University of South Florida, Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings

Similar documents
University Library Collection Development and Management Policy

Collections, Technical Services & Scholarly Communications

HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Perceptions of value and value beyond perceptions: measuring the quality and value of journal article readings

Speak Up 2012 Grades 9 12

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

Thesis and Dissertation Submission Instructions

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Educator s e-portfolio in the Modern University

Collaboration: Meeting the Library User's Needs in a Digital Environment

Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Series, Scientific Communications and Authorship -- October 13,

STRATEGIES FOR EXPANDING

Self-Study Report. Markus Geissler, PhD

Virtual Seminar Courses: Issues from here to there

WSU LIBRARIES DECISION MATRIX FY

Best Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008

Library Consortia: Advantages and Disadvantages

Meriam Library LibQUAL+ Executive Summary

An Evaluation of E-Resources in Academic Libraries in Tamil Nadu

Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Historians. Jennifer Rutner Roger C. Schonfeld

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Generating Test Cases From Use Cases

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Managing an Open Access Fund: Tips from the Trenches and Questions for the Future

Advancing the Discipline of Leadership Studies. What is an Academic Discipline?

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

ACTL5103 Stochastic Modelling For Actuaries. Course Outline Semester 2, 2014

SCOPUS An eye on global research. Ayesha Abed Library

Introduction to Moodle

Challenges in Delivering Library Services for Distance Learning

THESIS GUIDE FORMAL INSTRUCTION GUIDE FOR MASTER S THESIS WRITING SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

Institutional repository policies: best practices for encouraging self-archiving

PROMOTION and TENURE GUIDELINES. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Gordon Ford College of Business Western Kentucky University

University of Texas Libraries. Welcome!

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

International Social Science Research in Africa, Asia, and Latin America: A Multidisciplinary Seminar on Concept, Design, and Praxis

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

Robert S. Marx Law Library University of Cincinnati College of Law Annual Report: *

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

E-LEARNING IN LIBRARY OF JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

EdX Learner s Guide. Release

THE ST. OLAF COLLEGE LIBRARIES FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Chemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016

Laura K. Ball. Drexel University

Community Unit # 2 School District Library Policy Manual

Susanne Rieger on her objectives as new President of EASC

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

Open Access Free/Open Software, Open Data, Creative Commons Wikipedia: Commonalities and Distinctions. Stevan Harnad UQAM & U Southampton

Course Content Concepts

Getting Started with Deliberate Practice

What to Do When Conflict Happens

Texas A&M University - Central Texas PSYK PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES. Professor: Elizabeth K.

Focus Groups and Student Learning Assessment

Class Numbers: & Personal Financial Management. Sections: RVCC & RVDC. Summer 2008 FIN Fully Online

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

SAMPLE SYLLABUS. Master of Health Care Administration Academic Center 3rd Floor Des Moines, Iowa 50312

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

State University of New York at Buffalo INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS PSC 408 Fall 2015 M,W,F 1-1:50 NSC 210

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

E-Portfolio for Teacher Educators at EIU. February 2005

Library services & information retrieval

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Academic Support Services Accelerated Learning Classes The Learning Success Center SMARTHINKING Student computer labs Adult Education

Registration Fee: $1490/Member, $1865/Non-member Registration Deadline: August 15, 2014 *Please see Tuition Policies on the following page

AST Introduction to Solar Systems Astronomy

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Cambridge NATIONALS. Creative imedia Level 1/2. UNIT R081 - Pre-Production Skills DELIVERY GUIDE

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

The EUA and Open Access

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Patient/Caregiver Surveys

User Education Programs in Academic Libraries: The Experience of the International Islamic University Malaysia Students

Practical Research. Planning and Design. Paul D. Leedy. Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbus, Ohio

LMIS430: Administration of the School Library Media Center

We re Listening Results Dashboard How To Guide

Newer Adult Education Methods and Techniques

STUDENT MOODLE ORIENTATION

Helping Graduate Students Join an Online Learning Community

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Java Programming. Specialized Certificate

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

COMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.

Introduction to Questionnaire Design

Infrastructure Issues Related to Theory of Computing Research. Faith Fich, University of Toronto

Promoting open access to research results

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Circulation information for Community Patrons and TexShare borrowers

Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning

An Introduction and Overview to Google Apps in K12 Education: A Web-based Instructional Module

Open Science at Tritonia Academic Library, University of Vaasa, Finland

Transcription:

University of South Florida, Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings

Table of Contents Overview... 3 Core National Questionnaire... 4 Scholarly Communication... 64 Undergraduate Instruction... 79 Graduate Instruction... 101 Demographic Questions... 115 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 2 / 126

