FRANÇAIS III : MAINS ET MERVEILLES MÉTIER/ARTISAN: ÉLÈVE(S) : Good jours avant 2 jours avant 1 jour avant le jour même. Includes all required

Similar documents
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNIQUES. Teaching by Lecture

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Freitag 7. Januar = QUIZ = REFLEXIVE VERBEN = IM KLASSENZIMMER = JUDD 115

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

November 2012 MUET (800)

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Language Acquisition Chart

REVIEW OF CONNECTED SPEECH

International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

Reading Horizons. Aid for the School Principle: Evaluate Classroom Reading Programs. Sandra McCormick JANUARY Volume 19, Issue Article 7

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

Lecturing Module

SLINGERLAND: A Multisensory Structured Language Instructional Approach

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

9779 PRINCIPAL COURSE FRENCH

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Secondary English-Language Arts

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

South Carolina English Language Arts

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

MGMT 3362 Human Resource Management Course Syllabus Spring 2016 (Interactive Video) Business Administration 222D (Edinburg Campus)

Unit Lesson Plan: Native Americans 4th grade (SS and ELA)

PUBLIC SPEAKING: Some Thoughts

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Graduate Program in Education

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

: USING RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

Topic 3: Roman Religion

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

Public Speaking Rubric

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Initial English Language Training for Controllers and Pilots. Mr. John Kennedy École Nationale de L Aviation Civile (ENAC) Toulouse, France.

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Intensive Writing Class

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

Application of Multimedia Technology in Vocabulary Learning for Engineering Students

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

One Stop Shop For Educators

The Writing Process. The Academic Support Centre // September 2015

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Academic Support Services Accelerated Learning Classes The Learning Success Center SMARTHINKING Student computer labs Adult Education

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Training Staff with Varying Abilities and Special Needs

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Example answers and examiner commentaries: Paper 2

Stimulation for Interaction. 1. Is your character old or young? He/She is old/young/in-between OR a child/a teenager/a grown-up/an old person

Longman English Interactive

Introduction to World Philosophy Syllabus Fall 2013 PHIL 2010 CRN: 89658

Introduction Brilliant French Information Books Key features

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Merbouh Zouaoui. Melouk Mohamed. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. 1. Introduction

Applying ADDIE Model for Research and Development: An Analysis Phase of Communicative Language of 9 Grad Students

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Calculators in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom: Helpful or Harmful?

Planning a Webcast. Steps You Need to Master When

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Writing Research Articles

Aviation English Training: How long Does it Take?

Transcription:

FRANÇAIS III : MAINS ET MERVEILLES DATE: MÉTIER/ARTISAN: ÉLÈVE(S) : VISUAL PRESENTATION Superior 9-10 Good 7-8 Needs Improvement 4-6 Weak 3-0 Students: Copie Imprimée 3 jours avant 2 jours avant 1 jour avant le jour même Student 1: Artisan, Ressources, Outils, Démarches, Produit Final, Qualités, Aptitudes/Talents, Avantages/Défis/ Obstacles Includes all required sections of presentation in a balanced manner. Includes all required sections of presentation but somewhat imbalanced representation. Missing one section of presentation. Missing more than one section of presentation. Student 2: Artisan, Ressources, Outils, Démarches, Produit Final, Qualités, Aptitudes/Talents, Avantages/Défis/ Obstacles Includes all required sections of presentation in a balanced manner. Includes all required sections of presentation but somewhat imbalanced representation. Missing one section of presentation. Missing more than one section of presentation.

Slides: Images and Labeling Appropriate amount of slides to match content; high-quality images that are clear and easily interpreted by audience; slides are not ever overwhelmed by too many images. Clearly-labeled slides, with photos and accurate information, with balanced but not overwhelming amount of text; no use of English; proper spelling and consistently correct use of grammatical structures. Acceptable amount of slides that mostly match content; images are somewhat high-quality and clear, and mostly well-interpreted by audience; slides are for the most part not overwhelmed by too many images. Mostly clearly-labeled slides, with photos and accurate information, but either not enough or overwhelming amount of text; little or no use of English, and mostly proper spelling and consistently correct use of grammatical structures. Minimal amount of slides that do not completely match content; some images not high-quality or clear; or slides are overwhelmed by too many images. Some clearly-labeled slides, with photos and accurate information, but often not enough or overwhelming amount of text; English regularly present and/or regular spelling mistakes and or misuse of grammatical structures Poor quality or missing images, or consistent over-crowding of images, making presentation unclear. Poorly-labeled slides, with not enough or overwhelming amount of text; frequent use of English and/or frequent spelling mistakes and incorrect grammar usage. Oral Knowledge and Detail The student appears very well-versed in his/her topic, with a depth of internal knowledge and understanding; it is evident that he/she is well-prepared prepared to share that topic with a rich variety of detail in a manner that fully engages and enlightens the class. The student appears wellversed, on the topic, with some obvious gaps in knowledge; is somewhat prepared to share that topic with the class, but at times details are lacking or inappropriate to consistently engage and enlighten the class. The student has average to low grasp of the topic, exhibiting mostly superficial knowledge of the topic; lacking the appropriate amount of detail to engage and enligthen the class. The student has very low personal grasp of the topic and/or is unable to engage or enlighten the audience.

Oral Fluency Student communicates thoughts very clearly and naturally in French using his/ her own words at an appropriate speed for the audience, without many errors in pronunciation, without long pauses, and without resorting to memorized structures or written notes. Student communicates fairly clearly and naturally, mostly using his/her own words, but with some repetitive errors in pronunciation; somewhat inconsistent or appropriate speed; some unnatural pauses, and/or somewhat regular use of written notes or memorized structures. Student speech is unnatural and consistently uclear, without using his/ her own words, with many errors in pronunciation. Speed is inappropriate for the audience, and/or many unnatural pauses and regular to frequent use of written notes or memorized structures. Very unclear speech, with many mispronunciations and/or unnatural speed which creates difficulty for audience to understand, Many long pauses and/or mostly parroting of structures used in the videoclip, rarely uses his/her own words and/or resorting to written notes and memorized structures. Oral Circumlocution and Vocabulary Student uses rich and non-repetitive vocabulary whenever possible; student is comfortable and adept at using circumlocution and gestures to help certain technical or other aspects of the craft. comfortable and able to use circumlocution and gestures to help certain technical or other aspects of the craft. positive and enthusiastic enough to engage the audience. Student does not regularly use circumlocution and gestures to help certain technical or other aspects of the craft. withdrawn and does not show enough enthusiasm to engage the audience. Student uses little or no circumlocution of or gestures, which results in failure to enhance communication or the audience understanding of the topic. Student goes through the motions without little or no enthusiasm.

Collaboration and Demeanor visibly evident and balanced; student s support of partner is fully evident. Student exhibits a positive demeanor that engages the audience somewhat lopsided; student s support of partner not consistently evident. Student exhibits an average demeanor that does not consistently engage the audience imbalanced in favor of one student or the other, and no support was evident Student s demeanor was such that it detracted from his/ her ability to engage with the audience consistently. almost non-existent. Clearly student was focused solely on his/ her portion of the presentation Student s demeanor was a detriment to his/her presentation and engagement with the audience. STUDENT 1: GRADE: STUDENT 2: GRADE: