Project ALERT. SAMHSA Model Programs

Similar documents
Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention programs and strategies with the greatest evidence of success

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation


Executive Summary. Abraxas Naperville Bridge. Eileen Roberts, Program Manager th St Woodridge, IL

The whole school approach and pastoral care

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Planning Theory-Based and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Interventions. An Intervention Mapping Approach

Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Principal vacancies and appointments

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Process Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

African American Male Achievement Update

Promoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children. Facilitator s Guide. Administration for Children & Families

Multi Method Approaches to Monitoring Data Quality

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Communities in Schools of Virginia

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Public Policy Agenda for Children

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Travis Park, Assoc Prof, Cornell University Donna Pearson, Assoc Prof, University of Louisville. NACTEI National Conference Portland, OR May 16, 2012

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

This document contains materials are intended as resources for the

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

A Lesson Study Project: Connecting Theory and Practice Through the Development of an Exemplar Video for Algebra I Teachers and Students

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

46 Children s Defense Fund

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Appendix. Journal Title Times Peer Review Qualitative Referenced Authority* Quantitative Studies

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Introduction to the HFLE course

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

PREVIEW LEADER S GUIDE IT S ABOUT RESPECT CONTENTS. Recognizing Harassment in a Diverse Workplace

Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) and Global School Health Policy and Practices Survey (SHPPS): GSHS

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

c o l l e g e o f Educ ation

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Constant Contact Survey Results

Executive Summary. Sidney Lanier Senior High School

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology

NCAA DRUG-TESTING PROGRAM

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Intro to Systematic Reviews. Characteristics Role in research & EBP Overview of steps Standards

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Trauma Informed Child-Parent Psychotherapy (TI-CPP) Application Guidance for

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Summary / Response. Karl Smith, Accelerations Educational Software. Page 1 of 8

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Every student absence jeopardizes the ability of students to succeed at school and schools to

Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Educational Resources. National Council or Teachers of English NCTE and Conference of English Leadership CEL

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

Keeping our Academics on the Cutting Edge: The Academic Outreach Program at the University of Wollongong Library

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary

Office Location: LOCATION: BS 217 COURSE REFERENCE NUMBER: 93000

We endorse the aims and objectives of the primary curriculum for SPHE: To promote the personal development and well-being of the child

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Clark Lane Middle School

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Transcription:

SAMHSA Model Programs Project ALERT Brief Description Recognition Program IOM Intervention Type Content Focus Protective Factors Risk Factors Interventions by Domain Key Program Approaches Outcomes Evaluation Design Delivery Specifications Intended Setting Fidelity Barriers and Problems Personnel Education Personnel Training Cost Intended Age Group Intended Population Gender Focus Replication Information Contact Information Program developers or their agents provided the Model Program information below. BRIEF DESCRIPTION Project ALERT is a 2-year drug prevention curriculum for middle school students, 11 to 14 years old, focusing on the substances that adolescents are most likely to use: alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and inhalants. It seeks to motivate adolescents against drug use, teach adolescents the skills and strategies needed to resist prodrug pressures, and establish nondrug-using norms. Program Background: In the early 1980s, the RAND Corporation, an internationally recognized nonprofit institution established to improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis, assessed the effectiveness of three major strategies for curtailing adolescent drug use: prevention, law enforcement, and treatment. Based on that study s conclusions, the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation funded RAND to develop and test Project ALERT between 1983 and 1993. National dissemination of the program, underwritten by the Hilton Foundation, began in 1991. Project ALERT has a presence in all 50 States. More than 18,000 teachers in approximately 3,500 school districts use Project ALERT in their classrooms. RAND is now developing and testing an enhanced version of Project ALERT that is designed for high schools. RECOGNITION Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Model Program U.S. Department of Education: Exemplary Program White House Office of National Drug Control Policy: Exemplary Program National Prevention Network: Exemplary Program

