The Chicken Run. by Vince Geiger. Grade level: Late primary/secondary (Years 6 11) Subject: mathematics Time required: 90 minutes

Similar documents
Digital Fabrication and Aunt Sarah: Enabling Quadratic Explorations via Technology. Michael L. Connell University of Houston - Downtown

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Grade 6: Correlated to AGS Basic Math Skills

Course Name: Elementary Calculus Course Number: Math 2103 Semester: Fall Phone:

Missouri Mathematics Grade-Level Expectations

Pre-AP Geometry Course Syllabus Page 1

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

Janine Williams, Mary Rose Landon

Using Calculators for Students in Grades 9-12: Geometry. Re-published with permission from American Institutes for Research

ASSESSMENT TASK OVERVIEW & PURPOSE:

If we want to measure the amount of cereal inside the box, what tool would we use: string, square tiles, or cubes?

Characterizing Mathematical Digital Literacy: A Preliminary Investigation. Todd Abel Appalachian State University

Sample Performance Assessment

Hardhatting in a Geo-World

Math 121 Fundamentals of Mathematics I

Math Grade 3 Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content

Bittinger, M. L., Ellenbogen, D. J., & Johnson, B. L. (2012). Prealgebra (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

GUIDE TO THE CUNY ASSESSMENT TESTS

Page 1 of 11. Curriculum Map: Grade 4 Math Course: Math 4 Sub-topic: General. Grade(s): None specified

Math 96: Intermediate Algebra in Context

Julia Smith. Effective Classroom Approaches to.

The Indices Investigations Teacher s Notes

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Mathematics. Mathematics

Mathematics subject curriculum

Syllabus ENGR 190 Introductory Calculus (QR)

Dublin City Schools Mathematics Graded Course of Study GRADE 4

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Characteristics of Functions

About How Good is Estimation? Assessment Materials Page 1 of 12

MAT 122 Intermediate Algebra Syllabus Summer 2016

Florida Mathematics Standards for Geometry Honors (CPalms # )

Math Techniques of Calculus I Penn State University Summer Session 2017

Unit 3: Lesson 1 Decimals as Equal Divisions

AP Calculus AB. Nevada Academic Standards that are assessable at the local level only.

MATH 205: Mathematics for K 8 Teachers: Number and Operations Western Kentucky University Spring 2017

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Montana Content Standards for Mathematics Grade 3. Montana Content Standards for Mathematical Practices and Mathematics Content Adopted November 2011

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses


Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Exploring Derivative Functions using HP Prime

First Grade Standards

LLD MATH. Student Eligibility: Grades 6-8. Credit Value: Date Approved: 8/24/15

Build on students informal understanding of sharing and proportionality to develop initial fraction concepts.

Getting Started with TI-Nspire High School Science

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

1.11 I Know What Do You Know?

How People Learn Physics

Syllabus Foundations of Finance Summer 2014 FINC-UB

Relationships Between Motivation And Student Performance In A Technology-Rich Classroom Environment

Pentomino Problem. Use the 3 pentominos that are provided to make as many different shapes with 12 sides or less. Use the following 3 shapes:

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

Spring 2014 SYLLABUS Michigan State University STT 430: Probability and Statistics for Engineering

Measurement. When Smaller Is Better. Activity:

Relating Math to the Real World: A Study of Platonic Solids and Tessellations

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

Math 181, Calculus I

Stacks Teacher notes. Activity description. Suitability. Time. AMP resources. Equipment. Key mathematical language. Key processes

Class Meeting Time and Place: Section 3: MTWF10:00-10:50 TILT 221

Functional Skills Mathematics Level 2 assessment

PUBLIC CASE REPORT Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Rubric Assessment of Mathematical Processes in Homework

Broward County Public Schools G rade 6 FSA Warm-Ups

Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment User Guide

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

Teaching a Laboratory Section

Level 6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Fee for 2017/18 is 9,250*

Helping Your Children Learn in the Middle School Years MATH

INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA PRODUCT GUIDE

Science Fair Project Handbook

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

After your registration is complete and your proctor has been approved, you may take the Credit by Examination for MATH 6A.

