University of Texas at Arlington

Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Associatio of Research Libraries / Texas A&M Uiversity www.libqual.org All All

All All

Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Cotributors Collee Cook Texas A&M Uiversity Fred Heath Uiversity of Texas BruceThompso Texas A&M Uiversity Amy Hoseth Associatio of Research Libraries Martha Kyrillidou Associatio of Research Libraries Joatha D. Sousa Associatio of Research Libraries Duae Webster Associatio of Research Libraries Associatio of Research Libraries / Texas A&M Uiversity www.libqual.org All All

Associatio of Research Libraries 21 Dupot Circle NW Suite 800 Washigto, DC 20036 Phoe 202-296-2296 Fax 202-872-0884 http://www.libqual.org Copyright 2005 Associatio of Research Libraries All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 1 of 90 1 Itroductio 1.1 Ackowledgemets This otebook cotais iformatio from the 2005 admiistratio of the LibQUAL+ protocol. The material o the followig pages is draw from the aalysis of resposes from the participatig istitutios collected i 2005. The LibQUAL+ project requires the skills of a dedicated group. We would like to thak several members of the LibQUAL+ team for their key roles i this developmetal project. From Texas A&M Uiversity, the quatitative guidace of Bruce Thompso ad the qualitative leadership of Yvoa Licol have bee key to the project's itegrity. The behid-the-scees roles of Bill Chollet ad others from the library Systems ad Traiig uits were also formative. From the Associatio of Research Libraries, we are appreciative of the project maagemet role of Martha Kyrillidou, the techical developmet role of Joatha Sousa, ad the commuicatios ad traiig support of Amy Hoseth. A New Measures Iitiative of this scope is possible oly as the collaborative effort of may libraries. To the directors ad liaisos at all participatig libraries goes the largest measure of gratitude. Without your commitmet, the developmet of LibQUAL+ would ot have bee possible. We would like to exted a special thak you to all admiistrators at the participatig cosortia ad libraries that are makig this project happe effectively across various istitutios. We would like to ackowledge the role of the Fud for the Improvemet of Post-secodary Educatio (FIPSE), U.S. Departmet of Educatio, which provided grat fuds of $498,368 over a three-year period (2001-03). We would also like to ackowledge the support of the Natioal Sciece Foudatio (NSF) for its grat of $245,737 over a three-year period (2002-04) to adapt the LibQUAL+ istrumet for use i the sciece, math, egieerig, ad techology educatio digital library commuity, a assessmet tool i developmet ow called DigiQUAL (formerly kow as e-qual). As we move towards the coclusio of these grat fudig activities, we would like to express our thaks for the fiacial support that has eabled the researchers egaged i this project to exceed all of our expectatios i stated goals ad objectives ad deliver a remarkable assessmet tool to the library commuity. Collee Cook Texas A&M Uiversity Fred Heath Uiversity of Texas Duae Webster Associatio of Research Libraries All All

Page 2 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 1.2 LibQUAL+ : Defiig ad Promotig Library Service Quality What is LibQUAL+? LibQUAL+ is a suite of services that libraries use to solicit, track, uderstad, ad act upo users opiios of service quality. These services are offered to the library commuity by the Associatio of Research Libraries (ARL). The program s ceterpiece is a rigorously tested Web-based survey budled with traiig that helps libraries assess ad improve library services, chage orgaizatioal culture, ad market the library. The goals of LibQUAL+ are to: Foster a culture of excellece i providig library service Help libraries better uderstad user perceptios of library service quality Collect ad iterpret library user feedback systematically over time Provide libraries with comparable assessmet iformatio from peer istitutios Idetify best practices i library service Ehace library staff members aalytical skills for iterpretig ad actig o data As of sprig 2005, more tha 600 libraries have participated i the LibQUAL+ survey, icludig colleges ad uiversities, commuity colleges, health scieces ad hospital/medical libraries, law libraries, ad public libraries-some through various cosortia, others as idepedet participats. LibQUAL+ has expaded iteratioally, with participatig istitutios i Caada, the U.K., ad Europe, ad has bee traslated ito a umber of laguages, icludig Frech, Swedish, Dutch, ad Afrikaas. The growig LibQUAL+ commuity of participats ad its extesive dataset are rich resources for improvig library services. How will LibQUAL+ beefit your library? Library admiistrators have successfully used LibQUAL+ survey data to idetify best practices, aalyze deficits, ad effectively allocate resources. Beefits to participatig istitutios iclude: Istitutioal data ad reports that eable you to assess whether your library services are meetig user expectatios Aggregate data ad reports that allow you to compare your library s performace with that of peer istitutios Workshops desiged for participats Access to a olie library of LibQUAL+ research articles The opportuity to become part of a commuity iterested i developig excellece i library services How does LibQUAL+ beefit your library users? LibQUAL+ gives your library users a chace to tell you where your services eed improvemet so you ca respod to ad better maage their expectatios. You ca develop services that better meet your users expectatios by comparig your library s data with that of peer istitutios ad examiig the practices of those libraries that are evaluated highly by their users. All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 3 of 90 How is the LibQUAL+ survey coducted? Coductig the LibQUAL+ survey requires little techical expertise o your part. You ivite your users to take the survey, distributig the URL for your library s Web form via e-mail. Respodets complete the survey form ad their aswers are set to a cetral database. The data are aalyzed ad preseted to you i reports describig your users desired, perceived, ad miimum expectatios of service. What are the origis of the LibQUAL+ survey? The LibQUAL+ survey evolved from a coceptual model based o the SERVQUAL istrumet, a popular tool for assessig service quality i the private sector. The Texas A&M Uiversity Libraries ad other libraries used modified SERVQUAL istrumets for several years; those applicatios revealed the eed for a ewly adapted tool that would serve the particular requiremets of libraries. ARL, represetig the largest research libraries i North America, partered with Texas A&M Uiversity Libraries to develop, test, ad refie LibQUAL+. This effort was supported i part by a three-year grat from the U.S. Departmet of Educatio s Fud for the Improvemet of Post-Secodary Educatio (FIPSE). All All

Page 4 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 1.3 Web Access to Data Data summaries from the 2005 iteratio of the LibQUAL+ survey will be available to project participats olie via the LibQUAL+ survey maagemet site: http://www.libqual.org/maage/results/idex.cfm All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 5 of 90 1.4 Explaatio of Charts ad Tables A workig kowledge of how to read ad derive relevat iformatio from the tables ad charts used i your LibQUAL+ results otebook is essetial. I additio to the explaatory text below, your ca fid a self-paced tutorial o the project web site at: http://www.libqual.org/iformatio/tools/idex.cfm Both the olie tutorial ad the text below are desiged to help you uderstad your survey results ad preset ad explai those results to others at your library. Radar Charts Radar charts are commoly used throughout the followig pages to display both aggregate results ad results from idividual istitutios. Basic iformatio about radar charts is outlied below, ad additioal descriptive iformatio is icluded throughout this otebook. What is a radar chart? Radar charts are useful whe you wat to look at several differet factors all related to oe item. Sometimes called spider charts or polar charts, radar charts feature multiple axes or spokes alog which data ca be plotted. Variatios i the data are show by distace from the ceter of the chart. Lies coect the data poits for each series, formig a spiral aroud the ceter. I the case of the LibQUAL+ survey results, each axis represets a differet survey questio. Questios are idetified by a code at the ed of each axis. The three dimesios measured by the survey are grouped together o the radar charts, ad each dimesio is labeled: Affect of Service (AS), Library as Place (LP), ad Iformatio Cotrol (IC). Radar charts are used i this otebook to preset the item summaries (the results from the 22 core survey questios). How to read a radar chart Radar charts are a effective way to graphically show stregths ad weakesses by eablig you to observe symmetry or uiformity of data. Poits close to the ceter idicate a low value, while poits ear the edge idicate a high value. Whe iterpretig a radar chart, it is importat to check each idividual axis as well as the chart s overall shape i order to gai a complete uderstadig of its meaig. You ca see how much data fluctuates by observig whether the spiral is smooth or has spikes of variability. Respodets miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted o each axis of your LibQUAL+ radar charts. The resultig gaps betwee the three levels are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. Geerally, a radar graph shaded blue ad yellow idicates that users perceptios of service fall withi the zoe of tolerace ; the distace betwee miimum expectatios ad perceptios of service quality is shaded i blue, ad the distace betwee their desired ad perceived levels of service quality is show i yellow. Whe users perceptios fall outside the zoe of tolerace, the graph will iclude areas of red ad gree shadig. If the distace betwee users miimum expectatios ad perceptios of service delivery is represeted i red, that idicates a egative service adequacy gap score. If the distace betwee the desired level of service ad perceptios of service delivery is represeted i gree, that idicates a positive service superiority gap score. All All

Page 6 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto s The mea of a collectio of umbers is their arithmetic average, computed by addig them up ad dividig by their total umber. I this otebook, meas are provided for users miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality for each item o the LibQUAL+ survey. s are also provided for the geeral satisfactio ad iformatio literacy outcomes questios. Stadard Deviatio Stadard deviatio is a measure of the spread of data aroud their mea. The stadard deviatio () depeds o calculatig the average distace of each score from the mea. I this otebook, stadard deviatios are provided for every mea preseted i the tables. Service Adequacy The Service adequacy gap score is calculated by subtractig the miimum score from the perceived score o ay give questio, for each user. Both meas ad stadard deviatios are provided for service adequacy gap scores o each item of the survey, as well as for each of the three dimesios of library service quality. I geeral, service adequacy is a idicator of the extet to which you are meetig the miimum expectatios of your users. A egative service adequacy gap score idicates that your users perceived level of service quality is below their miimum level of service quality ad is prited i red. Service Superiority The Service superiority gap score is calculated by subtractig the desired score from the perceived score o ay give questio, for each user. Both meas ad stadard deviatios are provided for service superiority gap scores o each item of the survey, as well as for each of the three dimesios of library service quality. I geeral, service superiority is a idicator of the extet to which you are exceedig the desired expectatios of your users. A positive service superiority gap score idicates that your users perceived level of service quality is above their desired level of service quality ad is prited i gree. Sectios with charts ad tables are omitted from the followig pages whe there are three or fewer idividuals i a specific group. I the cosortium otebooks, istitutio type summaries are ot show if there is oly oe library for a istitutio type. Idividual library otebooks are produced separately for each participat. All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 7 of 90 1.5 A Few Words about LibQUAL+ 2005 Libraries today cofrot escalatig pressure to demostrate impact. As Culle (2001) has oted, Academic libraries are curretly facig their greatest challege sice the explosio i tertiary educatio ad academic publishig which bega after World War II... [T]he emergece of the virtual uiversity, supported by the virtual library, calls ito questio may of our basic assumptios about the role of the academic library, ad the security of its future. Retaiig ad growig their customer base, ad focusig more eergy o meetig their customers' expectatios is the oly way for academic libraries to survive i this volatile eviromet. (pp. 662-663) I this eviromet, "A measure of library quality based solely o collectios has become obsolete" (Nitecki, 1996, p. 181). These cosideratios have prompted the Associatio of Research Libraries (ARL) to sposor a umber of "New Measures" iitiatives. The New Measures efforts represet a collective determiatio o the part of the ARL membership to augmet the collectio-cout ad fiscal iput measures that comprise the ARL Idex ad ARL Statistics, to date the most cosistetly collected statistics for research libraries, with outcome measures such as assessmets of service quality ad satisfactio. Oe New Measures iitiative is the LibQUAL+ project (Cook, Heath & B. Thompso, 2002, 2003; Heath, Cook, Kyrillidou & Thompso, 2002; Thompso, Cook & Heath, 2003; Thompso, Cook & Thompso, 2002). The book by Cook, Heath ad Thompso (forthcomig) details much of the related history ad research. Withi a service-quality assessmet model, "oly customers judge quality; all other judgmets are essetially irrelevat" (Zeithaml, Parasurama, Berry, 1990, p. 16). LibQUAL+ was modeled o the 22-item SERVQUAL tool developed by Parasurama, Berry ad Zeithaml (Parasurama, Berry & Zeithaml, 1991). However, SERVQUAL has bee show to measure some issues ot particularly relevat i libraries, ad to ot measure some issues of cosiderable iterest to library users. The fial 22 LibQUAL+ items were developed through several iteratios of quatitative studies ivolvig a larger pool of 56 items. The selectio of items employed i the LibQUAL+ survey has bee grouded i the users' perspective as revealed i a series of qualitative studies ivolvig a larger pool of items. The items were idetified followig qualitative research iterviews with studet ad faculty library users at several differet uiversities (Cook, 2002a; Cook & Heath, 2001). LibQUAL+ is ot just a list of 22 stadardized items. First, LibQUAL+ offers libraries the ability to select five optioal local service quality assessmet items. Secod, the survey icludes a commets box solicitig ope-eded user views. Almost half of the people respodig to the LibQUAL+ survey provide valuable feedback through the commets box. These ope-eded commets are helpful for ot oly (a) uderstadig why users provide certai ratigs, but also (b) uderstadig what policy chages users suggest, because may users feel the obligatio to be costructive. Participatig libraries are fidig the real-time access to user commets oe of the most useful devices i challegig library admiistrators to thik outside of the box ad develop iovative ways for improvig library services. LibQUAL+ is a way of listeig to users called a total market survey. As Berry (1995) explaied, All All

Page 8 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Whe well desiged ad executed, total market surveys provide a rage of iformatio umatched by ay other method... A critical facet of total market surveys (ad the reaso for usig the word 'total') is the measuremet of competitors' service quality. This [also] requires usig o-customers i the sample to rate the service of their suppliers. (p. 37) Although (a) measurig perceptios of both users ad o-users, ad (b) collectig perceptios data with regard to peer istitutios ca provide importat isights, LibQUAL+ is oly oe of 11 "ways of listeig" to customers, a "total market survey." Berry recommeded usig multiple listeig methods, ad emphasized that "Ogoig data collectio...is a ecessity. Trasactioal surveys, total market surveys, ad employee research should always be icluded" (Berry, 1995, p. 54). Score Scalig "Perceived" scores o the 22 LibQUAL+ core items, the three subscales, ad the total score, are all scaled 1 to 9, with 9 beig the most favorable. Both the gap scores ("Adequacy" = "Perceived" -"Miimum"; "Superiority" = "Perceived" - "Desired") are scaled such that higher scores are more favorable. Thus, a adequacy gap score of +1.2 o a item, subscale, or total score is better tha a adequacy gap score of +1.0. A superiority gap score of -0.5 o a item, subscale, or total score is better tha a superiority gap score of -1.0. Usig LibQUAL+ Data I some cases LibQUAL+ data may cofirm prior expectatios ad library staff will readily formulate actio plas to remedy perceived deficiecies. But i may cases library decisio-makers will seek additioal iformatio to corroborate iterpretatios or to better uderstad the dyamics uderlyig user perceptios. For example, oce a iterpretatio is formulated, library staff might review recet submissios of users to suggestio boxes to evaluate whether LibQUAL+ data are cosistet with iterpretatios, ad the suggestio box data perhaps also provide user suggestios for remedies. User focus groups also provide a powerful way to explore problems ad potetial solutios. A uiversity-wide retreat with a small-group facilitated discussio to solicit suggestios for improvemet is aother follow-up mechaism that has bee implemeted i several LibQUAL+ participatig libraries. Ideed, the ope-eded commets gathered as part of LibQUAL+ are themselves useful i fleshig out isights ito perceived library service quality. Respodets ofte use the commets box o the survey to make costructive suggestios o specific ways to address their cocers. Qualitative aalysis of these commets ca be very fruitful. I short, LibQUAL+ is ot 22 items. LibQUAL+ is 22 items plus a commets box! Cook (2002b) provided case study reports of how staff at various libraries have employed data from prior reditios of LibQUAL+. Heath, Kyrillidou, ad Askew edited a special issue of the Joural of Library Admiistratio (Vol. 40, No. 3/4) reportig additioal case studies o the use of LibQUAL+ data to aid the improvemet of library service quality. This special issue has recetly bee published by Hayworth Press as a moograph. This publicatio ca be ordered through the LibQUAL+ web site at <http://www.libqual.org>. 2004 Data Screeig The 22 LibQUAL+ core quatitative items measure perceptios of total service quality, as well as three All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 9 of 90 sub-dimesios of perceived library quality: (a) Service Affect (9 items, such as "willigess to help users"); (b) Library as Place (5 items, such as "a getaway for study, learig, or research"); ad (c) Iformatio Cotrol (8 items, such as "a library Web site eablig me to locate iformatio o my ow" ad "prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I require for my work"). However, as happes i ay survey, i 2005 some users provided icomplete data, or icosistet data, or both. I compilig the summary data reported here, several criteria were used to determie which respodets to omit from these aalyses. 1. Complete Data. The Web software that presets the 22 core items moitors whether a give user has completed all items. O each of these items, i order to submit the survery successfully, users must provide a ratig of (a) miimally-acceptable service, (b) desired service, ad (c) perceived service or rate the item "ot applicable" ("NA"). If these coditios are ot met, whe the user attempts to leave the Web page presetig the 22 core items, the software shows the user where missig data are located, ad requests complete data. The user may of course abado the survey withougt completig all the items. Oly records with complete data o the 22 items ad where respodets chose a "user group," if applicable, were retaied i summary statistics. 2. Excessive "NA" Resposes. Because some istitutios provided access to a lottery drawig for a icetive (e.g., a Palm PDA) for completig the survey, some users might have selected "NA" choices for all or most of the items rather tha reportig their actual perceptios. Or some users may have views o such a arrow rage of quality issues that their data are ot very iformative. I this survey it was decided that records cotaiig more tha 11 "NA" resposes should be elimiated from the summary statistics. 3. Excessive Icosistet Resposes. O LibQUAL+ user perceptios ca be iterpreted by locatig "perceived" results withi the "zoe of tolerace" defied by data from the "miimum" ad the "desired" ratigs. For example, a mea "perceived" ratig o the 1-to-9 (9 is highest) scale of 7.5 might be very good if the mea "desired" ratig is 6.0. But a 7.5 perceptio score is less satisfactory if the mea "desired" ratig is 8.6, or if the mea "miimum" ratig is 7.7. Oe appealig feature of such a "gap measuremet model" is that the ratig format provides a check for icosistecies i the respose data (Thompso, Cook & Heath, 2000). Logically, o a give item the "miimum" ratig should ot be higher tha the "desired" ratig o the same item. For each user a cout of such icosistecies, ragig from "0" to "22," was made. Records cotaiig more tha 9 logical icosistecies were elimiated from the summary statistics. LibQUAL+ Norms A importat way to iterpret LibQUAL+ data is by examiig the zoes of tolerace for items, the three subscale scores, ad the total scores. However, the collectio of such a huge umber of user perceptios has afforded us with the uique opportuity to create orms tables that provide yet aother perspective o results. Norms tell us how scores "stack up" withi a particular user group. For example, o the 1-to-9 (9 is highest) scale, users might provide a mea "perceived" ratig of 6.5 o a item, "the prited library materials I eed for my work." The same users might provide a mea ratig o "miimum" for this item of 7.0, ad a mea service-adequacy "gap score" (i.e., "perceived" mius "miimum") of -0.5. All All

Page 10 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto The zoe-of-tolerace perspective suggests that this library is ot doig well o this item, because "perceived" falls below "miimally acceptable." This is importat to kow. But there is also a secod way (i.e., ormatively) to iterpret the data. Both perspectives ca be valuable. A total market survey admiistered to more tha 100,000 users, as was LibQUAL+ i 2004, affords the opportuity to ask ormative questios such as, "How does a mea 'perceived' score of 6.5 stack up amog all idividual users who completed the survey?", or "How does a mea service-adequacy gap score of -0.5 stack up amog the gap scores of all istitutios participatig i the survey?" If 70 percet of idividual users geerated "perceived" ratigs lower tha 6.5, 6.5 might ot be so bad. Ad if 90 percet of istitutios had service-adequacy gap scores lower tha -0.5 (e.g., -0.7, -1.1), a mea gap score of -0.5 might actually be quite good. Users simply may have quite high expectatios i this area. They may also commuicate their dissatisfactio by ratig both (a) "perceived" lower ad (b) "miimum" higher. This does ot mea that a service-adequacy gap score of -0.5 is ecessarily a cause for celebratio. But a service-adequacy gap score of -0.5 o a item for which 90 percet of istitutios have a lower gap score is a differet gap score tha the same -0.5 for a differet item i which 90 percet of istitutios have a higher service-adequacy gap score. Oly orms give us isight ito this comparative perspective. Ad a local user-satisfactio survey (as agaist a total market survey) ca ever provide this isight. Commo Miscoceptio Regardig Norms. A ufortuate ad icorrect miscoceptio is that orms make value statemets. Norms do ot make value statemets! Norms make fact statemets. If you are a forest rager, ad you make $25,000 a year, a orms table might iform you of the fact that you make less moey tha 85 percet of the adults i the Uited States. But if you love the outdoors, you do ot care very much about moey, ad you are very service-orieted, this fact statemet might ot be relevat to you. Or, i the cotext of your values, you might iterpret this fact as beig quite satisfactory. LibQUAL+ Norms Tables. Of course, the fact statemets made by the LibQUAL+ orms are oly valuable if you care about the dimesios beig evaluated by the measure. More backgroud o LibQUAL+ orms is provided by Cook ad Thompso (2001) ad Cook, Heath ad B. Thompso (2002). LibQUAL+ orms for earlier years are available o the Web at the followig URL: <http://www.coe.tamu.edu/~bthompso/libq2004.htm> Respose Rates At the America Library Associatio mid-witer meetig i Sa Atoio i Jauary, 2000, participats were cautioed that respose rates o the fial LibQUAL+ survey would probably rage from 25-33 percet. Higher respose rates ca be realized (a) with shorter surveys that (b) are directly actio-orieted (Cook, Heath & R.L. Thompso, 2000). For example, a very high respose rate could be realized by a library director admiisterig the followig oe-item survey to users: All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 11 of 90 Istructios. Please tell us what time to close the library every day. I the future we will close at whatever time receives the most votes. Should we close the library at? (A) 10 p.m. (B) 11 p.m. (C) midight (D) 2 p.m. Lower respose rates will be expected for total market surveys measurig geeral perceptios of users across istitutios, ad whe a itetioal effort is made to solicit perceptios of both users ad o-users. Two cosideratios should gover the evaluatio of LibQUAL+ respose rates. Miimum Respose Rates. Respose rates are computed by dividig the umber of completed surveys at a istitutio by the umber of persos asked to complete the survey. However, we do ot kow the actual respose rates o LibQUAL+, because we do ot kow the correct deomiators for these calculatios. For example, give iadequacy i records at schools, we are ot sure how may e-mail addresses for users are accurate. Ad we do ot kow how may messages to ivite participatio were actually opeed. I other words, what we kow for LibQUAL+ is the "lower-boud estimate" of respose rates. For example, if 200 out of 800 solicitatios result i completed surveys, we kow that the respose rate is at least 25 percet. But because we are ot sure whether 800 e-mail addresses were correct or that 800 e-mail messages were opeed, we are ot sure that 800 is the correct deomiator. The respose rate ivolvig oly correct e-mail addresses might be 35 or 45 percet. We do't kow the exact respose rate. Represetativeess Versus Respose Rate. If 100 percet of the 800 people we radomly selected to complete our survey did so, the we ca be assured that the results are represetative of all users. But if oly 25 percet of the 800 users complete the survey, the represetativeess of the results is ot assured. Nor is urepresetativeess assured. Represetativeess is actually a matter of degree. Ad several istitutios each with 25 percet respose rates may have data with differet degrees of represetativeess. We ca ever be sure about how represetative our data are as log as ot everyoe completes the survey. But we ca at least address this cocer by comparig the demographic profiles of survey completers with the populatio (Thompso, 2000). At which uiversity below would oe feel more cofidet that LibQUAL+ results were reasoably represetative? Alpha Uiversity Completers (=200 / 800) Populatio (N=16,000) Geder Geder Studets 53% female Studets 51% female Faculty 45% female Faculty 41% female Disciplies Disciplies Liberal Arts 40% Liberal Arts 35% Sciece 15% Sciece 20% Other 45% Other 45% Completers (=200 / 800) Omega Uiversity Populatio (N=23,000) All All