National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors: Exemplary Program Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America: Exemplary Program National Middle School Association: Endorsement INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE CLASSIFICATION (IOM) UNIVERSAL, SELECTIVE Developed for high- and low-risk adolescents from a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds. INTERVENTION TYPE SCHOOL-BASED CONTENT FOCUS ALCOHOL, ILLEGAL DRUGS, TOBACCO This program focuses primarily on alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana; it also includes materials on inhalants, cocaine, and other illegal drugs. PROTECTIVE FACTORS INDIVIDUAL, FAMILY, PEER, SCHOOL INDIVIDUAL Reasons not to use drugs Perceptions that few peers use, most disapprove Belief that one can resist prodrug pressures Intentions not to use Belief that friends respect nonusers Ability to identify and counter advertising appeals Multiple strategies for resisting drugs Ability to identify and resist internal pressures to use FAMILY Communication with parents and other adults PEER Motivation and skills to help friends avoid drug use Responsible behavior modeled by peers 2

SCHOOL Establishment of norms against drug use Cooperative learning Respect for others RISK FACTORS INDIVIDUAL, FAMILY, PEER, SCHOOL INDIVIDUAL Current use of alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs Intention to use in the future Belief that drug use is not harmful or has positive effects Belief that drug use is normal Low self-esteem Inadequate resistance skills FAMILY Lack of clear norms against use Poor communication PEER Peer drug use Peer approval of drugs SCHOOL High levels of drug use Low norms against use INTERVENTIONS BY DOMAIN INDIVIDUAL, FAMILY, PEER, SCHOOL, COMMUNITY INDIVIDUAL Education to build motivation and skills for avoiding drug use FAMILY Task-oriented family education sessions to improve family interactions (e.g., parent involvement in program homework assignments, etc.) PEER Peer-resistance education 3

SCHOOL Classroom drug education Classroom-based skills development COMMUNITY Education to alter perceptions of societal norms and expectations KEY PROGRAM APPROACHES IN-SCHOOL CURRICULA, PARENT-CHILD INTERACTIONS IN-SCHOOL CURRICULA The curriculum consists of weekly lessons that involve guided classroom discussions and small group activities that stimulate peer interaction and challenge student beliefs and perceptions; intensive role-playing activities to help students learn resistance skills. PARENT-CHILD INTERACTIONS Parents are involved through homework assignments that involve parents in the learning process by facilitating parent-child discussions of drugs and how to resist using them. HOW IT WORKS Trained teachers typically deliver Project ALERT in a classroom setting, but some districts have adapted it for use in after-school settings where trained personnel are available. Implementing Project ALERT involves staff in the following activities: Participating in a 1-day training workshop Teaching 11 core lessons during the first year and 3 booster lessons the following year Promoting parent involvement through home learning opportunities To deliver lessons effectively, teachers need to establish an open, supportive classroom environment, facilitate student participation, reinforce good performance, help students acquire the confidence that they really can resist prodrug pressures, and respond appropriately to student questions about drugs. Project ALERT lessons should be taught 1 week apart over the course of 11 weeks for Year 1 and 3 weeks for Year 2. Teachers need to participate in a 1-day training workshop where they learn the rationale and theory underlying Project ALERT, the skills needed to deliver the lessons, and implementation guidelines for achieving program fidelity. The location and dates of upcoming training workshops are listed on the program s Web site, www.projectalert.best.org. Technical assistance is provided through an online faculty advisor, toll-free telephone support, and newsletters. A fidelity instrument is available to monitor implementation quality. 4

