Faculty Empowering Faculty: A Guide to Partnering with the CFI

Similar documents
Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

What does Quality Look Like?

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

James Madison University Civic Action Plan

Core Values Engagement and Recommendations October 20, 2016

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

School Leadership Rubrics

Mapping the Assets of Your Community:

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Master of Social Sciences in Psychology

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Interview on Quality Education

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

VIA ACTION. A Primer for I/O Psychologists. Robert B. Kaiser

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

INSPIRE A NEW GENERATION OF LIFELONG LEARNERS

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Student Experience Strategy

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Texas Woman s University Libraries

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Writing an Effective Proposal for Teaching Grant: Focusing on Student Success & Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

The IDN Variant Issues Project: A Study of Issues Related to the Delegation of IDN Variant TLDs. 20 April 2011

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Madison Online Volume I, Issue II October Tech News. Inside this Issue:

EMBA 2-YEAR DEGREE PROGRAM. Department of Management Studies. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai

GOING GLOBAL 2018 SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL

Educational Leadership and Administration

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Examples of Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Innovation in Education and Research

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Integral Teaching Fellowship Application Packet Spring 2018

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Using research in your school and your teaching Research-engaged professional practice TPLF06

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

SCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

EQuIP Review Feedback

SGS ROADMAP

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Senior Project Information

Co-teaching in the ESL Classroom

Fundamental Elements of Venezuela s El Sistema Which Inform and Guide El Sistema-inspired Programs in the USA

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Aurora College Annual Report

lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Supplemental Focus Guide

Transcription:

Faculty Empowering Faculty: A Guide to Partnering with the CFI Center for Faculty Innovation Msc 4603 cfi@jmu.edu (540)568-4846 Fall 2017

THE CENTER FOR FACULTY INNOVATION The Center for Faculty Innovation blends holistic faculty development with a vision of impacting faculty at various levels and career milestones. CFI programs address all areas of faculty life teaching, scholarship, and career planning by promoting innovations and thoughtful interactions that enhance and improve the JMU academic experience. CFI programs reflect scholarly, evidence-informed practices through a variety of programming genres from workshops to faculty interest groups to semester-long fellowships. CFI MISSION We are a community of faculty and educational developers collaborating to create opportunities for professional growth and innovation. CFI VISION The CFI will cultivate inclusive communities of peers committed to helping each other succeed, advancing individual and organizational change. CFI VALUES The CFI values collaboration, innovation, strategic planning, integration, inclusiveness, scholarly approaches, and responsiveness.

CFI PARTNERS The Center for Faculty Innovation has incrementally built sustainable, mutually enhancing relationships across campus in the form of collaborative partnerships and co-sponsorships. CFI s commitment to faculty empowering faculty includes investing in current and new campus relationships using a model of authentic partnership; this means that the CFI works with partners to build a shared programming vision, develop high impact program designs, create reliable assessment strategies, and follow evidence-based faculty development models. Partners share in planning, decision-making, and the pursuit of mutually agreed-upon outcomes. The CFI trusts that a model of adaptive learning, collaborative problem solving, and common vision will strengthen and broaden professional development opportunities for JMU faculty. This model also poises the CFI and partners to make informed, scholarly contributions to the global dialogue on the changing role of the professoriate in higher education. AUTHENTIC PARTNERSHIP PROCESS The authentic partnership process involves an iterative planning cycle in which the CFI works with departments, organizations, and facilitators to (1) define program outcomes, (2) select the appropriate programming genre (e.g., workshop, roundtable, etc.), (3) manage program logistics, (4) discuss ways to enhance the success of the program, and (5) develop a plan to evaluate the impact of the program (Figure 1). Results will be used to enhance future program offerings, refine program outcomes, and/or be disseminated through scholarly venues or institutional reports. Program Impact Program Enhancements Programming Areas and Outcomes Program Logistics Programming Genres Figure 1: Authentic Partnership Process GETTING STARTED Early planning of programs is essential. In most cases, it is ideal to contact the CFI one semester prior to the desired program date to begin the planning cycle. Typically, the CFI plans fall programs during the summer, spring programs during the fall, and summer programs during the spring. Planning deadlines and schedules will be available for the larger events that the CFI coordinates (e.g. January Symposium, May Symposium, and New Faculty Orientation) to ensure that there is sufficient time to complete the planning cycle prior to the event. Prospective partners may contact the CFI at cfi@jmu.edu to submit programming ideas.

