Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

Similar documents
Price Sensitivity Analysis

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Vast Inequality in Wealth Means Poor School Districts Are Less Able to Rely on Local Property Taxes

Trends in College Pricing

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

Anatomy and Physiology. Astronomy. Boomilever. Bungee Drop

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Public Health Law Program

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Making Health Happen on Campus: A Review of a Required General Education Health Course

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Brian Isetts University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Anthony W. Olson PharmD University of Minnesota, Twin Cities,

Q1: Why Is Data Analysis Important? Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on BRFSS Data Analysis and Methods. Q2: How Reliable Are BRFSS Data?

K-12 EDUCATION. Statement of Qualifications

EPA Approved Laboratories for UCMR 3

46 Children s Defense Fund

Global School-based Student Health Survey. UNRWA Global School based Student Health Survey (GSHS)

EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS. Geisinger - Community Medical Center 1800 Mulberry St Scranton PA

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Don t miss out on experiencing 4-H Camp this year!

Chapter Six The Non-Monetary Benefits of Higher Education

Northwest Region Touchpoint

KATIE E. DIETER CURRICULUM VITAE. CONTACT INFORMATION 416 Somersbe Place Bloomington, IN

Sociology. Faculty. Emeriti. The University of Oregon 1

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health University of Arizona. SYLLABUS CPH 608A: Public Health Law and Ethics Spring 2016

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

EDUCATION: BS, The University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Health Care Administration & Biology, 1998 ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE:

Judith Fox Notre Dame Law School 725 Howard Street South Bend, IN (574)

Process Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program

MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN (MCW) WHO WE ARE AND OUR UNIQUE VALUE

2008 TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS REPORT

A Whole School Approach: Collaborative Development of School Health Policies, Processes, and Practices

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Global Health Kitwe, Zambia Elective Curriculum

THE LUCILLE HARRISON CHARITABLE TRUST SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION. Name (Last) (First) (Middle) 3. County State Zip Telephone

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Miami Valley Tech Prep

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

Risk factors in an ageing population: Evidence from SAGE

Nutrition 10 Contemporary Nutrition WINTER 2016

UW RICHLAND. uw-richland richland.uwc.edu

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

SUPPORTING AND EDUCATING TRAUMATIZED STUDENTS. CSSP Conference 2014 Barb Bieber

Physicians Medical Center (Texas Health Center for Diagnostics & Surgery Plano) Community Health Needs Assessment

CLINICAL TRAINING AGREEMENT

Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities

B.A., Amherst College, Women s and Gender Studies, Magna Cum Laude (2001)

EDUCATION TEACHING EXPERIENCE

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

EDUCATION. MEDICAL LICENSURE State of Illinois License DEA. BOARD CERTIFICATION Fellow, American Academy of Pediatrics FACULTY APPOINTMENTS

The Impact of a Rural School-Based Health Center on Students and Their Families in Sneedville, Tennessee: A Case Study.

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Upon completion of the Integrated Core Curriculum students will demonstrate competence in:

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

Resume. Christine Ann Loucks Telephone: (208) (work)

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

DST ASSIGNMENTS FALL 2012

Monitoring & Evaluation of Community and Stakeholder Engagement. Nombuyiselo Tshandu Wits Clinical HIV/TB Research Unit South Africa

Career Services JobFlash! as of July 26, 2017

Republican and Democratic Nominations are to be made for the following Federal, State, County and Municipal Offices:

Thinking of standards from first year

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Jenny M. Linker (Zarak)

NETWORK DEVELOPMENT GRANTEES

2017 Polk County City Election Polling Locations

Action Work Plan for School Year Mercer County Schools Wellness Plan. County Sponsor: Amanda Aliff

Canada and the American Curriculum:

2015 / Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Program. heal. serve. educate. To serve, to heal and to educate

Mayo School of Health Sciences. Clinical Pastoral Education Internship. Rochester, Minnesota.