OUTCOMES DECREASES IN SUBSTANCE USE, OTHER TYPES OF OUTCOMES The program achieved the following, relative to control group, 15 months after baseline. DECREASES IN SUBSTANCE USE 30% decrease in marijuana initiation rates. 60% decrease in current marijuana use in adult-led programs. 20% to 25% decrease in current and occasional cigarette use among baseline experimenters. 33% to 55% decrease in regular and heavy cigarette use among baseline experimenters. OTHER TYPES OF OUTCOMES Significant enhancement of antidrug beliefs, with many effects persisting into 10th grade. Project ALERT helps adolescents Understand the consequences of using drugs Develop reasons not to use Understand the benefits of being drug-free Recognize that most people do not use drugs Identify and counter prodrug pressures Resist advertising appeals Support others in their decisions not to use Learn how to quit Communicate with parents Recognize alternatives to substance use EVALUATION DESIGN Project ALERT used a rigorous pre-post design with random assignment of 30 schools to one control and two treatment conditions (i.e., an adult teacher group and an adult teacher plus teen leader group). The participating schools had diverse student bodies. Nine schools had a minority population of 50 percent or more. Trained data collectors administered student surveys in all schools before and after program lessons. Self-reported drug use was validated by testing saliva samples collected from students and by consistency analyses over time. Logistic regression was used to analyze substance use outcomes as a function of treatment and baseline covariates. Multiple controls helped rule out alternative explanations of treatment effects. All analyses were adjusted for attrition and clustering of students within schools. 5

DELIVERY SPECIFICATIONS 1 3 YEARS Amount of time required to deliver the program to obtain documented outcomes: There are 11 core lessons in year one, taught 1 week apart over 11 weeks, and 3 booster lessons in year two, taught over 3 weeks. The lessons are 45 minutes long. Project ALERT is ideally implemented as part of a middle grade health education or science curriculum. INTENDED SETTING RURAL, URBAN, SUBURBAN Developed for use in rural, urban, and suburban target settings. FIDELITY Components that must be included in order to achieve the same outcomes cited by the developer: Lessons should be taught at the recommended intervals, over years one and two. Teachers must participate in a 1-day training workshop. Home learning opportunities must be completed. BARRIERS AND PROBLEMS Rapid turnover of teaching staff within school districts and the need to provide annual training for new staff have been addressed through the availability of an online training option. PERSONNEL FULL TIME, PART TIME Teachers trained in the Project ALERT curriculum implement the program. EDUCATION UNDERGRADUATE Teachers with a minimum undergraduate degree trained in the Project ALERT curriculum. 6

PERSONNEL TRAINING Location: ON SITE (user) Teachers must participate in a 1-day training workshop where they learn the rationale and theory, skills needed to deliver the lessons, and implementation guidelines for achieving program fidelity. Workshops can be held at the district level when 20 or more teachers are interested. Regional workshops are available to accommodate districts training fewer teachers. COST (estimated in U.S. dollars) $1,001 5,000 Cost considerations for implementing this program as recommended by the developer: Training costs, classroom equipped with a TV and VCR, chalkboard, newsprint, felt-tip pens, and masking tape. Overhead projector and screen are optional. Capacity to photocopy a limited number of student handouts is necessary. TRAINING COSTS The Project ALERT package is priced at $150 per teacher. The package provides access to prescheduled training workshops and/or online training. It includes all necessary curriculum materials and a variety of complimentary support services. AVAILABLE PRODUCTS All teachers receive the following resources with the training: Teacher s guide with 11 lesson plans for year one and 3 booster lesson plans for year two 8 interactive student videos 12 full-color classroom posters Also included free of charge are periodic updates to the video and print materials, as well as technical assistance through an online faculty advisor, toll-free phone support, and newsletters. An optional overview video for colleagues and community members is available, along with videos demonstrating key activities and teaching strategies. INTENDED AGE GROUP CHILDHOOD (5 11), EARLY ADOLESCENT (12 14) Developed for use in middle school with children 11 to 14 years old. INTENDED POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN, HISPANIC/LATINO, ASIAN AMERICAN, AMERICAN INDIAN, WHITE This program has been delivered to diverse populations, including high- and low-risk White, African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian American, and American Indian youth. 7