Overview The University of South Florida, Tampa implementation of the Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey was launched on September 22, 2015, and was closed to new responses on December 11, 2015, with a total of 168 complete responses. The questionnaire covers topics in several key areas, including: how faculty members discover and access materials for research; faculty members usage of scholarly communication services; faculty members research practices, including data preservation and management behaviors and needs; faculty members perceptions of students research skills; the role of the library in supporting faculty members needs; and faculty members undergraduate and graduate instruction practices. The following report provides a highlevel overview of findings from the USF Tampa faculty survey. 1 Details 1,300 USF Tampa faculty members received an email invitation to participate in a survey about the impact of digital technologies on their research, teaching, and publishing. Three email reminders were sent before the close of the survey. In total, 288 respondents clicked the survey link (about 22% of those who received the email invitation), with 245 of those starting the survey (about 19%) and 168 of those respondents completing the survey, for an overall response rate of about 13%. Due to the survey flow and skip patterns, not all USF Tampa respondents received every question in the survey. How to interpret the findings For each question in the USF Tampa faculty survey, this document provides a single graph and table of overall responses. Title pages provide information about survey flow and contingent items, which signify that a question was only presented to those who satisfied a condition in their response to another question. If you have any questions about this report or working with the raw data provided, please contact Christine Wolff, Ithaka S+R Survey Administrator, at Christine.Wolff@ithaka.org. 1 This report covers results from completed surveys and does not include an overview of partially completed responses. Partially completed responses are included in the spreadsheet of raw data. USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 3 / 126

Core National Questionnaire Q1 Below are four possible starting points for research in academic literature. Typically, when you are conducting academic research, which of these four starting points do you use to begin locating information for your research? Q2 When you explore the scholarly literature to find new journal articles and monographs relevant to your research interests, how do you most often begin your process? Select one of the following: Q3 You may employ a variety of different tactics to "keep up" with current scholarship in your field on a regular basis. Please use the scales below to rate from 10 to 1 how important each of the following methods is for staying current with new scholarship in your field. [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] Q4 Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view a 10 equals Extremely well and a 1 equals Not at all well. You may pick any number on the scale. The higher the number, the better you think the statement describes your point of view. The lower the number, the less you think the statement describes your point of view. Please note: the phrase scholarly monograph, which appears in this question and in other questions throughout this survey, refers to a single volume book published by a scholar for an academic audience. Q5 Below is a list of ways you may use a scholarly monograph. Please think about doing each of these things with a scholarly monograph in print format or in digital format, and use the scales below to indicate how much easier or harder is it to perform each activity in print or digital format. Please select one answer for each item. Q6 When you think about the journal articles and scholarly monographs that you routinely use - for research as well as for teaching - how important are each of the following sources? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 4 / 126

Q7 When you want a scholarly monograph or journal article that you do not have immediate access to through your college or university library's physical or digital collections, how often do you use each of the following methods to seek access to that material? Q8 Is performing academic research among your professional responsibilities? Q9 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How important to your research is each of the following digital research activities and methodologies today? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] Q10 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] You may have the opportunity to share the findings of your scholarly research in a variety of different formats. Please use the scales below to indicate how often you have shared the findings of your scholarly research in each of the following ways in the past five years. Q11 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] When it comes to influencing your decisions about journals in which to publish an article of yours, how important to you is each of the following characteristics of an academic journal? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] Q12 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Q13 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Does your college or university library, scholarly society, university press, or another service provider assist you with any of the following aspects of the publication process? Q14 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How valuable do you find support from your college or university library for each of the following aspects of the publication process, or how valuable would you find it if this support was offered to you? [10 = extremely valuable; 1 = not at all valuable] Q15 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How important is it to you that your research reaches each of the following possible audiences? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 5 / 126

Q16 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Multiple selections possible] Which of the following types of research data do you build up or collect for your own research? Please select all that apply: Q17 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Are any of the following types of your research publications or products available online for free (such as via your personal webpage or an open access repository)? Q18 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Response options contingent on response to Q17] Is your scholarly research hosted online at your institution s repository (USF Scholar Commons), an open access disciplinary repository (such as PubMed, SSRN, etc.), or is your scholarly research freely available elsewhere (such as your personal webpage)? For each of the type(s) of scholarly work(s) listed below, please select all hosting sources that apply: Q19 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Have you ever received or are you currently receiving extramural funding for your scholarly research from a public or government grant-making organization (such as the NSF, NIH, NEH, etc.)? Q20 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] To what extent do you support or oppose the federal policy mandating that publicly funded scholarly research and/or data be made freely available online (i.e., via an open access repository or database)? [6 = highly support; 1 = highly oppose] Q21 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Response options contingent on response to Q17] And, when you think about how your work is assessed, such as for tenure, promotion, or research funding, how much recognition should you receive for your research products compared to traditional research publications such as journal articles and scholarly books? USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 6 / 126

