CREATING AND USING RUBRIC

Similar documents
Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

Language Acquisition Chart

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

EQuIP Review Feedback

Stacks Teacher notes. Activity description. Suitability. Time. AMP resources. Equipment. Key mathematical language. Key processes

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

eportfolio Assessment of General Education

USING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL

On-the-Fly Customization of Automated Essay Scoring

Relating Math to the Real World: A Study of Platonic Solids and Tessellations

Classify: by elimination Road signs

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Biome I Can Statements

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Outcome Based Education 15/01/2012

Developing True/False Test Sheet Generating System with Diagnosing Basic Cognitive Ability

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Promoting Active Learning in University Classes

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Sample Performance Assessment

Study Group Handbook

Assessment and Evaluation

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics. Standards Unpacking Documents Grade 5

Rigor is NOT a Four-Letter Word By Barbara R. Blackburn (Eye On Education, Inc., 2008)

learning collegiate assessment]

KS1 Transport Objectives

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Focus Groups and Student Learning Assessment

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Module 12. Machine Learning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

The Paradox of Structure: What is the Appropriate Amount of Structure for Course Assignments with Regard to Students Problem-Solving Styles?

MBA6941, Managing Project Teams Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives.

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Innovative Methods for Teaching Engineering Courses

Annual Report Accredited Member

Copyright Corwin 2015

Student s Edition. Grade 6 Unit 6. Statistics. Eureka Math. Eureka Math

Spreadsheet software UBU104 F/502/4625 VRQ. Learner name: Learner number:

re An Interactive web based tool for sorting textbook images prior to adaptation to accessible format: Year 1 Final Report

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

What can I learn from worms?

TEACHING VOCABULARY USING DRINK PACKAGE AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI 1 KREBET MASARAN SRAGEN IN 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

Tap vs. Bottled Water

Creating Meaningful Assessments for Professional Development Education in Software Architecture

Grade 3 Science Life Unit (3.L.2)

SETTING STANDARDS FOR CRITERION- REFERENCED MEASUREMENT

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

About How Good is Estimation? Assessment Materials Page 1 of 12

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

School Leadership Rubrics

Measurement & Analysis in the Real World

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Generating Test Cases From Use Cases

Self Study Report Computer Science

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

What does Quality Look Like?

Philosophy of Literacy. on a daily basis. My students will be motivated, fluent, and flexible because I will make my reading

Different Requirements Gathering Techniques and Issues. Javaria Mushtaq

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

Notes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course (Deciding What to Design) 1

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

Enduring Understandings: Students will understand that

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

Inclusion in Music Education

Lecturing Module

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Application for Fellowship Theme Year Sephardic Identities, Medieval and Early Modern. Instructions and Checklist

Digital Fabrication and Aunt Sarah: Enabling Quadratic Explorations via Technology. Michael L. Connell University of Houston - Downtown

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

Slam Poetry-Theater Lesson. 4/19/2012 dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx. Lindsay Jag Jagodowski

Presented by The Solutions Group

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

Paper 2. Mathematics test. Calculator allowed. First name. Last name. School KEY STAGE TIER

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS

B. How to write a research paper

Transcription:

CREATING AND USING RUBRIC Center for Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2015

Session Objectives At the end of the session you will be able to: define a rubric articulate how a rubric can be useful describe characteristics of a rubric design a rubric for an assessment project

What is a rubric? A rubric is an assessment tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or what counts and gradations of quality for each criterion, from excellent to poor.

Why use a Rubric? Rubrics can visually track progress patterns can use patterns of success to assess the strengths/weaknesses of a project/process can be shared to determine the degree of consensus regarding what, how, and why a certain process/project is being implemented

Descriptors for each criterion Basic Features of a Rubric Description: Gradations of achievement levels Scale Level 1 Scale Level 2 Scale Level 3 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Criterion 4

Constructing a Rubric Four Important Steps: 1. Determine Topic/Task 2. List Learning Outcomes/Objectives 3. Determine Criteria for Success 4. Describe Assessment Measure (adapted from Stevens & Levi, 2005)

Step 1: Decide Topic/Task 1. What is the purpose of this topic/task? What do you hope learners/users will gain? 2. What skills must learners/user have or develop from this topic/task for you to assess it in a meaningful fashion?

Step 2: List Learning Outcomes/objective 1. What specific learning outcomes/objective have you identified for this topic? 2. What tasks/skills are to be completed/required to achieve these learning outcomes/objective? 3. What types of evidence do you want to see?

