Word Analysis. Forty tasks are divided into five strands:

Similar documents
Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

(Musselwhite, 2008) classrooms.

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE BALANCED LITERACY PLATFORM

Bell Work Integrating ELLs

Using CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading. Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

REQUIRED TEXTS Woods, M. & Moe, A.J. (2011). Analytical Reading Inventory with Readers Passages (9 th edition). Prentice Hall.

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Using SAM Central With iread

A Critique of Running Records

Language and Literacy: Exploring Examples of the Language and Literacy Foundations

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Reading Horizons. A Look At Linguistic Readers. Nicholas P. Criscuolo APRIL Volume 10, Issue Article 5

Learning Lesson Study Course

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Grade Five Chapter 6 Add and Subtract Fractions with Unlike Denominators Overview & Support Standards:

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

SLINGERLAND: A Multisensory Structured Language Instructional Approach

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

San Marino Unified School District Homework Policy

MFL SPECIFICATION FOR JUNIOR CYCLE SHORT COURSE

Plainfield Public School District Reading/3 rd Grade Curriculum Guide. Modifications/ Extensions (How will I differentiate?)

A Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher

WiggleWorks Software Manual PDF0049 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Kings Local. School District s. Literacy Framework

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Richardson, J., The Next Step in Guided Writing, Ohio Literacy Conference, 2010

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Characteristics of the Text Genre Realistic fi ction Text Structure

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

EQuIP Review Feedback

Phonemic Awareness. Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education TST BOCES

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

Literacy Learner Analysis Project. Kamille Samborski. Michigan State University. April 30, 2013

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Holy Family Catholic Primary School SPELLING POLICY

The Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension. Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities.

TRAVEL TIME REPORT. Casualty Actuarial Society Education Policy Committee October 2001

Loveland Schools Literacy Framework K-6

The Effects of Super Speed 100 on Reading Fluency. Jennifer Thorne. University of New England

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Guided Reading with A SPECIAL DAY written and illustrated by Anne Sibley O Brien

Fountas-Pinnell Level P Informational Text

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Fountas-Pinnell Level M Realistic Fiction

Chapter 5. The Components of Language and Reading Instruction

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR BASIC EDUCATION STANDARD I AND II

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

ALEKS. ALEKS Pie Report (Class Level)

Tests For Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

Hacker, J. Increasing oral reading fluency with elementary English language learners (2008)

End-of-Module Assessment Task K 2

Similar Triangles. Developed by: M. Fahy, J. O Keeffe, J. Cooper

Considerations for Aligning Early Grades Curriculum with the Common Core

21st Century Community Learning Center

READ 180 Next Generation Software Manual

Elementary Supplemental (purchase only) Instructional Materials -- Draft

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Answer Key To Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Piano Safari Sight Reading & Rhythm Cards for Book 1

PROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS. Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES

Films for ESOL training. Section 2 - Language Experience

Objective: Model division as the unknown factor in multiplication using arrays and tape diagrams. (8 minutes) (3 minutes)

Unit 9. Teacher Guide. k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. Kindergarten Core Knowledge Language Arts New York Edition Skills Strand

Bebop Books Page 1. Guided Reading with SPLASH! written by Dinah Johnson photographed by Maria Victoria Torrey

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

The New York City Department of Education. Grade 5 Mathematics Benchmark Assessment. Teacher Guide Spring 2013

Creating an Online Test. **This document was revised for the use of Plano ISD teachers and staff.

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

NAME: East Carolina University PSYC Developmental Psychology Dr. Eppler & Dr. Ironsmith

J j W w. Write. Name. Max Takes the Train. Handwriting Letters Jj, Ww: Words with j, w 321

Transcription:

Word Analysis Introduction Background and Rationale This guide discusses the essential features of the DRA2 Word Analysis assessment. Learn when to administer word analysis, which tasks to administer, how to score the tasks, and how to use the results in direct-classroom instruction. The DRA2 Word Analysis is a diagnostic assessment that provides teachers with a systematic means to observe how struggling and emerging readers attend to and work with various components of spoken and written words. Forty tasks are divided into five strands: 1. phonological awareness 2. metalanguage, or language used to talk about printed language concepts 3. letter/high-frequency word recognition 4. phonics 5. structural analysis and syllabication The tasks reflect what developing readers need to know and do in order to successfully problem solve unknown or less-familiar words as they read meaningful texts. The tasks are sequenced in order of difficulty based upon the performance of students at the same DRA2 text levels as well as research-based expectations for phonological research. Components The DRA2 Word Analysis components include the Teacher Resource Guide, the Student Assessment Book and the Training CD. 1