Page 12 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Geder Geder Studets 35% female Studets 59% female Faculty 65% female Faculty 43% female Disciplies Disciplies Liberal Arts 40% Liberal Arts 15% Sciece 20% Sciece 35% Other 40% Other 50% The persuasiveess of such aalyses is greater as the umber of variables used i the comparisos is greater. The LibQUAL+ software has bee expaded to automate these comparisos ad to output side-by-side graphs ad tables comparig sample ad populatio profiles for give istitutios. Show these to people who questio result represetativeess. However, oe cautio is i order regardig percetages. Whe total is small for a istitutio, or withi a particular subgroup, huge chages i percetages ca result from very small shifts i umbers. LibQUAL+ Iteractive Statistics I additio to the istitutio ad group otebooks ad the orms, LibQUAL+ has also provided a iteractive eviromet for data aalysis where istitutios ca mie istitutioal data for peer comparisos. The LibQUAL+ Iteractive Statistics web page icludes graphig capabilities for all LibQUAL+ scores (total ad dimesio scores) for each idividual istitutio or groups of istitutios. Graphs may be geerated i either jpeg format for presetatio purposes or flash format that icludes more detailed iformatio for olie browsig. Tables may also be produced i a iteractive fashio for oe or multiple selectios of variables for all idividual istitutios or groups of participatig istitutios. Additioal developmet aims at deliverig orms i a iteractive eviromet. To access the LibQUAL+ Iteractive Statistics olie, go to: <http://www.libqual.org/maage/results/idex.cfm> Survey Data I additio to the otebooks, the iteractive statistics, ad the orms, LibQUAL+ also makes available (a) raw survey data i SPSS at the request of participatig libraries, ad (b) raw survey data i Excel for all participatig libraries. Additioal traiig usig the SPSS datafile is available as a follow-up workshop activity ad through the Service Quality Evaluatio Academy (see below), which also offers traiig o aalyzig qualitative data. The survey commets are also dowloadable i Excel format. ARL Service Quality Evaluatio Academy LibQUAL+ is a importat tool i the New Measures toolbox that librarias ca use to improve service quality. But, eve more fudametally, the LibQUAL+ iitiative is more tha a sigle tool. LibQUAL+ is a effort to create a culture of data-drive service quality assessmet ad service quality improvemet withi libraries. Such a culture must be iformed by more tha oe tool, ad by more tha oly oe of the 11 ways of listeig to users. To facilitate a culture of service quality assessmet, ad to facilitate more iformed usage of LibQUAL+ data, the Associatio of Research Libraries has created the aual ARL Service Quality Evaluatio Academy. For more iformatio about the Academy, see the LibQUAL+ evets page at All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 13 of 90 <http://www.libqual.org/evets/idex.cfm> The itesive, five-day Academy teaches both qualitative ad quatitative skills that library staff ca use to evaluate ad geerate service-quality assessmet iformatio. The third cohort of Academy participats graduated i May, 2004. The Academy is oe more resource for library staff who would like to develop ehaced service-quality assessmet skills. For more iformatio, about LibQUAL+ or the Associatio of Research Libraries Statistics ad Measuremet program, see: <http://www.libqual.org/> <http://www.statsqual.org/> <http://www.arl.org/> Refereces Berry, L.L. (1995). O great service: A framework for actio. New York: The Free Press. Cook, C.C., Heath F., Thompso, B. LibQUAL+ from the UK Perspective. 5th Northumbria Iteratioal Coferece Proceedigs, Durham, UK, July, 2003. Cook, C.C. (2002a). A mixed-methods approach to the idetificatio ad measuremet of academic library service quality costructs: LibQUAL+. (Doctoral dissertatio, Texas A&M Uiversity, 2001). Dissertatio Abstracts Iteratioal, 62, 2295A. (Uiversity Microfilms No. AAT3020024) Cook, C. (Guest Ed.). (2002b). Library decisio-makers speak to their uses of their LibQUAL+ data: Some LibQUAL+ " case studies. Performace Measuremet ad Metrics, 3. Cook, C., & Heath, F. (2001). Users' perceptios of library service quality: A "LibQUAL+ " qualitative study. Library Treds, 49, 548-584. Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompso, B. (2002). Score orms for improvig library service quality: A LibQUAL+ study. portal: Libraries ad the Academy, 2, 13-26. Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompso, B. (2003). "Zoes of tolerace" i perceptios of library service quality: A LibQUAL+ study. portal: Libraries ad the Academy, 3, 113-123. Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompso, B. (forthcomig). Improvig service quality i libraries: LibQUAL+. Washigto, DC: Associatio of Research Libraries. (Iteratioal Stadard Book Number 0-918006-96-1) [out i Summer/Fall 2004] Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompso, R.L. (2000). A meta-aalysis of respose rates i Web- or Iteret-based surveys. Educatioal ad Psychological Measuremet, 60, 821-836. Cook, C., & Thompso, B. (2001). Psychometric properties of scores from the Web-based LibQUAL+ study of perceptios of library service quality. Library Treds, 49, 585-604. Culle, R. (2001). Perspectives o user satisfactio surveys. Library Treds, 49, 662-686. Heath, F., Kyrillidou, M. & Askew, C.A. (Guest Eds.). (i press). Libraries report o their LibQUAL+ fidigs: From Data to Actio. Joural of Library Admiistratio. Heath, F., Cook, C., Kyrillidou, M., & Thompso, B. (2002). ARL Idex ad other validity correlates of LibQUAL+ scores. portal: Libraries ad the Academy, 2, 27-42. Kyrillidou, M., Olshe, T., Heath, F., Boelly, C., ad Cote, J. P. Cross-cultural implemetatio of LibQUAL+ : the Frech laguage experiece. 5th Northumbria Iteratioal Coferece Proceedigs, Durham, UK, All All

Page 14 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto July, 2003. Kyrillidou, M. ad Youg, M. (2004). ARL Statistics 2002-03. Washigto, DC: Associatio of Research Libraries. Nitecki, D.A. (1996). Chagig the cocept ad measure of service quality i academic libraries. The Joural of Academic Librariaship, 22, 181-190. Parasurama, A., Berry, L.L., ad Zeithaml, V.A. Refiemet ad Reassessmet of the SERVQUAL Scale. Joural of Retailig 67 (1991): 420-450. Thompso, B. (2000, October). Represetativeess versus respose rate: It ai't the respose rate!. Paper preseted at the Associatio of Research Libraries (ARL) Measurig Service Quality Symposium o the New Culture of Assessmet: Measurig Service Quality, Washigto, DC. Thompso, B., Cook, C., & Heath, F. (2000). The LibQUAL+ gap measuremet model: The bad, the ugly, ad the good of gap measuremet. Performace Measuremet ad Metrics, 1, 165-178. Thompso, B., Cook, C., & Heath, F. (2003). Structure of perceptios of service quality i libraries: A LibQUAL+ study. Structural Equatio Modelig, 10, 456-464. Thompso, B., Cook, C., & Thompso, R.L. (2002). Reliability ad structure of LibQUAL+ scores: Measurig perceived library service quality. portal: Libraries ad the Academy, 2, 3-12. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasurama, A., Berry, L.L. (1990). Deliverig quality service: Balacig customer perceptios ad expectatios. New York: Free Press. All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 15 of 90 1.6 Library Statistics for Uiversity of Texas at Arligto The statistical data below were provided by the participatig istitutio i the olie Represetativeess* sectio. Defiitios for these items ca be foud i the ARL Statistics: <http://www.arl.org/stats/pubpdf/arlstat03.pdf>. Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe statistical data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Volumes held Jue 30, 2004: Volumes added durig year - Gross: Total umber of curret serials received: Total library expeditures (i U): Persoel - professioal staff, FTE: Persoel - support staff, FTE: 1,135,943 35,304 37,662 $10,478,832 48 77 1.7 Cotact Iformatio for Uiversity of Texas at Arligto The perso below served as the istitutio's primary LibQUAL+ liaiso durig this survey implemetatio. Name: Title: Address: Phoe: Email: Ms. Kare L. Hopkis Asst. to the Directorate for Plaig ad Assessmet 702 College Street Cetral Library Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Arligto, TX 76019 USA 817-272-7158 klhopkis@uta.edu All All

Page 16 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 2 Demographic Summary for Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 2.1 Respodets by User Group User Group Respodet Respodet % Udergraduate First year Secod year Third year Fourth year Fifth year ad above No-degree 39 4.45% 51 5.82% 111 12.66% 95 10.83% 48 5.47% 6 0.68% Sub Total: 350 39.91% Graduate Masters Doctoral No-degree or Udecided 284 32.38% 62 7.07% 13 1.48% Sub Total: 359 40.94% Faculty Adjuct Faculty Assistat Professor Associate Professor Lecturer Professor Other Academic Status 9 1.03% 33 3.76% 32 3.65% 10 1.14% 28 3.19% 9 1.03% Sub Total: 121 13.80% Library Staff Admiistrator Maager, Head of Uit Public Services Systems Techical Services Other 1 0.11% 6 0.68% 16 1.82% 2 0.23% 6 0.68% 7 0.80% Sub Total: 38 4.33% Staff Research Staff Other staff positios 3 0.34% 6 0.68% Sub Total: 9 1.03% Total: 877 100.00% All All

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 17 of 90 2.2 Populatio ad Respodets by User Sub-Group The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by sub-group (e.g. First year, Masters, Professor), based o user resposes to the demographic questios at the ed of the survey istrumet ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each user subgroup i red. Populatio percetages for each user subgroup are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each user sub-group for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. First year (Udergraduate) Secod year (Udergraduate) Third year (Udergraduate) Fourth year (Udergraduate) Fifth year ad above (Udergraduate) No-degree (Udergraduate) User Sub-Group Masters (Graduate) Doctoral (Graduate) No-degree or Udecided (Graduate) Adjuct Faculty (Faculty) Assistat Professor (Faculty) Associate Professor (Faculty) Lecturer (Faculty) Professor (Faculty) Other Academic Status (Faculty) Respodet Profile by User Sub-Group Populatio Profile by User Sub-Group 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percetage All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff)

Page 18 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto User Sub-Group Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % First year (Udergraduate) 3,618 13.66% 39 4.70% 8.96% Secod year (Udergraduate) 3,884 14.66% 51 6.14% 8.52% Third year (Udergraduate) 4,775 18.03% 111 13.37% 4.66% Fourth year (Udergraduate) 5,982 22.59% 95 11.45% 11.14% Fifth year ad above (Udergraduate) 0 0.00% 48 5.78% -5.78% No-degree (Udergraduate) 855 3.23% 6 0.72% 2.51% Masters (Graduate) 5,324 20.10% 284 34.22% -14.11% Doctoral (Graduate) 859 3.24% 62 7.47% -4.23% No-degree or Udecided (Graduate) 0 0.00% 13 1.57% -1.57% Adjuct Faculty (Faculty) 76 0.29% 9 1.08% -0.80% Assistat Professor (Faculty) 163 0.62% 33 3.98% -3.36% Associate Professor (Faculty) 174 0.66% 32 3.86% -3.20% Lecturer (Faculty) 172 0.65% 10 1.20% -0.56% Professor (Faculty) 206 0.78% 28 3.37% -2.60% Other Academic Status (Faculty) 397 1.50% 9 1.08% 0.41% Total: 26,485 100.00% 830 100.00% 0.00% All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 19 of 90 2.3 Populatio ad Respodets by Stadard Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the LibQUAL+ stadard disciplie categories. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Agriculture / Evirometal Studies Architecture Busiess Commuicatios / Jouralism Educatio Egieerig / Computer Sciece Geeral Studies Disciplie Health Scieces Humaities Law Military / Naval Sciece Other Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Percetage All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff)

Page 20 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Agriculture / Evirometal Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Architecture 1,186 4.48% 42 5.06% -0.58% Busiess 5,006 18.90% 132 15.90% 3.00% Commuicatios / Jouralism 842 3.18% 17 2.05% 1.13% Educatio 889 3.36% 54 6.51% -3.15% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 4,089 15.44% 194 23.37% -7.93% Geeral Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Health Scieces 3,825 14.44% 76 9.16% 5.29% Humaities 1,494 5.64% 76 9.16% -3.52% Law 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Military / Naval Sciece 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Other 2,387 9.01% 49 5.90% 3.11% Performig & Fie Arts 1,012 3.82% 25 3.01% 0.81% Sciece / Math 609 2.30% 62 7.47% -5.17% Social Scieces / Psychology 2,406 9.08% 85 10.24% -1.16% Udecided 2,740 10.35% 18 2.17% 8.18% Total: 26,485 100.00% 830 100.00% 0.00% All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 21 of 90 2.4 Populatio ad Respodets by Customized Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the customized disciplie categories supplied by the participatig library. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Architecture Busiess Child Studies Commuicatios / Jouralism Crimiology Educatio Disciplie Egieerig / Computer Sciece Health Scieces Humaities Iterdiscipliary Studies Kiesiology Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Percetage All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff)

Page 22 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Architecture 1,186 4.48% 42 5.06% -0.58% Busiess 5,006 18.90% 132 15.90% 3.00% Child Studies 32 0.12% 3 0.36% -0.24% Commuicatios / Jouralism 842 3.18% 17 2.05% 1.13% Crimiology 587 2.22% 12 1.45% 0.77% Educatio 889 3.36% 54 6.51% -3.15% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 4,089 15.44% 194 23.37% -7.93% Health Scieces 3,825 14.44% 76 9.16% 5.29% Humaities 1,494 5.64% 76 9.16% -3.52% Iterdiscipliary Studies 1,361 5.14% 20 2.41% 2.73% Kiesiology 407 1.54% 14 1.69% -0.15% Performig & Fie Arts 1,012 3.82% 25 3.01% 0.81% Sciece / Math 609 2.30% 62 7.47% -5.17% Social Scieces / Psychology 2,406 9.08% 85 10.24% -1.16% Udecided 2,740 10.35% 18 2.17% 8.18% Total: 26,485 100.00% 830 100.00% 0.00% All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff, Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 23 of 90 2.5 Respodet Profile by Age This table shows a breakdow of survey respodets by age; both the umber of respodets () ad the percetage of the total umber of respodets represeted by each age group are displayed. Age Respodets Respodets % Uder 18 2 0.24% 18-22 220 26.22% 23-30 303 36.11% 31-45 194 23.12% 46-65 109 12.99% Over 65 11 1.31% Total: 839 100.00% 2.6 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles by Sex The table below shows a breakdow of survey respodets by sex, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The umber ad percetage for each sex are give for the geeral populatio ad for survey respodets. *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Sex Populatio N Populatio % Respodets Respodets % Male 12,728 48.06% 410 48.87% Female 13,757 51.94% 429 51.13% Total: 26,485 100.00% 839 100.00% All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