A BLENDED MODEL FOR NON-TRADITIONAL TEACHING AND LEARNING OF MATHEMATICS

Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards Mathematics

OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS

Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Star Math Pretest Instructions

Foothill College Fall 2014 Math My Way Math 230/235 MTWThF 10:00-11:50 (click on Math My Way tab) Math My Way Instructors:

THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Intermediate Algebra

Paper 2. Mathematics test. Calculator allowed. First name. Last name. School KEY STAGE TIER

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

The Creation and Significance of Study Resources intheformofvideos

ICTCM 28th International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics

Alignment of Australian Curriculum Year Levels to the Scope and Sequence of Math-U-See Program

Radius STEM Readiness TM

Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Transcription:

The Chicken Run by Vince Geiger Activity overview A farmer has 60 metres of chicken wire and wants to build the largest rectangular run he can. He has two options. The first option is to build a free standing run in which he will use the fencing at his disposal to enclose the four sides of the run. The second option is to build the run up against an existing fence and use the available fencing to enclose the area with three sides additional to the existing fence. The farmer wishes to know which dimensions will offer the greatest floor space for each model as well as which design will provide the greatest area for the chickens to walk around in. Background The question of optimizing the area enclosed by an invariant perimeter is not new but the ideas that the enclosed area will vary with the dimensions of the enclosure is almost anti-intuitive to many students (and some adults).ti-nspire permits a much more integrated, multi-dimensional view of this problem that is often only investigated using the device of calculus. Concepts Scale, Geometric construction, Co-ordinate Geometry, Algebraic Modeling, Function Graphing, Optimisation using numeric, functional and differential calculus based approaches Teacher preparation Allowing the students the opportunity to experience the problem scenario is very helpful in it orientates students thinking toward the nature and the goals of the task. Thus some work outside with tape measures and wooden stakes or tent pegs would be a useful start to this activity. Classroom management tips There is a great deal of value in making use of a group or cluster approach to solving this problem because of the discussion and debate that can be stimulated when groups have to present, argue for, and sometimes defend their findings. Students should work in clusters with half the clusters working on the fully enclosed run and the other half working on the run that is to be built up against a wall. Students should spend some initial time working in their groups to develop an understanding of the problem and also to develop a strategy for how to proceed. If they reach a point when they are genuinely stuck they should send one of their members to seek advice from another group and bring this back for discussion. The teacher should have minimal input other than general hints and helping out with any technical problems students encounter when using technology. Towards the end of the available time each group should present their findings to the class using the TI- Nspire device and projection facilities as a way of supporting their arguments. The responsibility of the class during this phase is to question and challenge (in a supportive way) the solution offered by each group and to assist in the correction of errors and misconceptions. Finally, the teacher should summarise all the ideas that have been developed during the session, making sure to identify any gaps and leading students to filling these in. Students should then complete a report that summarises the finding of the class as well as the different approaches that may have been used to develop those findings. 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 1

Technical prerequisites Students should know how to: Construct basic geometric objects (points, lines, segments, circles ) and use features such as Measurement Transfer, Locus and Calculate. (Graphs & Geometry Tool) Transfer Measurements to co-ordinate axes so as to link x- and y-co-ordinates from a geometrical construction to a function graphing environment. (Graphs & Geometry Tool) (NOTE: the geometric constructions are NOT required for this task unless the teacher specifically wishes students to create their own constructions. Generally, students would use the geometric objects provided with which to explore the problem). Store values from geometric constructions as variables, which can then be used in algebraic constructions. (Calculator) Define and graph functions which can then be used to graphically verify an algebraic model against a geometric locus. (Calculator and Graphs & Geometry Tool) Define and operate upon expressions as preparation for solving relevant equations using CAS (Calculator Tool) Step-by-step directions Stage 1: Understanding the task and preliminary exploration. 1) Describe the task and ask students to act out the problem while attempting to develop an approximate solution with the assistance of physical aids such as tape measures, tent pegs, etc. 2) Provide two specific focuses for their investigation. i) What happens to the area of an enclosed chicken run as you change the dimensions of the rectangular enclosure? ii) What dimensions will provide the maximum area for the chickens to walk around in for each of the suggested models? 3) Explain how the geometric objects provided within Graphs & Geometry work and how they can be used to model the two scenarios they have been asked to investigate. 4) Provide opportunity for preliminary explanation and the chance to ask for clarification. 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 2

Stage 2: Geometric investigation: Exploring a geometric model in order to develop a numeric model and then building a graphical representation from the numeric model. 1) Students should explore the focus questions using the geometric models provided. For older or more experienced students a discussion of the nature of the constructions behind these models might be of value. This is especially the case if there is an intention to extend students by challenging them to develop other models, i.e., other shapes or orientations. 2) The teacher should not provide a great deal of input at this stage although if students are struggling they might be directed to the idea of pressing CTRL-(.) (period) in order to build a more detailed graphical model. Students could be encouraged to refer to the organized list of these values in the Lists & Spreadsheet application and to infer a solution from these values. 3) After looking carefully at the numeric values they have generated, students could make use of the Locus tool to identify the curve of continuous values that represent this problem. This curve can then be used to identify the dimensions that will optimize the floor space of either model. Further, this stage of the process should also suggest to students the possible algebraic models which might be appropriate for each respective circumstance. 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 3

