POLITENESS STRATEGIES USED IN THE EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW BETWEEN PUTRA NABABAN AND BARACK OBAMA, MARCH 10, N RCTI

Similar documents
INCREASING STUDENTS ABILITY IN WRITING OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH PEER CORRECTION

Dian Wahyu Susanti English Education Department Teacher Training and Education Faculty. Slamet Riyadi University, Surakarta ABSTRACT

ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS FOUND IN HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE BY JOANNE KATHLEEN ROWLING

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH SHOW AND TELL TECHNIQUE TO THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMPN 1 PADEMAWU-PAMEKASAN

Research Journal ADE DEDI SALIPUTRA NIM: F

Aas Samrotul Faidah¹ Metty Agustine Primary².

THE ROLES OF INTEGRATING INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF ENGLISH STUDENTS OF FKIP UIR

Novi Riani, Anas Yasin, M. Zaim Language Education Program, State University of Padang

DESINGING TASK-BASED INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY ON RECYCLING NEWSPAPER IN READING PROCEDURE TEXT

TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY COMBINING BRAINSTORMING AND Y CHART STRATEGIES AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

THE EFFECT OF USING SILENT CARD SHUFFLE STRATEGY TOWARD STUDENTS WRITING ACHIEVEMENT A

THE ROLE OF ENGLISH TEACHERS ON HELPING PASSIVE LEARNERS IN CLASSROOM (A Study at The Ninth Grade Students of SMP N 31 Andalas Padang)

LEXICAL COHESION ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE WHAT IS A GOOD RESEARCH PROJECT? BY BRIAN PALTRIDGE A JOURNAL ARTICLE

Syamsul Rizal Vera Fitria

THE ANALYSIS OF PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES IN VARSITY ENGLISH DEBATE CONTEST (A Descriptive Study of Varsity English Debaters at IVED 2013)

Towards Teachers Communicative Competence Enhancement: A Study on School Preparation for Bilingual Programs

COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIME TOKEN IN THE TEACHING OF SPEAKING

JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA, DAN STUDI AMERIKA 35

Flouting Maxims in Conversational Implicature in The Ellen Degeneres Talk Show

USING STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENTS WRITING ABILITY

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. A. Research Method. descriptive form in conducting the research since the data of this research

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA IMPACT OF ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA AND ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ON INTRA-ASEAN TRADE

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES AND ENTREPRENEURIAL COMPETENCIES AMONG STUDENTS IN A MALAYSIAN UNIVERSITY

English Education Journal

An Investigation into Teacher Practice of Jigsaw Technique in Teaching Narrative for Eight Graders of SMPN 1 Menganti

A STUDY OF REFUSAL STRATEGY USED BY ENGLISH TEACHERS IN MADIUN REGENCY IN DECLINING AN INVITATION, AN OFFER AND A SUGGESTION

SIMILARITY MEASURE FOR RETRIEVAL OF QUESTION ITEMS WITH MULTI-VARIABLE DATA SETS SITI HASRINAFASYA BINTI CHE HASSAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

Perspektif Pendidikan dan Keguruan, Vol V, No. 9, April 2014 ISSN

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. A. Research Type and Design. questions. As stated by Moleong (2006: 6) who makes the synthesis about

yang menghadapi masalah Down Syndrome. Mereka telah menghadiri satu program

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMK NEGERI 8 SURAKARTA IN 2015/2016 ACADEMIC YEAR

THE ACQUISITION OF WH QUESTION BY EFL STUDENTS LEARNING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE PUBLICATION ARTICLE. For Getting Master Degree of Education

IMPROVING VOCABULARY ABILITY BY USING COMIC Randa Wijaksana banigau Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Udayana. Abstrak

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

AN ANALYSIS OF PHRASAL VERBS USED IN REFORM MAGAZINE AT UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG THESIS. By : RAISA ANAKOTTA

THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN S AND TRANSVESTITE S SPEAKING STYLE IN KINKY BOOTS MOVIE

THE REALIZATION STRATEGIES OF SPEECH ACT REQUESTS IN THE CLASSROOM

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA TYPES OF WRITTEN FEEDBACK ON ESL STUDENT WRITERS ACADEMIC ESSAYS AND THEIR PERCEIVED USEFULNESS

