Report on Recruitment and Retention of Faculty and Staff of Color. Recruitment and Retention Council Winter 2010

Similar documents
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Idaho Public Schools

Transportation Equity Analysis

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Program Change Proposal:

Shelters Elementary School

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Progress or action taken

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Bellevue University Admission Application

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

African American Male Achievement Update

46 Children s Defense Fund

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Cooper Upper Elementary School

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

çääéöé `çñ eìã~åáíáéë

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

1. Conclusion: Supply and Demand Analysis by Primary Positions

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

A Diverse Student Body

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Principal vacancies and appointments

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

World s Best Workforce Plan

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Best Colleges Main Survey

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE STUDENT PLACEMENTOFFICE PROGRAM REVIEW SPRING SEMESTER, 2010

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.


TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Journalism Department Program Review. Prepared by Professor Lori Medigovich

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Educational Attainment

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

African American Studies Program Self-Study. Professor of History. October 9, 2015

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Robert S. Unnasch, Ph.D.

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS CALENDAR

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like

Raw Data Files Instructions

Evaluation of Teach For America:

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Transcription:

Report on Recruitment and Retention of Faculty and Staff of Color Recruitment and Retention Council Winter 2010

Introduction In spring 2003, the Recruitment and Retention Council prepared its first report on recruitment and retention of faculty and staff of color at Highline Community College. This is our sixth report, which addresses our progress since 2008. In the last four years, the student body has continued to become more diverse (statistics are for 2009): Highline now has the most diverse student body among community colleges in the state: 66% students of color (includes 19% other/foreign national/multiracial). (HCC Fact Sheet, September, 2009). Highline has the highest percentage of immigrant/refugee/temporary legal resident students among community and technical colleges in the state: 30.8%. The system total is 8% (2008 Fall Quarter Report, State Board). Thanks to Human Resources, and especially Rosemary Martinez, for compiling the data. 1

Explanatory notes: Data: For purposes of this report, employees have been divided into two categories, faculty and staff. Some data sources organize employees differently and have slightly conflicting numbers. No attempt has been made to reconcile them. Affirmative Action: Highline is required to be in compliance with federal Affirmative Action regulations, although state Affirmative Action programs were eliminated in 1998. Terminology: This report uses the terms African American, American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino and White, even where data sources use different terminology (e.g., the U.S. Census Bureau uses Black, American, Asian, Hispanic and White). The authors recognize the lack of societal consensus on these terms and have attempted to follow the terminology used by civil rights organizations. 2

Faculty of Color The percentage of full-time faculty of color has not increased since the last report. The percentage of tenured and tenure-track faculty of color at Highline dropped one percent to 22.7% from 2007 to 2009, following steady increases since 1993, when faculty of color made up only 5% of the overall faculty. Relative to the other 34 community and technical colleges in the state, Highline dropped to 5th place in 2009 in percentage of faculty of color (See Table 1). The national average percentage of faculty of color in twoyear institutions is 19.3, according to the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. The college is not underutilizing African American faculty. It continues to underutilize Latino and American faculty. Underutilization is defined by the WAC 251-01-440 as having fewer racial/ethnic minorities in a particular job group than would reasonably be expected by their availability. According to the State s analysis of availability of faculty of color, Highline raised its percentage of African American faculty from the previous report (to 9.03%), while continuing to underutilize Latino faculty (1.39%). American faculty remains underutilized from the previous report at 0.0%. However, the availability of American faculty is considered low enough that losing or gaining one faculty member can make the difference between meeting utilization goals and not meeting them. The college continues to meet utilization goals for Asians/Pacific Islanders (14.58%). (See Table 2.) Faculty of color are disbursed among all divisions. Faculty of color increased in the Arts & Humanities Division (from 28% to 30%), Social Sciences Division (from 17% to 19%) and in Pure & Applied Sciences (from 24% to 26%) due to a drop in total faculty in those divisions. Developmental Studies maintained their 2008 level at 37.5%, while Counselors/Librarians decreased from 22% to 12.5%. (See Table 3). 3

Ethnic diversity has decreased among faculty on one-year contracts and in internships. The total number of one-year/intern faculty of color decreased significantly from 33% in 2008 to 12% in 2009. (see Table 4). The percentage of part-time faculty of color has increased at Highline, but has decreased overall across the State. The percentage of part-time faculty of color at Highline has increased from 12.4% in 2007 to 17.1% in 2009. Highline has risen above seven other colleges since 2007 in the percentage of part-time faculty of color, but several colleges have higher percentages including Cascadia, at 24.4% and Seattle Central at 25.5%. Overall, the percentage of part-time faculty of color across the State has dropped since 2007. (See Table 5.) The applicant pool increased slightly in diversity from 2007 to 2008. There was no recruitment for tenure-track positions during the 2009 hiring season. The total number of applicants of color for tenure-track positions rose from 16 in 2007 to 22 in 2008, with increases in both Asian/Pacific Islander and African American applicants. American and Latino applicants both decreased. White applicants increased from 74 to 85 and the number of people who did not declare a race increased from 13 to 19. There was no recruitment for tenure-track positions during the 2009 hiring season. (See Table 6.) 4