Page 24 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 3 Survey Item Summary for Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 3.1 Core Questios Summary This radar chart shows aggregate results for the core survey questios. Each axis represets oe questio. A code to idetify each questio is displayed at the outer poit of each axis. While questios for each dimesio of library service quality are scattered radomly throughout the survey, o this chart they are grouped ito sectios: Affect of Service, Library as Place, ad Iformatio Cotrol. O each axis, respodets' miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted, ad the resultig "gaps" betwee the three levels (represetig service adequacy or service superiority) are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. The two followig tables show mea scores ad stadard deviatios for each questio, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) AS-7 AS-6 AS-5 Affect of Service AS-8 AS-4 AS-9 AS-3 IC-1 AS-2 IC-2 AS-1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IC-3 LP-5 IC-4 LP-4 Iformatio Cotrol IC-5 IC-6 LP-2 LP-3 Library as Place IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 Perceived Less Tha Miimum Perceived Greater Tha Miimum Perceived Less Tha Desired Perceived Greater Tha Desired All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 25 of 90 ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 5.76 7.49 6.62 0.86-0.87 810 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 5.86 7.24 6.63 0.77-0.62 823 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 6.70 7.93 7.24 0.55-0.69 830 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 6.62 7.88 7.26 0.64-0.62 823 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 6.68 7.97 7.21 0.53-0.76 821 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 6.46 7.75 7.15 0.69-0.60 818 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 6.70 7.92 7.21 0.51-0.71 817 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 6.71 7.91 7.35 0.65-0.56 817 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 6.76 7.99 7.26 0.50-0.72 735 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 6.65 8.20 7.09 0.44-1.11 816 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 6.84 8.21 7.08 0.24-1.13 835 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 6.59 7.88 7.06 0.47-0.83 808 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 6.69 8.12 7.10 0.41-1.02 828 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 6.99 8.22 7.47 0.48-0.75 825 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 6.87 8.19 7.20 0.33-0.99 826 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 6.81 8.09 7.29 0.48-0.81 824 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 6.94 8.22 7.18 0.24-1.04 796 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 6.25 7.77 6.40 0.15-1.37 803 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 6.31 7.63 6.57 0.26-1.06 797 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 6.59 7.94 7.09 0.51-0.85 814 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 6.46 7.80 6.91 0.45-0.89 798 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 5.97 7.36 6.78 0.81-0.58 737 study Overall: 6.56 7.90 7.06 0.49-0.85 839 All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

Page 26 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 1.83 1.53 1.64 1.84 1.72 810 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 1.97 1.71 1.73 1.85 1.70 823 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 1.81 1.38 1.65 1.88 1.71 830 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 1.74 1.33 1.52 1.80 1.61 823 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 1.80 1.30 1.57 1.84 1.59 821 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 1.81 1.37 1.50 1.82 1.58 818 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 1.76 1.28 1.51 1.81 1.57 817 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 1.75 1.30 1.47 1.79 1.54 817 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 1.74 1.30 1.49 1.78 1.51 735 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 1.87 1.25 1.76 2.01 1.76 816 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 1.73 1.17 1.69 2.07 1.72 835 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 1.84 1.42 1.66 2.04 1.85 808 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 1.74 1.22 1.50 1.90 1.63 828 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 1.74 1.12 1.39 1.80 1.52 825 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 1.72 1.20 1.44 1.91 1.59 826 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 1.69 1.21 1.39 1.81 1.49 824 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 1.78 1.28 1.62 2.06 1.77 796 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 1.99 1.66 1.85 2.39 2.21 803 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 2.06 1.76 1.87 2.52 2.32 797 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 1.87 1.35 1.68 2.05 1.89 814 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 1.96 1.63 1.66 2.10 1.94 798 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 2.13 1.89 1.76 2.35 2.19 737 study Overall: 1.42 0.96 1.13 1.40 1.14 839 All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 27 of 90 3.2 Core Questio Dimesios Summary O the chart below, scores for each dimesio of library service quality have bee plotted graphically. The exterior bars represet the rage of miimum to desired mea scores for each dimesio. The iterior bars represet the rage of miimum to perceived mea scores (the service adequacy gap) for each dimesio of library service quality. 9 8 7 6 5 4 Affect of Service Iformatio Cotrol Library as Place Overall Dimesio Rage of Miimum to Desired Rage of Miimum to Perceived ("Adequacy Gap") All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

Page 28 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto The followig table displays mea scores for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 6.47 7.78 7.10 0.63-0.68 839 Iformatio Cotrol 6.80 8.14 7.18 0.39-0.96 839 Library as Place 6.32 7.70 6.75 0.43-0.94 828 Overall: 6.56 7.90 7.06 0.49-0.85 839 The followig table displays stadard deviatio for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 1.50 1.08 1.26 1.44 1.23 839 Iformatio Cotrol 1.47 0.95 1.18 1.52 1.22 839 Library as Place 1.68 1.32 1.41 1.81 1.63 828 Overall: 1.42 0.96 1.13 1.40 1.14 839 All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 29 of 90 3.3 Local Questios Summary This table shows mea scores for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 5.84 7.33 6.61 0.77-0.73 831 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 6.16 7.50 6.91 0.75-0.58 802 A secure ad safe place 7.24 8.23 7.66 0.42-0.57 816 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 6.84 7.95 7.35 0.51-0.60 749 6.75 8.09 7.42 0.66-0.67 698 This table displays stadard deviatios for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 1.88 1.62 1.74 2.02 1.99 831 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 1.92 1.63 1.59 1.92 1.72 802 A secure ad safe place 1.81 1.28 1.52 1.84 1.52 816 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 1.87 1.43 1.60 1.95 1.63 1.82 1.30 1.46 1.84 1.54 749 698 All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

Page 30 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 3.4 Geeral Satisfactio Questios Summary This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the geeral satisfactio questios: Satisfactio with Treatmet, Satisfactio with Support, ad Satisfactio with Overall Quality of Service, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the geeral satisfactio questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9. Satisfactio Questio I geeral, I am satisfied with the way i which I am treated at the library. 7.40 1.52 838 I geeral, I am satisfied with library support for my learig, research, ad/or teachig eeds. 7.13 1.64 839 How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.29 1.33 839 3.5 Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios Summary This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the iformatio literacy outcomes questios, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the iformatio literacy outcomes questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9 with 1 beig "strogly disagree" ad 9 represetig "strogly agree". Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios The library helps me stay abreast of developmets i my field(s) of iterest. 6.39 1.78 839 The library aids my advacemet i my academic disciplie. 6.97 1.62 839 The library eables me to be more efficiet i my academic pursuits. 7.04 1.61 839 The library helps me distiguish betwee trustworthy ad utrustworthy iformatio. 6.12 1.90 839 The library provides me with the iformatio skills I eed i my work or study. 6.62 1.73 839 All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 31 of 90 3.6 Library Use Summary This chart shows a graphic represetatio of library use (both o the premises ad electroically), as well as use of o-library iformatio gateways such as Yahoo ad Google. Bars represet the frequecy with which respodets report usig these resources: Daily, Weekly, Mothly, Quarterly, or Never. The table below the chart displays the umber ad percetage of respodets who selected each optio. 100 90 80 Percetage 70 60 50 40 30 How ofte do you use resources o library premises? How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 20 10 0 Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never Frequecy Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never / % How ofte do you use resources o library premises? 250 29.80% 339 40.41% 156 18.59% 66 7.87% 28 3.34% 839 100.00% How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? 238 28.40% 365 43.56% 136 16.23% 62 7.40% 37 4.42% 838 100.00% How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 630 75.09% 143 17.04% 39 4.65% 16 1.91% 11 1.31% 839 100.00% All (Excludig Library Staff) All (Excludig Library Staff)

Page 32 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 4 Udergraduate Summary 4.1 Demographic Summary for Udergraduate 4.1.1 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Udergraduate by Stadard Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the LibQUAL+ stadard disciplie categories. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). Agriculture / Evirometal Studies Architecture Busiess Commuicatios / Jouralism Educatio Egieerig / Computer Sciece Geeral Studies Disciplie Health Scieces Humaities Law Military / Naval Sciece Other Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Percetage Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 33 of 90 Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Agriculture / Evirometal Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Architecture 864 4.52% 17 4.86% -0.34% Busiess 3,940 20.61% 52 14.86% 5.76% Commuicatios / Jouralism 777 4.07% 13 3.71% 0.35% Educatio 8 0.04% 21 6.00% -5.96% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 1,926 10.08% 48 13.71% -3.64% Geeral Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Health Scieces 3,140 16.43% 54 15.43% 1.00% Humaities 1,040 5.44% 16 4.57% 0.87% Law 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Military / Naval Sciece 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Other 2,176 11.38% 37 10.57% 0.81% Performig & Fie Arts 917 4.80% 14 4.00% 0.80% Sciece / Math 310 1.62% 31 8.86% -7.24% Social Scieces / Psychology 1,276 6.68% 30 8.57% -1.90% Udecided 2,740 14.34% 17 4.86% 9.48% Total: 19,114 100.00% 350 100.00% 0.00% Udergraduate Udergraduate

Page 34 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 4.1.2 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Udergraduate by Customized Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the customized disciplie categories supplied by the participatig library. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). Architecture Busiess Child Studies Commuicatios / Jouralism Crimiology Educatio Disciplie Egieerig / Computer Sciece Health Scieces Humaities Iterdiscipliary Studies Kiesiology Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Percetage Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 35 of 90 Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Architecture 864 4.52% 17 4.86% -0.34% Busiess 3,940 20.61% 52 14.86% 5.76% Child Studies 32 0.17% 2 0.57% -0.40% Commuicatios / Jouralism 777 4.07% 13 3.71% 0.35% Crimiology 505 2.64% 10 2.86% -0.22% Educatio 8 0.04% 21 6.00% -5.96% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 1,926 10.08% 48 13.71% -3.64% Health Scieces 3,140 16.43% 54 15.43% 1.00% Humaities 1,040 5.44% 16 4.57% 0.87% Iterdiscipliary Studies 1,284 6.72% 14 4.00% 2.72% Kiesiology 355 1.86% 11 3.14% -1.29% Performig & Fie Arts 917 4.80% 14 4.00% 0.80% Sciece / Math 310 1.62% 31 8.86% -7.24% Social Scieces / Psychology 1,276 6.68% 30 8.57% -1.90% Udecided 2,740 14.34% 17 4.86% 9.48% Total: 19,114 100.00% 350 100.00% 0.00% Udergraduate Udergraduate

Page 36 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 4.1.3 Respodet Profile for Udergraduate by Age This table shows a breakdow of survey respodets by age; both the umber of respodets () ad the percetage of the total umber of respodets represeted by each age group are displayed. Age Respodets Respodets % Uder 18 2 0.57% 18-22 191 54.57% 23-30 99 28.29% 31-45 48 13.71% 46-65 10 2.86% Over 65 0 0.00% Total: 350 100.00% 4.1.4 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Udergraduate by Sex The table below shows a breakdow of survey respodets by sex, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The umber ad percetage for each sex are give for the geeral populatio ad for survey respodets. *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Sex Populatio N Populatio % Respodets Respodets % Male 8,941 46.78% 150 42.86% Female 10,173 53.22% 200 57.14% Total: 19,114 100.00% 350 100.00% Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 37 of 90 4.2 Core Questios Summary for Udergraduate This radar chart shows aggregate results for the core survey questios. Each axis represets oe questio. A code to idetify each questio is displayed at the outer poit of each axis. While questios for each dimesio of library service quality are scattered radomly throughout the survey, o this chart they are grouped ito sectios: Affect of Service, Library as Place, ad Iformatio Cotrol. O each axis, respodets' miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted, ad the resultig "gaps" betwee the three levels (represetig service adequacy or service superiority) are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. The two followig tables show mea scores ad stadard deviatios for each questio, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) AS-7 AS-6 AS-5 Affect of Service AS-8 AS-4 AS-9 AS-3 IC-1 AS-2 IC-2 AS-1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IC-3 LP-5 IC-4 LP-4 Iformatio Cotrol IC-5 IC-6 LP-2 LP-3 Library as Place IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 Perceived Less Tha Miimum Perceived Greater Tha Miimum Perceived Less Tha Desired Perceived Greater Tha Desired Udergraduate Udergraduate

