Palmer High School / North Middle School IB Assessment Policy. Section 1: Definitions and Philosophy. Assessment

Similar documents
Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

Copyright Corwin 2015

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Promotion and Tenure Policy

EQuIP Review Feedback

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

lourdes gazca, American University in Puebla, Mexico

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Graduate Program in Education

School Leadership Rubrics

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Turkey in the 20 th Century guide

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

What does Quality Look Like?

IB Diploma Subject Selection Brochure

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

Model of Lesson Study Approach during Micro Teaching

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Further, Robert W. Lissitz, University of Maryland Huynh Huynh, University of South Carolina ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Charter School Performance Accountability

Academic Language: Equity for ELs

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

World s Best Workforce Plan

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Mark J. Trexler. A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education

A Study of Successful Practices in the IB Program Continuum

The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme at Carey

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

British International School Istanbul Academic Honesty Policy

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Program Assessment and Alignment

Executive Summary. Mt. Mourne School - An IBO World School

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

West s Paralegal Today The Legal Team at Work Third Edition

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Designing Case Study Research for Pedagogical Application and Scholarly Outcomes

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

A Model for Planning Learning Experiences to Promote Achievement in Diverse Secondary Classrooms

Governors State University Student Affairs and Enrollment Management: Reaching Vision 2020

Cognitive Modeling. Tower of Hanoi: Description. Tower of Hanoi: The Task. Lecture 5: Models of Problem Solving. Frank Keller.

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Advancing the Discipline of Leadership Studies. What is an Academic Discipline?

Strategies for Solving Fraction Tasks and Their Link to Algebraic Thinking

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

SCIENCE DISCOURSE 1. Peer Discourse and Science Achievement. Richard Therrien. K-12 Science Supervisor. New Haven Public Schools

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

ATTRIBUTES OF EFFECTIVE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL

Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. School of Education

Transcription:

Palmer High School / North Middle School IB Assessment Policy Section 1: Definitions and Philosophy Assessment Assessment is the measurement of what students know and can do. How and when we evaluate students directly informs planning, teaching, and learning. Effective assessment places students at the center of their learning by allowing teachers to monitor student progress and adjust instruction to improve achievement. Assessment is managed through an active partnership among students, teachers, and parents/guardians. Clarity of expectations and good communication are shared responsibilities. Formal IB Assessment and Classroom Grades In the International Baccalaureate Diploma program (grades 11-12), students demonstrate learning through formal, IB-required assessments that result in final IB marks ranging from 1 (low) to 7 (high). 1 In the IB Middle Years program (grades 6-10), assessments are designed by local schools and teachers following IB guidelines. IB students are also assessed throughout their courses and receive classroom grades reported through Q (District 11 s electronic grading system). In high school, semester grades earned become part of the student s transcript that may be reported to colleges, employers, and others. Summative and Formative Assessment Aligned with both current research into best practices and IB s own guidelines, teachers use a range of formative and summative tasks. 2 Formative assessment allows teachers to monitor student progress towards meeting IB standards. Students receive meaningful, detailed, and timely feedback that supports improvement. Teachers use data from such assessments to modify instruction to promote learning. Formative assessment serves as the foundation for learning and prepares students for the higherstakes nature of summative assessments, which measure achievement at the end of a course or unit. Although grades entered by teachers into Q may include both formative and summative tasks, final 1 Some assessments are external, such as the official IB exams at the end of courses that are submitted to IB examiners for grading. Others are internal, meaning that teachers mark the assessments and submit scores and samples to IB for moderation. 2 Descriptions of research-based best practices may be found in Guskey, Thomas R., ed., The Teacher as Assessment Leader, 2009; Marzano, R., What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action (2003); Reeves, Douglas, ed., Ahead of the Curve: The Power of Assessment to Transform Teaching and Learning (2007); and Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J., Understanding by Design (2004). IB guidelines are described in IBO, The Middle Years Programme: From Principles into Practice (2009); IBO, The Diploma Programme: From Principles into Practice (2009); and IBO, Diploma Programme Assessment: Principles and Practice (2004). IB Assessment Policy: Palmer/North Page 1

semester grades value the most accurate reflection of student achievement rather than simply averaging of grades over time. Criterion-Related Assessment IB assessment is criterion-related rather than norm-referenced. This means that a rubric is used to judge student work in relation to identified levels of attainment. 3 For some components, assessment is measured through mark schemes aligned to the relevant IB subject s formal Aims and Objectives. Section 2: Summative Assessment of Learning Defining summative assessment Summative assessments occur at the end of a unit or a course and summarize what the students learned or didn t learn. They are for giving grades and measuring the overall learning of students against a given standard. 4 Consequently, summative tasks are seen as assessment of learning. The use of criteria and rubrics In IB courses at Palmer High School and North Middle School, the vast majority of summative assessments are graded by teachers using IB assessment criteria. 5 In this way, students, parents, and teachers have specific information about how students are progressing towards achieving IB standards. Because students can only meet standards they know about, it is the responsibility of the teacher to share rubrics with students in advance and to provide explicit instruction that clarify expectations. Assessment models, sample work, and feedback to students In the case of the Diploma program (grades 11 and 12) summative assessments often model in both format and material tested the formal assessments that are officially set by the IB itself. In the Middle Years program, summative assessments are designed by classroom teachers as there are no formal assessments externally set by the IB for 6 th through 10 th graders. In both MYP and DP courses, summative assessments target the official IB Aims and Objectives of the relevant subject, whether or not formal IB assessment criteria are used. 3 IBO, Guidelines for Developing a School Assessment Policy, 2009 (in press). 4 Jakicic, Assessment that Makes Sense, in Guskey, 2009, p. 35. 5 When might a summative assessment not be marked using IB criteria? Certain assessments might use a format that is not explicitly mandated by the IB for that subject. For instance, there is no IB requirement for oral presentation in History courses; however, a teacher may require students to demonstrate content knowledge and skills as part of a group seminar report. Even so, such assessments will support the Aims and Objectives of the relevant subject, and teachers will provide students with appropriate rubrics and clarify expectations. IB Assessment Policy: Palmer/North Page 2