Stage 3: Taking a functional approach to the task 1) Students can make use of the variable linking facility to develop and test algebraic models against the geometric models they develop initially. These can be tested by altering the equation live until the model generated by the geometric approach matches that of the algebraic conjecture. 2) Alternatively, students can develop their algebraic model from first principles and enter their equations directly into the function entry line to produce a graph of their model(s). These models can be verified to see if coordinates on their functional model match those of their geometric model. 3) The Point On tool can then be used to identify the local maximum and so the optimum dimensions of their chicken run. 4) Students should be constantly making comparisons between the approaches they have used so far in order to confirm their findings as they will soon have to offer these to their classmates in a public fashion. 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 4

Stage 4 Confirming a result through the use of CAS 1) Finally, students can confirm their findings (again) through the use of Nspire s CAS facility (if available). Linking variables from Graphs & Geometry makes it easier to enter expressions. 2) At this stage students should present the finding of each group making use of TI- Nspire as a presentation tool to support their conjectures. 3) This presentation should be followed by a report that discusses their findings and also uses different representations of the problem to confirm their solution. The report should also discuss the strengths and limitations of their models as well as any assumptions that have been made in the construction of the models. (TI-Nspire CAS screen shown) *Note 1: In order to make use of the data linking facility across applications a consistent scale must be used across all applications. It is likely students will need to be reminded of the need to take account of scale. *Note 2: This activity can be used at many school levels. In the later years of primary school/early secondary students could use of pre-constructed geometric models that have already been developed in investigate the problem numerically. As students progress through school other elements can be introduced such as a graphical approach or a CAS approach. It will be left to the teacher to make judgements as to when the different elements can be introduced. 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 5

Assessment and evaluation This task would be best assessed through a report or assignment. Students will need to explore and investigate the task and then make use of a variety of TI-Nspire s facilities to confirm their findings and this is difficult to do under supervised exam conditions. As this is a modeling activity students should be directed to consider and discuss issues such as the assumptions made in setting up their models and the strengths and limitations of those models. The report should address both the problem they have investigated personally as well as the alternative task presented to them by other groups. The presentation component of the task could also be used as a basis for what students have learnt. In this assessment mode care should be taken to ensure that each member of the group has as meaning ful task within the presentation where they can demonstrate their knowledge of content as well as their understanding of the approach they tool to solving the problem. Each student should also have a role in the presentation that permitted them to demonstrate their facility with TI-Nspire. Scaffolding questions for the Chicken Run task For your model: 1) What is the length of the chicken run when the width is 10 meters? When the width is 15 meters? 2) What is the area of your chicken run when the width is 10 metres? When the width is 15 metres? 3) Fill in the table below? Width (w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 Length (l) Area (a) 4) Use these tables to estimate the maximum area of the floor plan of your chicken run. 5) What is unusual about the last entry in the table? Can you explain why this is? 6) Develop a formula for your model that describes the relationship between width and area. 7) Use your equations and the equation grapher to determine the dimensions that will provide your chickens with the maximum amount of floor space? 1) Stand alone model: 20 m, 15 m Three sided model: 40 m, 30 m 2) Stand alone model: 200 m 2, 225 m 2 Three sided model: 400 m 2, 450 m 2 3) Stand alone model Width (m) 5 10 15 20 25 30 Length (m) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Area (m 2 ) 125 200 225 200 125 0 Three sided model Width (m) 5 10 15 20 25 30 Length (m) 50 40 30 20 10 0 Area (m 2 ) 250 400 450 400 250 0 4) Stand alone model: 225 m 2 Three sided model: 450 m 2 5) The area is 0. Because the width makes use of all the available fencing the length is 0. Since A=l * w then the are is 0 as well. 6) Stand alone model: Three sided model: ( 60! 2w) a = w 2 ( 60! w) a = w 2 7) Stand alone model: 25 m x 25 m: 225 m 2 Three sided model: 15 m x 25 m: 450 m 2 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 6

Activity extensions 1) Find general rules for the models studied above (one for each) that will predict the dimensions needed to optimize the floor space given the length of fencing available. 2) Find another rectangular orientation that could be used to build the chicken run and investigate it in the same ways as above. (hint: what other existing structure could be used to help support the available fencing. 3) Explore a range of other shapes as the basis of the floor plan of the chicken run. Determine which of your chosen shapes offers the best area to perimeter ratio. Can you make a general statement about the shape of a floor plan and the floor plan s area to perimeter ratio. 2007 Texas Instruments Incorporated Page 7