Addressing TB in the Mines: A Multi- Sector Approach in Practice

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

Suffolk County Civil Service Dispatcher Exam

Los Angeles Unified School District

Name in full: Last First Middle. Telephone: Day Evening Social Security No.: Internship: Dates of Start and Completion. Name and Address of Hospital:

PENNSYLVANIA. A review of the. for the school year. Department of Education

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

Meet the Preceptors. Jeremy Rose, Pharm.D., BCPS Preceptor for Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Stewardship

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

MICHAEL A. TALLMAN Curriculum Vitae

SUMMARY REPORT MONROE COUNTY, OH OFFICIAL RESULTS PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 6, 2012 RUN DATE:03/20/12 11:03 AM STATISTICS REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001

Contract Promotional Review Committee support for the Pharmaceutical Industry. Medical Affairs Regulatory Legal

Educational Attainment

PRECONFERENCE WORKSHOPS:

LAURA RAIDONIS BATES. Department of English, Indiana State University

Virtual Learning in Virginia

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

EDUC 998 The Doctoral Dissertation Proposal Summer 2004

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Curriculum Assessment Employing the Continuous Quality Improvement Model in Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs

IRB Reviews Prep to Research Form Revised

Transcription:

2011 Indiana

Introduction Where we live matters to our health. The health of a community depends on many different factors, including quality of health care, individual behavior, education and jobs, and the environment. We can improve a community s health through programs and policies. For example, people who live in communities with ample park and recreation space are more likely to exercise, which reduces heart disease risk. People who live in communities with smoke-free laws are less likely to smoke or to be exposed to second-hand smoke, which reduces lung cancer risk. The problem is that there are big differences in health across communities, with some places being much healthier than others. And up to now, it has been hard to get a standard way to measure how healthy a county is and see where they can improve. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute are pleased to present the 2011 County Health Rankings, a collection of 50 reports that reflect the overall health of counties in every state across the country. For the second year in a row, counties can get a snapshot of how healthy their residents are by comparing their overall health and the factors that influence their health with other counties in their state. This allows communities to see county-to-county where they are doing well and where they need to improve. Everyone has a stake in community health. We all need to work together to find solutions. The County Health Rankings serve as both a call to action and a needed tool in this effort. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement: In this model, health outcomes are measures that describe the current health status of a county. These health outcomes are influenced by a set of health factors. These health factors and their outcomes may also be affected by community-based programs and policies designed to alter their distribution in the community. Counties can improve health outcomes by addressing all health factors with effective, evidence-based programs and policies. To compile the Rankings, we built on our prior work in Wisconsin, obtained input from a team of expert advisors, and worked closely with staff from the National Center for Health Statistics. Together we selected a number of population health measures based on scientific relevance, importance, and availability of data at the county level. For a more detailed explanation of our approach, the methods used to compile the Rankings, information on the action steps communities can take to improve their health, and examples of communities in action, see www.countyhealthrankings.org www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana 1

The Rankings This report ranks Indiana counties according to their summary measures of health outcomes and health factors, as well as the components used to create each summary measure. The figure below depicts the structure of the Rankings model. Counties receive a rank for each population health component; those having high ranks (e.g., 1 or 2) are estimated to be the healthiest. Our summary health outcomes rankings are based on an equal weighting of mortality and morbidity measures. The summary health factors rankings are based on weighted scores of four types of factors: behavioral, clinical, social and economic, and environmental. The weights for the factors (shown in parentheses in the figure) are based upon a review of the literature and expert input, but represent just one way of combining these factors. 2 www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana

The maps on this page display Indiana s counties divided into groups by health rank. The lighter colors indicate better performance in the respective summary rankings. The green map shows the distribution of summary health outcomes. The blue displays the distribution of the summary rank for health factors. Maps help locate the healthiest and least healthy counties in the state. The health factors map appears similar to the health outcomes map, showing how health factors and health outcomes are closely related. HEALTH OUTCOMES HEALTH FACTORS www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana 3