Please read the following statement and tell us whether you strongly agree with the statement, agree, somewhat agree, neither agree nor disagree, somewhat disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree. Q22 Societal impact, or the benefit of scholarly work and research products to society, should be a key measure of research performance for tenure, promotion, or funding proposals Q23 [Contingent on respondent selecting at least one option in Q16] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Q24 [Contingent on respondent selecting at least one option in Q16] Please use the scale below to rate from 10 to 1 how valuable you would find each of the following possible sources of support for managing or preserving research data, media, or images or how valuable you do find each of the following sources of support for managing or preserving research data, media, or images. [10 = extremely valuable; 1 = not at all valuable] Q25 [Contingent on respondent selecting at least one option in Q16] [Multiple selections possible] If these collections or sets of research data are preserved following the conclusion of the projects, what methods are used to preserve them? Please select each method by which they are preserved or indicate that they are not preserved. Q26 How dependent would you say you are on your college or university library for research you conduct? [10 = completely dependent; 1 = not at all dependent] Q27 How important is it to you that your college or university library provides each of the functions below or serves in the capacity listed below? [6 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] Q28 Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 7 / 126

Q29 Is teaching either undergraduate or postgraduate courses among your professional responsibilities? Q30 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q29] [Multiple selections possible] Please select which types of courses you have taught in the last 2 years: Q31 [Contingent on respondent teaching an undergraduate course] In general, how often do you do each of the following when designing or structuring your undergraduate courses: Q32 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q29] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Q33 [Contingent on respondent teaching a lower division undergraduate course] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Q34 [Contingent on respondent teaching an upper division undergraduate course] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Q35 [Contingent on respondent teaching an undergraduate and/or graduate course] As far as you know, how often do students in the courses you teach interact with librarians at your college or university library? Q36 [Contingent on respondent teaching an undergraduate and/or graduate course] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 8 / 126

Q1 Below are four possible starting points for research in academic literature. Typically, when you are conducting academic research, which of these four starting points do you use to begin locating information for your research? Response Percent The library building 2 1.20% A general purpose search engine on the internet or world wide web 58 34.73% Your online library website or catalog 53 31.74% A specific electronic research resource/computer database 54 32.34% 167 100.00% Typically, when you are conducting academic research, which of these four starting points do you use to begin locating information for your research? The library building A general purpose search engine on the internet or world wide web Your online library website or catalog A specific electronic research resource/computer database USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 9 / 126

Q2 When you explore the scholarly literature to find new journal articles and monographs relevant to your research interests, how do you most often begin your process? Select one of the following: Response Percent Visit my college or university library s website or online catalog 41 24.55% Search on a specific scholarly database 50 29.94% Search on a general purpose search engine 11 6.59% Search on Google Scholar 54 32.34% Ask a colleague 1 0.60% Ask a librarian 1 0.60% Other: 9 5.39% 167 100.00% When you explore the scholarly literature to find new journal articles and monographs relevant to your research interests, how do you most often begin your process? Visit my college or university library s website or online catalog Search on a specific scholarly database Search on a general purpose search engine Search on Google Scholar Ask a colleague Ask a librarian Other: USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 10 / 126

Q3 You may employ a variety of different tactics to "keep up" with current scholarship in your field on a regular basis. Please use the scales below to rate from 10 to 1 how important each of the following methods is for staying current with new scholarship in your field. [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response Following the work of key scholars 62.42% 29.09% 8.48% 165 Regularly skimming new issues of key journals 69.28% 25.30% 5.42% 166 Regularly skimming table of contents (TOC) alerts of key journals 56.63% 31.93% 11.45% 166 Reading or skimming book reviews 36.42% 32.10% 31.48% 162 Subscribing to relevant disciplinary or field-specific email listservs 54.27% 30.49% 15.24% 164 Reviewing catalogs or announcements from scholarly publishers 34.57% 35.19% 30.25% 162 Setting alerts for specific relevant keywords, authors, saved searches, or cited references 31.48% 38.89% 29.63% 162 Reading materials rated highly by a relevant repository or scholarly tool 40.25% 33.33% 26.42% 159 Reading materials suggested by other scholars 70.30% 21.82% 7.88% 165 Reading materials suggested by personalized search engine recommendations 33.33% 37.65% 29.01% 162 Attending conferences or workshops 73.94% 21.82% 4.24% 165 Following other researchers through blogs or social media 27.61% 34.36% 38.04% 163 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 11 / 126

Q3 You may employ a variety of different tactics to "keep up" with current scholarship in your field on a regular basis. Please use the scales below to rate from 10 to 1 how important each of the following methods is for staying current with new scholarship in your field. [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] Please use the scales below to rate from 10 to 1 how important each of the following methods is for staying current with new scholarship in your field. Following the work of key scholars Regularly skimming new issues of key journals Regularly skimming table of contents (TOC) alerts of key journals Reading or skimming book reviews Subscribing to relevant disciplinary or field-specific email listservs Reviewing catalogs or announcements from scholarly publishers Setting alerts for specific relevant keywords, authors, saved searches, or cited Reading materials rated highly by a relevant repository or scholarly tool Reading materials suggested by other scholars Reading materials suggested by personalized search engine Attending conferences or workshops Following other researchers through blogs or social media 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 12 / 126