Page 38 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 5.58 7.36 6.49 0.91-0.87 342 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 5.55 6.95 6.34 0.79-0.62 345 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 6.58 7.80 6.99 0.42-0.81 344 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 6.41 7.69 7.02 0.61-0.67 339 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 6.54 7.91 7.20 0.65-0.71 340 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 6.36 7.67 7.02 0.66-0.65 341 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 6.49 7.78 7.15 0.66-0.63 338 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 6.48 7.73 7.24 0.76-0.49 341 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 6.51 7.86 7.19 0.67-0.67 311 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 6.35 7.96 6.98 0.64-0.98 342 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 6.57 7.97 7.04 0.47-0.93 347 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 6.40 7.75 7.12 0.72-0.63 333 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 6.37 7.88 7.05 0.68-0.84 343 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 6.85 8.12 7.49 0.64-0.63 343 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 6.62 8.00 7.20 0.58-0.80 342 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 6.55 7.87 7.25 0.70-0.62 343 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 6.56 7.90 7.17 0.61-0.74 321 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 6.30 7.90 6.36 0.06-1.54 345 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 6.32 7.74 6.57 0.24-1.17 345 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 6.62 8.02 7.17 0.55-0.84 341 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 6.56 7.92 7.00 0.44-0.91 345 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 6.15 7.61 6.80 0.66-0.80 323 study Overall: 6.40 7.79 6.99 0.59-0.81 350 Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 39 of 90 ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 1.81 1.50 1.61 1.74 1.69 342 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 1.97 1.82 1.81 1.82 1.77 345 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 1.89 1.44 1.75 1.94 1.76 344 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 1.82 1.42 1.59 1.80 1.62 339 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 1.85 1.28 1.52 1.76 1.49 340 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 1.84 1.39 1.51 1.79 1.55 341 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 1.84 1.27 1.46 1.78 1.47 338 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 1.84 1.39 1.50 1.73 1.60 341 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 1.86 1.37 1.43 1.72 1.46 311 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 1.94 1.35 1.80 2.03 1.81 342 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 1.81 1.29 1.75 2.03 1.79 347 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 1.98 1.52 1.65 2.00 1.72 333 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 1.85 1.33 1.53 1.91 1.68 343 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 1.87 1.16 1.43 1.85 1.55 343 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 1.85 1.30 1.51 1.86 1.67 342 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 1.83 1.37 1.36 1.75 1.43 343 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 1.99 1.51 1.59 1.99 1.65 321 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 2.01 1.56 1.91 2.38 2.18 345 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 2.00 1.60 1.86 2.40 2.19 345 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 1.92 1.29 1.65 1.90 1.78 341 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 1.93 1.47 1.66 1.99 1.81 345 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 2.10 1.59 1.76 2.29 2.00 323 study Overall: 1.50 1.01 1.13 1.35 1.13 350 Udergraduate Udergraduate

Page 40 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 4.3 Core Questio Dimesios Summary for Udergraduate O the chart below, scores for each dimesio of library service quality have bee plotted graphically. The exterior bars represet the rage of miimum to desired mea scores for each dimesio. The iterior bars represet the rage of miimum to perceived mea scores (the service adequacy gap) for each dimesio of library service quality. 9 8 7 6 5 4 Affect of Service Iformatio Cotrol Library as Place Overall Dimesio Rage of Miimum to Desired Rage of Miimum to Perceived ("Adequacy Gap") Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 41 of 90 The followig table displays mea scores for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 6.28 7.63 6.95 0.68-0.68 350 Iformatio Cotrol 6.53 7.93 7.15 0.62-0.78 350 Library as Place 6.39 7.83 6.77 0.38-1.06 348 Overall: 6.40 7.79 6.99 0.59-0.81 350 The followig table displays stadard deviatio for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 1.52 1.10 1.22 1.34 1.18 350 Iformatio Cotrol 1.56 1.04 1.19 1.46 1.20 350 Library as Place 1.64 1.13 1.37 1.71 1.51 348 Overall: 1.50 1.01 1.13 1.35 1.13 350 Udergraduate Udergraduate

Page 42 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 4.4 Local Questios Summary for Udergraduate This table shows mea scores for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 5.56 7.09 6.45 0.89-0.64 344 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 5.95 7.42 6.71 0.76-0.70 332 A secure ad safe place 7.25 8.31 7.68 0.43-0.63 343 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 6.64 7.72 7.35 0.71-0.37 299 6.35 7.77 7.25 0.90-0.52 277 This table displays stadard deviatios for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 1.95 1.71 1.80 2.04 2.13 344 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 1.94 1.56 1.64 1.92 1.72 332 A secure ad safe place 1.80 1.13 1.49 1.75 1.39 343 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 1.98 1.55 1.58 1.77 1.42 1.97 1.47 1.46 1.80 1.55 299 277 Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 43 of 90 4.5 Geeral Satisfactio Questios Summary for Udergraduate This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the geeral satisfactio questios: Satisfactio with Treatmet, Satisfactio with Support, ad Satisfactio with Overall Quality of Service, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the geeral satisfactio questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9. Satisfactio Questio I geeral, I am satisfied with the way i which I am treated at the library. 7.36 1.56 350 I geeral, I am satisfied with library support for my learig, research, ad/or teachig eeds. 7.16 1.64 350 How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.28 1.30 350 4.6 Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios Summary for Udergraduate This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the iformatio literacy outcomes questios, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the iformatio literacy outcomes questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9 with 1 beig "strogly disagree" ad 9 represetig "strogly agree". Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios The library helps me stay abreast of developmets i my field(s) of iterest. 6.12 1.81 350 The library aids my advacemet i my academic disciplie. 6.78 1.67 350 The library eables me to be more efficiet i my academic pursuits. 6.87 1.67 350 The library helps me distiguish betwee trustworthy ad utrustworthy iformatio. 6.33 1.89 350 The library provides me with the iformatio skills I eed i my work or study. 6.67 1.70 350 Udergraduate Udergraduate

Page 44 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 4.7 Library Use Summary for Udergraduate 100 This chart shows a graphic represetatio of library use (both o the premises ad electroically), as well as use of o-library iformatio gateways such as Yahoo ad Google. Bars represet the frequecy with which respodets report usig these resources: Daily, Weekly, Mothly, Quarterly, or Never. The table below the chart displays the umber ad percetage of respodets who selected each optio. 90 80 Percetage 70 60 50 40 30 How ofte do you use resources o library premises? How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 20 10 0 Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never Frequecy Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never / % How ofte do you use resources o library premises? 108 30.86% 146 41.71% 59 16.86% 23 6.57% 14 4.00% 350 100.00% How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? 56 16.05% 142 40.69% 76 21.78% 44 12.61% 31 8.88% 349 100.00% How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 262 74.86% 54 15.43% 20 5.71% 9 2.57% 5 1.43% 350 100.00% Udergraduate Udergraduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 45 of 90 5 Graduate Summary 5.1 Demographic Summary for Graduate 5.1.1 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Graduate by Stadard Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the LibQUAL+ stadard disciplie categories. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). Agriculture / Evirometal Studies Architecture Busiess Commuicatios / Jouralism Educatio Egieerig / Computer Sciece Geeral Studies Disciplie Health Scieces Humaities Law Military / Naval Sciece Other Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Percetage Graduate Graduate

Page 46 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Agriculture / Evirometal Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Architecture 274 4.43% 24 6.69% -2.25% Busiess 957 15.48% 68 18.94% -3.46% Commuicatios / Jouralism 18 0.29% 1 0.28% 0.01% Educatio 819 13.25% 25 6.96% 6.28% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 1,991 32.20% 137 38.16% -5.96% Geeral Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Health Scieces 550 8.90% 13 3.62% 5.27% Humaities 304 4.92% 32 8.91% -4.00% Law 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Military / Naval Sciece 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Other 135 2.18% 4 1.11% 1.07% Performig & Fie Arts 0 0.00% 2 0.56% -0.56% Sciece / Math 189 3.06% 20 5.57% -2.51% Social Scieces / Psychology 946 15.30% 32 8.91% 6.39% Udecided 0 0.00% 1 0.28% -0.28% Total: 6,183 100.00% 359 100.00% 0.00% Graduate Graduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 47 of 90 5.1.2 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Graduate by Customized Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the customized disciplie categories supplied by the participatig library. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). Architecture Busiess Child Studies Commuicatios / Jouralism Crimiology Educatio Disciplie Egieerig / Computer Sciece Health Scieces Humaities Iterdiscipliary Studies Kiesiology Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Percetage Graduate Graduate

Page 48 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Architecture 274 4.43% 24 6.69% -2.25% Busiess 957 15.48% 68 18.94% -3.46% Child Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Commuicatios / Jouralism 18 0.29% 1 0.28% 0.01% Crimiology 62 1.00% 0 0.00% 1.00% Educatio 819 13.25% 25 6.96% 6.28% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 1,991 32.20% 137 38.16% -5.96% Health Scieces 550 8.90% 13 3.62% 5.27% Humaities 304 4.92% 32 8.91% -4.00% Iterdiscipliary Studies 63 1.02% 4 1.11% -0.10% Kiesiology 10 0.16% 0 0.00% 0.16% Performig & Fie Arts 0 0.00% 2 0.56% -0.56% Sciece / Math 189 3.06% 20 5.57% -2.51% Social Scieces / Psychology 946 15.30% 32 8.91% 6.39% Udecided 0 0.00% 1 0.28% -0.28% Total: 6,183 100.00% 359 100.00% 0.00% Graduate Graduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 49 of 90 5.1.3 Respodet Profile for Graduate by Age This table shows a breakdow of survey respodets by age; both the umber of respodets () ad the percetage of the total umber of respodets represeted by each age group are displayed. Age Respodets Respodets % Uder 18 0 0.00% 18-22 28 7.80% 23-30 198 55.15% 31-45 100 27.86% 46-65 33 9.19% Over 65 0 0.00% Total: 359 100.00% 5.1.4 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Graduate by Sex The table below shows a breakdow of survey respodets by sex, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The umber ad percetage for each sex are give for the geeral populatio ad for survey respodets. *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Sex Populatio N Populatio % Respodets Respodets % Male 3,078 49.78% 202 56.27% Female 3,105 50.22% 157 43.73% Total: 6,183 100.00% 359 100.00% Graduate Graduate

Page 50 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 5.2 Core Questios Summary for Graduate This radar chart shows aggregate results for the core survey questios. Each axis represets oe questio. A code to idetify each questio is displayed at the outer poit of each axis. While questios for each dimesio of library service quality are scattered radomly throughout the survey, o this chart they are grouped ito sectios: Affect of Service, Library as Place, ad Iformatio Cotrol. O each axis, respodets' miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted, ad the resultig "gaps" betwee the three levels (represetig service adequacy or service superiority) are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. The two followig tables show mea scores ad stadard deviatios for each questio, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) AS-7 AS-6 AS-5 Affect of Service AS-8 AS-4 AS-9 AS-3 IC-1 AS-2 IC-2 AS-1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IC-3 LP-5 IC-4 LP-4 Iformatio Cotrol IC-5 IC-6 LP-2 LP-3 Library as Place IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 Perceived Less Tha Miimum Perceived Greater Tha Miimum Perceived Less Tha Desired Perceived Greater Tha Desired Graduate Graduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 51 of 90 ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 5.78 7.63 6.58 0.80-1.05 345 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 5.95 7.40 6.70 0.76-0.70 352 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 6.61 7.98 7.31 0.70-0.67 357 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 6.67 8.00 7.39 0.72-0.62 357 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 6.68 8.03 7.16 0.48-0.87 354 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 6.45 7.79 7.18 0.73-0.61 351 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 6.75 8.01 7.17 0.42-0.84 350 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 6.78 8.00 7.32 0.54-0.68 349 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 6.83 8.03 7.29 0.47-0.73 309 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 6.72 8.37 7.13 0.41-1.24 346 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 6.88 8.36 7.13 0.25-1.23 358 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 6.70 7.99 7.08 0.38-0.92 347 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 6.80 8.30 7.11 0.31-1.18 357 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 7.04 8.29 7.45 0.41-0.85 355 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 6.94 8.32 7.20 0.26-1.12 356 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 6.89 8.23 7.28 0.39-0.95 355 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 7.06 8.36 7.27 0.21-1.08 351 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 6.36 7.94 6.48 0.13-1.45 343 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 6.49 7.87 6.66 0.17-1.20 342 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 6.66 8.04 7.13 0.47-0.91 351 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 6.64 8.04 6.94 0.30-1.10 344 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 6.10 7.54 6.89 0.79-0.65 317 study Overall: 6.64 8.03 7.09 0.46-0.93 359 Graduate Graduate

Page 52 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 1.80 1.45 1.68 1.90 1.67 345 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 1.96 1.64 1.68 1.89 1.67 352 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 1.70 1.30 1.51 1.75 1.65 357 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 1.66 1.27 1.49 1.83 1.66 357 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 1.72 1.24 1.61 1.90 1.68 354 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 1.78 1.33 1.49 1.80 1.60 351 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 1.66 1.22 1.56 1.82 1.66 350 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 1.66 1.22 1.49 1.83 1.55 349 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 1.69 1.30 1.52 1.86 1.55 309 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 1.79 1.09 1.73 1.93 1.71 346 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 1.66 1.04 1.59 1.96 1.60 358 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 1.68 1.24 1.64 1.92 1.80 347 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 1.62 1.05 1.49 1.83 1.57 357 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 1.62 1.02 1.40 1.78 1.46 355 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 1.61 1.06 1.41 1.90 1.44 356 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 1.54 1.00 1.45 1.84 1.52 355 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 1.61 1.11 1.57 1.97 1.73 351 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 1.86 1.43 1.79 2.33 2.08 343 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 1.96 1.53 1.92 2.58 2.29 342 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 1.76 1.29 1.69 2.15 1.89 351 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 1.77 1.31 1.62 2.09 1.86 344 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 2.02 1.77 1.74 2.42 2.25 317 study Overall: 1.38 0.85 1.15 1.42 1.12 359 Graduate Graduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 53 of 90 5.3 Core Questio Dimesios Summary for Graduate O the chart below, scores for each dimesio of library service quality have bee plotted graphically. The exterior bars represet the rage of miimum to desired mea scores for each dimesio. The iterior bars represet the rage of miimum to perceived mea scores (the service adequacy gap) for each dimesio of library service quality. 9 8 7 6 5 4 Affect of Service Iformatio Cotrol Library as Place Overall Dimesio Rage of Miimum to Desired Rage of Miimum to Perceived ("Adequacy Gap") Graduate Graduate