The Teacher Resource Guide has directions for administration, recording, and scoring of each assessment task along with the Blackline masters, an explanation with various samples of completed Blackline masters, sample mini-lessons and/or learning activities for word analysis tasks, a glossary, and recommended references. The Student Assessment Book includes the pictures, letters, and/or words for the assessment tasks. The Training CD demonstrates how different types of tasks are conducted and scored. Administering It is recommended that Word Analysis be administered during the first part of the school year after the DRA2 has been administered. It is also recommended that teachers re-administer Word Analysis midyear and at the end of the year to determine if students have gained control of those tasks they initially demonstrated, no/little, and/or some control. It is also readministered to identify a new focus for instruction for students who are still reading below a designated level of proficiency on the DRA2 due to ineffective word-solving strategies. The DRA2 Word Analysis is intended for emerging readers in Kindergarten and beginning first grade to identify their level of phonological awareness and basic knowledge of phoneme/grapheme relationships struggling readers in the latter part of first grade through third grade who are reading below grade level or designated levels of proficiency due to ineffective word-solving skills and strategies fourth- and fifth-grade students whose independent DRA2 text level is 38 or below It is not intended for students who have demonstrated adequate progress on the DRA2 and are meeting established levels of proficiency. Furthermore, it is not meant for students who are able to decode text but have difficulty demonstrating their comprehension of what they have read or students whose silent and oral reading rates are slow but who basically make only a few miscues. 2

First Administration Stopping Administration The first time the DRA2 Word Analysis is administered, the initial task is determined by the student s current independent DRA text level. After identifying the students independent DRA text level, teachers will use the chart to determine which DRA2WA task to administer first. The second and/or subsequent times the DRA2 Word Analysis is administered, teachers will assess only those tasks on which the student previously scored no, little, or some control. Teachers begin with the recommended entry task and continue administering until the student performs any three tasks with no/ little, and/or some control on any three tasks. The three tasks do not need to be in consecutive order. Assessment Procedures When administering the assessment, teachers should use the following directions: Follow the specific directions for each task. Read aloud to the student all statements, words, and/or sounds that are in boldface italics. Use a stopwatch to document the amount of time it takes for the student to complete each designated timed task. An icon of a stopwatch and the maximum length of time recorded in minutes and seconds is included on timed tasks as a reminder. Write the student s name and date at the top of the Record of Responses form for each task administered. 3

Guidelines Scoring The teacher records observation of the student s responses on the Record of Responses for each task in the appropriate column for the first, second, and third administration of the task. A correct response is indicated by a check mark. If a response is incorrect, the teacher writes the incorrect response given by the student. If an incorrect response is self-corrected, the teacher places sc to the right of the incorrect response that the student self-corrected. If an item is skipped or omitted, the teacher will place a dash. For each timed task, record the length of time in minutes and seconds on the designated lines. The teacher will write observations of how the student responded. The teacher will need to follow the specific criteria provided with each task to identify correct and self-corrected responses. Adding the number of correct and self-corrected responses will yield a total score. The total score is recorded at the bottom of the page. Use the student s total score to identify the student s level of control for the task. There are four levels of control: No/Little Control (0 39% correct) Some Control (40 79% correct) Gaining Control (80 99% correct) Control (100% correct) Student Cumulative Record On the Student Cumulative Record, record both the date on which the DRA2 Word Analysis is administered and the student s current DRA2 text level in the appropriate grade-level section each time the assessment is given. 4

On the second and third pages of the Student Cumulative Record, record the date when each task was completed in the appropriate column, depending upon the student s level of control. Focus for Instruction The Focus for Instruction is designed to help teachers use the information gained from the DRA2 Word Analysis to plan for instruction and implement developmentally appropriate learning activities. The following guidelines will help determine a focus for instruction and select related activities: 1. Identify what the student needs to learn next based on his or her responses to the three DRA2 Word Analysis tasks in which the student demonstrated, no/little, and/or some control. 2. Determine the focus for instruction, and place the date by the strand(s) that the student is in need of instruction on the back of the Student Cumulative Record. 3. Review and select sample mini-lessons or learning activities located in the Teacher Resource Book to teach and reinforce the identified word analysis tasks. 5

Group Profile Form Review After the identification of a focus for instruction is completed, teachers will want to complete a DRA2 Word Analysis Group Profile form. This form will enable teachers to compile each student s levels of control for the tasks completed in order to group the students according to instructional needs and plan more effectively for their instruction. The primary goal of the DRA2 is to identify each student s independent DRA2 text level and to document how this changes over time. Teachers often encounter a number of students who make little or no progress in their ability to read more challenging texts due to inefficient word analysis strategies. Some of these students are struggling readers who do not know how to efficiently problem solve unknown words they meet in text. Their oral reading is often slow, choppy, and repetitious as they work to figure out words. Others are at-risk emerging readers who do not understand how oral language is related to written language or how to attend to print. To help these at-risk struggling and emerging readers, teachers need further information about their knowledge and skills in working with words in context and in isolation. The DRA2 Word Analysis was created for this very purpose. 6