PROGRAMMING AREAS AND OUTCOMES CFI programs strive to impact faculty by offering experiences that enhance academic culture and promote excellence in teaching, scholarship, and career planning. In addition to creating specific outcomes for your program, you will work with your CFI liaison to align your program with one or more of the programming area outcomes listed below. PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING Faculty will make progress toward: Appreciating pedagogy - the art and science of teaching and learning - as a significant higher education endeavor; Identifying factors that influence pedagogical choices; Creating assignments and/or course or curricula that align learning objectives, assessment, and learning activities; Designing and offering courses or curricula that align learning objectives, assessment, and learning activities; Articulating how current pedagogical choices reflect disciplinary norms; Practicing the integration of scholarship with teaching and other career aspirations; and Integrating knowledge of student development models in teaching philosophies and practice. PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN SCHOLARSHIP Faculty will make progress toward: Appreciating diverse forms, purposes, and communication modes of scholarship in higher education; Enhancing scholarly productivity; Forming collaborative research projects with students, faculty, and staff at JMU and other institutions; Advancing scholarly skills and output; Exploring and securing funding opportunities to support scholarly activities; and Practicing the integration of scholarship with teaching and other career aspirations.

PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN CAREER PLANNING Faculty will make progress toward: Appreciating the place and purpose of comprehensive career planning in academic careers; Creating a comprehensive career plan with meaningful, measurable goals for professional advancement; Identifying and implementing effective strategies for career advancement; Achieving self-defined career milestones; Applying best practices of performance documentation to career advancement; Developing and fostering productive mentoring and networking relationships; and Identifying strategies to maintain balance in work-life continuum. ENHANCING ACADEMIC CULTURE Faculty will make progress toward: Feeling an increased sense of belonging to the JMU community; Enhancing diversity and inclusivity through teaching, scholarship, and career development; Engaging in reflective practices about their faculty roles; Establishing and strengthening relationships with colleagues across disciplines, colleges, and ranks that support teaching, scholarship, and/or career development; and Developing holistic, integrated, and satisfying agendas in teaching, scholarship, and career development that align with the values of academic units and discipline(s). PROGRAMMING GENRES The Center for Faculty Innovation offers a variety of program types that may be adapted for unique programming ideas or themes. The following list describes the most common CFI programming genres. The CFI can offer suggestions and ideas for additional programming genres. WORKSHOPS offer faculty introductory experiences to new pedagogies, scholarly experiences, or foundational components of comprehensive career planning. Faculty or visiting scholars facilitate workshops and offer opportunities to apply new ideas to academic endeavors. When participating in a workshop, faculty will Experience pedagogy appropriate to the workshop content; and Have the opportunity to actively apply the session content. ROUNDTABLES build insight and community around topics of mutual interest by offering facilitated inquiry into a timely issue or dynamic that cuts across the spectrum of teaching, scholarship, and career planning. Knowledgeable facilitators provide short, informative presentations followed by interactive dialogue with participants about material presented. When participating in a roundtable, faculty will Experience an organized overview of the topic; Engage in informed, reflective dialogue with facilitators and participants; and Share perspectives with colleagues.

PROGRAMMING GENRES CONTINUED SCHOLARLY TALKS feature faculty from JMU and other universities that engage colleagues in academically informed inquiry and the creation of a vibrant community. These talks focus on diverse aspects of faculty life and create opportunities for faculty to connect with others. When attending a scholarly talk, faculty will... Experience an organized presentation. LOCKDOWNS encourage faculty to dive into projects with concentrated time and effort. When participating in a lockdown, faculty will Experience a focused work environment; Interact with consultants, as necessary; and Explore future consultation opportunities. INSTITUTES provide faculty with extended, immersive experiences pertaining to teaching, scholarship, or career planning. Institutes range from half-day options to multi-day events, allowing for more opportunities for engagement and disciplined inquiry. Institutes are facilitated by faculty mentors and consultants with expertise in teaching, scholarship, or career planning. When participating in an institute, faculty will Experience pedagogy appropriate to the institute content; and Have the opportunity to actively apply the session content. FLASHPOINTS are faculty-generated public forums aimed at spotlighting global and local events significant to our human and planetary experience. Flashpoints begin with a panel of faculty from different disciplines answering questions posed by a moderator. The forum then opens to the audience for an interactive dialogue. When attending a flashpoint, faculty will Experience organized, moderated discussion with topic experts; and Engage in informed, reflective dialogue with facilitators and community members.