Staff of Color Staff is defined for this report as including all employees who are not faculty. It s possible to categorize this group in many different ways and, therefore, to look at the statistics in different ways. The percentage of staff of color has increased among Para-professional, Grounds/Maintenance/Custodial, Administrative and Management staff. Between 2008 and 2009, the percentage of technical/para-professional staff of color increased from 27% to 32%, clerical staff increased from 25% to 27%, and managers increased from 18% to 23%. Administrators of color remained consistent at 20%, and professional/classified staff decreased from 17% to 15%. (see Table 10). According to the State Board, in 2009 23.1% of classified/support staff and 16.7% of administrative/professional staff across the system were people of color. Across the State, most staffing categories are less diverse than state population and are increasing at slower rates than population growth. (Access and Success for People of Color in Washington Community & Technical Colleges: Progress Report, Revised June, 2009) Among the four major units, Student Services and Administration have the greatest percentages of staff of color. Their percentages are 35% and 46%, respectively. Student Services staff of color has decreased by 1% since 2008, and Administration increased by 6% over the same time period. Academic Affairs and Institutional Advancement continue to have low percentages of staff of color; however, Institutional Advancement increased from 22% in 2008 to 25% in 2010 (see Table 8). Among the three major job classes, the percentage of staff of color is highest among classified staff (33%). Classified staff are those who work under conditions established by collective bargaining or under civil service rules (e.g., secretaries, facilities staff, computer support people). As noted above, the percentage of staff of color in classified/support positions across the system was 23.1% in 2009, according to the State Board. Therefore, Highline s percentage of staff of color in this area is much better than average. (see Table 9). Among administrators, 20% are people of color, and among other exempt staff (e.g., managers) 22% are people of color (see Table 9). According to the State Board, 16.7% of administrative/professional staff across the system are people of color so Highline is better than the system as a whole (Access and Success for People of Color in Washington Community & Technical Colleges: Progress Report, Revised June, 2009). 5

The ethnic/racial composition of staff members has changed from 2005-2008. The federal affirmative action reports categorize staff differently than the State Board. They use the following categories: professional (the equivalent of classified), clerical, technical/paraprofessional, grounds/maintenance/custodial, administrators, and managers. According to the college s latest affirmative action report, over the three year period from 2005 to 2008, the following changes occurred (this data is not included in the tables in the appendix): Significant increases o The percentage of African increased among professional staff. o The percentages of Latinos increased among professional and clerical staff. o The percentages of Asian/Pacific Islanders increased among clerical staff and administrators. Significant decrease o The percentage of African decreased among administrators. In general, the college continued to underutilize in all of the six job categories, Latinos in four of the six job categories, and African in three of the six job categories (see Table 10). Thirteen percent of staff affected by the 2009 staff reductions were people of color. Five of the forty staff who retired and were not replaced, were laid off, or whose positions were eliminated, were people of color. As 28% of staff on campus are people of color, this means the reductions did not impact people of color disproportionately (see Table 11). Data is not currently available on the ethnic/racial composition of hourly positions or of applicant pools. 6

Retention In April 2002, Human Resources began systematically collecting exit interviews of leaving employees. Although we do not yet have enough data to draw hard conclusions, there is no suggestion so far that people of color are more likely to leave Highline than white employees or that issues related to culture and race are causing people to leave. For example, between December 2004 and March 2006, of the 64 employees who left Highline, 17 percent were people of color (The total workforce, not including part-time faculty, was 23.26% people of color in 2005). In exit interviews, most people said they were leaving because of retirement or a better opportunity. 7

Appendix: Tables and Graphs Table 1: Community/Technical Colleges in State with Higher Percentages of Full-Time Faculty of Color than Highline, 2007 and 2009 Community/Technical College Percentage of Full-Time Faculty of Color, 2007 Percentage of Full-Time Faculty of Color, 2009 Seattle Voc Institute 30% 40.0% North Seattle 29.9% 31.5% Seattle Central 28.8% 29.6% South Seattle No longer higher than Highline 29.4% (22.4%) Highline 23.7% 22.7% Green River 14% 15.0% Source: State Board of Community and Technical Colleges Table 2: Affirmative Action Update, 2008-2009, Faculty Total Total POC* African American Hispanic Asian Pacific Islander American Previous # 143 32 11 2 19 0 Appointment 24 2 0 0 2 0 # Appointment 8.33% 0% 0% 8.33% 0 % Current 144 31 13 2 21 0 Utilization # Current 21.53% 9.03% 1.39% 14.58% 0.00% Utilization % Availability 20.20% 6.9% 1% 11.8%.5% % Goals Met for Period (Placements) (Y/N) Y Y N Y N Table 3: Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty of Color by Division, 2008 and 2009 Division Faculty of Color Total Faculty Percent of Division Total 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 Developmental Studies 3 3 8 8 37.5% 37.5% Arts & Humanities 8 8 29 27 28% 30% Counselors/Librarians 2 1 9 8 22% 12.5% Social Sciences 4 4 23 21 17% 19% Pure & Applied Sciences 8 8 34 31 24% 26% Business 5 3 22 17 23% 18% Health, PE & Education 2 2 16 15 12.5% 13% 8

