Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Charles Stewart Mott Foundation John Templeton Foundation United Nations Foundation. Recent donors include:

Similar documents
Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

46 Children s Defense Fund

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

Housekeeping. Questions

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

CLE/MCLE Information by State

NASWA SURVEY ON PELL GRANTS AND APPROVED TRAINING FOR UI SUMMARY AND STATE-BY-STATE RESULTS

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

The following tables contain data that are derived mainly

Fisk University FACT BOOK. Office of Institutional Assessment and Research

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

Proficiency Illusion

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

Understanding University Funding

Set t i n g Sa i l on a N e w Cou rse

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

ObamaCare Expansion Enrollment is Shattering Projections

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Giving in the Netherlands 2015

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Imagine this: Sylvia and Steve are seventh-graders

EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES A peer-reviewed scholarly journal

top of report Note: Survey result percentages are always out of the total number of people who participated in the survey.

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

NBCC NEWSNOTES. Guidelines for the New. World of WebCounseling. Been There, Done That: Multicultural Training Can. Always be productively revisted

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

LEWIS M. SIMES AS TEACHER Bertel M. Sparks*

Educational Attainment

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Kenya: Age distribution and school attendance of girls aged 9-13 years. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 20 December 2012

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

January 2014 March 2015 Virginia LGBT TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report August 10, 2015

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

Innovation Village: Building Tradition

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

Use of CIM in AEP Enterprise Architecture. Randy Lowe Director, Enterprise Architecture October 24, 2012

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

CC Baccalaureate. Kevin Ballinger Dean Consumer & Health Sciences. Joe Poshek Dean Visual & Performing Arts/Library

Albert (Yan) Wang. Flow-induced Trading Pressure and Corporate Investment (with Xiaoxia Lou), Forthcoming at

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Trends in College Pricing

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

CATALOGUE OF THE TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, AND STUDENTS, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA; AND OF THE GRAMMAR AND CHARITY SCHOOLS, ATTACHED TO THE SAME.

Emergency Safety Interventions Kansas Regulations and Comparisons to Other States. April 16, 2013

Produced by the Feminist Majority Foundation s Campus Leadership Program East Coast: 1600 Wilson Blvd Suite 801, Arlington, VA

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

NCEO Technical Report 27

Draft Preliminary Master Plan April 18, 2012

Mathematics Session 1

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

Evaluation of Grassroots Volunteer Leadership Development Training Conducted by Points of Light Foundation

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

The Implementation of a Consecutive Giving Recognition Program at the University of Florida

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Building a Grad Nation

Transcription:

Philanthropy Panel Study A part of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics This analysis is available to Premium Service Subscribers of the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University. To subscribe, go to www.philanthropy.iupui.edu. The Philanthropy Panel Study (PPS) is a module of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), which reaches more than 8,000 households every two years. The PSID is fielded by the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. Questions were asked in 2009 about giving in 2008. The School of Philanthropy thanks Atlantic Philanthropies for the initial funding to launch PPS in 2001 and the donors whose recent contributions make continued waves of PPS possible. Recent donors include: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Charles Stewart Mott Foundation John Templeton Foundation United Nations Foundation To contribute, please contact Lisa Viaches (lviaches@iupui.edu) or give online at www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/give-now and select School of Philanthropy Research Funding. 2

Acknowledgments The analyses presented here are made possible by the work of many people, including: Founding Director of the Philanthropy Panel Study, Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm At the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University: Gene R. Tempel, Founding Dean Patrick M. Rooney, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Research Una O. Osili, Director of Research Amy N. Thayer, Associate Director of Research Amir D. Hayat, Applied Statistician Grace Baranowski, Research Associate Yuan Cheng, Graduate Student Intern Traci Wilmoth, Research Assistant Thomas Pearson, Research Assistant Jon Bergdoll, Research Assistant Denay Patterson, Research Assistant Melissa Wall, Research Assistant Riley Mineart, Research Assistant Permission is granted to use, circulate, and cite figures in this pamphlet with attribution to the Philanthropy Panel Study. For more information about the Philanthropy Panel Study, please see the School s website at www.philanthropy.iupui.edu. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy 550 West North Street, Suite 301 Indianapolis, IN 46202 3