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FACTORS AFFECTING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS CLASSROOM PARTICIPATION

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Laporan Penelitian Unggulan Prodi

UNIVERSITY ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (UniAMS) CHE FUZIAH BINTI CHE ALI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

Teachers Prior Knowledge Influence in Promoting English Learning Strategies in Primary School Classroom Practices

THE DIRECTIVE ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS IN THE HELP MOVIE

AN INTRODUCTION (2 ND ED.) (LONDON, BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC PP. VI, 282)

STUDENTS SATISFACTION LEVEL TOWARDS THE GENERIC SKILLS APPLIED IN THE CO-CURRICULUM SUBJECT IN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA NUR HANI BT MOHAMED

Ack now ledgem ents. Neverthless, any possible deficiency and laxity are the responsibility of the JEELL managements.

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

NEGOTIATION OF MEANING IN THE ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM INTERACTION

COHESION USED IN NATIVE DEEN`S SONG LYRICS: ANALYSIS ON ITS GRAMMATICAL AND LEXICAL DEVICES THESIS. Sarjana Degree in English Education BY :

DEVELOPING STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF THE SIMPLE PAST TENSE BY USING NARRATIVE TEXT

DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATIVE STRUCTURE OF MEASURING AREA OF RECTANGLES AND SQUARES MASTER THESIS. Anisa Fatwa Sari NIM

Linguistic Devices Reflecting Women s Inferiority in Tohari s Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk

TEACHING ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION AT THE SIXTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI KAUMAN BLORA

INSTRUCTION: This section consists of SIX (6) structured questions. Answer FOUR (4) questions only.

THE USE OF ENGLISH MOVIE IN TEACHING AUSTIN S ACT

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

-Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce

HUBUNGAN MINAT DAN SIKAP TERHADAP PENCAPAIAN PELAJAR DALAM KURSUS DPA3043 AUDITING. Fazlina Binti. Abd Rahiman. Aniza Suriati Binti Abdul Shukor

Faculty Of Information and Communication Technology

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

LANCI ARTICLES ARTIKEL. On apologizing in Persian: A socio-cultural inquiry. 1. Introduction. Amin Karimnia a Akbar Afghari b

THE USE OF SERIES PICTURE AS A TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS MASTERY SIMPLE PRESENT CONTINOUS TENSE OF SMP AL-HILAL AMBON. Saidna Zulfiqar Bin Tahir

POST-GRADUATE MASTER OF LANGUAGE STUDIES UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA 2016

Language Choice in the Malaysia-Thailand Border: A Domain-based Analysis

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA GENDER, PASSAGE CONTENT AND TEXT TYPES IN READING COMPREHENSION AMONG ESL LEARNERS

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA SKEW ARMENDARIZ RINGS AND THEIR RELATIONS

ACCOMMODATING WORLD ENGLISHES IN DEVELOPING EFL LEARNERS ORAL COMMUNICATION

Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu JPBM (Malay Language Education Journal MyLEJ)

PENGGUNAAN ICT DALAM KALANGAN GURU PELATIH KEMAHIRAN HIDUP FAKULTI PENDIDIKAN, UTM

Approaches to Teaching Second Language Writing Brian PALTRIDGE, The University of Sydney

Assessing School-based Learning: A Developmental Framework for Student Teachers

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

IMPROVING STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION USING FISHBONE DIAGRAM (A

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

SURAT PERMOHONAN PUBLIKASI

ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL COHESION IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS JOURNALS. A Thesis

1. Drs. Agung Wicaksono, M.Pd. 2. Hj. Rika Riwayatiningsih, M.Pd. BY: M. SULTHON FATHONI NPM: Advised by:

English for Specific Purposes World ISSN Issue 34, Volume 12, 2012 TITLE:

LISTENING STRATEGIES AWARENESS: A DIARY STUDY IN A LISTENING COMPREHENSION CLASSROOM

TRUST AND RISK IN GAMES OF PARTIAL INFORMATION

International Conference on Current Trends in ELT. Compliment Responses: A Comparative Study of Native English Speakers and Iranian L2 Speakers