Whenever practical, teachers provide samples of work that have been marked so that students can internalize the assessment standards and understand what is expected. 6 Such samples may be 1) the actual work of former Palmer/North students that have been marked or moderated by the IB; 2) models generated personally by instructors; and/or 3) samples provided by the IB in official Teacher Support Material or through formal training. Feedback to students on summative assessments is related to the criteria; however, it may take various forms, including indicating specific achievement levels attained against the various criteria; descriptive marginal comments or annotations; and/or an overall summative comment. Summative assessments and course grades Summative assessments comprise an important role in the final letter grade a student earns in a given IB course. Teachers must translate achievement levels attained on the IB rubric into point totals that can be entered into Q, District 11 s electronic grading program. Teachers have several methods available to them to clarify to students how IB grades are derived: they may post on web pages, distribute to students in hard copy, and/or publish explanations as part of their Course of Study available in the Written Curriculum section of the school s IB website. Section 3: Formative Assessment for Learning Defining formative assessment Formative assessments are all those activities undertaken by teachers and students that provide information to be used as feedback to enhance learning and achievement. 7 IB teachers use a variety of formative assessment strategies to gather evidence of student progress in acquiring knowledge, skills and abilities towards specific learning targets. The use of criteria and rubrics 6 When might it not be practical for a teacher to provide a marked sample? Some formal IB assessments include short answer questions (constructed responses) or even multiple-choice items with very definite right-and-wrong answers. It is important for teachers to give students experience with assessments like that, but providing a marked sample of that specific assessment ahead of time would be impractical. 7 Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. IB Assessment Policy: Palmer/North Page 3

IB subject area criteria are deconstructed to identify and describe levels of achievement to shape formative assessment tasks, providing students and teachers with learning targets that directly inform achievement on summative tasks. Progress is communicated with clear distinction between various levels of achievement to assist learning progress. Student and teacher partnerships develop as a result of collaborative efforts to analyze feedback, monitor progress and adopt new, more effective strategies for teaching and learning to reach the intended learning goals. Teachers work towards providing descriptive and timely feedback on welldesigned formative assessments. In turn, students develop understanding that lifelong learning requires their effort, practice and advocacy in order to progress. Students must invest in their progress daily, initiating additional support as needed and building self-awareness of their learning strengths and challenges. Formative assessments and course grades Formative assessments provide the opportunity for students and teachers to take manageable risks in the learning process, and, therefore, these assessments play a lesser role in the calculation of the final course grade than do summative tasks. Additionally, IB teachers are encouraged to separate performance from behavior when factoring course grades and work towards the development of a fairly-weighted grading scale together with department colleagues and guided by researched bestpractices and IB subject guides. 8 Section 4: Reporting and Recording IB Achievement In an effort to inform students and parents about the progress that students are making towards meeting IB standards, IB marks (1-7) are reported in each subject area as part of quarter and semester report cards. (Teachers may also report IB achievement on mid-quarterly progress reports, but this is not required.) These cumulative marks indicate a student s achievement in meeting specific learning goals as measured by IB assessment rubrics contained in the relevant IB subject guides, or, in the case of grades 6 through 9 of the Middle Years program, based on an interim objective derived from the assessment criteria within the subject guides for 10 th grade. It is important to understand that these IB cumulative marks indicate a student s level of achievement thus far in the course as defined by IB. These marks do not reflect effort, motivation, or behavior. Nor do these marks become part of a student s transcript or permanent record. They do not influence grade 8 O Connor, K. (2002). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. IB Assessment Policy: Palmer/North Page 4

point average or class rank in any way. Rather, the marks allow the school and the family to view the student s growth in a subject over time, and to focus on areas of challenge and formulate a response to a need in a given area. (In the Diploma program, these marks also provide some predictive insight into how well the student may ultimately perform on official IB exams.) Students and parents can determine how teachers derive IB cumulative marks by visiting the websites of individual teachers. In most cases, the mark will be the result of one or more summative assessments graded according to IB criteria. In Diploma program courses, the mark may also reflect student performance on official IB internal assessments: these are assessments designed by the IB but graded by the instructor and then submitted to IB as part of the student s overall IB mark. Section 5: Accountability and Review Students can expect a culture of accountability in the development of assessment protocols that inform their learning. Teachers work regularly in collaborative professional learning communities to discuss, clarify and sequence the learning targets for the class, and hence develop formative and summative assessments to measure student progress toward these objectives. All teachers are responsible for clarifying how their own classroom assessment practices adhere to the general guidelines described in the official Palmer/North IB Assessment policy. Teachers may post such explanations on course websites, distribute hard copy explanations to students, and/or publish them as part of their Course of Study outlines included in the Written Curriculum section of the school s IB website. IB instructors work in collaboration with parents through the IB Parent Advisory Board and the Building Action and Accountability Committee, BAAC, to develop and maintain transparency of teaching and assessment practices. It is the IB coordinator s responsibility to assist instructors in the implementation of the policy by providing access to key IB documents and the IB Online Curriculum Centre. It is the responsibility of the head of school to ensure compliance with the policy and to provide the staff development needed to implement the policy. IB Assessment Policy: Palmer/North Page 5