DATE OF REVISION November 7, PURPOSE The Policy on Policies governs the development and oversight of all formal university policies.

Similar documents
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

Academic Affairs Policy #1

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Academic Affairs Policy #1

2. Related Documents (refer to policies.rutgers.edu for additional information)

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Curriculum Development Manual: Academic Disciplines

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG WORKING PARTY ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW PANEL ON UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE. Report of the Working Party

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON STAFF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Program Change Proposal:

The University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians

TITLE IX COMPLIANCE SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY. Audit Report June 14, Henry Mendoza, Chair Steven M. Glazer William Hauck Glen O.

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

New Graduate Program Proposal Review Process. Development of the Preliminary Proposal

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

State Parental Involvement Plan

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

University of Toronto

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

PROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Conflicts of Interest and Commitment (Excluding Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

MMU/MAN: MASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

New Program Process, Guidelines and Template

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

OP-P 602 A-E Page 1 of 8. Operating Protocol-Procedure #: 602 (A-E) Category: Instruction Office of Primary Responsibility: Office of Academic Affairs

Audit Documentation. This redrafted SSA 230 supersedes the SSA of the same title in April 2008.

Palmetto College University of South Carolina Columbia, SC (803) BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF STUDY

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

Records and Information Management Spring Semester 2016

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Guidelines for Completion of an Application for Temporary Licence under Section 24 of the Architects Act R.S.O. 1990

TROY UNIVERSITY MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DEGREE PROGRAM

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

with Specific Procedures for UT Extension Searches

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Duke University FACULTY HANDBOOK THE

Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part

Doctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook. Version January Northcentral University

POLITECNICO DI MILANO

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Maurício Serva (Coordinator); Danilo Melo; Déris Caetano; Flávia Regina P. Maciel;

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

REPORT OF THE PROVOST S REVIEW PANEL. Clinical Practices and Research in the Department of Neurological Surgery June 27, 2013

Audit and Compliance Committee - Agenda

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

MILTON SANTIAGO, Ed.D.

VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION (VISA)

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

University of Toronto

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

Course and Examination Regulations

Proposed Amendment to Rules 17 and 22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION

Academic Regulations Governing the Juris Doctor Program 1

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

Transcription:

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION UNIV University Administration POLICY TITLE Policy on Policies: Development and Oversight of University Policies SCOPE USC System RESPONSIBLE OFFICER President DATE OF REVISION November 7, 2017 POLICY NUMBER UNIV 1.00 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Office of the President PURPOSE The Policy on Policies governs the development and oversight of all formal university policies. DEFINITIONS Administrative Division: Organizational entity within the university with responsibility for the development and maintenance of university policy. Expedited review: Process completed with electronic review by policy advisory committee and without open comment period. Non-substantive change: Revision related to grammatical or formatting revision, URL update, titles of individuals and organization structure, material appearing only in an appendix, and other changes of similar impact. Policy Liaison: Individual designated by the responsible officer to serve as the main point of contact with the Office of the Provost for all policy-related matters for the administrative division or campus. Procedure: A statement that prescribes specific action to be taken to conform to established policies, allowing for the orderly implementation of those policies. Responsible Officer: The division head of each administrative division who is responsible for development and implementation of policy within that administrative division. Substantive change: Revision constitutes impactful change on implementation or compliance. Unit: Campus, college or school, or other organizational entity within the university. University policy: Policy that applies broadly through the university and requires the president s review and approval. POLICY STATEMENT University Policies are formal policies and procedures at the University of South Carolina that have campus-wide application for the Columbia campus or system-wide application. The university uses a standard policy format and a uniform review and approval process for university policies to improve communication, promote administrative consistency and efficiency, and ensure compliance with pertinent state and federal laws as well as state and regional accreditation requirements. All campuses must follow the procedures outlined in this policy regarding the approval of new university policies or the revision or repeal of existing policies. A. Oversight 1

1. University Policy Records a. The University of South Carolina Policies and Procedures Manual contains all current system-wide university policies and campus-specific policies for the Columbia campus. This online manual is published by the Office of the Provost and contains all official, university-approved versions of university policies for the system and the Columbia campus. b. If there is a discrepancy between a unit version of a policy and the Policies and Procedures Manual on the policy website, the policy website will be considered the official version. Units with separate policy websites should not have duplicate versions of USC Columbia and USC system policies. All unit websites and paper documents should reference the policies available at Policies and Procedures Manual. c. Policies specific to a comprehensive campus or the Palmetto College campuses are maintained by the office of the respective chancellor and are available on campus websites as appropriate. 2. Administrative Responsibility for University Policies a. University policies in the Policies and Procedures Manual are organized by administrative division. Within each division, the division head is considered the responsible officer for the development and implementation of that administrative division's policies. For system-wide policies, the division head must provide opportunity for review by the Office of System Planning prior to submission to the Office of the Provost. As needed, the division head will work with the responsible officers of other administrative divisions. b. Comprehensive campus chancellors and the Palmetto College chancellor, are considered the responsible officers for the development, authorization and implementation of campus-specific policies as well as the implementation of system-wide policies. As needed, the chancellors will work with the Office of System Planning and with the responsible officers of the administrative divisions. c. Each responsible officer will annually appoint a policy liaison who will serve as the main point of contact with the Provost's Office for all policyrelated matters for the division or campus. d. A list of responsible officers and policy liaisons for university policies is included as Appendix A. 2