GENDER FOCUS BOTH GENDERS Developed for use with both male and female students. REPLICATION AND ADAPTATION INFORMATION With funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, RAND is currently testing a modified version of Project ALERT in over 50 South Dakota schools. Approximately 12 percent of more than 4,000 middle school participants are American Indian. The middle school curriculum has been expanded to include new parent/child home learning opportunities and additional lessons on alcohol misuse and smoking cessation. To test whether high school boosters will prolong program effects, RAND also developed ALERT Plus, with five lessons each for grades nine and ten. CONTACT INFORMATION Phyllis L. Ellickson RAND 1700 Main Street Post Office Box 2138 Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 TARGET SETTINGS Urban, suburban, and rural, including multiple small towns INTERVENTION SITES Over 50 middle schools and their feeder high schools across the State of South Dakota PERSONNEL CAPACITY AND TRAINING Same as above RACIAL / ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF PARTICIPANTS White and American Indian COST ESTIMATES Same as above OTHER DIFFERENCES Middle school program: New lessons on alcohol misuse and smoking cessation; new parent/child home learning opportunities. High school program: Five additional lessons each for grades nine and ten. 8

ADAPTATIONS OF THE MODEL PROGRAM GENERAL SUMMARY A NIDA-funded study currently is being conducted by Penn State to test an alternative model for delivering Project ALERT in schools. The model is named EXSELS, which stands for Extension and Schools Enhancing Life Skills. Cooperative Extension school collaborations have been developed in eight Pennsylvania counties to implement and evaluate Project ALERT. Community program leaders are hired and supervised through Cooperative Extension to teach the curriculum. Program leaders teach half of the classrooms alone and half with the assistance of teen leaders from the local high school. If Project ALERT can be effectively implemented by community program leaders through Cooperative Extension, potential benefits are that: (1) adoption and implementation fidelity may be increased in some schools since often-overburdened teachers are relieved of the responsibility of teaching the curriculum; and (2) the model could be disseminated across the United States because every county has a Cooperative Extension office affiliated with the State s land grant university. CONTACT INFORMATION Principal investigator of the study is Tena St. Pierre, Ph.D., at the Pennsylvania State University. 325 Agricultural Administration Building Penn State University University Park, PA 16802 Phone: (814) 865-0399 Fax: (814) 863-4753 IOM CLASSIFICATION Universal TARGET SETTING Rural, urban, and suburban DELIVERY LOCATIONS Eight Pennsylvania middle schools TARGET AGE Middle school children in seventh and eighth grade GENDER Males and females PROGRAM FOCUS Tobacco, alcohol, inhalants, and marijuana RACIAL/ETHNIC COMPOSITION High- and low-risk White and African American youth 9

PARENT INVOLVEMENT Same as above KEY OUTCOMES Study in progress; no outcomes are yet available. KEY PROGRAM STRATEGIES Same as teacher-led Project ALERT FIDELITY Unavailable at this time DELIVERY SPECIFICATIONS The 11 core lessons are delivered in seventh grade, one per week over 11 weeks. Three booster lessons are delivered in eighth grade, taught over 6 weeks, one every other week. Lessons are part of middle school life sciences, health, or physical education classes. PERSONNEL CAPACITY Qualified community program leaders hired through Cooperative Extension are trained in the Project ALERT curriculum. Program leaders have a demonstrated ability to work with youth. PERSONNEL TRAINING Same as above COST ESTIMATES Curriculum cost same as above. Additional cost for program leader teaching six classrooms = approximately $1,750 for 11 core lessons and $650 for 3 booster lessons. BARRIERS/PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS Unavailable at this time CONTACT INFORMATION ABOUT THE DEVELOPER Phyllis Ellickson, Ph.D., and colleagues at RAND developed Project ALERT with funding from the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation. The program has its own dissemination organization established by the Hilton Foundation to train teachers in effective implementation of the program, provide technical assistance, and periodically update classroom materials. FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT Project ALERT 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 970 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (800) 253-7810 Fax: (213) 623-9585 E-mail: info@projectalert.best.org Web site: http://www.projectalert.com 10