QM s Internal Continuous Improvement Process. Presenters: Brenda Boyd, Cecelia Green

Similar documents
Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

46 Children s Defense Fund

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

Housekeeping. Questions

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

CLE/MCLE Information by State

NASWA SURVEY ON PELL GRANTS AND APPROVED TRAINING FOR UI SUMMARY AND STATE-BY-STATE RESULTS

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

The following tables contain data that are derived mainly

Set t i n g Sa i l on a N e w Cou rse

Understanding University Funding

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

Fisk University FACT BOOK. Office of Institutional Assessment and Research

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

LEWIS M. SIMES AS TEACHER Bertel M. Sparks*

Proficiency Illusion

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

NBCC NEWSNOTES. Guidelines for the New. World of WebCounseling. Been There, Done That: Multicultural Training Can. Always be productively revisted

Teaching Colorado s Heritage with Digital Sources Case Overview

OSU Access Week at Puebla, Mexico

top of report Note: Survey result percentages are always out of the total number of people who participated in the survey.

ObamaCare Expansion Enrollment is Shattering Projections

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

The Honorable John D. Tinder, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7 th Circuit (retired) Clerk

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Imagine this: Sylvia and Steve are seventh-graders

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

CC Baccalaureate. Kevin Ballinger Dean Consumer & Health Sciences. Joe Poshek Dean Visual & Performing Arts/Library

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

Use of CIM in AEP Enterprise Architecture. Randy Lowe Director, Enterprise Architecture October 24, 2012

ATTRIBUTES OF EFFECTIVE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

Please find below a summary of why we feel Blackboard remains the best long term solution for the Lowell campus:

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Brian Isetts University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Anthony W. Olson PharmD University of Minnesota, Twin Cities,

The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology Nicholas C. Kawa (co-authors: Chris McCarty, José A. Clavijo Michelangeli, and Jessica Clark)

Beyond Educational Tourism: Lessons Learned While Student Teaching Abroad

EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES A peer-reviewed scholarly journal

National FFA Collegiate Scholarships Catalog

2014 Journalism Graduate Skills for the Professional Workplace: Expectations from Journalism Professionals and Educators

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

2017 Police Field Guide

Synchronous Blended Learning Best Practices

The Implementation of a Consecutive Giving Recognition Program at the University of Florida

Blended Learning Module Design Template

Our Hazardous Environment

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

Susanna M Donaldson Curriculum Vitae

Prairie View A&M University Houston, TX P.O. Box 519; MS 2220; Hilliard Hall (281)

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

Produced by the Feminist Majority Foundation s Campus Leadership Program East Coast: 1600 Wilson Blvd Suite 801, Arlington, VA

Integrating Blended Learning into the Classroom

AC : DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRAS- TRUCTURE COURSE

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

Aclara is committed to improving your TWACS technical training experience as well as allowing you to be safe, efficient, and successful.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Science Studies Weekly 5th Grade

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Albert (Yan) Wang. Flow-induced Trading Pressure and Corporate Investment (with Xiaoxia Lou), Forthcoming at

Ready Common Core Ccls Answer Key

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Draft Preliminary Master Plan April 18, 2012

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

Ken Cyree, Ph.D. Dean of the Business School Frank R. Day/Mississippi Bankers Association Chair Professor of Finance

Transcription:

QM s Internal Continuous Improvement Process Presenters: Brenda Boyd, Cecelia Green

Introductions & Overview Cecelia Green Professional Development Manager Brenda Boyd Director of Professional Development & Consulting Upon completion of this session, you ll be able to: Describe the triggers that lead to change Explain QM s internal approach to continuous quality improvement Describe the process undertaken to update the flagship workshop

QM: A National Standard WASHINGTON MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MAINE OREGON IDAHO WYOMING SOUTH DAKOTA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN NEW YORK VT NH RI CONN MASS NEVADA UTAH COLORADO NEBRASKA IOWA ILLINOIS INDIANA OHIO WV PENN NEW JERSEY DELAWARE MARYLAND CALIFORNIA ARIZONA NEW MEXICO KANSAS OKLAHOMA MISSOURI ARKANSAS KENTUCKY TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MISS ALABAMA GEORGIA TEXAS LOUISIANA FLORIDA PUERTO RICO Current Subscribers Consortium Subscribers VIRGIN ISLANDS ALASKA Statewide Subscribers HAWAII

3 QM Program Components QM Rubric QM Process QM Professional Development

Continuous Improvement

QM Key Idea QM is about continuous improvement, not perfection!

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement Course Revisions QM Delivery Feedback

Drivers of Change New Rubric Every 3 years Professional development Driven by changes to the Rubric Learning Management System (LMS) Feedback from facilitators Participant evaluations Issues in QM formal reviews

Role of QM Rubric Begins with learning objectives (standards 2.1 and 2.2) selecting measurable, precise verbs Importance of Alignment Six specific review standards: 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1 and 6.1 Use Alignment tables to ensure alignment Consider all standards Changes to the Rubric initiate a review of all workshops and course; appropriate updates discussed and implemented

Moodle QM Classroom (Moodle LMS) Capabilities drive upgrades Upgrades mean planned outages Update all workshops & courses Benefits Can be a learning opportunity (and a chance to experience what online students experience) QM created and provides technical support