Table 4: Intern and One-year Faculty of Color by Division, 2009 Division Faculty of Color Total Faculty Percent (of Division Total) Developmental Studies 0 0 NA Arts & Humanities 1 4 25% Counselors/Librarians 0 0 NA Social Sciences 0 2 NA Pure & Applied Sciences 0 4 NA Business 1 5 20% Health, PE & Education 0 2 NA PSEC 0 0 NA TOTAL 2 17 12% Table 5: Community/Technical Colleges in State with Higher Percentages of Part-Time Faculty of Color than Highline, 2007 and 2009 Community/Technical College Percentage of Part-Time Faculty of Color, 2007 Percentage of Part-Time Faculty of Color, 2009 Seattle Voc Institute 47.1% 48.4% Cascadia 37.3% 24.4% Seattle Central 27.5% 25.5% Renton 16.7% 18.3% Edmonds 13.1% No longer above Highline (12.2%) Big Bend 20.5% No longer above Highline (15.9%) Shoreline No longer above Highline (11%) 10.1% Clover Park No longer above Highline 8.0% (10.5%) Yakima Valley 15% No longer above Highline (15.9%) Columbia Basin 14% No longer above Highline (10.7%) South Seattle 17.2% No longer above Highline (15.9%) North Seattle 12.6% No longer above Highline (13.2%) Bellevue 15.6% No longer above Highline (12.1%) Lake Washington No longer above Highline 13.8% (10.1%) Highline 12.4% 17.1% Green River 10.3% 11.1% Source: State Board of Community and Technical Colleges 9

Graph 1: All Applicants for Tenure-Track Positions by Race 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2008 Recruitment 2008 Recruitment Table 6: All Applicants for Tenure-Track Positions by Race Total Asian/ Pacific Islander African American All applicants, 2008 hiring season All applicants, 2009 hiring No season Recruitment All applicants, 2010 hiring season Not Available American Latino White Undeclared 126 13 6 0 3 85 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 7: Fulltime People of Color by Organizational Unit 2008 and 2009 2008 2009-10 Organizational Unit Classified Administrators Exempt Class. Admin. Exempt Academic Affairs 6 (14%) 1 (14%) 4 (7%) 8 (20%) 1 (14%) 7 (13%) Administration 34 (44%) 2 (29%) 2 (13%) 33 (41%) 2 (29%) 2 (12%) Student Services 12 (38%) 2 (33%) 12(43%) 6 (33%) 2 (33%) 9 (29%) Institutional Advancement 1 (17%) 0 (3*) 1(14%) 1 (20%) 0 (3*) 2 (29%) *Actual number of employees in department Table 8: Staff of Color by Area (permanent, full-time) Area Number of Employees in Area Number of People of Color in Area Percentage of People of Color in Area Sept 2008 Mar 2010 Sept 2008 Mar 2010 Sept 2008 Mar 2010 Student Services 73 49 26 17 36% 35% Administration 95 80 38 37 40% 46% Academic Affairs 234 225 49 48 21% 21% Institutional Advancement 9 12 2 3 22% 25% 10

Table 9: Staff of Color by Job Class (permanent, full-time) Area Number of Employees in Area Number of People of Color in Area Percentage of People of Color in Area Sept 2008 Mar 2010 Sept 2008 Mar 2010 Sept 2008 Mar 2010 Classified 157 144 49 48 31% 33% Administrators 25 25 5 5 20% 20% Exempt (not in Admin. Cabinet) 98 91 18 20 18% 22% Table 10: Staff by Race, Based on Federal Affirmative Action Categories, 2008 and 2009 Category Number of Employees Number of People of Color Percent of People of Color Underutilized Groups 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 Professional (classified) 35 39 6 6 17% 15%, Latinos Clerical 55 59 14 16 25% 27% Latinos, Technical/Paraprofesional Grounds/Maintenance/Custodial 33 34 9 11 27% 32% Latinos, 37 35 24 21 65% 60% African, Administrators 25 25 5 5 20% 20% African, Latinos, Managers 98 87 18 20 18% 23% African, Latinos, Table 11: Impact of 2009 Layoffs on Staff of Color Positions eliminated 40 Vacant positions eliminated 5 Retirements not replaced 0 Layoffs 35 Positions reduced 4 Of 35 people impacted (last three categories), 5 number of people of color Latinos, African, African, Latinos, African, Latinos, 11