Modal Verbs for the Advice Move in Advice Columns

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH

Improving Student s Listening Skill Using Task- Based Approach in EFL Classroom Setting

E 31 The Innovative Reflective Thinking Process In Solving Calculus Problems

Can you complain? Cross-cultural comparison of indirect complaints in Russian and American English

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING THROUGH COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING METHOD AT THE STMIK ROYAL TELADAN KISARAN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017

THE EFFECTS OF ERROR TREATMENT ON INTERLANGUAGE: A CASE STUDY OF INDONESIAN LEARNERS LEARNING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE ABSTRACT

PROBLEMS IN ADJUNCT CARTOGRAPHY: A CASE STUDY NG PEI FANG FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR

THE INFLUENCE OF COOPERATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH WRITING SKILL VIEWED FROM STUDENTS CREATIVITY

SYARAT-SYARAT KEMASUKAN DI TATI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. together and language learning is supposed to happen. As stated by

An Analysis of Gender Differences in Minimal Responses in the conversations in the two TV-series Growing Pains and Boy Meets World

DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE OF SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR VOCABULARY FOR THE THIRD GRADERS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Vicente Amado Antonio Nariño HH. Corazonistas and Tabora School

Impact of Learner-Centred Teaching Environment with the Use of Multimedia-mediated Learning Modules in Improving Learning Experience

THE EFFECTS OF ONE STAYS THE REST STRAY AND LOCKSTEP TECHNIQUES ON THE ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENTS READING ACHIEVEMENTS

Transcription:

POLITENESS STRATEGIES USED IN THE EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW BETWEEN PUTRA NABABAN AND BARACK OBAMA, MARCH 10, 2010 0N RCTI JOURNAL ARTICLE Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra (S.S) in English language By: Yusti Yunita Sari Sri Mulatsih FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DIAN NUSWANTORO UNIVERSITY SEMARANG 2013 1

PAGE OF APPROVAL This journal article has been approved by Advisor, Strata 1 Study Program of English Language, Faculty of Humanities Dian Nuswantoro University on March 5 th, 2013. Advisor Dra. Sri Mulatsih, M.Pd. 2

POLITENESS STRATEGIES USED IN THE EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW BETWEEN PUTRA NABABAN AND BARACK OBAMA, MARCH 10, 2010 0N RCTI Yusti Yunita Sari and Sri Mulatsih English Department, Dian Nuswantoro University ABSTRACT The title of this research is Politeness Strategies Used in the Exclusive Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, March 10, 2010 on RCTI. It is aimed at describing the politeness strategies used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, and describing the factors influencing the use of those strategies. The data were taken from the utterances by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama in the interview. The interview data were transcribed into written data. It were classified based on politeness strategies by Brown and Levinson (1987). From the analysis, it can be concluded that in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, there are four Politeness Strategies used. There are 86 utterances which consist of 39 utterances used by Putra Nababan and 47 utterances used by Barack Obama. There were 29 Bald on record strategies; 12 utterances by Putra Nababan and 17 utterances by Barack Obama, 25 Positive politeness strategies; 9 utterances by Putra Nababan and 16 utterances by Barack Obama, 31 Negative politeness strategies; 17 utterances by Putra Nababan and 14 utterances by Barack Obama, and 1 Off record strategy used by Putra Nababan. From the analysis researcher found out that Putra Nababan used negative politeness more than other strategies, because Barack Obama s status and occupation is higher than him, so Putra Nababan used this strategy to keep his politeness in speaking and the hearer will feel respected. And then, the factors influencing the use of strategies by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, are occupation, social status and formality. Key Words: formality, interview, occupation, politeness strategies, social status. Judul penelitian ini adalah " Strategi Kesopanan yang Digunakan dalam Wawancara Eksklusif antara Putra Nababan dan Barack Obama, 10 Maret 2010 di RCTI". Hal ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan strategi kesantunan yang digunakan oleh Putra Nababan dan Barack Obama, dan menjelaskan faktorfaktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan strategi tersebut. Data diambil dari ucapan-ucapan oleh Putra Nababan dan Barack Obama dalam wawancara. Data wawancara ditranskripsi menjadi data tertulis. Ini diklasifikasikan berdasarkan strategi kesantunan oleh Brown dan Levinson (1987). Dari analisis tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa dalam wawancara antara Putra Nababan dan Barack Obama, ada empat Strategi Kesopanan yang digunakan. Ada 86 ucapan yang terdiri dari 39 ucapan yang digunakan oleh 3