Summary Health Outcomes & Health Factors Rankings Counties receive two summary ranks: Health Outcomes Health Factors Each of these ranks represents a weighted summary of a number of measures. Health outcomes represent how healthy a county is while health factors are what influences the health of the county. Rank Health Outcomes Rank Health Factors 1 Hamilton 1 Hamilton 2 Dubois 2 Hendricks 3 Boone 3 Boone 4 LaGrange 4 Warrick 5 Hendricks 5 Hancock 6 Warrick 6 Dubois 7 DeKalb 7 Monroe 8 Wells 8 Johnson 9 Whitley 9 Wells 10 Marshall 10 Spencer 11 Johnson 11 Tipton 12 Putnam 12 Dearborn 13 Warren 13 Tippecanoe 14 Gibson 14 Whitley 15 Adams 15 Gibson 16 Monroe 16 Marshall 17 Tippecanoe 17 Jasper 18 Porter 18 Posey 19 Elkhart 19 Porter 20 Kosciusko 20 Franklin 21 Huntington 21 Ohio 22 Tipton 22 Bartholomew 23 Carroll 23 Brown 24 Union 24 Carroll 25 Brown 25 Warren 26 Benton 26 Harrison 27 Hancock 27 DeKalb 28 Dearborn 28 Adams 29 White 29 Vanderburgh 30 Steuben 30 Morgan 31 Harrison 31 Putnam 32 Ripley 32 Pike 33 Ohio 33 Benton 34 Posey 34 Kosciusko 35 Allen 35 Jackson 36 Morgan 36 Allen 37 Noble 37 Martin 38 Decatur 38 Ripley 39 Owen 39 Floyd 40 Spencer 40 St. Joseph 41 Bartholomew 41 Pulaski 42 Franklin 42 Henry 43 St. Joseph 43 Clinton 44 Rush 44 Delaware 45 Floyd 45 Montgomery 4 www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana

Rank Health Outcomes Rank Health Factors 46 Miami 46 Rush 47 Clinton 47 Newton 48 Jasper 48 Daviess 49 Daviess 49 Huntington 50 Randolph 50 Wabash 51 Cass 51 Union 52 Wabash 52 White 53 Clark 53 Cass 54 Fulton 54 Lawrence 55 Fountain 55 Fountain 56 Montgomery 56 Howard 57 Newton 57 Fulton 58 Vigo 58 Clark 59 Orange 59 Shelby 60 Washington 60 Decatur 61 Lawrence 61 Randolph 62 Clay 62 Steuben 63 LaPorte 63 Knox 64 Howard 64 LaGrange 65 Crawford 65 LaPorte 66 Blackford 66 Grant 67 Vermillion 67 Switzerland 68 Knox 68 Greene 69 Jefferson 69 Parke 70 Henry 70 Sullivan 71 Perry 71 Perry 72 Wayne 72 Wayne 73 Parke 73 Jay 74 Jackson 74 Scott 75 Madison 75 Vigo 76 Vanderburgh 76 Vermillion 77 Marion 77 Clay 78 Shelby 78 Miami 79 Pulaski 79 Elkhart 80 Greene 80 Orange 81 Delaware 81 Noble 82 Grant 82 Jefferson 83 Jay 83 Crawford 84 Lake 84 Madison 85 Jennings 85 Fayette 86 Martin 86 Washington 87 Sullivan 87 Owen 88 Fayette 88 Blackford 89 Switzerland 89 Marion 90 Pike 90 Jennings 91 Starke 91 Starke 92 Scott 92 Lake www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana 5

Health Outcomes Rankings The summary health outcomes ranking is based on measures of mortality and morbidity. Each county s ranks for mortality and morbidity are displayed here. The mortality rank, representing length of life, is based on a measure of premature death: the years of potential life lost prior to age 75. The morbidity rank is based on measures that represent health-related quality of life and birth outcomes. We combine four morbidity measures: self-reported fair or poor health, poor physical health days, poor mental health days, and the percent of births with low birthweight. Rank Mortality Morbidity 1 Hamilton Dubois 2 Boone Hamilton 3 Hendricks Warren 4 Warrick LaGrange 5 LaGrange Boone 6 Gibson Marshall 7 Wells Hendricks 8 DeKalb Brown 9 Dubois Tipton 10 Johnson Whitley 11 Huntington Adams 12 Monroe Union 13 Whitley DeKalb 14 Tippecanoe Putnam 15 Porter Elkhart 16 Steuben White 17 Putnam Posey 18 Marshall Hancock 19 Adams Ripley 20 Kosciusko Porter 21 Elkhart Tippecanoe 22 Dearborn Johnson 23 Rush Wells 24 Franklin Carroll 25 Benton Kosciusko 26 Carroll Warrick 27 Ohio Benton 28 Morgan Monroe 29 Allen Harrison 30 Orange Spencer 31 Floyd Noble 32 Hancock Bartholomew 33 Warren Owen 34 Harrison Dearborn 35 Union Decatur 36 Tipton Jasper 37 Brown Ohio 38 Randolph Newton 39 White Montgomery 40 Decatur Miami 41 Ripley Gibson 42 St. Joseph Allen 43 Noble St. Joseph 44 Daviess Fulton 45 Owen Clinton 6 www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana

Rank Mortality Morbidity 46 Blackford Clay 47 Bartholomew Cass 48 Clinton Henry 49 Miami Wabash 50 Posey Huntington 51 Spencer Morgan 52 Vermillion Fountain 53 Perry Daviess 54 Jasper Clark 55 Cass Lawrence 56 Clark LaPorte 57 Wabash Knox 58 Jefferson Steuben 59 Vigo Parke 60 Fountain Howard 61 Washington Martin 62 Madison Pulaski 63 Fulton Floyd 64 Vanderburgh Crawford 65 Crawford Franklin 66 Montgomery Randolph 67 Howard Vigo 68 Lawrence Washington 69 LaPorte Wayne 70 Wayne Jackson 71 Jackson Shelby 72 Knox Rush 73 Newton Jennings 74 Grant Marion 75 Clay Lake 76 Greene Jay 77 Delaware Starke 78 Marion Jefferson 79 Sullivan Vermillion 80 Parke Delaware 81 Henry Greene 82 Shelby Blackford 83 Fayette Grant 84 Jay Madison 85 Lake Vanderburgh 86 Pulaski Perry 87 Jennings Switzerland 88 Switzerland Orange 89 Pike Sullivan 90 Martin Fayette 91 Scott Pike 92 Starke Scott www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana 7

Health Factors Rankings The summary health factors ranking is based on four factors: health behaviors, clinical care, social and economic, and physical environment factors. In turn, each of these factors is based on several measures. Health behaviors include measures of smoking, diet and exercise, alcohol use, and risky sex behavior. Clinical care includes measures of access to care and quality of care. Social and economic factors include measures of education, employment, income, family and social support, and community safety. The physical environment includes measures of environmental quality and the built environment. Health Clinical Social & Economic Physical Rank Behaviors Rank Care Rank Factors Rank Environment 1 Hamilton 1 Hamilton 1 Hamilton 1 Ohio 2 Monroe 2 Warrick 2 Hendricks 2 Howard 3 Tipton 3 Boone 3 Boone 3 Adams 4 Brown 4 Vanderburgh 4 Hancock 4 Dearborn 5 Marshall 5 Howard 5 Dubois 5 DeKalb 6 Hancock 6 Hendricks 6 Warrick 6 Jasper 7 Tippecanoe 7 Johnson 7 Posey 7 Lawrence 8 Hendricks 8 Dubois 8 Spencer 8 Martin 9 Warrick 9 Bartholomew 9 Johnson 9 Scott 10 Warren 10 St. Joseph 10 Porter 10 Franklin 11 Gibson 11 Wells 11 Monroe 11 Newton 12 Wells 12 Wabash 12 Dearborn 12 St. Joseph 13 Adams 13 Hancock 13 Wells 13 Jefferson 14 Dubois 14 Delaware 14 Franklin 14 Hendricks 15 Clinton 15 Marion 15 Harrison 15 Tippecanoe 16 LaGrange 16 Adams 16 Benton 16 Boone 17 Johnson 17 Gibson 17 Tippecanoe 17 Orange 18 Spencer 18 Marshall 18 Whitley 18 Delaware 19 Lawrence 19 Carroll 19 Jasper 19 Carroll 20 Putnam 20 DeKalb 20 Warren 20 Fayette 21 Boone 21 Huntington 21 Gibson 21 Brown 22 Pike 22 Allen 22 Tipton 22 Dubois 23 Jasper 23 Spencer 23 Bartholomew 23 Fulton 24 Wayne 24 Whitley 24 Floyd 24 Allen 25 Whitley 25 Miami 25 Ohio 25 Porter 26 Scott 26 Jackson 26 Carroll 26 Blackford 27 Fulton 27 Madison 27 Pike 27 Henry 28 Grant 28 Vigo 28 Ripley 28 Marshall 29 Elkhart 29 Harrison 29 Morgan 29 Hamilton 30 Benton 30 Dearborn 30 Martin 30 Decatur 31 Posey 31 Steuben 31 Jackson 31 Huntington 32 DeKalb 32 Floyd 32 Clark 32 Miami 33 Kosciusko 33 Clark 33 Shelby 33 Madison 34 Morgan 34 Kosciusko 34 Montgomery 34 Steuben 35 Harrison 35 Henry 35 Putnam 35 Bartholomew 36 Cass 36 Wayne 36 Union 36 Whitley 37 Ripley 37 Montgomery 37 Pulaski 37 Wayne 38 Vanderburgh 38 Grant 38 Daviess 38 Vigo 39 Ohio 39 Elkhart 39 Brown 39 Ripley 40 Dearborn 40 Franklin 40 Knox 40 Rush 41 Union 41 LaPorte 41 Rush 41 Monroe 42 Greene 42 Putnam 42 Marshall 42 Fountain 43 St. Joseph 43 Ohio 43 Newton 43 Grant 44 Newton 44 Jasper 44 White 44 Washington 45 Franklin 45 Cass 45 Fountain 45 Morgan 8 www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana

Health Clinical Social & Economic Physical Rank Behaviors Rank Care Rank Factors Rank Environment 46 Daviess 46 Morgan 46 Kosciusko 46 LaPorte 47 Parke 47 Jefferson 47 DeKalb 47 Randolph 48 Porter 48 Posey 48 Huntington 48 Lake 49 Noble 49 Tipton 49 Allen 49 Clay 50 Switzerland 50 Jennings 50 Sullivan 50 Shelby 51 Carroll 51 Pulaski 51 Perry 51 LaGrange 52 Decatur 52 Lawrence 52 Henry 52 Warren 53 Jay 53 Fayette 53 Greene 53 Kosciusko 54 Bartholomew 54 Orange 54 Clay 54 Vermillion 55 Martin 55 Clinton 55 Wabash 55 Jay 56 Crawford 56 Porter 56 Vanderburgh 56 Jackson 57 Fountain 57 Scott 57 Vermillion 57 Pulaski 58 Rush 58 Jay 58 Switzerland 58 Tipton 59 Pulaski 59 White 59 Steuben 59 Owen 60 Sullivan 60 Shelby 60 Cass 60 Elkhart 61 Randolph 61 Perry 61 Clinton 61 Parke 62 LaPorte 62 LaGrange 62 Decatur 62 Hancock 63 Knox 63 Brown 63 Randolph 63 Montgomery 64 White 64 Pike 64 Delaware 64 Noble 65 Allen 65 Monroe 65 Parke 65 Gibson 66 Jackson 66 Randolph 66 Fulton 66 Wabash 67 Floyd 67 Crawford 67 Adams 67 Sullivan 68 Henry 68 Tippecanoe 68 Washington 68 Crawford 69 Howard 69 Clay 69 St. Joseph 68 Switzerland 70 Fayette 70 Rush 70 Jefferson 70 Vanderburgh 71 Delaware 71 Fulton 71 Owen 71 Starke 72 Vermillion 72 Decatur 72 Orange 72 Clinton 73 Perry 73 Washington 73 Madison 73 Jennings 74 Montgomery 74 Blackford 74 LaPorte 74 White 75 Clark 75 Martin 75 Vigo 75 Warrick 76 Wabash 76 Warren 76 Jay 76 Benton 77 Vigo 77 Parke 77 Noble 76 Union 78 Miami 78 Daviess 78 Miami 78 Daviess 79 Blackford 79 Owen 79 Lawrence 79 Cass 80 Shelby 80 Ripley 80 LaGrange 80 Posey 81 Steuben 81 Fountain 81 Howard 81 Pike 82 Huntington 82 Lake 82 Grant 82 Floyd 83 Marion 83 Starke 83 Scott 83 Spencer 84 Orange 84 Noble 84 Crawford 84 Wells 85 Clay 85 Benton 85 Blackford 85 Greene 86 Starke 86 Union 86 Jennings 86 Putnam 87 Jennings 87 Switzerland 87 Wayne 87 Johnson 88 Owen 88 Knox 88 Starke 88 Knox 89 Jefferson 89 Vermillion 89 Marion 89 Perry 90 Lake 90 Newton 90 Fayette 90 Harrison 91 Madison 91 Greene 91 Elkhart 91 Marion 92 Washington 92 Sullivan 92 Lake 92 Clark www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana 9