Page 54 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto The followig table displays mea scores for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 6.50 7.87 7.12 0.62-0.75 359 Iformatio Cotrol 6.89 8.28 7.21 0.33-1.07 359 Library as Place 6.45 7.88 6.82 0.37-1.06 354 Overall: 6.64 8.03 7.09 0.46-0.93 359 The followig table displays stadard deviatio for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 1.48 1.00 1.31 1.51 1.25 359 Iformatio Cotrol 1.37 0.80 1.18 1.47 1.16 359 Library as Place 1.60 1.16 1.41 1.86 1.61 354 Overall: 1.38 0.85 1.15 1.42 1.12 359 Graduate Graduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 55 of 90 5.4 Local Questios Summary for Graduate This table shows mea scores for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 5.99 7.58 6.59 0.60-0.99 357 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 6.32 7.64 7.05 0.73-0.60 346 A secure ad safe place 7.21 8.22 7.64 0.43-0.58 349 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 6.92 8.12 7.37 0.45-0.75 331 6.93 8.29 7.45 0.51-0.84 301 This table displays stadard deviatios for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 1.82 1.48 1.73 2.00 1.87 357 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 1.89 1.58 1.53 1.99 1.76 346 A secure ad safe place 1.76 1.25 1.59 1.99 1.67 349 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 1.76 1.19 1.55 1.98 1.66 1.64 1.04 1.49 1.82 1.45 331 301 Graduate Graduate

Page 56 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 5.5 Geeral Satisfactio Questios Summary for Graduate This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the geeral satisfactio questios: Satisfactio with Treatmet, Satisfactio with Support, ad Satisfactio with Overall Quality of Service, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the geeral satisfactio questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9. Satisfactio Questio I geeral, I am satisfied with the way i which I am treated at the library. 7.37 1.50 358 I geeral, I am satisfied with library support for my learig, research, ad/or teachig eeds. 7.11 1.57 359 How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.25 1.30 359 5.6 Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios Summary for Graduate This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the iformatio literacy outcomes questios, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the iformatio literacy outcomes questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9 with 1 beig "strogly disagree" ad 9 represetig "strogly agree". Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios The library helps me stay abreast of developmets i my field(s) of iterest. 6.56 1.68 359 The library aids my advacemet i my academic disciplie. 7.16 1.51 359 The library eables me to be more efficiet i my academic pursuits. 7.16 1.51 359 The library helps me distiguish betwee trustworthy ad utrustworthy iformatio. 6.01 1.94 359 The library provides me with the iformatio skills I eed i my work or study. 6.60 1.78 359 Graduate Graduate

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 57 of 90 5.7 Library Use Summary for Graduate 100 This chart shows a graphic represetatio of library use (both o the premises ad electroically), as well as use of o-library iformatio gateways such as Yahoo ad Google. Bars represet the frequecy with which respodets report usig these resources: Daily, Weekly, Mothly, Quarterly, or Never. The table below the chart displays the umber ad percetage of respodets who selected each optio. 90 80 Percetage 70 60 50 40 30 How ofte do you use resources o library premises? How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 20 10 0 Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never Frequecy Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never / % How ofte do you use resources o library premises? 133 37.05% 142 39.55% 51 14.21% 23 6.41% 10 2.79% 359 100.00% How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? 146 40.67% 160 44.57% 37 10.31% 13 3.62% 3 0.84% 359 100.00% How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 284 79.11% 57 15.88% 10 2.79% 3 0.84% 5 1.39% 359 100.00% Graduate Graduate

Page 58 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 6 Faculty Summary 6.1 Demographic Summary for Faculty 6.1.1 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Faculty by Stadard Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the LibQUAL+ stadard disciplie categories. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). Agriculture / Evirometal Studies Architecture Busiess Commuicatios / Jouralism Educatio Egieerig / Computer Sciece Geeral Studies Disciplie Health Scieces Humaities Law Military / Naval Sciece Other Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Percetage Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 59 of 90 Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Agriculture / Evirometal Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Architecture 48 4.04% 1 0.83% 3.21% Busiess 109 9.18% 12 9.92% -0.74% Commuicatios / Jouralism 47 3.96% 3 2.48% 1.48% Educatio 62 5.22% 8 6.61% -1.39% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 172 14.48% 9 7.44% 7.04% Geeral Studies 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Health Scieces 135 11.36% 9 7.44% 3.93% Humaities 150 12.63% 28 23.14% -10.51% Law 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Military / Naval Sciece 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Other 76 6.40% 8 6.61% -0.21% Performig & Fie Arts 95 8.00% 9 7.44% 0.56% Sciece / Math 110 9.26% 11 9.09% 0.17% Social Scieces / Psychology 184 15.49% 23 19.01% -3.52% Udecided 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Total: 1,188 100.00% 121 100.00% 0.00% Faculty Faculty

Page 60 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 6.1.2 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Faculty by Customized Disciplie The chart ad table below show a breakdow of survey respodets by disciplie, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio. This sectio shows survey respodets broke dow based o the customized disciplie categories supplied by the participatig library. The chart maps percetage of respodets for each disciplie i red. Populatio percetages for each disciplie are mapped i blue. The table shows the umber ad percetage for each disciplie, for the geeral populatio (N) ad for survey respodets (). Architecture Busiess Child Studies Commuicatios / Jouralism Crimiology Educatio Disciplie Egieerig / Computer Sciece Health Scieces Humaities Iterdiscipliary Studies Kiesiology Performig & Fie Arts Sciece / Math Social Scieces / Psychology Udecided Respodet Profile by Disciplie Populatio Profile by Disciplie 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Percetage Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 61 of 90 Disciplie Populatio N Populatio Respodets Respodets % % %N - % Architecture 48 4.04% 1 0.83% 3.21% Busiess 109 9.18% 12 9.92% -0.74% Child Studies 0 0.00% 1 0.83% -0.83% Commuicatios / Jouralism 47 3.96% 3 2.48% 1.48% Crimiology 20 1.68% 2 1.65% 0.03% Educatio 62 5.22% 8 6.61% -1.39% Egieerig / Computer Sciece 172 14.48% 9 7.44% 7.04% Health Scieces 135 11.36% 9 7.44% 3.93% Humaities 150 12.63% 28 23.14% -10.51% Iterdiscipliary Studies 14 1.18% 2 1.65% -0.47% Kiesiology 42 3.54% 3 2.48% 1.06% Performig & Fie Arts 95 8.00% 9 7.44% 0.56% Sciece / Math 110 9.26% 11 9.09% 0.17% Social Scieces / Psychology 184 15.49% 23 19.01% -3.52% Udecided 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% Total: 1,188 100.00% 121 100.00% 0.00% Faculty Faculty

Page 62 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 6.1.3 Respodet Profile for Faculty by Age This table shows a breakdow of survey respodets by age; both the umber of respodets () ad the percetage of the total umber of respodets represeted by each age group are displayed. Age Respodets Respodets % Uder 18 0 0.00% 18-22 0 0.00% 23-30 2 1.65% 31-45 45 37.19% 46-65 64 52.89% Over 65 10 8.26% Total: 121 100.00% 6.1.4 Populatio ad Respodet Profiles for Faculty by Sex The table below shows a breakdow of survey respodets by sex, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The umber ad percetage for each sex are give for the geeral populatio ad for survey respodets. *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Sex Populatio N Populatio % Respodets Respodets % Male 709 59.68% 57 47.11% Female 479 40.32% 64 52.89% Total: 1,188 100.00% 121 100.00% Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 63 of 90 6.2 Core Questios Summary for Faculty This radar chart shows aggregate results for the core survey questios. Each axis represets oe questio. A code to idetify each questio is displayed at the outer poit of each axis. While questios for each dimesio of library service quality are scattered radomly throughout the survey, o this chart they are grouped ito sectios: Affect of Service, Library as Place, ad Iformatio Cotrol. O each axis, respodets' miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted, ad the resultig "gaps" betwee the three levels (represetig service adequacy or service superiority) are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. The two followig tables show mea scores ad stadard deviatios for each questio, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) AS-7 AS-6 AS-5 Affect of Service AS-8 AS-4 AS-9 AS-3 IC-1 AS-2 IC-2 AS-1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IC-3 LP-5 IC-4 LP-4 Iformatio Cotrol IC-5 IC-6 LP-2 LP-3 Library as Place IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 Perceived Less Tha Miimum Perceived Greater Tha Miimum Perceived Less Tha Desired Perceived Greater Tha Desired Faculty Faculty

Page 64 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 6.20 7.43 7.21 1.01-0.22 114 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 6.47 7.61 7.31 0.84-0.30 117 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 7.23 8.09 7.82 0.59-0.28 120 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 6.99 8.03 7.61 0.62-0.42 118 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 7.03 7.95 7.39 0.36-0.56 118 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 6.78 7.82 7.51 0.74-0.31 117 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 7.13 8.03 7.51 0.38-0.52 120 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 7.17 8.14 7.79 0.62-0.36 118 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 7.30 8.24 7.42 0.12-0.82 107 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 7.29 8.37 7.34 0.04-1.03 119 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 7.47 8.45 7.10-0.37-1.35 121 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 6.76 7.92 6.85 0.08-1.08 119 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 7.23 8.32 7.32 0.08-1.00 120 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 7.28 8.31 7.50 0.22-0.81 118 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 7.35 8.35 7.28-0.08-1.08 119 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 7.34 8.33 7.44 0.09-0.90 117 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 7.64 8.67 7.02-0.62-1.66 116 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 5.64 6.77 6.26 0.62-0.51 106 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 5.62 6.42 6.33 0.70-0.09 101 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 6.27 7.42 6.88 0.61-0.54 113 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 5.60 6.63 6.57 0.97-0.06 101 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 4.87 5.85 6.33 1.46 0.48 91 study Overall: 6.81 7.82 7.19 0.38-0.63 121 Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 65 of 90 ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 1.92 1.85 1.53 1.88 1.83 114 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 1.82 1.51 1.40 1.85 1.59 117 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 1.82 1.42 1.58 1.98 1.67 120 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 1.73 1.24 1.31 1.72 1.31 118 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 1.87 1.52 1.58 1.88 1.56 118 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 1.78 1.45 1.44 1.91 1.53 117 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 1.77 1.43 1.43 1.75 1.49 120 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 1.65 1.25 1.22 1.79 1.33 118 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 1.44 1.03 1.55 1.61 1.43 107 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 1.65 1.31 1.66 1.98 1.67 119 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 1.52 1.07 1.77 2.26 1.79 121 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 1.91 1.63 1.76 2.40 2.28 119 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 1.59 1.22 1.36 1.88 1.57 120 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 1.68 1.30 1.25 1.70 1.57 118 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 1.55 1.25 1.27 1.84 1.60 119 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 1.55 1.21 1.28 1.72 1.48 117 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 1.35 0.77 1.81 2.17 1.94 116 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 2.31 2.26 1.82 2.53 2.43 106 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 2.49 2.47 1.73 2.68 2.64 101 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 2.00 1.66 1.64 2.14 2.06 113 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 2.44 2.44 1.80 2.33 2.37 101 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 2.35 2.50 1.78 2.17 2.36 91 study Overall: 1.31 1.06 1.07 1.42 1.17 121 Faculty Faculty

Page 66 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 6.3 Core Questio Dimesios Summary for Faculty O the chart below, scores for each dimesio of library service quality have bee plotted graphically. The exterior bars represet the rage of miimum to desired mea scores for each dimesio. The iterior bars represet the rage of miimum to perceived mea scores (the service adequacy gap) for each dimesio of library service quality. 9 8 7 6 5 4 Affect of Service Iformatio Cotrol Library as Place Overall Dimesio Rage of Miimum to Desired Rage of Miimum to Perceived ("Adequacy Gap") Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 67 of 90 The followig table displays mea scores for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 6.91 7.89 7.51 0.60-0.39 121 Iformatio Cotrol 7.29 8.33 7.23-0.06-1.10 121 Library as Place 5.72 6.74 6.55 0.82-0.19 117 Overall: 6.81 7.82 7.19 0.38-0.63 121 The followig table displays stadard deviatio for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 1.48 1.20 1.15 1.52 1.24 121 Iformatio Cotrol 1.30 0.99 1.15 1.59 1.33 121 Library as Place 1.92 1.83 1.44 1.90 1.84 117 Overall: 1.31 1.06 1.07 1.42 1.17 121 Faculty Faculty