Putra Nababan dan 47 ucapan yang digunakan oleh Barack Obama. Ada 29 Bald pada catatan; 12 ucapan-ucapan oleh Putra Nababan dan 17 ucapan-ucapan oleh Barack Obama, 25 strategi kesantunan positif, 9 ucapan oleh Putra Nababan dan 16 ucapan-ucapan oleh Barack Obama, 31 strategi kesantunan negatif, 17 ucapan-ucapan oleh Putra Nababan dan 14 tuturan oleh Barack Obama, dan 1 catatan Off digunakan oleh Putra Nababan. Dari analisis peneliti menemukan bahwa Putra Nababan menggunakan kesantunan negatif lebih dari strategi lain. Dan kemudian, faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan strategi oleh Putra Nababan dan Barack Obama, adalah pekerjaan, status sosial dan formalitas. Kata Kunci: formalitas, pekerjaan, status sosial, strategi kesantunan, wawancara. 4

INTRODUCTION Language is an important thing of communication. People need language as a tool to communicate to each other. With language people can express their ideas and thought to the other people and also to deliver wishes. People need language to communicate or interact with others. Sometimes we do not realize that during our communication, we actually use some aspects of communication. Within this study, the researcher would like to look out more clearly about the uses of conversation interaction aspects within a interview. Interview is a conversation between two or more people to ask something or information about the interviewee. Conversation is determined to develop a social relationship or even to make a decision. Conversation is more than merely the exchange of information because through conversation it can be decided whether the message is received by the hearer or not. Politeness strategies influence conversation because the content in the talk goal of politeness is to make all the parties relaxes and comfortable with another. The interview is an important method of creating the show. It is also the way in which a great portion of the content of the genre is presented and consequently the focus is on people and conversation. The interview can take place in one place and there must be a contact between two participants, those are speaker and interlocutor. Both are important factors in speech situation. The researcher uses the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama as the data of the analysis because Putra Nababan is one of the Indonesian journalist who got an opportunity to interview one of the important person in the world, this may be a great point to the readers of the thesis and also to show the politeness strategies. Brown and Levinson (1987), said that politeness is used in order to enter into social relationships, to acknowledge and show an awareness of the face, the public self-image, the sense of self, of the people that we address. Politeness strategies are developed for the main purpose of dealing with these FTA s. They said that it is universal characteristic across cultures that speakers should respect each others expectations regarding self-image, take account of their feelings and avoid Face Threatening Acts (FTAs). The Exclusive Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama is presented on RCTI. In the Exclusive Interview there are politeness strategies used by Putra Nababan. He used politeness strategies in the interview, because he spoke to the President of America who has higher status than him. Through this research, the researcher wants to analyze the politeness strategies used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama in the Exclusive Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 5

RESEARCH METHOD Research Method In this research, the researcher used the descriptive qualitative approach in analyzing the data. Descriptive qualitative was used in this research since researcher descriptively explained the utterances containing politeness used by the Exclusive Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on March 10, 2010 on RCTI. The data of this research were collected from video of the Exclusive Interview Between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on March 10, 2010 on RCTI. Unit of Analysis The unit of analysis of this research is the utterances produced by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on the interview March 10, 2010 on RCTI. All of the politeness strategies in the speaker s utterances were analyzed in this research. Source of Data The data of this study are spoken data. The researcher took the data from the Exclusive Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on March 10, 2010 on RCTI. The interview took place at White House, Washington DC, US. Techniques of Data Collection The data of the study were collected by using the following steps: 1. The first time watching the Exclusive Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on March 10, 2010 on RCTI and the second time on the video. 2. Downloading the video from youtube and note-taking the interview conducted by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on the interview March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 3. Transcribing all the Speaker s utterances used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on the interview March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 3.5 Techniques of Data Analysis The steps to analyze the data are: 1. Reading the data carefully. 2. Identifying the politeness used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on the interview March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 3. Classifying the politeness used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on the interview March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 4. Finding out the proportion of each type of politeness strategy based on Brown and Levinson in the utterances used by the Exclusive Interview Between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 5. Analyzing the factors that influence the choice of politeness strategies based on the theory of Brown and Levinson. 6. Drawing conclusion. 6