Meeting Subscriber Needs QM Live! Web conferencing workshops Feedback from participants busy schedules Save time Individualize specific standards Scalable and sustainable More interaction and engagement Can reach more participants Teaching Online Requested by community Trusted partner in COAT

Meeting QM Community Needs Master Reviewer Recertification Annual Recertification Role of MR Course Reviews Recommendations Competencies Peer Reviewer Recertification (to come) Identification of PR Competencies Trigger: 2014-16 Rubric Release

QM Professional Development

Professional Development Team Director Instructional Designer Instructional Designer (Search Open) Instructional Technologist Registrar Consultant

PD by the Numbers QM has facilitated workshops and courses for over 23,000+ faculty, administrators and instructional design staff Workshops Offered: 16 Certification Courses Offered: 4 (PRC, MRC, OFC, FFC)

QM Professional Development Focus Faculty Development Workshops Prepare faculty to design and improve courses QM Certifications (for Implementation) Prepare faculty and staff to hold QM roles Delivery Options Online virtual, asynchronous Onsite face-to-face, synchronous Web Conferencing virtual, synchronous

Faculty Development Workshops Course Design Workshops Applying the QM Rubric* Designing Your Online Course Improve Your Online Course Designing Your Blended Course Delivery Workshop Teaching Online: An Introduction to Online Delivery *Note: Applying the QM Rubric is the prerequisite for all certifications (for implementation) Focused Improvement Workshops Design that Welcomes Your Students Create Measurable Learning Objectives Choose and Use Media Effectively Addressing Accessibility Alignment Workshops Investigate Learning Objectives and Assessments Link Instructional Materials and Learner Engagement

QM Certification Courses Prerequisite for Certifications: Applying the QM Rubric (APPQMR) Certifications: Peer Reviewer Course* Master Reviewer Certification* Certified Facilitator* FFC: For face-to-face delivery of APPQMR OFC: For online delivery of APPQMR (* - Offered online only)

Determining Success Distinguish Workshops and Certifications How do we determine if participants are successful? Workshops Similar to f2f experience Participation Completion of required assignments, discussions, quizzes Certifications Scores on quizzes and assignments Quality of feedback in forums and assignments (use of Rubric) Written assessments Facilitator discretion

New Demo Courses

Search For New Demo Courses Triggers: Current demo course had been used for 9 years and had not been updated in 4 years; didn t feel current Feedback from participants and facilitators Time for a change! Perspective: QM tried at least 3 times to identify new demo courses, but not successful until 2013.

Goals for New Demo Courses New courses that are less familiar to participants Present new challenges for reviewers Reflect more current technologies Share the review and recommendations as instructional materials

New Demo Course Characteristics Course discipline is likely to be easily understood by most reviewers. Course has measurable course- and module-level objectives. Course appears to use a range of tools and media. Course does not appear to be perfect and is likely to benefit from the feedback provided by a QM review.

Timeline For Demo Courses Selection Period Sept 2012 Dec 2012 Jan 2013 Feb 2013 Mar 2013 May June May June Activity Call for Courses from QM subscribers 30+ course applications received Final Five Courses selected Reviews of five final courses begin Revision of PRC and APP begin Final Review Reports submitted Demo course revisions begin Re-certifications for all APP Facilitators Pilot PRC and APP Pilot FFC and OFC

Review Outcomes 1 met standards on first review and received all points 4 courses met standards upon amendment Review Outcomes determined selection based on Workshop & Course Objectives QM was able to use 4 out of 5 reviewed courses

Impact of New Demo Courses

Impact on QM Workshops & Courses Become thoroughly familiar with new demo courses Revise course materials for Applying the QM Rubric (APPQMR) Peer Reviewer Course (PRC) Online Facilitator Recertification (OFC) Face-to-Face Facilitator Certification (FFC) Master Reviewer Certification (MRC) Design that Welcomes Your Students (St 1/7) Design Your Online Course (DYOC)

APP Redesign APPQMR = QM s Flagship Workshop Incremental revisions Complete overhaul triggered by: Rubric change New demo course Includes Design and development Pilot Facilitator Recertifications

Goals for Revised APP Workshop APP still a workshop More engaging and consistent Same learning outcomes for both modes Make APP activities more interesting/varied? Fewer online forums Expand online activities New, more F2F activities Increased personal accountability F2F

Focus of APP Revision Explaining what the rubric is and how to apply it Alignment Making evidence-based decisions Writing helpful recommendations Key ideas and skills rather than specific standards Integration & holistic approach

Impact on Facilitation Developed and Mandated Re-certification courses for Certified Facilitators 250 Online 300 F2F QM Facilitators Rigorous & Demanding Recertification Value of Certification Continuous Improvement

Foster Incremental Change QM appreciates and acts on feedback from Workshop participants Facilitators Changes occur incrementally QM mantra: QM is about continuous improvement, not perfection!

The Future

Badges Potential visual way of demonstrating competency Competencies Community Contributions Stackable Badges Implications for roles? Reviews?

Workshop Review Review QM workshops and courses using the Continuing and Professional Education (CPE) Rubric

PD Challenges QM Rubric 2014 2016 will be released next year Focus on incremental changes to QM workshops and certification courses May necessitate more global revisions Setting subscriber expectations Continuing integration of new demo courses and review reports into QM courses Improving Moodle functionality and support

Evaluation Please complete the session evaluation.

Thanks to YOU Quality Matters! More Information at: www.qualitymatters.org