A Guide for Examinees. about the G-TELP

Similar documents
Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

SETTING STANDARDS FOR CRITERION- REFERENCED MEASUREMENT

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Language Acquisition Chart

Lower and Upper Secondary

NCEO Technical Report 27

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Developing a College-level Speed and Accuracy Test

What does Quality Look Like?

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report

Guide for Test Takers with Disabilities

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Intensive English Program Southwest College

Sample Performance Assessment

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

ELS LanguagE CEntrES CurriCuLum OvErviEw & PEDagOgiCaL PhiLOSOPhy

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Russian 0015: Russian for Heritage Learners 2 MoWe 3:00PM - 4:15PM G13 CL

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

TESL/TESOL DIPLOMA PROGRAMS VIA TESL/TESOL Diploma Programs are recognized by TESL CANADA

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, INTERMEDIATE LEVEL

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Running head: LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF UNIVERSITY REGISTERS 1

Review of Student Assessment Data

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Why OUT-OF-LEVEL Testing? 2017 CTY Johns Hopkins University

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Intensive Writing Class

Top Ten: Transitioning English Language Arts Assessments

Computerized Adaptive Psychological Testing A Personalisation Perspective

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

South Carolina English Language Arts

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Fisk Street Primary School

Special Edition. Starter Teacher s Pack. Adrian Doff, Sabina Ostrowska & Johanna Stirling With Rachel Thake, Cathy Brabben & Mark Lloyd

CERTIFICATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CONTINUING EDUCATION. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group:

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014

Introduction. on the New HSK Test

University of New Orleans

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Florida Reading for College Success

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Preparing for Permanent Residency and Citizenship

Making Sales Calls. Watertown High School, Watertown, Massachusetts. 1 hour, 4 5 days per week

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

21st Century Community Learning Center

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Jazz Dance. Module Descriptor.

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Technical Skills for Journalism

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Further, Robert W. Lissitz, University of Maryland Huynh Huynh, University of South Carolina ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS

prehending general textbooks, but are unable to compensate these problems on the micro level in comprehending mathematical texts.

World Languages Unpacked Content for Classical Language Programs What is the purpose of this document?

EQuIP Review Feedback

Transcription:

A Guide for Examinees about the G-TELP

A Guide for Examinees about the G-TELP The General Test of English Language Proficiency (G-TELP) Level Test consists of a battery of objective tests which assess the English language proficiency of young adults and adults (aged 16 and older) on five different levels of functional ability. The level ranges from Level One (highest level) to Level Five (lowest level). The G-TELP Level Test assesses English language proficiency in the following skill areas: grammar, listening, reading and vocabulary. (Grammar section is not included at Level One.) Features of G-TELP Test The G-TELP is criterion-referenced, whereas other commonly-used tests are norm-referenced. G-TELP proficiency assessments are made according to universally recognized criteria that describe the ability of the examinee in the performance of specific language tasks. In contrast, norm-referenced tests compare the examinee s test scores with those of other examinees. Those scores serve as general indicators of language proficiency relative to that of other test-takers, but provide no objective, diagnostic information. The G-TELP tests provide detailed, task-referenced information on the examinee s performance, contained in a profile report that is formative rather than summative. This diagnostic report indicates what individuals can do with the English language, thus making it possible to better ascertain performance levels of competence, as well as strengths and weaknesses. This information is invaluable for decision-makers in the industry and for educational purposes. G-TELP Levels 1 to 5 closely approximates a measure of communicative competence in grammar, listening comprehension, reading comprehension, and vocabulary, because they utilize real-world, authentic tasks, situations, and materials. The G-TELP provides a measure of general English language proficiency, instead of focusing on just academic or business contests such as those tests required to secure university admission or a position in an English-speaking country. The G-TELP evaluates the skills of examinees at five different levels of competence. By