FINDING AND DISCUSSION 4.1. The Finding of the Politeness Strategy used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama in the Exclusive Interview on March 10, 2010 on RCTI. This chapter describes the data analysis. The researcher analyses the data after the data were collected. The data was taken from the utterances by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama in the Exclusive Interview on March 10, 2010 on RCTI. The researcher tried to find out the propotion of each type of politeness strategy based on Brown and Levinson in the utterances used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, and analyzing the factors which influence the choice of certain politeness strategies in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama. The researcher found 86 utterances that can categorized in the Politeness Strategies. There are 29 utterances using Bald on record strategy, 25 utterances Positive politeness strategy, 31 utterances Negative politeness strategy, and 1 utterance Off record strategy. For more details analysis of Politeness strategies that occur in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama would be shown on the table 4.1. Table 4.1. The Frequency of Politeness Strategies Used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama on the interview March 10, 2010 on RCTI. No. Types of Politeness Strategy Putra Nababan Barack Obama % % 1. Bald on Record 12 30.77% 17 36.17% 2. Positive Politeness 9 23.08% 16 34.04% 3. Negative Politeness 17 43.59% 14 29.79% 4. Off Record 1 2.56% - - Total 39 100% 47 100% Table 4.1. shows that there are 86 utterances which consist of 39 utterances used by Putra Nababan and 47 utterances used by Barack Obama. There were 29 Bald on record strategies; 12 utterances by Putra Nababan and 17 utterances by Barack Obama, 25 Positive politeness strategies; 9 utterances by Putra Nababan and 16 utterances by Barack Obama, 31 Negative politeness strategies; 17 utterances by Putra Nababan and 14 utterances by Barack Obama, and 1 Off record strategy used by Putra Nababan. From the table the researcher shows that Putra Nababan used negative politeness more than other strategies. Putra Nababan used this strategy to keep his politeness in speaking and the hearer will respected. Therefore the politeness is needed to obtain good results in his interview. 7

4.2. Discussion of the findings of the politeness strategy used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama in the Exclusive Interview on March 10, 2010 on RCTI. 4.2.1. Bald On Record Table 4.2. The Frequency of Bald on Record used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama Strategy Bald on Record Putra Nababan Barack Obama % % 1 Cases of nonminimization 12 100% 17 100% of the face threat Total 12 100% 17 100% Table 4.2. shows that there are 30 utterances Bald on Record strategies. They are 30 cases of non-minimization of the face threat utterances; 12 utterances used by Putra Nababan and 18 utterances used by Barack Obama. Obama used this strategy more than Nababan because he is more powerful. 4.2.2. Positive Politeness Table 4.3. The Frequency of Positive Politeness used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama Strate gy Name of strategy Putra Nababan Barack Obama % % 1 Notice, attend to hearer 1 11.11% - - (his interest, wants, needs, goods) 3 Intensify interest to - - 10 62.50% hearer 5 Seek agreement 7 77.78% 2 12.50% 6 Avoid disagreement - - 3 18.75% 11 Be optimistic 1 11.11% 1 6.25% Total 9 100% 16 100% Table 4.3. shown that there are 25 utterances Positive politeness strategies used in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama. They are 9 utterances used by Putra Nababan, and then 16 utterances used by Barack Obama. Obama is more dominant than Nababan. From the analysis, it can be concluded that Obama wants to give a good respon to Nababan. He wants to intensify the interest of speaker s contribution by making a good story. 8