Q4 Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view a 10 equals Extremely well and a 1 equals Not at all well. You may pick any number on the scale. The higher the number, the better you think the statement describes your point of view. The lower the number, the less you think the statement describes your point of view. Please note: the phrase scholarly monograph, which appears in this question and in other questions throughout this survey, refers to a single volume book published by a scholar for an academic audience. 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response Within the next five years, the use of e- books will be so prevalent among faculty and students that it will not be necessary to maintain library collections of hard-copy books. 21.56% 29.34% 49.10% 167 Print versions of scholarly monographs play a very important role in my research and teaching 41.32% 28.74% 29.94% 167 Assuming that electronic collections of journals are proven to work well, I would be happy to see hard copy collections discarded and replaced entirely by electronic collections 60.48% 22.75% 16.77% 167 If my library cancelled the current issues of a print version of a journal but continued to make them available electronically, that would be fine with me 83.23% 10.18% 6.59% 167 I am completely comfortable with journals I use regularly ceasing their print versions and publishing in electronic-only form. 67.47% 19.28% 13.25% 166 Electronic versions of scholarly monographs play a very important role in my research and teaching 56.89% 28.74% 14.37% 167 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 13 / 126

Q4 Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view a 10 equals Extremely well and a 1 equals Not at all well. You may pick any number on the scale. The higher the number, the better you think the statement describes your point of view. The lower the number, the less you think the statement describes your point of view. Please note: the phrase scholarly monograph, which appears in this question and in other questions throughout this survey, refers to a single volume book published by a scholar for an academic audience. Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. Within the next five years, the use of e-books will be so prevalent among faculty and students that it will Print versions of scholarly monographs play a very important role in my research and teaching Assuming that electronic collections of journals are proven to work well, I would be happy to see hard If my library cancelled the current issues of a print version of a journal but continued to make them I am completely comfortable with journals I use regularly ceasing their print versions and Electronic versions of scholarly monographs play a very important role in my research and teaching 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 14 / 126

Q5 Below is a list of ways you may use a scholarly monograph. Please think about doing each of these things with a scholarly monograph in print format or in digital format, and use the scales below to indicate how much easier or harder is it to perform each activity in print or digital format. Please select one answer for each item. Much easier in print format than digital Somewhat easier in print format than digital About the same in print and digital format Somewhat easier in digital format than print Much easier in digital format than print Reading cover to cover in depth 60.98% 18.29% 9.15% 4.27% 7.32% 164 Reading a section in depth 45.73% 21.34% 20.73% 4.88% 7.32% 164 Skimming in whole or in part 35.98% 14.63% 18.90% 14.02% 16.46% 164 Searching for a particular topic 15.24% 4.88% 10.37% 18.29% 51.22% 164 Exploring references 22.70% 14.11% 19.63% 14.11% 29.45% 163 Comparing treatment of ideas between monographs 33.74% 23.31% 24.54% 9.20% 9.20% 163 Response USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 15 / 126

Q5 Below is a list of ways you may use a scholarly monograph. Please think about doing each of these things with a scholarly monograph in print format or in digital format, and use the scales below to indicate how much easier or harder is it to perform each activity in print or digital format. Please select one answer for each item. Please use the scales below to indicate how much easier or harder is it to perform each activity in print or digital format. Reading cover to cover in depth Reading a section in depth Skimming in whole or in part Searching for a particular topic Exploring references Comparing treatment of ideas between monographs 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Much easier in print format than digital About the same in print and digital format Much easier in digital format than print Somewhat easier in print format than digital Somewhat easier in digital format than print USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 16 / 126

Q6 When you think about the journal articles and scholarly monographs that you routinely use - for research as well as for teaching - how important are each of the following sources? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response My college or university library s collections or subscriptions 89.63% 7.93% 2.44% 164 My own personal collection or subscriptions 50.92% 25.15% 23.93% 163 My academic department s collections or subscriptions 19.38% 23.75% 56.88% 160 Collections or subscriptions of other institutions 48.47% 35.58% 15.95% 163 Materials that are freely available online 69.94% 25.77% 4.29% 163 When you think about the journal articles and scholarly monographs that you routinely use - for research as well as for teaching - how important are each of the following sources? My college or university library s collections or subscriptions My own personal collection or subscriptions My academic department s collections or subscriptions Collections or subscriptions of other institutions Materials that are freely available online 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 17 / 126