Overview of Educational Giving A number of demographic factors play a role in how much households and individuals give to charity. The graphs in this overview provide comparisons of giving to educational organizations by: Age (<=40, 41 64, and 65+) Income (<=$50,000, $50,001 $99,999, and,000+) Wealth, excluding the equity in a home (<=$50,000, $50,001 $199,999, and $200,000+) Education level of the head of household (high school or less, some college, bachelor s degree, and graduate school) Geographical location, using regions of the United States defined by the U.S. Census Bureau Marital status of the head of household (married, never married, widowed, separated, and divorced) This overview uses the 2009 wave of the Panel Philanthropy Study (PPS) data, a module of the Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID), to make inferences about household charitable giving in the United States. The PPS is the nation s first and largest ongoing study examining the charitable giving of American households over time. This overview uses the nationally representative data from PPS to present some key facts about charitable giving based on responses provided by households in 2008, drawing on demographic characteristics of U.S. donor households. This report presents the giving rate (the percentage of U.S. households that gave) and the average and median gift amounts among U.S. donor households to educational organizations. In general, the higher the number of respondents in a group, the more reliable the result (the more likely the same result would be found if we had an opportunity to conduct the same study repeatedly with multiple representative samples at the same time). Statistics calculated for a group with fewer than 100 observations are starred in this report in order to indicate that the result should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, the analysis presented in this report does not control for any other variable. Households that answered the philanthropy questions were asked first if they made charitable donations totaling $25 or more in 2008. Households responding yes were asked further questions about how much they gave to each of 11 different types of charities. Nearly 8,700 households participated in the 2009 wave of the PSID. The analysis for this report is based on the 8,475 households that responded to the philanthropy questions. In our analysis, we used the sampling weights provided by the PSID research team at the University of Michigan to yield nationally representative results. Overview of Giving to Educational Organizations in 2008 Giving Rate Average amount per donor household Median amount per donor household Educational Giving 14.5% $544 $125 14.5 percent of all U.S. households gave to educational organizations in 2008 $544 was the average giving amount to educational organizations per donor households $125 was the median gift amount to educational organizations per donor households 4

Giving Rate to Educational Organizations by Head of Household s Age Group 17.4% 10.0% 15.1% <=40 41-64 65+ This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to educational organizations in 2008 by the age group of the head of household. The giving rate to educational organizations did not necessarily increase with the head of household s age. Households headed by an individual 41 to 64 years gave at a slightly higher rate (by 2.3 percentage points) than did households headed by an individual 65 or older. One in ten households headed by an individual 40 or younger gave to educational organizations. Overall, 14.5 percent of responding households reported giving to educational organizations in 2008. 5

Giving to Educational Organizations by Head of Household s Age Group $593 $732 $249 $150 $150 Average <=40 n=319 41-64 n=577 65+ n=134 Median This graph shows the average and median amounts given to educational organizations by the age group of the head of household. Though the giving rate to educational organizations did not increase with the age of the head of household, the average amount given to educational organizations did increase with the age of the head of household. On average, donating households headed by an individual 41 to 64 years old gave $344 more to educational organizations than households headed by an individual 40 or younger. Among those that gave, the median gift amount to educational organizations from both households headed by an individual 41 to 64 years old and households headed by an individual 65 or older was $150. Among all U.S. donor households, the average amount given to educational organizations was $544 (median=$125). 6

Giving Rate to Educational Organizations by Household Income Level 31.0% 6.4% 15.4% <=$50,000 $50,001-$99,999,000+ This graph shows the giving rate to educational organizations by household income level in 2008. Households with higher income levels gave to educational organizations at a higher rate. The giving rate to educational organizations of households with income levels of,000 or more was twice that of households with income levels between $50,001 and $99,999 and nearly five times that of households with income levels of $50,000 or more. Overall, 14.5 percent of responding households reported giving to educational organizations in 2008. 7

Giving to Educational Organizations by Household Income Level $474 $701 $356 $200 Average <=$50,000 n=227 $50,001-$99,999 n=331,000+ n=473 Median The graph shows the average and median amounts given to educational organizations in 2008 by household income level. Though households with higher income levels gave at higher rates to educational organizations, those that did give did not necessarily donate more on average to educational organizations. Among those that gave, the median gift amount to educational organizations from both households with income levels of $50,000 or less and households with income levels between $50,001 and $99,999 was. On average, donating households with income levels of $50,000 or less gave $118 more to educational organizations than households with income levels between $50,001 and $99,999. Among all U.S. donor households, the average gift amount was $544 (median=$125) to educational organizations in 2008. 8

Giving Rate to Educational Organizations by Household Wealth Level 29.5% 8.5% 18.6% <=$50,000 $50,001-$199,999 $200,000+ This graph shows the giving rate to educational organizations in 2008 by household wealth level. For this analysis, wealth did not include the value of the equity in the household home. Households with higher levels of wealth gave at higher rates to educational organizations. The giving rate to educational organizations increased by close to 10 percentage points at each wealth level. Between wealth levels of $50,000 or less and between $50,001 and $199,999, the giving rate increased 10.1 percentage points. Between wealth levels of between $50,001 and $199,999 and $200,000 or more, the giving rate increased by 10.9 percentage points. Overall, 14.5 percent of responding households reported giving to educational organizations in 2008. 9

