something about the topic. 16. I know what the teacher expects me to learn. 17. I am good at remembering information. 18. I use different learning strategies depending on the situation. 19. I ask myself if there was an easier way to do things after I finish a task. 20. I have control over how well I learn. 21. I periodically review to help me understand important relationships. 22. I ask myself questions about the material before I begin. 23. I think of several ways to solve a problem and choose the best one. 24. I summarize what I ve learned after I finish. 25. I ask others for help when I don t understand something. 26. I can motivate myself to learn when I need to 27. I am aware of what strategies I use when I study. 28. I find myself analyzing the usefulness of strategies while I study. 29. I use my intellectual strengths to compensate for my weaknesses. 30. I focus on the meaning and significance of new information. 31. I create my own examples to make information more meaningful. True False

32. I am a good judge of how well I understand something. 33. I find myself using helpful learning strategies automatically. 34. I find myself pausing regularly to check my comprehension. 35. I know when each strategy I use will be most effective. 36. I ask myself how well I accomplish my goals once I m finished. 37. I draw pictures or diagrams to help me understand while learning. 38. I ask myself if I have considered all options after I solve a problem. 39. I try to translate new information into my own words. 40. I change strategies when I fail to understand. 41. I use the organizational structure of the text to help me learn. 42. I read instructions carefully before I begin a task. 43. I ask myself if what I m reading is related to what I already know. 44. I reevaluate my assumptions when I get confused. 45. I organize my time to best accomplish my goals. 46. I learn more when I am interested in the topic. 47. I try to break studying down into smaller steps. 48. I focus on overall meaning rather than specifics. 49. I ask myself questions about how well I am doing while I am learning something new. 50. I ask myself if I learned as much as I could have once I finish a task. 51. I stop and go back over new information that is not clear. 52. I stop and reread when I get confused. True False Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) Scoring Guide Directions -- For each True on the MAI give yourself 1 point on the following charts. For each False, give yourself 0 points in the Score column. Total the score of each category and place in box. DECLARATIVE KNOWLEDGE -- The factual knowledge the learner needs before being able to process or use critical thinking related to the topic -- Knowing about, what, or that -- Knowledge of one s skills, intellectual resources, and abilities as a learner -- Students can obtain knowledge through presentations, demonstrations, discussions PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE -- The application of knowledge for the purposes of completing a procedure or process -- Knowledge about how to implement learning procedures (e.g. strategies) -- Requires students know the process as well as when to apply process in various situations -- Students can obtain knowledge through discovery, cooperative learning, and problem solving CONDITIONAL KNOWLEDGE -- The determination under what circumstances specific processes or skills should transfer -- Knowledge about when and why to use learning procedures -- Application of declarative and procedural knowledge with certain conditions presented -- Students can obtain knowledge through simulation KNOWLEDGE ABOUT COGNITION DECLARATIVE KNOWLEDGE 5. I understand my intellectual strengths and weaknesses. 10. I know what kind of information is most important to learn. 12. I am good at organizing information. 16. I know what the teacher expects me to learn. 17. I am good at remembering information. 20. I have control over how well I learn. 32. I am a good judge of how well I understand something. 46. I learn more when I am interested in the topic. SCORE TOTAL 8 PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE SCORE CONDITIONAL KNOWLEDGE SCORE 3. I try to use strategies that have worked in the past. 15. I learn best when I know something about the topic. 14. I have a specific purpose for each strategy I use. 18. I use different learning strategies depending on the situation. 27. I am aware of what strategies I use when I 26. I can motivate myself to learn when I need to. study. 33. I find myself using helpful learning strategies automatically. 29. I use my intellectual strengths to compensate for my weaknesses. 35. I know when each strategy I use will be most effective. TOTAL 4 TOTAL 5 Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

PLANNING --Planning, goal setting, and allocating resources prior to learning INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES --Skills and strategy sequences used to process information more efficiently (e.g., organizing, elaborating, summarizing, selective focusing) COMPREHENSION MONITORING --Assessment of one s learning or strategy use DEBUGGING STRATEGIES --Strategies used to correct comprehension and performance errors EVALUATION --Analysis of performance and strategy effectiveness after a learning episode REGULATION OF COGNITION PLANNING 4. I pace myself while learning in order to have enough time. 6. I think about what I really need to learn before I begin a task. 8. I set specific goals before I begin a task. 22. I ask myself questions about the material before I begin. 23. I think of several ways to solve a problem and choose the best one. 42. I read instructions carefully before I begin a task. 45. I organize my time to best accomplish my goals. SCORE TOTAL 7 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES SCORE COMPREHENSION MONITORING SCORE 9. I slow down when I encounter important information. 1. I ask myself periodically if I am meeting my goals. 13. I consciously focus my attention on important information. 2. I consider several alternatives to a problem before I answer. 30. I focus on the meaning and significance of new information. 11. I ask myself if I have considered all options when solving a problem. 31. I create my own examples to make information more meaningful. 21. I periodically review to help me understand important relationships. 37. I draw pictures or diagrams to help me understand while learning. 28. I find myself analyzing the usefulness of strategies while I study. 39. I try to translate new information into my own words. 34. I find myself pausing regularly to check my comprehension. 41. I use the organizational structure of the text to help me learn 49. I ask myself questions about how well I am doing while learning something new. 43. I ask myself if what I m reading is related to what I already know. 47. I try to break studying down into smaller steps. 48. I focus on overall meaning rather than specifics. TOTAL 10 TOTAL 7 DEBUGGING STRATEGIES SCORE EVALUATION SCORE 25. I ask others for help when I don t understand 7. I know how well I did once I finish a test. something. 40. I change strategies when I fail to understand. 18. I ask myself if there was an easier way to do things after I finish a task. 44. I re-evaluate my assumptions when I get 24. I summarize what I ve learned after I finish. confused. 51. I stop and go back over new information that is not clear. 36. I ask myself how well I accomplish my goals once I m finished. 52. I stop and reread when I get confused. 38. I ask myself if I have considered all options after I solve a problem. 49. I ask myself if I learned as much as I could have once I finish a task. TOTAL 5 TOTAL 6