InTASC STANDARD 2: LEARNING DIFFERENCES

Similar documents
Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

What does Quality Look Like?

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

School Leadership Rubrics

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

This table contains the extended descriptors for Active Learning on the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

EQuIP Review Feedback

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

4-H Ham Radio Communication Proficiency Program A Member s Guide

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

MATHS Required September 2017/January 2018

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Timeline. Recommendations

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

State Parental Involvement Plan

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

EDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Proposition 1: Teachers are committed to students and their learning.

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Educational Psychology

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

A Guide to Student Portfolios

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

2016 School Performance Information

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Pyramid. of Interventions

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Assessment and Evaluation

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Transcription:

Western Oregon University Observation Form: To be completed by Mentor Teacher TEACHER CANDIDATE: OBSERVER: DATE: GRADE LEVEL: NUMBER OF STUDENTS: CONTENT: SCHOOL: ADDITIONAL SUPPORT: CIRCLE LEVEL: Term I Term II Term III InTASC STANDARD 2: LEARNING DIFFERENCES The candidate uses understanding of individual differences, diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards. Does not take into account individual students learning differences or Understands the value of and attempts to differentiate instruction for groups of students. Responds to individual students assessed learning development needs and plans differentiated instruction accordingly. 2.1 Makes appropriate and timely provisions for individual students with particular learning differences or Anticipates individual student learning needs based on formative and summative assessment data and proactively designs differentiated instruction to accelerate the growth of each learner. 2.2 Incorporates tools of language development into planning and instruction to support academic English proficiency. Rarely utilizes strategies that support students in the development of academic English proficiency. Demonstrates awareness of the needs of learners of academic English and attempts to use this knowledge in the design and delivery of instruction. Consistently uses a variety of strategies for making content accessible to learners of academic English and for supporting the development of language proficiency based upon assessed Engages learners of academic English in assessing their progress in meeting language and content standards. Is resourceful and flexible in the design and adjustment of scaffolds based on English learners proficiencies, knowledge, and skills in content. 2.3 Accesses resources, supports, and services to meet learning Does not follow school procedures mandated for students with specific learning differences or Seeks ways to access resources, supports, and assistance to meet specific student learning Makes accomodations and modifications of instruction to suppoort students with special Collaborates with resource personnel to identify, organize, and disseminate information and resources for serving students with exceptional learning Western Oregon University College of Education i-5

InTASC STANDARD 3: LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS The candidate works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation. Does not establish a safe, productive, learning environment. Attempts to establish classroom expectations that lead to a safe and productive learning environment. Consistently establishes clear classroom expectations that lead to a safe and productive learning environment. 3.1 Establishes a safe and productive learning environment. Has established clear guidelines to facilitate a safe and productive learning environment. Empowers students to be part of the process. 3.2 Organizes, allocates, and manages the resources (time, space, and attention) to actively and equitably engage learners. Makes minimal effort to organize or allocate time or resources in support of students learning. Attempts to use instructional time and classroom resources to heighten learner engagement and seeks ways to connect with individual students. Designs and manages classroom space, instructional time, and physical resources to accommodate students needs and involvement in learning. Pursues opportunities to connect with individual students on a regular basis. Uses total physical environment as a resource to promote individual and group learning. Masterfully manages and equitably allocates instructional time and connects with all students to maximize learning. 3.3 Communicates with students in ways that respect unique backgrounds and support a positive classroom climate. Does not establish rapport with students. Rarely takes into consideration students unique backgrounds nor commits to developing a community of learners. Communicates with students in a fair and respectful manner. Attempts to build classroom community by attending to the unique backgrounds of students. Develops a positive classroom climate based on shared values and expectations for respectful interaction with regard to race, culture, gender, sexual orientation, religion, socioeconomic status, and exceptionalities. Collaborates with students to facilitate student self-reflection and ownership for ongoing improvement of the classroom community based on respect, fairness, and the value of all members. Western Oregon University College of Education i-6

