Extended Essay Scoring Rubric

Similar documents
English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Language Arts Levels 15 17/18

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

November 2012 MUET (800)

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Graduate Program in Education

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Assessment and Evaluation

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Multi-genre Writing Assignment

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Master Program: Strategic Management. Master s Thesis a roadmap to success. Innsbruck University School of Management

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

The Writing Process. The Academic Support Centre // September 2015

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

- Period - Semicolon - Comma + FANBOYS - Question mark - Exclamation mark

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Difficulties in Academic Writing: From the Perspective of King Saud University Postgraduate Students

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Mini Lesson Ideas for Expository Writing

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Unit of Study: STAAR Revision and Editing. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District Elementary Language Arts Department, Grade 4

Research Journal ADE DEDI SALIPUTRA NIM: F

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Resources for Teaching Writing Intensive Courses

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

PHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Student Writing Manual

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

Textbook: American Literature Vol. 1 William E. Cain /Pearson Ed. Inc. 2004

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

EQuIP Review Feedback

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Emmaus Lutheran School English Language Arts Curriculum

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Lab Reports for Biology

Senior Project Information

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Technical Skills for Journalism

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

eportfolio Assessment of General Education

Turkey in the 20 th Century guide

Technical Manual Supplement

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

: USING RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Program Evaluation Spring Online

Transcription:

Candidate: IB Number: Extended Scoring Rubric A: Research Question (Objectives and ) This criterion assesses the extent to which the purpose of the essay is specified. In many subjects, the aim of the essay will normally be expressed as a question and, therefore, this criterion is called the "research question." However, certain disciplines may permit or encourage different ways of formulating the research task. The research question is not stated in the introduction or does not lend itself to 0 a systematic investigation in an extended essay in the subject in which it is registered. The research question is stated in the introduction but is not clearly expressed or is too broad in scope to be treated effectively within the word limit. The research question is clearly stated in the introduction and sharply focused, making effective treatment possible within the word limit. You should study the information on writing a thesis/research question on the Dartmouth College Writing Program website at http://www.dartmouth.edu/-writing/materials/student/ac paper/develop.shtml

Extended Scoring Rubric B: Introduction (Objectives and 5) This criterion assesses the extent to which the introduction makes clear how the research question relates to existing knowledge on the topic and explains how the topic chosen is significant and worthy of investigation. 0 Little or no attempt is made to set the research question into context. There is little or no attempt to explain the significance of the topic. Some attempt is made to set the research question into context. There is some attempt to explain the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation. The context of the research question is clearly demonstrated. The introduction clearly explains the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation. You should study the information on developing an introduction on the Dartmouth College Writing Program website at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/writing/materias/studentiac paper/write. shtml#intro s

Extended Scoring Rubric C: Investigation (Objectives and ) This criterion assesses the extent to which the investigation is planned and an appropriate range of sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, that is relevant to the research question. Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is. 0 There is little or no evidence that sources have been consulted or data gathered, and little or no evidence of planning in the investigation. A range of inappropriate sources has been consulted, or inappropriate data has been gathered, and there is little evidence that the investigation has been planned. A limited range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, and some relevant material has been selected. There is evidence of some planning in the investigation. A sufficient range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, and relevant material has been selected. The investigation has been satisfactorily planned. An imaginative range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been 4 gathered, and relevant material has been carefully selected. The investigation has been well planned.

Extended Scoring Rubric D: Knowledge and Understanding of Topic (Objectives and 7) Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is. "Academic context", as used in this guide, can be defined as the current state of the field of study under investigation. However, this is to be understood in relation to what can reasonably be expected of a pre-university student. For example, to obtain a level 4, it would be sufficient to relate the investigation to the principal lines of inquiry in the relevant field; detailed, comprehensive knowledge is not required. - 4 0 The essay demonstrates no real knowledge or understanding of the topic studied. The essay demonstrates some knowledge but little understanding of the topic I studied. The essay shows little awareness of an academic context for the investigation. The essay demonstrates an adequate knowledge and some understanding of the topic studied. The essay shows some awareness of an academic context for the investigation. The essay demonstrates a good knowledge and understanding of the topic studied. Where appropriate, the essay successfully outlines an academic context for the investigation. The essay demonstrates a very good knowledge and understanding of the topic 4 studied. Where appropriate, the essay clearly and precisely locates the investigation in an academic context.

Extended Scoring Rubric E. Reasoned Argument: (Objectives and 4) This criterion assesses the extent to which the essay uses the material collected to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and develops a reasoned argument in relation to the research question. Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is. - 5-0 4 There is no attempt to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question. There is a limited or superficial attempt to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question. There is some attempt to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question, but this is only partially successful. Ideas are presented in a logical and coherent manner, and a reasoned argument is developed in relation to the research question, but with some weaknesses. Ideas are presented clearly and in a logical and coherent manner. The essay succeeds in developing a reasoned and convincing argument in relation to the research question. Information about logic and argument is located on the Dartmouth College Writing Program website at hap://www.dartmouth.edu/-writing/materials/student/ac paper/logic.shtml. Additional information on how to develop an informed argument can be found on the same website at hap://www.dartmouth.edu/-writing/materials/student/ac paper/what.shtml.