Q7 When you want a scholarly monograph or journal article that you do not have immediate access to through your college or university library's physical or digital collections, how often do you use each of the following methods to seek access to that material? Often Occasionally Rarely Never Response Give up and look for a different resource that I can access 14.02% 34.76% 26.83% 24.39% 164 Use interlibrary loan or document delivery services provided by my library 62.42% 22.42% 12.73% 2.42% 165 Contact the author 2.44% 33.54% 37.20% 26.83% 164 Search for a freely available version online 65.85% 23.17% 6.71% 4.27% 164 Purchase it myself from the publisher or a vendor 12.20% 28.05% 28.66% 31.10% 164 Ask a friend at another institution 9.15% 27.44% 30.49% 32.93% 164 Request a copy using social media (such as #icanhazpdf on Twitter, etc.) 1.84% 8.59% 17.79% 71.78% 163 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 18 / 126

Q7 When you want a scholarly monograph or journal article that you do not have immediate access to through your college or university library's physical or digital collections, how often do you use each of the following methods to seek access to that material? How often do you use each of the following methods to seek access to a scholarly monograph or journal article that you do not have immediate access to through your college or university library's physical or digital collections? Give up and look for a different resource that I can access Use interlibrary loan or document delivery services provided by my library Contact the author Search for a freely available version online Purchase it myself from the publisher or a vendor Ask a friend at another institution Request a copy using social media (such as #icanhazpdf on Twitter, etc.) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Often Occasionally Rarely Never USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 19 / 126

Q8 Is performing academic research among your professional responsibilities? Response Percent Yes 154 92.22% No 13 7.78% 167 100.00% Is performing academic research among your professional responsibilities? Yes No USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 20 / 126

Q9 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How important to your research is each of the following digital research activities and methodologies today? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response Computational analysis of text (text mining) 20.53% 27.81% 51.66% 151 GIS/mapping of data 15.33% 19.33% 65.33% 150 Analysis of quantitative data that you generate in the course of your research 61.33% 12.67% 26.00% 150 Analysis of qualitative data that you generate in the course of your research 57.05% 15.44% 27.52% 149 Analysis of pre-existing quantitative data that you do not generate in the course of your research 41.33% 22.67% 36.00% 150 Analysis of pre-existing qualitative data that you do not generate in the course of your research 40.54% 19.59% 39.86% 148 Writing software or code 20.53% 15.23% 64.24% 151 Using models or simulations 36.24% 15.44% 48.32% 149 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 21 / 126

Q9 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How important to your research is each of the following digital research activities and methodologies today? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] How important to your research is each of the following digital research activities and methodologies today? Computational analysis of text (text mining) GIS/mapping of data Analysis of quantitative data that you generate in the course of your research Analysis of qualitative data that you generate in the course of your research Analysis of pre-existing quantitative data that you do not generate in the Analysis of pre-existing qualitative data that you do not generate in the Writing software or code Using models or simulations 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 22 / 126

Q10 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] You may have the opportunity to share the findings of your scholarly research in a variety of different formats. Please use the scales below to indicate how often you have shared the findings of your scholarly research in each of the following ways in the past five years. Often Occasionally Rarely Never Response Peer-reviewed journals 88.67% 10.00% 1.33% 150 Magazines and trade journals that are not peer reviewed 5.41% 20.27% 34.46% 39.86% 148 Scholarly monographs or edited volumes, published by an academic publisher 50.00% 28.67% 12.67% 8.67% 150 Trade books that do not specifically target an academic audience 5.41% 12.84% 27.03% 54.73% 148 Published conference proceedings 33.33% 33.33% 22.00% 11.33% 150 Blogs or social media 12.24% 15.65% 21.77% 50.34% 147 Pre-print or e-print digital archives 20.95% 22.30% 24.32% 32.43% 148 Online under a Creative Commons or Open Source license 9.46% 20.27% 25.68% 44.59% 148 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 23 / 126

Q10 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] You may have the opportunity to share the findings of your scholarly research in a variety of different formats. Please use the scales below to indicate how often you have shared the findings of your scholarly research in each of the following ways in the past five years. Please use the scales below to indicate how often you have shared the findings of your scholarly research in each of the following ways in the past five years. Peer-reviewed journals Magazines and trade journals that are not peer reviewed Scholarly monographs or edited volumes, published by an academic publisher Trade books that do not specifically target an academic audience Published conference proceedings Blogs or social media Pre-print or e-print digital archives Online under a Creative Commons or Open Source license 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Often Occasionally Rarely Never USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 24 / 126

Q11 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] When it comes to influencing your decisions about journals in which to publish an article of yours, how important to you is each of the following characteristics of an academic journal? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response The journal makes its articles freely available on the internet, so there is no cost to purchase or read 37.84% 36.49% 25.68% 148 The journal permits scholars to publish articles for free, without paying page or article charges 79.73% 12.16% 8.11% 148 Measures have been taken to ensure the protection and safeguarding of the journal s content for the long term 50.68% 22.30% 27.03% 148 The current issues of the journal are circulated widely, and are well read by scholars in your field 87.25% 11.41% 1.34% 149 The journal is highly selective; only a small percentage of submitted articles are published 63.27% 29.25% 7.48% 147 The journal is accessible to readers not only in developed nations, but also in developing nations 37.41% 33.33% 29.25% 147 The journal has a high impact factor or an excellent academic reputation 87.07% 10.20% 2.72% 147 The journal s area of coverage is very close to my immediate area of research 91.95% 8.05% 149 If accepted, the journal will publish my article quickly, with relatively little delay 61.07% 34.23% 4.70% 149 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 25 / 126