Page 68 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 6.4 Local Questios Summary for Faculty This table shows mea scores for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 6.17 7.29 7.12 0.95-0.17 121 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 6.30 7.30 7.11 0.81-0.19 116 A secure ad safe place 7.26 7.96 7.64 0.38-0.31 115 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 7.11 8.05 7.35 0.25-0.70 110 7.27 8.33 7.79 0.52-0.54 111 This table displays stadard deviatios for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 1.73 1.65 1.50 1.94 1.80 121 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 2.00 1.93 1.61 1.75 1.59 116 A secure ad safe place 2.05 1.73 1.43 1.68 1.42 115 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 1.92 1.67 1.75 2.21 1.90 1.70 1.30 1.32 1.94 1.64 110 111 Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 69 of 90 6.5 Geeral Satisfactio Questios Summary for Faculty This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the geeral satisfactio questios: Satisfactio with Treatmet, Satisfactio with Support, ad Satisfactio with Overall Quality of Service, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the geeral satisfactio questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9. Satisfactio Questio I geeral, I am satisfied with the way i which I am treated at the library. 7.65 1.46 121 I geeral, I am satisfied with library support for my learig, research, ad/or teachig eeds. 7.17 1.86 121 How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.42 1.50 121 6.6 Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios Summary for Faculty This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the iformatio literacy outcomes questios, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the iformatio literacy outcomes questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9 with 1 beig "strogly disagree" ad 9 represetig "strogly agree". Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios The library helps me stay abreast of developmets i my field(s) of iterest. 6.65 1.93 121 The library aids my advacemet i my academic disciplie. 6.94 1.79 121 The library eables me to be more efficiet i my academic pursuits. 7.26 1.68 121 The library helps me distiguish betwee trustworthy ad utrustworthy iformatio. 5.87 1.77 121 The library provides me with the iformatio skills I eed i my work or study. 6.50 1.70 121 Faculty Faculty

Page 70 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 6.7 Library Use Summary for Faculty 100 This chart shows a graphic represetatio of library use (both o the premises ad electroically), as well as use of o-library iformatio gateways such as Yahoo ad Google. Bars represet the frequecy with which respodets report usig these resources: Daily, Weekly, Mothly, Quarterly, or Never. The table below the chart displays the umber ad percetage of respodets who selected each optio. 90 80 Percetage 70 60 50 40 30 How ofte do you use resources o library premises? How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 20 10 0 Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never Frequecy Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never / % How ofte do you use resources o library premises? 8 6.61% 49 40.50% 41 33.88% 19 15.70% 4 3.31% 121 100.00% How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? 34 28.10% 61 50.41% 19 15.70% 4 3.31% 3 2.48% 121 100.00% How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 77 63.64% 30 24.79% 9 7.44% 4 3.31% 1 0.83% 121 100.00% Faculty Faculty

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 71 of 90 7 Library Staff Summary 7.1 Demographic Summary for Library Staff 7.1.1 Respodet Profile for Library Staff by Age This table shows a breakdow of survey respodets by age; both the umber of respodets () ad the percetage of the total umber of respodets represeted by each age group are displayed. Age Respodets Respodets % Uder 18 0 0.00% 18-22 1 2.63% 23-30 4 10.53% 31-45 5 13.16% 46-65 26 68.42% Over 65 2 5.26% Total: 38 100.00% 7.1.2 Respodet Profile for Library Staff by Sex The table below shows a breakdow of survey respodets by sex, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The umber ad percetage for each sex are give for the geeral populatio ad for survey respodets. *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Sex Respodets Respodets % Male 8 21.05% Female 30 78.95% Total: 38 100.00% Library Staff Library Staff

Page 72 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 7.2 Core Questios Summary for Library Staff This radar chart shows aggregate results for the core survey questios. Each axis represets oe questio. A code to idetify each questio is displayed at the outer poit of each axis. While questios for each dimesio of library service quality are scattered radomly throughout the survey, o this chart they are grouped ito sectios: Affect of Service, Library as Place, ad Iformatio Cotrol. O each axis, respodets' miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted, ad the resultig "gaps" betwee the three levels (represetig service adequacy or service superiority) are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. The two followig tables show mea scores ad stadard deviatios for each questio, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) AS-7 AS-6 AS-5 Affect of Service AS-8 AS-4 AS-9 AS-3 IC-1 AS-2 IC-2 AS-1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IC-3 LP-5 IC-4 LP-4 Iformatio Cotrol IC-5 IC-6 LP-2 LP-3 Library as Place IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 Perceived Less Tha Miimum Perceived Greater Tha Miimum Perceived Less Tha Desired Perceived Greater Tha Desired Library Staff Library Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 73 of 90 ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 6.53 8.26 6.53 0.00-1.74 38 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 6.55 8.00 6.79 0.24-1.21 38 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 7.26 8.42 7.05-0.21-1.37 38 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 6.92 8.21 7.08 0.16-1.13 38 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 7.00 8.29 7.05 0.05-1.24 38 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 6.68 8.03 7.16 0.47-0.87 38 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 7.13 8.50 6.82-0.32-1.68 38 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 7.08 8.34 7.47 0.39-0.87 38 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 6.84 8.30 6.78-0.05-1.51 37 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 6.54 8.11 6.78 0.24-1.32 37 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 6.82 8.18 5.58-1.24-2.61 38 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 6.57 7.89 6.73 0.16-1.16 37 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 6.84 8.11 7.11 0.26-1.00 38 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 7.18 8.34 7.58 0.39-0.76 38 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 6.82 8.29 6.42-0.39-1.87 38 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 6.92 8.38 6.92 0.00-1.46 37 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 6.97 8.16 7.24 0.27-0.92 37 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 6.50 8.03 5.13-1.37-2.89 38 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 6.72 7.58 5.56-1.17-2.03 36 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 6.58 7.76 5.76-0.82-2.00 38 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 6.49 8.05 6.62 0.14-1.43 37 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 6.00 7.45 6.71 0.71-0.74 38 study Overall: 6.78 8.12 6.68-0.10-1.45 38 Library Staff Library Staff

Page 74 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 1.33 1.06 1.50 1.68 1.67 38 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 1.67 1.38 1.54 2.07 1.93 38 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 1.86 1.06 1.29 1.80 1.44 38 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 1.62 0.99 1.48 1.75 1.58 38 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 1.69 1.16 1.51 1.66 1.63 38 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 1.88 1.38 1.41 1.62 1.66 38 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 1.55 0.76 1.63 1.95 1.76 38 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 1.75 0.99 1.41 1.70 1.61 38 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 1.89 0.94 1.86 2.11 2.04 37 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 1.57 1.31 1.55 1.72 1.78 37 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 1.61 1.27 2.20 2.79 2.44 38 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 1.80 1.39 1.45 1.59 1.61 37 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 1.33 1.01 1.16 1.29 1.34 38 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 1.35 0.85 1.11 1.48 1.28 38 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 1.63 0.84 2.00 2.39 1.77 38 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 1.46 0.89 1.50 2.00 1.61 37 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 1.34 0.99 1.26 1.41 1.34 37 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 1.77 1.40 2.02 2.59 2.60 38 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 1.41 1.66 2.12 2.43 3.10 36 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 1.65 1.36 1.99 2.73 2.55 38 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 1.37 1.31 1.50 1.95 2.15 37 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 1.93 1.87 1.56 2.38 2.11 38 study Overall: 1.16 0.78 1.06 1.34 1.20 38 Library Staff Library Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 75 of 90 7.3 Core Questio Dimesios Summary for Library Staff O the chart below, scores for each dimesio of library service quality have bee plotted graphically. The exterior bars represet the rage of miimum to desired mea scores for each dimesio. The iterior bars represet the rage of miimum to perceived mea scores (the service adequacy gap) for each dimesio of library service quality. 9 8 7 6 5 4 Affect of Service Iformatio Cotrol Library as Place Overall Dimesio Rage of Miimum to Desired Rage of Miimum to Perceived ("Adequacy Gap") Library Staff Library Staff

Page 76 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto The followig table displays mea scores for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 6.89 8.26 6.98 0.08-1.29 38 Iformatio Cotrol 6.85 8.19 6.80-0.05-1.39 38 Library as Place 6.45 7.77 5.96-0.49-1.81 38 Overall: 6.78 8.12 6.68-0.10-1.45 38 The followig table displays stadard deviatio for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 1.44 0.89 1.23 1.41 1.38 38 Iformatio Cotrol 1.20 0.77 1.14 1.37 1.17 38 Library as Place 1.22 1.11 1.40 1.93 1.86 38 Overall: 1.16 0.78 1.06 1.34 1.20 38 Library Staff Library Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 77 of 90 7.4 Local Questios Summary for Library Staff This table shows mea scores for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 6.37 7.92 6.47 0.11-1.45 38 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 6.22 7.68 6.84 0.62-0.84 37 A secure ad safe place 7.66 8.45 6.87-0.79-1.58 38 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 7.39 8.50 6.39-1.00-2.11 38 6.69 8.09 7.31 0.63-0.77 35 This table displays stadard deviatios for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 1.55 1.17 1.62 1.31 1.50 38 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 1.69 1.31 1.34 1.57 1.61 37 A secure ad safe place 1.76 1.35 1.51 2.36 2.02 38 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 1.46 0.83 1.62 1.90 1.67 1.55 1.01 1.13 1.19 1.03 38 35 Library Staff Library Staff

Page 78 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 7.5 Geeral Satisfactio Questios Summary for Library Staff This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the geeral satisfactio questios: Satisfactio with Treatmet, Satisfactio with Support, ad Satisfactio with Overall Quality of Service, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the geeral satisfactio questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9. Satisfactio Questio I geeral, I am satisfied with the way i which I am treated at the library. 7.32 1.34 38 I geeral, I am satisfied with library support for my learig, research, ad/or teachig eeds. 7.18 1.47 38 How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.16 1.10 38 7.6 Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios Summary for Library Staff This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the iformatio literacy outcomes questios, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the iformatio literacy outcomes questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9 with 1 beig "strogly disagree" ad 9 represetig "strogly agree". Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios The library helps me stay abreast of developmets i my field(s) of iterest. 7.00 1.45 38 The library aids my advacemet i my academic disciplie. 6.95 1.58 38 The library eables me to be more efficiet i my academic pursuits. 6.82 1.35 38 The library helps me distiguish betwee trustworthy ad utrustworthy iformatio. 6.82 1.41 38 The library provides me with the iformatio skills I eed i my work or study. 7.00 1.38 38 Library Staff Library Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 79 of 90 7.7 Library Use Summary for Library Staff 100 This chart shows a graphic represetatio of library use (both o the premises ad electroically), as well as use of o-library iformatio gateways such as Yahoo ad Google. Bars represet the frequecy with which respodets report usig these resources: Daily, Weekly, Mothly, Quarterly, or Never. The table below the chart displays the umber ad percetage of respodets who selected each optio. 90 80 Percetage 70 60 50 40 30 How ofte do you use resources o library premises? How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 20 10 0 Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never Frequecy Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never / % How ofte do you use resources o library premises? 31 81.58% 2 5.26% 3 7.89% 2 5.26% 0 0.00% 38 100.00% How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? 24 63.16% 7 18.42% 5 13.16% 1 2.63% 1 2.63% 38 100.00% How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 25 65.79% 7 18.42% 3 7.89% 0 0.00% 3 7.89% 38 100.00% Library Staff Library Staff

Page 80 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 8 Staff Summary 8.1 Demographic Summary for Staff 8.1.1 Respodet Profile for Staff by Age This table shows a breakdow of survey respodets by age; both the umber of respodets () ad the percetage of the total umber of respodets represeted by each age group are displayed. Age Respodets Respodets % Uder 18 0 0.00% 18-22 1 11.11% 23-30 4 44.44% 31-45 1 11.11% 46-65 2 22.22% Over 65 1 11.11% Total: 9 100.00% 8.1.2 Respodet Profile for Staff by Sex The table below shows a breakdow of survey respodets by sex, based o user resposes to the demographic questios ad the demographic data provided by istitutios i the olie Represetativeess sectio*. The umber ad percetage for each sex are give for the geeral populatio ad for survey respodets. *Note: Participatig istitutios were ot required to complete the Represetativeess sectio. Whe populatio data is missig or icomplete, it is because this data was ot provided. Sex Respodets Respodets % Male 1 11.11% Female 8 88.89% Total: 9 100.00% Staff Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 81 of 90 8.2 Core Questios Summary for Staff This radar chart shows aggregate results for the core survey questios. Each axis represets oe questio. A code to idetify each questio is displayed at the outer poit of each axis. While questios for each dimesio of library service quality are scattered radomly throughout the survey, o this chart they are grouped ito sectios: Affect of Service, Library as Place, ad Iformatio Cotrol. O each axis, respodets' miimum, desired, ad perceived levels of service quality are plotted, ad the resultig "gaps" betwee the three levels (represetig service adequacy or service superiority) are shaded i blue, yellow, gree, ad red. The two followig tables show mea scores ad stadard deviatios for each questio, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) AS-7 AS-6 AS-5 Affect of Service AS-8 AS-4 AS-9 AS-3 IC-1 AS-2 IC-2 AS-1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IC-3 LP-5 IC-4 LP-4 Iformatio Cotrol IC-5 IC-6 LP-2 LP-3 Library as Place IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 Perceived Less Tha Miimum Perceived Greater Tha Miimum Perceived Less Tha Desired Perceived Greater Tha Desired Staff Staff