B. Required Approval Process 1. System-wide University Policies a. The Office of the Provost coordinates the review and approval of new, revised and repealed system-wide university policies. b. All system-wide university policies with the exception of Board of Trustee policies (BTRU) must be approved by the president. c. Board of Trustees policies (BTRU) must be reviewed by the Office of General Counsel prior to approval by the Board of Trustees. d. Draft new policies, substantially revised policies and policies recommended for repeal must be distributed to the university community for review and comment prior to final approval. 2. Campus-specific University Policies Columbia campus-specific policies must be approved by the president and will follow the approval process for system-wide policies. Comprehensive campus-specific policies must be approved by the respective campus chancellor. Palmetto College campus-specific policies must be approved by the Palmetto College chancellor. 3. Expedited Approval C. Related Publications Non-substantive revisions to existing policy may be approved directly by the president or respective chancellor using an expedited approval process. The Office of the Provost categorizes revision as non-substantive, in consultation with the Policy Advisory Committee. When it is in the best interest of the university, draft new policies or those recommended for substantial revision or repeal may also be approved directly by the president or Board of Trustees using an expedited approval process. This includes policy development, revision or repeal directly related to state or federal law. 1. Faculty Manuals 3

Policies and procedures relating to faculty may be separately maintained and distributed in the relevant campus-specific Faculty Manual. All Faculty Manuals must be kept up-to-date. The chief academic affairs officers are responsible for ensuring that all Faculty Manuals are revised to reflect newly approved University Policies within six months of the policy's approval. In the event of inconsistency between the Faculty Manual and the Policies and Procedures Manual, the Faculty Manual is considered the final authority. Faculty Manual revisions for all campuses must be approved by the president and the Board of Trustees. After review by the appropriate faculty governance body, draft revisions to a Faculty Manual should be forwarded to the Provost's Office. The Provost's Office will coordinate the final review process in preparation for presentation to the Board of Trustees. a. Revisions to the Columbia campus Faculty Manual will be forwarded for comment to the Office of the General Counsel and Division of Human Resources. Information copies will also be sent to the Executive Council and the Council of Academic Deans. b. Revisions to the comprehensive and Palmetto College campuses Faculty Manuals will be forwarded for comment to the Office of the General Counsel and the Division of Human Resources, as well as an information copy to the Executive Council. Final versions of Faculty Manual revisions will be forwarded by the Provost's Office to the president and then to the Board of Trustees for approval. 2. Academic Bulletins Academic policies and procedures relating to students may also be contained in campus specific Bulletins, published annually by the Office of the University Registrar. Changes to the bulletins must be approved by the appropriate faculty governance bodies. Revisions to the Bulletins are approved through the appropriate faculty governance body. D. University Policy Maintenance and Periodic Review 1. Responsible officers must ensure that the division's university policies are up to date and revised when necessary to reflect current practice and/or procedures. Each university policy will be reviewed by the originating administrative division and revised as necessary at least every five years. 2. University Policy Archive The Provost's Office will maintain a policy archive containing all known copies of university policies, including repealed policies and previous versions of the 4

Columbia campus Faculty Manual. The academic affairs offices on the comprehensive campuses and Palmetto College are responsible for maintaining archives of campus-specific Faculty Manuals and campus-specific policies on their respective campuses. PROCEDURE A. Comprehensive and Palmetto College Campus Procedures Comprehensive and Palmetto College campuses should develop their own campus-based procedures to implement this policy where appropriate. B. Procedures for System-wide and Columbia campus-specific Policy Approval 1. Policy Advisory Committee The Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) is comprised of representatives of the administrative divisions, Palmetto College and comprehensive campuses, Faculty Senate, and General Counsel and includes a student representative. The Office of the Provost will facilitate identification of PAC members and work of the committee. This committee is charged to consult with university offices on proposals for new, revised and repealed policies to consider whether they are necessary and aligned with institutional mission, goals and priorities; that policies are concise, consistent in format and scope, and easy to understand; to identify constituencies and other policies that may be affected; and to make recommendations to appropriate offices. The PAC also assists with dissemination and sharing feedback regarding policies. 2. New, Substantially Revised or Repealed University Policies a. Draft new policies and those recommended for substantial revision or repeal must be developed and fully vetted within the administrative division. i. The policy must be formatted to conform to the standard template included as Appendix B. A description of the revisions should be included in the Reason for Revision section when appropriate. ii. Use the words must or will rather than should and shall in the body of the policy. As policies are developed to help improve communication, promote administrative consistency and efficiency, and ensure compliance with pertinent state and federal laws as well as state and regional accreditation requirements, use of the words should and shall is to be avoided as it infers the action is optional, which makes the need for the policy questionable. 5