Q11 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] When it comes to influencing your decisions about journals in which to publish an article of yours, how important to you is each of the following characteristics of an academic journal? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] When it comes to influencing your decisions about journals in which to publish an article of yours, how important to you is each of the following characteristics of an academic journal? The journal makes its articles freely available on the internet, so there is The journal permits scholars to publish articles for free, without paying Measures have been taken to ensure the protection and safeguarding of the The current issues of the journal are circulated widely, and are well read The journal is highly selective; only a small percentage of submitted The journal is accessible to readers not only in developed nations, but The journal has a high impact factor or an excellent academic The journal s area of coverage is very close to my immediate area of If accepted, the journal will publish my article quickly, with relatively little delay 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 26 / 126

Q12 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response Circulating pre-print versions of my research outputs is an important way for me to communicate my research findings with my peers 38.51% 34.46% 27.03% 148 Scholarly publishers have been rendered less important to my process of communicating scholarly knowledge by my increasing ability to share my work directly with peers online 19.18% 32.19% 48.63% 146 I clearly understand the criteria that are used to evaluate me in tenure and promotion decision-making 74.83% 15.65% 9.52% 147 I shape my research outputs and publication choices to match the criteria I perceive for success in tenure and promotion processes 57.24% 24.83% 17.93% 145 I would be happy to see the traditional subscription-based publication model replaced entirely by an open access publication system in which all scholarly research outputs would be freely available to the public 57.53% 23.97% 18.49% 146 Enabling the broadest possible readership of my research outputs is an important way for me to maximize the impact of my research findings 75.86% 20.69% 3.45% 145 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 27 / 126

Q12 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. Circulating pre-print versions of my research outputs is an important way for me to communicate my research findings with my peers Scholarly publishers have been rendered less important to my process of communicating scholarly knowledge by my increasing ability to share I clearly understand the criteria that are used to evaluate me in tenure and promotion decision-making I shape my research outputs and publication choices to match the criteria I perceive for success in tenure and promotion processes I would be happy to see the traditional subscriptionbased publication model replaced entirely by an open access publication system in which all Enabling the broadest possible readership of my research outputs is an important way for me to maximize the impact of my research findings 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 28 / 126

Q13 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Does your college or university library, scholarly society, university press, or another service provider assist you with any of the following aspects of the publication process? Yes No Response Helping me understand and negotiate favorable publication contracts 6.12% 93.88% 147 Helping me determine where to publish a given work to maximize its impact 21.09% 78.91% 147 Helping me to assess the impact of my work following its publication 36.73% 63.27% 147 Managing a public webpage for me that lists links to my recent scholarly outputs, provides information on my areas of research and teaching, and provides contact information for me 27.89% 72.11% 147 Does your college or university library, scholarly society, university press, or another service provider assist you with any of the following aspects of the publication process? Helping me understand and negotiate favorable publication contracts Helping me determine where to publish a given work to maximize its impact Helping me to assess the impact of my work following its publication Managing a public webpage for me that lists links to my recent scholarly outputs, provides information on 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 29 / 126

Q14 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How valuable do you find support from your college or university library for each of the following aspects of the publication process, or how valuable would you find it if this support was offered to you? [10 = extremely valuable; 1 = not at all valuable] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response Helping me understand and negotiate favorable publication contracts 28.37% 23.40% 48.23% 141 Helping me determine where to publish a given work to maximize its impact 31.21% 27.66% 41.13% 141 Helping me to assess the impact of my work following its publication 41.67% 29.86% 28.47% 144 Managing a public webpage for me that lists links to my recent scholarly outputs, provides information on my areas of research and teaching, and provides contact information for me 47.18% 23.94% 28.87% 142 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 30 / 126

Q14 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How valuable do you find support from your college or university library for each of the following aspects of the publication process, or how valuable would you find it if this support was offered to you? [10 = extremely valuable; 1 = not at all valuable] How valuable do you or would you find support from your college or university library for each of the following aspects of the publication process? Helping me understand and negotiate favorable publication contracts Helping me determine where to publish a given work to maximize its impact Helping me to assess the impact of my work following its publication Managing a public webpage for me that lists links to my recent scholarly outputs, provides information on my areas of research and teaching, and provides contact information for me 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 31 / 126