Page 82 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 6.44 7.89 6.00-0.44-1.89 9 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 6.33 7.56 6.00-0.33-1.56 9 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 7.78 8.89 6.56-1.22-2.33 9 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 7.56 8.67 6.78-0.78-1.89 9 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 7.33 8.44 7.11-0.22-1.33 9 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 6.67 8.44 6.33-0.33-2.11 9 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 6.67 8.00 6.78 0.11-1.22 9 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 6.56 8.33 7.22 0.67-1.11 9 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 6.50 7.88 6.75 0.25-1.13 8 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 7.00 8.67 6.22-0.78-2.44 9 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 7.56 8.44 6.44-1.11-2.00 9 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 6.67 8.11 7.00 0.33-1.11 9 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 7.00 7.63 5.63-1.38-2.00 8 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 7.00 8.33 7.22 0.22-1.11 9 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 7.00 8.11 6.22-0.78-1.89 9 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 6.78 8.22 7.00 0.22-1.22 9 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 7.25 8.50 6.13-1.13-2.38 8 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 7.11 7.78 6.00-1.11-1.78 9 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 6.22 8.00 5.89-0.33-2.11 9 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 6.67 8.22 5.67-1.00-2.56 9 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 5.63 7.63 6.25 0.63-1.38 8 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 6.00 7.50 6.50 0.50-1.00 6 study Overall: 6.78 8.16 6.43-0.35-1.73 9 Staff Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 83 of 90 ID Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service AS-1 Employees who istill cofidece i users 1.51 0.78 1.32 2.07 1.69 9 AS-2 Givig users idividual attetio 2.24 1.24 2.06 1.32 1.24 9 AS-3 Employees who are cosistetly courteous 1.09 0.33 1.51 1.92 1.66 9 AS-4 Readiess to respod to users' questios 1.01 0.50 1.64 1.56 1.90 9 AS-5 Employees who have the kowledge to aswer 1.12 0.73 1.36 1.99 1.66 9 user questios AS-6 Employees who deal with users i a carig 1.73 0.73 1.66 2.24 1.83 9 fashio AS-7 Employees who uderstad the eeds of their 1.73 1.41 1.86 2.85 2.59 9 users AS-8 Willigess to help users 1.67 0.71 1.30 2.45 1.45 9 AS-9 Depedability i hadlig users' service problems 1.51 1.46 1.83 2.66 2.53 8 Iformatio Cotrol IC-1 Makig electroic resources accessible from my 2.65 0.50 1.99 3.56 2.07 9 home or office IC-2 A library Web site eablig me to locate 1.88 1.01 1.94 2.98 2.35 9 iformatio o my ow IC-3 The prited library materials I eed for my work 1.12 0.78 1.41 2.00 1.96 9 IC-4 The electroic iformatio resources I eed 1.51 1.69 1.51 2.50 2.62 8 IC-5 Moder equipmet that lets me easily access 1.22 1.32 1.56 2.11 2.20 9 eeded iformatio IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid 1.73 1.36 1.99 3.31 2.89 9 thigs o my ow IC-7 Makig iformatio easily accessible for 1.30 0.97 1.66 2.86 2.33 9 idepedet use IC-8 Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I 1.58 0.76 2.03 3.18 2.56 8 require for my work Library as Place LP-1 Library space that ispires study ad learig 1.05 1.39 2.40 2.57 3.11 9 LP-2 Quiet space for idividual activities 1.64 1.00 1.76 2.55 1.96 9 LP-3 A comfortable ad ivitig locatio 1.66 0.83 2.12 2.12 2.30 9 LP-4 A getaway for study, learig, or research 1.85 1.51 1.91 3.11 2.62 8 LP-5 Commuity space for group learig ad group 1.26 1.05 1.87 2.74 2.37 6 study Overall: 1.20 0.60 1.23 2.02 1.69 9 Staff Staff

Page 84 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 8.3 Core Questio Dimesios Summary for Staff O the chart below, scores for each dimesio of library service quality have bee plotted graphically. The exterior bars represet the rage of miimum to desired mea scores for each dimesio. The iterior bars represet the rage of miimum to perceived mea scores (the service adequacy gap) for each dimesio of library service quality. 9 8 7 6 5 4 Affect of Service Iformatio Cotrol Library as Place Overall Dimesio Rage of Miimum to Desired Rage of Miimum to Perceived ("Adequacy Gap") Staff Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 85 of 90 The followig table displays mea scores for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 6.84 8.23 6.60-0.24-1.63 9 Iformatio Cotrol 6.94 8.25 6.52-0.43-1.74 9 Library as Place 6.31 7.83 5.99-0.33-1.85 9 Overall: 6.78 8.16 6.43-0.35-1.73 9 The followig table displays stadard deviatio for each dimesio of library service quality measured by the LibQUAL+ survey, where is the umber of respodets for each particular dimesio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) A complete listig of the survey questios ad their dimesios ca be foud i Appedix A. Dimesio Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Affect of Service 1.13 0.49 1.11 1.73 1.42 9 Iformatio Cotrol 1.46 0.80 1.38 2.57 2.00 9 Library as Place 1.20 0.77 1.73 2.28 2.12 9 Overall: 1.20 0.60 1.23 2.02 1.69 9 Staff Staff

Page 86 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 8.4 Local Questios Summary for Staff This table shows mea scores for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 5.78 7.22 6.00 0.22-1.22 9 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 5.88 7.13 6.38 0.50-0.75 8 A secure ad safe place 8.11 8.67 7.67-0.44-1.00 9 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 7.22 8.33 6.78-0.44-1.56 9 6.78 8.00 7.00 0.22-1.00 9 This table displays stadard deviatios for each of the local questios added by the idividual library or cosortium, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. (For a more detailed explaatio of the headigs, see the Itroductio to this otebook.) Questio Text Miimum Desired Perceived Adequacy Superiority Makig me aware of library resources ad services 2.11 1.30 1.50 2.44 2.39 9 Teachig me how to locate, evaluate, ad use iformatio 0.83 1.46 1.41 1.93 1.98 8 A secure ad safe place 0.60 0.50 1.12 1.33 1.32 9 Accuracy i the catalog, borrowig, ad overdue records Timely delivery of the articles ad documets that I eed 1.30 1.32 1.99 2.88 2.70 1.86 1.50 1.41 2.54 2.40 9 9 Staff Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 87 of 90 8.5 Geeral Satisfactio Questios Summary for Staff This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the geeral satisfactio questios: Satisfactio with Treatmet, Satisfactio with Support, ad Satisfactio with Overall Quality of Service, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the geeral satisfactio questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9. Satisfactio Questio I geeral, I am satisfied with the way i which I am treated at the library. 7.11 1.05 9 I geeral, I am satisfied with library support for my learig, research, ad/or teachig eeds. 6.67 1.73 9 How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.11 1.45 9 8.6 Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios Summary for Staff This table displays the mea score ad stadard deviatio for each of the iformatio literacy outcomes questios, where is the umber of respodets for each particular questio. These scores are calculated from resposes to the iformatio literacy outcomes questios o the LibQUAL+ survey, i which respodets rated their levels of geeral satisfactio o a scale from 1-9 with 1 beig "strogly disagree" ad 9 represetig "strogly agree". Iformatio Literacy Outcomes Questios The library helps me stay abreast of developmets i my field(s) of iterest. 6.44 0.88 9 The library aids my advacemet i my academic disciplie. 6.44 1.01 9 The library eables me to be more efficiet i my academic pursuits. 6.00 1.66 9 The library helps me distiguish betwee trustworthy ad utrustworthy iformatio. 6.11 1.96 9 The library provides me with the iformatio skills I eed i my work or study. 6.67 1.66 9 Staff Staff

Page 88 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto 8.7 Library Use Summary for Staff 100 This chart shows a graphic represetatio of library use (both o the premises ad electroically), as well as use of o-library iformatio gateways such as Yahoo ad Google. Bars represet the frequecy with which respodets report usig these resources: Daily, Weekly, Mothly, Quarterly, or Never. The table below the chart displays the umber ad percetage of respodets who selected each optio. 90 80 Percetage 70 60 50 40 30 How ofte do you use resources o library premises? How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 20 10 0 Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never Frequecy Daily Weekly Mothly Quarterly Never / % How ofte do you use resources o library premises? 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 100.00% How ofte do you access library resources through a library Web page? 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 100.00% How ofte do you use Yahoo(TM), Google(TM), or o-library gateways for iformatio? 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 100.00% Staff Staff

LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto Page 89 of 90 9 Appedix A: LibQUAL+ Dimesios LibQUAL+ measures dimesios of perceived library quality - that is, each survey questio is part of a broader category (a dimesio), ad scores withi those categories are aalyzed i order to derive more geeral iformatio about library users' perceptios of service. These dimesios were first based o the origial SERVQUAL survey istrumet (the framework for the LibQUAL+ survey tool; for more iformatio o the origis of LibQUAL+, go to <http://www.libqual.org/publicatios/>). The LibQUAL+ survey dimesios have evolved with each iteratio, becomig more refied ad focused for applicatio to the library cotext. The 2005 iteratio of the LibQUAL+ survey has three dimesios. Dimesios for each iteratio of the LibQUAL+ survey are outlied below. LibQUAL+ 2000 Dimesios The 2000 iteratio of the LibQUAL+ survey, which had 41 questios, measured eight separate dimesios: Assurace (the kowledge ad courtesy of employees, ad their ability to covey trust ad cofidece) Empathy (carig, idividual attetio) Library as Place (library as a sactuary/have or site for learig ad cotemplatio) Reliability (ability to perform the promised service depedably ad accurately) Resposiveess (willigess to help customers ad provide prompt service) Tagibles (appearace of physical facilities, equipmet, persoel ad commuicatios materials) Istructios/Custom Items Self-Reliace LibQUAL+ 2001 Dimesios After careful aalysis of the results from the 2000 survey, the dimesios were further refied to re-groud the SERVQUAL items i the library cotext. Four sub-dimesios resulted for the 2001 iteratio: Service Affect (ie items, such as willigess to help users ) Library as Place (five items, such as a have for quiet ad solitude ) Persoal Cotrol (six items, such as website eablig me to locate iformatio o my ow ), ad Iformatio Access (five items, such as comprehesive prit collectios ad coveiet busiess hours ) LibQUAL+ 2002 ad 2003 Dimesios For the 2002 iteratio of the LibQUAL+ survey, the dimesios were oce agai refied based o aalysis of the previous year's results. While the four dimesios were retaied, their titles were chaged slightly to more clearly represet the questios ad data. The same four dimesios were also used o the 2003 survey: Access to Iformatio Affect of Service Library as Place Persoal Cotrol All All

Page 90 of 90 LibQUAL+ 2005 Survey Results - Uiversity of Texas at Arligto LibQUAL+ 2004 ad 2005 Dimesios After the 2003 survey was completed, factor ad reliability aalyses o the resultig data revealed that two of the dimesios measured by the survey - Access to Iformatio ad Persoal Cotrol - had collapsed ito oe. The followig three dimesios were measured by the 2004 ad 2005 istrumets: Library as Place, Affect of Service, ad Iformatio Cotrol. I additio, three core questios were elimiated from the 2003 versio of the survey, leavig 22 core items o the fial survey istrumet. The list below displays the dimesios used to preset the results i the 2005 otebooks, alog with the questios that relate to each dimesio. (Note: The questios below are those used i the College ad Uiversity implemetatio of the survey, versio.) Affect of Service [AS-1] Employees who istill cofidece i users [AS-2] Givig users idividual attetio [AS-3] Employees who are cosistetly courteous [AS-4] Readiess to respod to users questios [AS-5] Employees who have the kowledge to aswer user questios [AS-6] Employees who deal with users i a carig fashio [AS-7] Employees who uderstad the eeds of their users [AS-8] Willigess to help users [AS-9] Depedability i hadlig users service problems Iformatio Cotrol [IC-1] Makig electroic resources accessible from my home or office [IC-2] A library Web site eablig me to locate iformatio o my ow [IC-3] The prited library materials I eed for my work [IC-4] The electroic iformatio resources I eed [IC-5] Moder equipmet that lets me easily access eeded iformatio [IC-6] Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to fid thigs o my ow [IC-7] Makig iformatio easily accessible for idepedet use [IC-8] Prit ad/or electroic joural collectios I require for my work Library as Place [LP-1] Library space that ispires study ad learig [LP-2] Quiet space for idividual activities [LP-3] A comfortable ad ivitig locatio [LP-4] A getaway for study, learig or research [LP-5] Commuity space for group learig ad group study All All

All All

Associatio of Research Libraries 21 Dupot Circle NW Suite 800 Washigto, DC 20036 Phoe 202-296-2296 Fax 202-872-0884 http://www.libqual.org Copyright 2005 Associatio of Research Libraries All All