4.2.3. Negative Politeness Table 4.4. The Frequency of Negative Politeness used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama Strate gy Name of strategy Putra Nababan Barack Obama % % 1 Be conventionally 7 41.18% 1 7.14% indirect 2 Question, hedge 6 35.3% 2 14.29% 3 Be pessimistic - - 1 7.14% 4 Minimize the imposition 2 11.76% 6 42.86% 5 Give deference 2 11.76% 1 7.14% 6 Apologize - - 3 21.43% Total 17 100% 14 100% Table 4.4. shown that there are 31 utterances Negative politeness strategies used in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama. They are 17 utterances used by Putra Nababan, and then 14 utterances used by Barack Obama. Nababan is more dominant than Obama because he, as a journalist, should be keep a good connection with his partner. 4.2.4. Off Record Table 4.5. The Frequency of Off Record used by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama Strate gy Name of strategy Putra Nababan Barack Obama % % 15 Be incomplete, use 1 100% - - ellipsis Total 1 100% - - Table 4.5. shown that only 1 utterance Off record stategy used in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama. This utterance used by Putra Nababan. 4.3. The Factors which Influence the Choice of Politeness Strategies in the Interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama 4.3.1. The payoffs: a priori considerations By going on record, Putra Nababan as the speaker can potentially get any of the following advantages. 9

Excerpt 33: 1 Obama: So, I am sure this' the first an interview ever done by Indonesian television in the white house, right? It must be right? 2 Nababan: Yes, this is the first time interview by Indonesian journalist, right? 3 Obama: yes, absolutely, yes Nababan get enlist the addressee or in support of speaker s self to satisfy hearer s negative face, in some degree. Obama makes sure that this is the first time to interviewed by Indonesian journalist. 4.3.2. The circumstance: sociological variables According to Brown and Levinson (1987: 74), there are three social factors that influence the choice of strategies, these are: 4.3.2.1. Occupation There is different occupation between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama. The occupation of Putra Nababan is as a journalist and the occupation of Barack Obama is a President of US. 4.3.2.2. Social status Barack Obama s status is higher than Putra Nababan. He is the President of US and Nababan is one of the Indonesian journalists. So Nababan pays attention and respect to Obama. 4.3.2.3. Formality Putra Nababan pays respect on his difference of occupation and social status with Barack Obama. He uses formality utterances to Obama. 10

CONCLUSION From the analysis, it can be concluded that in the interview between Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, there are four Politeness Strategies used. There are 86 utterances which consist of 39 utterances used by Putra Nababan and 47 utterances used by Barack Obama. There were 30 Bald on record strategies; 12 utterances by Putra Nababan and 17 utterances by Barack Obama, 25 Positive politeness strategies; 9 utterances by Putra Nababan and 16 utterances by Barack Obama, 31 Negative politeness strategies; 17 utterances by Putra Nababan and 14 utterances by Barack Obama, and 1 Off record strategy used by Putra Nababan. From the analysis the researcher found out that Putra Nababan used negative politeness more than other strategies, because Barack Obama s status and occupation is higher than him, so Putra Nababan used this strategy to keep his politeness in speaking and the hearer will feel respected. And then, the factors influencing the used of strategies by Putra Nababan and Barack Obama, there are three factors. They are occupation, social status and formality. Nababan is a journalist. Therefore, in his speaking he uses polite utterances because he spoke to the President in the interviewed. Obama s social status is higher than Nababan, he is the President of U.S and Nababan is one of the Indonesian journalist. So Nababan pay attention and respect to Obama. Both occupation and social status indirectly influence Nababan in using formal utterances to Obama. 11

BIBLIOGRAPHY Bakhtiar Alvien. 2010. Conversation Analysis of Interview Between RCTI TV Reporter Putra Nababan and US President Barrack Obama. Unpublished Thesis. Semarang: Dian Nuswantoro Brown and Levinson. 1987. Politeness Some Universals in Languages Usage. London: Cambridge University Press. Brown and Levinson. 1997. Politeness, http://logos.euregon.edu/explore/socioling/politeness.htm/(april,2004). Brown and Levinson. 1999. What is the Politeness? Lingua Library. http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossary of Linguistic Term/What is Politeness.htm/(April, 2004). Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman Holmes, Janet. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguitics. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Pragmatics. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. Paltridge, Brian. 2000. Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Australia: Gold Press. www.youtube.com/watch?v=snrn8l9kqjk part1 www.youtube.com/watch?v=qktvjpaqxuk part2 www.youtube.com/watch?v=aorpwdb8jbi part3 www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7xeh-czyns part4 Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 12