PROGRAMMING GENRES CONTINUED FACULTY COMMUNITIES encompass a range of configurations and styles of faculty engagement in which faculty empower faculty in extended dialogue, inquiry, and discovery around a topic of common concern, interest, or relevance. Faculty communities most commonly take the form of faculty interest groups, fellowships, or reading groups. When participating in a faculty community, faculty will Form meaningful connections with colleagues; Have the opportunity to explore a topic of common concern, interest, or relevance; Have the opportunity to apply what is learned to teaching, scholarship, or career planning. o o Faculty Interest Groups create an informal forum for learning and dialogue related to topics proposed by faculty. FIGs are faculty-driven and provide opportunities for the formation of cross-disciplinary connections related to a topic(s) of mutual interest. Madison Fellowships provide an opportunity for faculty to focus on a sustained inquiry and exchange around a timely issue, trend, or topic related to teaching, scholarship, or career planning. Fellowships are small self-directed, self-facilitated groups. o Reading Groups bring faculty from multiple disciplines together to discuss articles, books, or other written resources related to higher education. The materials are selected by either the faculty group or the CFI, as connected to broader trends or initiatives. PROGRAM LOGISTICS The CFI's operations team manages most of the logistics for the successful launch, execution, and assessment of programs. In collaboration with partners, the CFI may help handle registration, reserve rooms, order catering, and send program reminders. Typically, the CFI team will advertise programs on the CFI website, publish information to the CFI s weekly digest, and post information on the CFI s social media accounts. The team will partner with you to market your event to the campus community. PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT An important component of program implementation is enhancement: focusing on ways to help participants achieve the program, area, and/or genre outcomes. As needed, a CFI faculty member can guide this discussion, highlighting relevant scholarly literature, survey results, or other resources to ensure programmatic success. Skilled in effective faculty development practices, CFI faculty can help infuse ideas and strategies into program design that align with the partnering organization, program outcomes, the programming genre, and participant needs.

PROGRAM IMPACT Mixed methods assessment practices are often utilized to evaluate program impact, assess faculty learning outcomes, and contribute to the scholarship of educational development. For most genres, the CFI will deploy a survey after the event to measure the process and indicated outcomes; however, not all genres are conducive to such surveying. CFI faculty, in concert with the CFI Assessment Coordinator, can help partners to explore additional methods to measure program impact. Some of these assessment strategies may involve the submission of a proposal to the JMU Institutional Review Board (IRB). Ultimately, the CFI wants to promote scholarly reflection regarding the impact of faculty development at JMU, ensuring that our authentic partners participate in this process. CFI PROFESSIONALS CFI Faculty (One executive director and three assistant directors) perform much of the planning for CFI initiatives while maintaining roles as instructional faculty in their affiliated academic units. CFI faculty teach two courses per year and maintain scholarly agendas in their disciplinary areas of expertise and/or in the scholarship of educational development. CFI Faculty Associates (10-12 per semester) are JMU faculty who have reassigned their time to work with the CFI. Faculty Associates provide a critical linkage between the CFI and their respective academic disciplines, colleges, and units. CFI Operations is a team of professional staff and student members who manage the logistics and execution of programming (room reservations, event registration, catering), collect assessment data, and coordinate budget initiatives for the CFI. CFI Faculty Facilitators and Consultants are campus experts in various aspects of academic life. The broad and talented facilitator pool supports the mutual-benefit model of faculty development and allows the CFI to address a variety of faculty needs.