Test Optional Admission Policy Stephanie Balmer Vice President for Enrollment, Marketing and Communications and Dean of Admissions
Test Optional Policy History o Fall 1995 was the first admissions cohort admitted under the test optional policy o Questions for consideration included: o Do test scores continue to serve a useful function as an indicator of college performance? o Do they provide information about students that cannot be determined by other means? o Do they unfairly discriminate against disadvantaged and/or minority students? o Are low scores preventing otherwise solid candidates from applying to Dickinson?
Test Optional Environment in 1995 o 241 institutions with test optional policies in place o Represented 12.7 percent of the total number of U.S. four-year institutions (n=2,244) o Peer schools with test optional policies included Bates, Bowdoin, Lafayette, Connecticut, Union, Middlebury, and Franklin & Marshall
Why Dickinson? o Bates test optional policy at the six-year mark found that their new policy encouraged more students from diverse backgrounds to apply because they felt Bates was concerned more about intellectual integrity, hard work, and real achievement than about test scores. o These findings were consistent with Dickinson s practice of admissions in which grade point average, recommendations, application essays and interviews were the most important factors in the acceptance or rejection of candidates. o New policy was a public declaration of practices already in place at Dickinson.
Effect on Public Perception 1995-1997 o Is Dickinson s policy of making test scores optional seen as a lowering of admissions standards? o Only a small (but increasing) percentage of applicants chose not to submit test scores o Frequency of non-submitters yield rate was higher than the overall pool o Policy did not appear to result in increased applications o Dickinson was one of approximately 13 percent of U.S. colleges adopting a test optional policy o In the entering class of 1995, non-submitters did not perform as well academically as submitters. o In the entering classes of 1996 and 1997, non-submitters and submitters performed equally as well academically.
More Recent Cohorts Quality (2008-2011) SAT Scores ACT Scores HS Rank Percentile Average Number of AP Exams HS GPA Demographics (2008-2011) SOC Gender Athletes Performance (2008-2010) Retention Rate FY GPA
Quality Indicators Submitters vs. Non-Submitters Non-submitters still appear quite capable based on these quality measures. In all cases the year-to-year difference of submitters vs. non-submitters remains fairly constant.
Average SAT Critical Reading Scores 700 649 641 641 640 600 538 530 542 544 500 400 300 200 2008 2009 2010 2011 100 0
Average SAT Math Scores 700 644 634 641 638 600 548 549 543 547 500 400 300 200 2008 2009 2010 2011 100 0
Average SAT Writing Scores 700 645 636 636 641 600 555 540 545 572 500 400 300 200 2008 2009 2010 2011 100 0
Average ACT Composite Scores 35 30 28 28 29 29 25 24 23 23 24 20 15 10 2008 2009 2010 2011 5 0
Average HS Class Rank Percentile 100% 90% 80% 89% 80% 84% 76% 87% 81% 87% 79% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 2008 2009 2010 2011 20% 10% 0%
Average Number of Advanced Placement Exams 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.5 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 2008 2009 2010 2011 0.0
Average HS GPA 4.0 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 0.5 0.0
Demographics Submitters vs. Non-Submitters Test optional policy increases access for students of color Larger proportion of females are submitting scores in the recent years Test optional policy is NOT being used a backdoor to admit athletes Higher percentage of highly selective colleges are introducing test optional admissions policies
Percent Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic 30% 25% 25% 24% 25% 24% 20% 15% 19% 16% 18% 15% 10% 2008 2009 2010 2011 5% 0%
Percent Female 70% 60% 55% 54% 57% 61% 53% 56% 55% 59% 50% 40% 30% 20% 2008 2009 2010 2011 10% 0%
70% Proportion of Athletes Submitting Scores 60% 50% 40% 56% 44% 53% 47% 60% 40% 46% 54% 30% 20% 2008 2009 2010 2011 10% 0%
Performance Submitters vs. Non-Submitters A statistically significant difference does exist for FY GPA of submitters vs. non-submitters, (about 0.3 percentage points) but as a whole both groups are performing quite well. Even though the difference is small (2% on average), the benefit in retention for nonsubmitters outweighs the slight difference in FY GPA
Retention Rates 2008-2010 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2008 2009 2010 Total Submitter 84% 86% 91% 87% Non-Submitter 86% 89% 91% 89%
Summary o Question: Are we in a stronger place today than we were prior to our test optional policy? o Answer: Yes. o o o o o Increased diversity Increased access Does not significantly erode overall quality Non-submitters are performing competitively Additional benefit of increased retention