2011 County Health Rankings: Measures, Data Sources, and Years of Data HEALTH OUTCOMES Measure Data Source Years of Data Mortality Premature death National Center for Health Statistics 2005-2007 Morbidity Poor or fair health Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2003-2009 HEALTH FACTORS HEALTH BEHAVIORS Poor physical health days Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2003-2009 Poor mental health days Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2003-2009 Low birthweight National Center for Health Statistics 2001-2007 Tobacco Adult smoking Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2003-2009 Diet and Exercise Adult obesity National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Alcohol Use Excessive drinking Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2003-2009 High Risk Sexual Behavior CLINICAL CARE Motor vehicle crash death rate National Center for Health Statistics 2001-2007 Sexually transmitted infections National Center for Hepatitis, HIV, STD and TB Prevention Teen birth rate National Center for Health Statistics 2001-2007 Access to Care Uninsured adults Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, U.S. Census Primary care providers Health Resources & Services Administration Quality of Care Preventable hospital stays Medicare/Dartmouth Institute 2006-2007 SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS Diabetic screening Medicare/Dartmouth Institute 2006-2007 Mammography screening Medicare/Dartmouth Institute 2006-2007 Education High school graduation National Center for Education Statistics 1 2006-2007 Some college American Community Survey 2005-2009 Employment Unemployment Bureau of Labor Statistics 2009 Income Children in poverty Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, U.S. Census Family and Social Support Inadequate social support Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2005-2009 Single-parent households American Community Survey 2005-2009 Community Safety Violent crime 2 Uniform Crime Reporting, Federal Bureau of Investigation PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Air Quality 3 Air pollution-particulate matter days U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Air pollution-ozone days U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008 2008 2007 2008 2008 2006-2008 Built Environment Access to healthy foods Census Zip Code Business Patterns 2008 Access to recreational facilities Census County Business Patterns 2008 2006 2006 1 State data sources for KY, NH, NC, PA, SC, and UT (2008-2009). 2 Homicide rate (2001-2007) from National Center for Health Statistics for AK, AZ, AR, CO, CT, GA, ID, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MN, MS, MT, NE, NH, NM, NC, ND, OH, SD, UT, and WV. State data source for IL. 3 Not available for AK and HI. 10 www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana

CREDITS Report Authors University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health Department of Population Health Sciences Population Health Institute Bridget Booske, PhD, MHSA Jessica Athens, MS Patrick Remington, MD, MPH This publication would not have been possible without the following contributions: Technical Advisors Amy Bernstein, ScD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Michele Bohm, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Research Assistance Jennifer Buechner Hyojun Park, MA Seth Prins, MPH Jennifer Robinson Matthew Rodock Anne Roubal Communications and Outreach Burness Communications Ivan Cherniack Nathan Jones, PhD Kate Konkle, MPH Angela Russell Julie Willems Van Dijk, PhD, RN Design Forum One, Alexandria, VA Media Solutions, UW School of Medicine and Public Health Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Brenda L. Henry, PhD, MPH Program Officer Michelle Larkin, JD, MS, RN Team Director and Senior Program Officer James S. Marks, MD, MPH Senior Vice President and Group Director, Health Group Joe Marx Senior Communications Officer Suggested citation: University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings 2011. www.countyhealthrankings.org/indiana 11

University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute 610 Walnut St, #524, Madison, WI 53726 (608) 265-6370 / info@countyhealthrankings.org