Q15 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How important is it to you that your research reaches each of the following possible audiences? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response Scholars in my specific subdiscipline or field of research 97.96% 2.04% 147 Scholars in my discipline but outside of my specific subdiscipline or field of research 84.35% 12.93% 2.72% 147 Scholars outside my discipline 63.27% 33.33% 3.40% 147 Undergraduate students 42.47% 43.15% 14.38% 146 Professionals outside of academia in areas related to my research interests 70.07% 22.45% 7.48% 147 The general public beyond the scholarly and associated professional community 47.95% 37.67% 14.38% 146 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 32 / 126

Q15 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] How important is it to you that your research reaches each of the following possible audiences? [10 = extremely important; 1 = not at all important] How important is it to you that your research reaches each of the following possible audiences? Scholars in my specific subdiscipline or field of research Scholars in my discipline but outside of my specific subdiscipline or field of research Scholars outside my discipline Undergraduate students Professionals outside of academia in areas related to my research interests The general public beyond the scholarly and associated professional community 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 33 / 126

Q16 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Multiple selections possible] Which of the following types of research data do you build up or collect for your own research? Please select all that apply: Response Percent Qualitative (such as open-ended survey responses, interview or focus group transcripts, laboratory or field notes, text, documents, images, video, audio, etc.) 91 66.42% Scientific (such as laboratory experimental data, slides, physical artifacts, biological specimens, samples, etc.) 52 37.96% Quantitative (such as numeric files, survey responses, geospatial data files, etc.) 92 67.15% Computational (such as models, algorithms, programs, scripts, etc.) 46 33.58% Other (please fill in): 17 12.41% 298 100.00% Which of the following types of research data do you build up or collect for your own research? 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% Qualitative (such as open-ended survey responses, interview or focus group transcripts, laboratory or field notes, text, documents, images, video, audio, etc.) Scientific (such as laboratory experimental data, slides, physical artifacts, biological specimens, samples, etc.) Quantitative (such as numeric files, survey responses, geospatial data files, etc.) Computational (such as models, algorithms, programs, scripts, etc.) Other (please fill in): USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 34 / 126

Q17 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Are any of the following types of your research publications or products available online for free (such as via your personal webpage or an open access repository)? Yes No Response Peer-reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings 68.28% 31.72% 145 Pre-prints of peer-reviewed journal articles 42.36% 57.64% 144 Working papers or draft manuscripts 16.44% 83.56% 146 Data, images, media, or other primary source materials 31.25% 68.75% 144 Books or scholarly monographs 22.22% 77.78% 144 Software or code 13.89% 86.11% 144 Blog or microblog posts 28.28% 71.72% 145 Responses or comments to online versions of articles, blog posts, discussion forums, or social media conversations 25.52% 74.48% 145 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 35 / 126

Q17 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Are any of the following types of your research publications or products available online for free (such as via your personal webpage or an open access repository)? Are any of the following types of your research publications or products available online for free (such as via your personal webpage or an open access repository)? Peer-reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings Pre-prints of peer-reviewed journal articles Working papers or draft manuscripts Data, images, media, or other primary source materials Books or scholarly monographs Software or code Blog or microblog posts Responses or comments to online versions of articles, blog posts, discussion forums, or social media 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 36 / 126

Q18 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Response options contingent on response to Q17] Is your scholarly research hosted online at your institution s repository (USF Scholar Commons), an open access disciplinary repository (such as PubMed, SSRN, etc.), or is your scholarly research freely available elsewhere (such as your personal webpage)? For each of the type(s) of scholarly work(s) listed below, please select all hosting sources that apply: My institution s repository (USF Scholar Commons) Open access disciplinary repository Elsewhere online Peer-reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings 34.12% 29.41% 61.18% 106 Pre-prints of peerreviewed journal articles 18.75% 33.33% 64.58% 56 Working papers or draft manuscripts 12.50% 31.25% 62.50% 17 Data, images, media, or other primary source materials 14.29% 14.29% 82.86% 39 Books or scholarly monographs 52.38% 23.81% 38.10% 24 Software or code 5.88% 23.53% 82.35% 19 Blog or microblog posts 9.38% 9.38% 84.38% 33 Responses or comments to online versions of articles, blog posts, discussion forums, or social media conversations 10.71% 21.43% 78.57% 31 Response USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 37 / 126

Q18 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Response options contingent on response to Q17] Is your scholarly research hosted online at your institution s repository (USF Scholar Commons), an open access disciplinary repository (such as PubMed, SSRN, etc.), or is your scholarly research freely available elsewhere (such as your personal webpage)? For each of the type(s) of scholarly work(s) listed below, please select all hosting sources that apply: Is your scholarly research hosted online at your institution s repository, an open access disciplinary repository, or is your scholarly research freely available elsewhere? Peer-reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings Pre-prints of peer-reviewed journal articles Working papers or draft manuscripts Data, images, media, or other primary source materials Books or scholarly monographs Software or code Blog or microblog posts Responses or comments to online versions of articles, blog posts, discussion forums, or social media 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% My institution s repository (USF Scholar Commons) Open access disciplinary repository Elsewhere online USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 38 / 126