Extended Scoring Rubric F. Application of Analytical and Evaluative Skills Appropriate to the Subiect ( Objective 7) 0 The essay shows no application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. The essay shows little application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. 4 The essay shows some application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills, which may be only partially effective. The essay shows sound application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. The essay shows effective and sophisticated application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. You may benefit from reading the information on constructing an informed argument (and developing evaluative and analytical skills) on the Dartmouth College Writing website at http://www.dartmouth.edu/-writing/materials/student/ac paper/what.shtml#argument.

G: Use of Language Appropriate to the Subject (Objective 6) Extended Scoring Rubric 7 0 4 The language used is inaccurate and unclear. There is no effective use of terminology appropriate to the subject. The language used sometimes communicates clearly but does not do so consistently. The use of terminology appropriate to the subject is only partly accurate. The language used for the most part communicates clearly. The use of terminology appropriate to the subject is usually accurate. The language used communicates clearly. The use of terminology appropriate to the subject is accurate, although there may be occasional lapses. The language used communicates clearly and precisely. Terminology appropriate to the subject is used accurately, with skill and understanding. You can make your essay (and your argument) easier to understand by attending to style and usage. Information on these topics can be found on the Dartmouth College Writing Program's website at http://www.dartmouth.edu/ writing/rnaterials/student/ac paper/style.shtml.

Extended Scoring Rubric H: Conclusion (Objectives, 4, and 5) This criterion assesses the extent to which the essay incorporates a conclusion that is relevant to the research question and is consistent with the evidence presented in the essay. - 8-0 Little or no attempt is made to provide a conclusion that is relevant to the research question. A conclusion is attempted that is relevant to the research question but may not be entirely consistent with the evidence presented in the essay. An effective conclusion is clearly stated; it is relevant to the research question and consistent with the evidence presented in the essay. It should include unresolved questions where appropriate to the subject concerned. You should study the information on developing an introduction on the Dartmouth College Writing Program website at: hap ://www. dartmouth. edu/ writin g/materi al s/student/ac paper/write. shtml#intros

Extended Scoring Rubric - 9 - I: Formal Presentation (Objective 5) This criterion assesses the extent to which the layout, organization, appearance and formal elements of the essay consistently follow a standard format. The formal elements are: title page, table of contents, page numbers, illustrative material, quotations, documentation (including references, citations and bibliography) and appendices (if used). 0 The formal presentation is unacceptable, or the essay exceeds 4,000 words. The formal presentation is poor. The formal presentation is satisfactory. The formal presentation is good. 4 The formal presentation is excellent.

Extended Scoring Rubric J: Abstract (Objective 5) The requirements for the abstract are for it to state clearly the research question that was investigated, how the investigation was undertaken and the conclusion(s) of the essay. - 0-0 The abstract exceeds 00 words or one or more of the required elements of an abstract (listed above) is missing. The abstract contains the elements listed above but they are not all clearly stated. The abstract clearly states all the elements listed above.

Extended Scoring Rubric K: Holistic judgment (Objective ) The purpose of this criterion is to assess the qualities that distinguish an essay from the average, such as intellectual initiative, depth of understanding and insight. While these qualities will be clearly present in the best work, less successful essays may also show some evidence of them and should be rewarded under this criterion. 0 The essay shows no evidence of such qualities. The essay shows little evidence of such qualities. The essay shows some evidence of such qualities. The essay shows clear evidence of such qualities. 4 The essay shows considerable evidence of such qualities.

Extended Scoring Rubric A. Research Question B. Introduction C. Investigation D. Knowledge/Understanding of Subject E. Reasoned Argument F. Application of Analytical and Evaluative Skills G. Use of Language H. Conclusion I. Formal Presentation J. Abstract K. Holistic Judgment TOTALS Draft Final

Extended Scoring Rubric Assessment Objectives In working on the extended essay, students are expected to:. plan and pursue a research project with intellectual initiative and insight.. formulate a precise research question.. gather and interpret material from sources appropriate to the research question. 4. structure a reasoned argument in response to the research question on the basis of the material gathered. 5. present their extended essay in a format appropriate to the subject, acknowledging sources in one of the established academic ways. 6. use the terminology and language appropriate to the subject with skill and understanding. 7. apply analytical and evaluative skills appropriate to the subject, with an understanding of the implications and the context of their research.

Extended Scoring Rubric Grammar and Usage Checklist The essay contains the following grammatical errors: sentence fragments run-on sentences comma splice comma errors improper use of quotation marks misuse of plurals and possessives pronoun / antecedent problems subject-verb agreement capitalization using numbers (refer to MLA Manual) spelling other punctuation marks colon ellipses dash semi-colon This essay contains the following writer's errors: voice problems (active voice is preferred) paragraph transitions use of contractions (eliminate) commonly misused words and expressions http:llwww.bartleby.com/4/strunk.html objectivity (writing in the first person) sentence variety parallel structure http://sutl.sut.ac.th/strunk/strunk.html#5 To correct grammatical errors, consult The Guide to Grammar and Writing at: http://grammar.ccc.commnet edu/grammar/index.htm To correct style and usage errors, consult The Elements of Style at: http://www.bartleby.corn/4l/ To correct errors of grammar, style and usage consult the Dartmouth Writing Project at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/-writing/materials/student/toc.shtml