InTASC STANDARD 4: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE The candidate understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content. Does not acknowledge the responsibility to support students acquisition of academic language in their content area(s). Recognizes and begins to utilize strategies that create opportunities for students to learn and practice academic language. Consistently incorporates opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language. 4.1 Creates opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in relevant content areas. Draws from a wide repertoire of strategies to accelerate academic language development for all students. 4.2 Integrates culturally relevant content to build upon learners background knowledge. Demonstrates minimal knowledge of students cultural backgrounds and experiences. Elicits information about students prior knowledge, life experiences, and interests; some connections are made to learning goals and objectives. Designs learning experiences that integrate culturally relevant content to build on learners background knowledge. Creates a learning environment that integrates culturally relevant content to establish relevancy and rigor. 4.3 Demonstrates deep knowledge of content standards and learning progressions in the discipline/s she/he teaches. Demonstrates little or no knowledge of subject matter and concept standards of the discipline. Articulates key concepts, skills and themes of relevant content standards in an accurate and coherent manner. Develops an understanding of learning progressions. Consistently demonstrates knowledge of subject matter and content standards to scaffold instruction based upon learners needs and the increasing complexity of the content, to support student understanding. Expands upon comprehensive knowledge of subject matter and content standards, learning progressions, and student development to ensure student understanding. Western Oregon University College of Education i-7

InTASC STANDARD 5: APPLICATION OF CONTENT The candidate understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. Does not engage learners in application of content knowledge or make interdisciplinary connections. Connects key concepts, skills, and themes within and across subject areas. Encourages students to apply their knowledge to real world problems. Standards (PR) Designs learning experiences where students apply content knowledge to complex, authentic issues through interdisciplinary lenses. 5.1 Engages learners in applying content knowledge to authentic complex issues using interdisciplinary themes or real world problems. Interrelates key concepts and underlying themes across the curriculum to extend relevant, in-depth learning for all students. Assures students application of cross-curricular learning by weaving themes into a meaningful learning experience. 5.2 Facilitates learners use of current tools, technologies, and resources to maximize content learning in varied contexts. Does not use tools, technology, and resources to ensure content learning. Matches appropriate tools, technology, and resources to the content to encourage student understanding and critical thinking. Uses and adapts current tools, technology, and resources that support students to make meaning of interdisciplinary content. Assists students to use tools and technology to construct knowledge and think critically. Embeds an extensive repertoire of effective tools and resources that challenge students to independently and collaboratively apply their knowledge and think critically about the interdisciplinary content. 5.3 Creates opportunities for learners to practice a variety of communication skills that address varied audiences and purpose. Does not provide opportunities for the development of students communication skills. Provides some opportunities for learners to practice communication skills in the classroom setting. Creates multiple opportunities for learners to practice communication skills in different formats for varied audiences and purposes. Integrates a wide range of communication media across multiple settings that encourage students to propose, develop, present, and defend their ideas. 5.4 Engages learners in critical and creative thinking encouraging new ideas and approaches. Rarely provides students content-linked opportunities to engage in critical and creative thinking. Provides opportunities for students to engage in critical and creative thinking related to content standards. Facilitates students formation of independent ideas and creative approaches that are connected to relevant content standards. Engages students in questioning strategies to challenge conventional assumptions. 5.5 Plans and implements supports for learner literacy development across content standards. Does not plan or implement any supports for learner literacy development across the curriculum. Plans and implements some supports for literacy development across the curriculum, but these are not always authentic, or developmentally and culturally appropriate. Plans and implements multiple supports for literacy development that are authentic, as well as developmentally and culturally appropriate. Plans and implements multiple supports for literacy development that are authentic,as well as developmentally and culturally appropriate. Taps into students interests to promote literacy and content development. Western Oregon University College of Education i-8

InTASC STANDARD 8: INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES The candidate understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. Makes little or no effort to engage students in using a range of learning skills and tools to access, interpret, evaluate, and apply information. Provides limited opportunities for students to identify and use learning skills and tools related to topics of study. Engages students in accessing, interpreting, evaluating and applying key concepts through active learning. Supports students to initiate inquiry using a variety of learning skills and tools. 8.1 Engages students in using a range of learning skills and available technology tools to, interpret, evaluate and apply information. Engages students in designing and carrying out inquiries to analyze content, draw conclusions, and share findings considering multiple perspectives within and across subject matter. 8.2 Asks questions that facilitate discussion and help students learn. Asks questions mainly focused on factual recall. Uses questioning strategies that require most students to recall, interpret and think critically. Uses questioning strategies that stimulate discussion, probe for understanding, and help students articulate ideas and thinking modes. Provides opportunities for all students to apply critical thinking and problem solving using questioning styles that connect prior knowledge and stimulate. curiosity. Strengths noticed by the Mentor Teacher: When planning future lessons you might consider: I have read this evaluative report of an observed lesson and have had the opportunity to confer with my mentor teacher or university supervisor regarding the data gathered and the generation of goals and ideas to be applied to future lesson implementation. Teacher Candidate: Printed Signature Date Mentor Teacher: Printed Signature Date Western Oregon University College of Education i-9