Example of what to avoid: Each administrator shall determine the appropriateness of such travel and the extent to which the university is to participate in defraying travel and subsistence expenses. Example of what to state: Each administrator will determine the appropriateness of such travel and the extent to which the university is to participate in defraying travel and subsistence expenses. Where flexibility may be needed in use of the words should and shall, the responsible office will determine if circumstances justify deviation. c. The responsible officer will forward the policy to the Office of the Provost for an internal administrative review. d. The PAC will review each new, substantially revised or repealed university policy as described above. The committee will recommend approval, recommend revisions to the submitting administrative division, and/or recommend related changes to other policies identified during the review process. e. The Office of the Provost will distribute the policy within the university community for comment. Policy drafts must be posted to the university policy website for a minimum of two weeks for review prior to final approval. At the discretion of the PAC, the open comment period for policy drafts with substantial impact on faculty affairs cannot occur between May 16 and August 15. f. Consolidated comments regarding the distributed versions will be forwarded by the policy liaison to the responsible officer. g. The responsible officer will finalize the policy and submit it to the Office of the Provost for a second internal administrative review. After this review, the policy may be submitted to the PAC for an additional review prior to forwarding to the president for final approval. h. Following the president's approval, the Office of the Provost will notify the responsible officer, the policy liaisons, and all affected campuses and divisions. The Provost's Office will also make the required update or change to the Policies and Procedures Manual. i. For policies requiring approval of the Board of Trustees, the Office of the Provost will forward the policy to the General Council for review prior to submission to the Secretary of the Board of Trustees for presentation to the Board of Trustees for approval. 6

3. Expedited Approval Process a. The draft policy is developed and fully vetted within the administrative division. The policy must be formatted to conform to the standard template attached as Appendix B. b. The Responsible Officer will forward policy to the Provost's Office with a request for an expedited review. c. The Provost's Office will forward the policy to the president for final approval. d. Following the president's approval, the Office of the Provost will notify the responsible officer, the policy liaisons, and all affected campuses and divisions. The Provost's Office will also make the required update or change to the Policies and Procedures Manual. RELATED UNIVERSITY, STATE AND FEDERAL POLICIES USC Columbia Faculty Manual USC Palmetto College Campuses Faculty Manual USC Beaufort Faculty Manual USC Aiken Faculty Manual USC Upstate Faculty Manual USC Academic Bulletins HISTORY OF REVISIONS DATE OF REVISION August 19, 2009 September 12, 2012 November 7, 2017 REASON FOR REVISION New policy Non-substantive revision to update appendices Revision to incorporate Policy Advisory Committee and to define new policy template APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B List of responsible officers and policy liaisons University policy template 7

UNIV 1.00: APPENDIX B UNIVERSITY POLICY TEMPLATE (1" margins; Times New Roman 12 point font; new language indicated by green underlined text; language marked for deletion by strikethrough text.) ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION UNIV University Administration POLICY TITLE Policy on Policies: Development and Oversight of University Policies SCOPE OF POLICY USC System RESPONSIBLE OFFICER President DATE OF REVISION XXX PURPOSE Brief description of what policy is intended to accomplish. POLICY NUMBER UNIV 1.00 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Office of the President DEFINITIONS Definition of keywords and acronyms used in the policy. Note that these keywords may also be searchable. Additional searchable key words can also be identified. POLICY STATEMENT The policy statement should be a concise statement of the university s intent regarding the topic of the policy and expectations regarding compliance with it. PROCEDURES Description of procedures directly related to compliance with this policy. The official policy document should describe higher-level aspects of procedures, e.g., approval chain and responsibilities, with detail regarding implementation linked to website or similar resource. The procedures section should clearly indicate mandatory or voluntary compliance. The procedure detailed in the policy document should not be dependent on a particular technology. RELATED UNIVERSITY, STATE AND FEDERAL POLICIES As applicable HISTORY OF REVISIONS DATE OF REVISION Date 1 Date 2 REASON FOR REVISION New policy approval Justification APPENDICES (If applicable) 8