focusing on a specific level of proficiency, each test achieves more extensive sampling of performance than a single test which assesses multiple levels. The G-TELP is primarily designed for in-country use in environments where English is not the primary language, and is available from duly licensed and qualified agents in many countries. Test Format Level Skill Area Number of Questions Time (min.) Level 1 Listening 30 30 Reading and Vocabulary 60 70 100 Grammar 26 20 Level 2 Listening 26 30 90 Reading and Vocabulary 28 40 Grammar 22 20 Level 3 Listening 22 20 80 Reading and Vocabulary 24 40 Grammar 20 20 Level 4 Listening 20 15 60 Reading and Vocabulary 20 25 Grammar 16 15 Level 5 Listening 16 15 55 Reading and Vocabulary 18 15 Who takes the G-TELP Test? Both non-native and native English speakers may take the test. For non-native English speakers, G-TELP Test assesses an examinee s English language proficiency. The test also reveals the examinee s strengths and weaknesses in the different aspects of the English language such as Comprehension, Grammar, Vocabulary, Pronunciation and Fluency. For native English speakers, the G-TELP Test assesses a native speaker s ability to converse in special and particular situations particularly in the business setting or academic setting.

What does the G-TELP assess? In the G-TELP, the emphasis is on determining functional ability to carry out well-defined language tasks as well as knowledge of the language. The grammar section involves ample context and realistic situations. In the listening section, a variety of speakers are presented. In the listening and reading sections, two types of questions assess the examinee s ability to understand explicitly stated information and to draw inferences from explicitly and implicitly stated information. Reading comprehensions include an appropriate proportion of selected vocabulary in the context of the specific reading tasks. How long does the G-TELP take to administer? The time duration for the G-TELP subtests vary with examinee ability levels. Levels Five and Four take approximately one hour to administer, plus additional time for instructions. Levels Three through One take approximately one and one half hours to administer, plus additional time for instructions. What kinds of scores are reported? Examinees scores are interpreted in relation to degree of mastery of clearly defined learning tasks or objectives. Several different scores are reported on a score report that presents a profile of detailed diagnostic information. Scores are also summarized by class or group, and provide individual and summary data. Where is the G-TELP scored? The G-TELP is scored at the International Testing Services Center (ITSC). Local scoring of the G-TELP is conducted in certain country locations by special arrangement and under ITSC guidelines.

G-TELP Results Release of test results With some exceptions, depending on local conditions, test results will be posted via the Internet on the designated day, and the score report will be mailed within two weeks from the testing date. Score percentage Section Score Condition to pass Grammar 100 Listening 100 Each Section (Grammar, Reading & Listening and Reading & 100 Vocabulary Vocabulary) should be over 75% Total 300 to pass the Level. Average 100 (On the part of test result You have answered 100% of all the question on the test correctly ) Level Mastery Score Level Mastery Score is determined by the number of skill areas in which the examinee has accumulated a Skill Area Score of 75% or more. Demonstrating mastery at Level Two is prerequisite for taking the test of Level One. Score report G-TELP Test Result has 3 sections, i.e. Level Mastery Score, Skill Area Score and Task/Structure Score. Level Mastery Score demonstrates if he or she passes the master and Skill Area Score displays the score of 3 each section (Grammar, Listening, Reading & Vocabulary). Task/Structure Score shows the information of question tasks/structures in detail.

Level Description Level 5: Basic Classroom English This level assesses the ability of the test taker to produce and recognize minimal amounts of English. The test taker has had limited exposure to English in the classroom, and knows only basic elements of the language. Level 4: Basic English in simple communication This level assesses the ability of a test taker to handle basic communicative functions. The test taker is capable of basic formulaic expressions such as those used in greetings and introductions, and is successful with basic communicative transactions. Although a test taker at this level has had only limited exposure to English outside of the classroom, he/she is able to use English in simple communication with native speakers in a narrow range of tasks. Level 3: Modified English in simple communication This level assesses the ability of a test taker to communicate in English on an elementary level. This person s exposure to English has been limited mainly to the classroom, with little extended contact with native speakers. It should be noted, however, that while a person at this level is not an independent user of the language and is not expected to cope with unmodified English, he/she would be able to function within a limited range of authentic English language situations. Level 2: Authentic and Modified English in Normal Communication This level assesses the ability of a test taker to use the language outside of classroom situations. This test taker is able to cope with some authentic English, has had contact with some authentic English, and has had contact with native speakers. Although his/her learning of the language has been classroom-based, the examinee is able to communicate with a native speaker within a wide range of tasks. Level 1: Authentic English in Complex Communication This level assesses the abilities of the examinee who is fully independent user of the language. This person has had extensive contract with native speakers, either through travel and/or living and working abroad.