Step 3: Identify Cognition Level (Bloom s revised Taxonomy) Remembering Understanding Applying Analyzing Evaluating Recognize Interpret Implement Compare Check List Exemplify Carry out Contrast Critique Describe Summarize Use Attribute Judge Identify Infer Calculate Organize Assess Retrieve Paraphrase Diagram Deconstruct Debate Name Convert Edit Analyze Estimate Recall Demonstrate Illustrate Categorize Appraise Select Differentiate Investigate Decompose Choose Locate Discuss Manipulate Deduce Defend Find Explain Modify Devise Evaluate Classify Execute Dissect Verify Outline Structure Justify Monitor

Step 4: Describe Assessment Levels 1. Enter the objective/outcome for the Dimension labels. (rows) 2. Use 3-5 point scale Below expectations, Meets expectations and Exceeds expectations for achievement scale. For a 3 point scale: 1. Enter assessment description using Bloom s verbs for the middle level column. (What is the optimum level of performance you expect for this dimension?) 2. Enter assessment description using Bloom s verbs for the right level column. (What is the highest level of performance you expect for this dimension?) 3. Enter assessment description using Bloom s verbs for the left level column. (What is the lowest level of performance you expect for this dimension?)

Activity: Assessment Rubric for Chocolate Chip Cookie Achievement level Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Criterion1 Criterion2 Criterion3

Activity: Assessment Rubric for Chocolate Chip Cookie Achievement level Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Texture Appearance Taste

Activity: Assessment Rubric for Chocolate Chip Cookie Achievement level Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Texture Overcooked or undercooked Only crisp or only chewy Crispy outside and chewy inside Appearance Burnt or Raw Partly brown thicker on the edges and thinner in center Taste Stale, salty and dry Semi-fresh with a buttery flavor Golden brown, thicker in center and thinner on edges Sweet, rich buttery flavor Adapted from http://www.usu.edu/provost/faculty/development/instructional_excellence/2009/blair_larsen/facultyrubricpresentation.pdf

Activity: Assessment Rubric for Chocolate Chip Cookie Achievement level Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Texture 20% Overcooked or undercooked 30% Only crisp or only chewy Appearance 10% Burnt or Raw 30% Partly brown thicker on the edges and thinner in center Taste 5% Stale, salty and dry 15% Semi-fresh with a buttery flavor 50% Crispy outside and chewy inside 60% Golden brown, thicker in center and thinner on edges 80% Sweet, rich buttery flavor

Activity: Assessment Rubric for Chocolate Chip Cookie Target : No more than 2 is the minimum acceptable level and no more than 5% of users score 1 Achievement level Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectation Exceeds Expectation Texture 15% Overcooked or undercooked 35% Only crisp or only chewy Appearance 10% Burnt or Raw 30% Partly brown thicker on the edges and thinner in center Taste 5% Stale, salty and dry 15% Semi-fresh with a buttery flavor 50% Crispy outside and chewy inside 60% Golden brown, thicker in center and thinner on edges 80% Sweet, rich buttery flavor

Example: Oral Presentation Content Exemplary Competent Developing Full understanding of topic Stays on topic Stays on topic 100-95% if the time Preparedness Completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed Eye contact Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room Good Understanding of parts of topic Stays on topic 94-75-% if the time Somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking Sometimes establishes eye contact Does not seem to understand topic It was hard to tell what the topic was Does not seem at all prepared to present Does not look at people during the presentation

Activity: Assessment Rubric for Your Project Achievement level Yes No Not Sure Criteria Replace with Criterion 1 Replace with Criterion 2 Replace with Criterion 3

etools for Rubric Construction RubiStar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org irubric: http://www.rcampus.com/indexrubric.cfm

AAC& U s VALUE Project (Retrieved from www.aacu.org/value/metarubrics.cfm August,16, 2010

Sources ALTEC at University of Kansas. RubiStar. Web site: http://rubistar.4teachers.org Carnegie Mellon, Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence. Grading and performance rubrics. Retrieved June 11, 2010 from http://www.cmu.edu/teaching//designteach/teach/rubrics.html Constructing a Rubric (Inductive Method) Stevens, D.D. and Levi, A.J. (2005) at http://www.uncg.edu/hhs/oaa/tl_assessment_rubrics/constructing_rubric.pdf, retrieved December 27,2012. Introduction to Rubrics: A Few Key Points Based on the Stevens and Levi (2005) Book by Dorothy K. Moore at http://oppcenter.chemeketa.edu/documents/rubrics_stevenslevi_050511.pdf, retrieved December 27, 2012. Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics [Electronic version]. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(14). Retrieved June 11, 2010 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=14 Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how? [Electronic version]. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3). Retrieved June 11, 2010 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3

For more information, contact the CIE Fellows: Joanna Campbell: jcampbell@bergen.edu Maureen Ellis-Davis: mellisdavis@bergen.edu Gail Fernandez: gfernandez@bergen.edu Amarjit Kaur: akaur@bergen.edu Ilene Klienman: iklienman@bergen.edu Shyamal (Sony) Tiwari: stiwari@bergen.edu