Q19 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] Have you ever received or are you currently receiving extramural funding for your scholarly research from a public or government grant-making organization (such as the NSF, NIH, NEH, etc.)? Response Percent Yes 90 59.60% No 61 40.40% 151 100.00% Have you ever received or are you currently receiving extramural funding for your scholarly research from a public or government grant-making organization? Yes No USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 39 / 126

Q20 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] To what extent do you support or oppose the federal policy mandating that publicly funded scholarly research and/or data be made freely available online (i.e., via an open access repository or database)? [6 = highly support; 1 = highly oppose] Response Percent 5-6 102 68.00% 3-4 39 26.00% 1-2 9 6.00% 150 100.00% 100.00% To what extent do you support or oppose the federal policy mandating that publicly funded scholarly research and/or data be made freely available online? 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% 5-6 3-4 1-2 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 40 / 126

Q21 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Response options contingent on response to Q17] And, when you think about how your work is assessed, such as for tenure, promotion, or research funding, how much recognition should you receive for your research products compared to traditional research publications such as journal articles and scholarly books? Much less recognition than traditional research publications Less recognition than traditional research publications Somewhat less recognition than traditional research publications About the same amount of recognition as traditional research publications Somewhat more recognition than traditional research publications More recognition than traditional research publications Much more recognition than traditional research publications Data, images, media, or other primary source materials 6.82% 20.45% 25.00% 27.27% 13.64% 2.27% 4.55% 44 Software or code 10.00% 15.00% 15.00% 50.00% 5.00% 5.00% 20 Pre-prints or e-prints 3.45% 22.41% 22.41% 46.55% 3.45% 1.72% 58 Blog or microblog posts 35.90% 38.46% 12.82% 7.69% 2.56% 2.56% 39 Responses or comments to online versions of articles, blog posts, discussion forum posts, or social media conversations 20.00% 40.00% 11.43% 20.00% 5.71% 2.86% 35 Response Other (please fill in): 5.88% 11.76% 17.65% 52.94% 2.94% 8.82% 34 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 41 / 126

Q21 [Contingent on respondent selecting yes in Q8] [Response options contingent on response to Q17] And, when you think about how your work is assessed, such as for tenure, promotion, or research funding, how much recognition should you receive for your research products compared to traditional research publications such as journal articles and scholarly books? How much recognition should you receive for your research products compared to traditional research publications such as journal articles and scholarly books? Data, images, media, or other primary source materials Software or code Pre-prints or e-prints Blog or microblog posts Responses or comments to online versions of articles, blog posts, discussion forum posts, or social Other (please fill in): 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Much less recognition than traditional research publications Less recognition than traditional research publications Somewhat less recognition than traditional research publications About the same amount of recognition as traditional research publications Somewhat more recognition than traditional research publications More recognition than traditional research publications Much more recognition than traditional research publications USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 42 / 126

Q22 Societal impact, or the benefit of scholarly work and research products to society, should be a key measure of research performance for tenure, promotion, or funding proposals Response Percent Strongly agree 27 16.67% Agree 44 27.16% Somewhat agree 25 15.43% Neither agree nor disagree 26 16.05% Somewhat disagree 13 8.02% Disagree 12 7.41% Strongly disagree 15 9.26% 162 100.00% 100.00% Societal impact, or the benefit of scholarly work and research products to society, should be a key measure of research performance for tenure, promotion, or funding proposals 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% Strongly agree Agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Disagree Strongly disagree USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 43 / 126

Q23 [Contingent on respondent selecting at least one option in Q16] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] 8-10 4-7 1-3 Response When I am in the process of collecting data, media, or images for my research, I often organize or manage these data on my own computer or computers 88.06% 7.46% 4.48% 134 When I am in the process of collecting data, media, or images for my research, I often organize or manage these data on a cloud storage service (such as Google Drive, Dropbox, Flickr, etc.) 41.04% 23.13% 35.82% 134 I find it difficult to organize or manage my data, media, or images 23.88% 29.10% 47.01% 134 My college or university library manages or organizes my data, media, or images on my behalf 4.51% 12.03% 83.46% 133 I find it difficult to preserve or store my data, media, or images for the long-term 29.32% 26.32% 44.36% 133 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 44 / 126

Q23 [Contingent on respondent selecting at least one option in Q16] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. [10 = extremely well; 1 = not at all well] Please use the 10 to 1 scales below to indicate how well each statement below describes your point of view. When I am in the process of collecting data, media, or images for my research, I often organize or manage these data on my own When I am in the process of collecting data, media, or images for my research, I often organize or manage these data on a cloud I find it difficult to organize or manage my data, media, or images My college or university library manages or organizes my data, media, or images on my behalf I find it difficult to preserve or store my data, media, or images for the long-term 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8-10 4-7 1-3 USF Tampa Faculty Survey: Report of Findings 45 / 126