Giving to Educational Organizations by Household Wealth Level $829 $547 $221 $200 Average <=$50,000 n=443 $50,001-$199,999 n=235 $200,000+ n=353 Median This graph shows the median and average amounts given to educational organizations in 2008 by household wealth level. For this analysis, wealth did not include the value of the equity in the household home. Households with higher wealth levels gave to educational organizations at a higher rate. Among those that gave, households with wealth levels of $200,000 or more gave $608 more to educational organizations, on average, than did those with wealth levels of $50,000 or less. Among all donating households, the average amount given to educational organizations was $540 (median=$125). 10

Giving Rate to Educational Organizations by Head of Household s Education Level 35.0% 6.0% 13.5% 24.7% HS or Less Some College BA/BS Graduate School HS or Less high school education or less BA/BS bachelor s degree This graph shows giving rates to educational organizations in 2008 by education level of the head of household. Households headed by an individual with a higher level of education gave at progressively higher rates to educational organizations. Households headed by an individual with at least some graduate coursework gave at the highest rate to educational organizations, while those headed by an individual with a high school education or less gave at the lowest rate. A 29.0 percentage point difference separated these categories. Households headed by an individual with a bachelor s degree gave at a higher rate to educational organizations (by 11.2 percentage points) than did households headed by an individual with some college education. Overall, 14.5 percent of responding households reported giving to educational organizations in 2008. 11

Giving to Educational Organizations by Head of Household s Education Level $697 $567 $587 $239 $150 $200 Average HS or Less n=229 Some College n=254 BA/BS n=274 Graduate School n=222 Median HS or Less high school education or less BA/BS bachelor s degree The graph shows the average and median amounts given to educational organizations in 2008 by education level of the head of household. Though the giving rate to educational organizations increased with the head of household s education level, those that did give did not necessarily donate more on average. While donor households headed by an individual with at least some graduate coursework gave less on average to educational organizations than donor households headed by an individual with a bachelor s degree, those with at least some graduate coursework did donate a larger median amount. Among all U.S. donor households, the average donation to educational organizations was $544 (median=$125). 12

Giving Rate to Educational Organizations by Household Geographic Region 24.1% 18.4% 10.1% 13.3% 14.6% 12.7% 12.9% 15.5% 15.5% This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to educational organizations in 2008 by U.S. geographic region. A difference of 14.0 percentage points separated the region with the highest giving rate to educational organizations (North East) and the lowest (East North Central). Overall, 14.5 percent of responding households reported giving to educational organizations in 2008. The regions as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, are described below. North East Mid Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington, DC, West Virginia Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington 13

Giving to Educational Organizations by Household Geographic Region $1,200 $273 $312 $442 $426 $488 $392 $570 $466 $120 North East n=55* Mid Atlantic n=142 $125 $200 East North Central n=127 West North Central n=88* $150 South Atlantic n=232 East South Central n=72* West South Central n=102 $200 Mountain n=68* Pacific n=143 Average Median *Sample size is relatively small. Results should be interpreted with caution. This graph shows the average and median amounts given to educational organizations by U.S. geographic region. Among donor households, households located in the Pacific region gave an average of $1,200 to educational organizations far beyond the common range which peaks at $570. On average, West South Central region donor households gave more than twice the amount than households located in the North East region to educational organizations. On average, Pacific region donor households gave more than four times the amount than that of the North East region donor households to educational organizations. Among all U.S. donor households, the average amount given to educational organizations was $544 (median=$125). Region definitions can be found on the previous page. 14

Giving Rate to Educational Organizations by Head of Household s Marital Status 19.5% 13.3% 8.3% 10.7% 6.3% Married Never Married Widowed Divorced Separated This graph shows the giving rate of U.S. households to educational organizations in 2008 by marital status of the head of household. Households headed by a married individual gave at a rate to educational organizations more than three times that of households headed by a separated individual. Households headed by a never-married individual gave at a slightly higher rate to educational organizations (by 2.0 percentage points) than did those headed by a separated individual. Overall, 14.5 percent of responding households reported giving to educational organizations in 2008. 15

Giving to Educational Organizations by Head of Household s Marital Status $666 $564 $480 $183 $288 $200 Married n=703 Never Married n=141 Widowed n=52* Divorced n=107 Separated n=28* Average Median *Sample size is relatively small. Results should be interpreted with caution. This graph shows the average and median amounts given to educational organizations in 2008 by the marital status of the head of household. Households headed by a married individual not only gave at the highest rate to educational organizations, these households also gave larger average and median gift amounts to these organizations. Despite giving to education at the lowest rate, donor households headed by a separated individual gave a higher average gift amount to educational organizations than both donor households headed by a never married individual and donor households headed by a divorced individual. Almost all marital status groups shared a common median gift amount to educational organizations (), with the exception of donor households headed by a married individual. Among all U.S. donor households, the average amount given to educational organizations was $544 (median=$125). 16