Level 1 Disposition Evaluation Form (Based upon InTASC Standards Critical Dispositions)

Similar documents
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

What does Quality Look Like?

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Field Experience Verification and Mentor Teacher Evaluation Form

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

Co-op Placement Packet

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

A Guide to Student Portfolios

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

Presented by The Solutions Group

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Dear Internship Supervisor:

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

COSCA COUNSELLING SKILLS CERTIFICATE COURSE

HMS 241 Lab Introduction to Early Childhood Education Fall 2015

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION Personnel Commission

Assessment and Evaluation

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application

Fall Semester. FACULTY NAME: Professor Jason L. Perry

ECD 131 Language Arts Early Childhood Development Business and Public Service

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Examinee Information. Assessment Information

School Leadership Rubrics

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

College of Education Department of Educational Psychology SYLLABUS

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision

University of Toronto

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

College of Social Sciences. Bachelor of Science in Human Services Version 5 Handbook

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Special Education Program Continuum

Introduction to Psychology

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

FACULTY OF ARTS & EDUCATION

Job Hunting Skills: Interview Process

Human Development: Life Span Spring 2017 Syllabus Psych 220 (Section 002) M/W 4:00-6:30PM, 120 MARB

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

Coping with Crisis Helping Children With Special Needs

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Indiana Corrections Leadership Academy Community Corrections Probation - Parole

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

SAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

Educating Students with Special Needs in Secondary General Education Classrooms. Thursdays 12:00-2:00 pm and by appointment

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT UNDER COMPETENCE BASED EDUCATION SCHEME

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

BSW Student Performance Review Process

Cooperating Teacher Training. College of Education

To provide students with a formative and summative assessment about their learning behaviours. To reinforce key learning behaviours and skills that

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Community Unit # 2 School District Library Policy Manual

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?

Transcription:

Level 1 Disposition Evaluation Form (Based upon InTASC Standards Critical Dispositions) Instructions: This instrument is designed to assess teacher candidates dispositions (attitudes, values and beliefs demonstrated through verbal and nonverbal behaviors). At Level 3 (60 hour field experience), this rubric is to be completed by the classroom teacher and at Level 4 (student teaching) it is to be completed by the classroom teacher and university supervisor. After submitting the completed rubric, a signed, printed evaluation is to be given to the candidate. Then, a conference should be held with the teacher candidate to discuss the results and provide constructive feedback. Candidate Name: Semester and Year: Program Area (Select One) Early Childhood Elementary Middle School Secondary School: Grade/Subject: Teacher: Supervisor:

Standard #1: Learner Development: Critical Dispositions 1.1 The teacher candidate respects learners differing strengths and needs and is committed to using this information to further each learner s development. (*Stakeholders include but are not limited to: students, cooperating teachers, paraprofessionals, administrators, etc.) Appears unaware of individual student differences and developmental milestones during conversations with stakeholders Beginning to recognize some individual student differences and begins to use knowledge of developmental milestones during conversations with stakeholders Identifies individual student differences and uses knowledge of developmental milestones during conversations with stakeholders Identifies and incorporates knowledge of developmental milestones about individual students cognitive, social, emotional, and physical needs during conversations with stakeholders 1.2 The teacher candidate takes responsibility for using learners strengths as a basis for growth and their weaknesses as opportunities for learning Unaware of/indifferent to students strengths and weaknesses when discussing learning experiences for students Attempts to discuss students strengths and weaknesses in designing learning experiences for students Consistently discusses students strengths and weaknesses in the design and implementation of developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences for most learners Consistently and effectively identifies students strengths and weaknesses during conversations to imagine the design and implementation of developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences for all learners

Standard #2: Learning Differences: Critical Dispositions 2.1 The teacher candidate believes that all learners can achieve at high levels and persists in helping each learner reach his/her full potential. Expectations for learning and achievement are limited or not conveyed during conversations with stakeholders Does not expect that all students can learn Focuses on content, not learners during conversations with stakeholders Expectations for learning and achievement are conveyed about some learners during conversations with stakeholders Expects that some students can learn Begins to focus on the learner rather than exclusively on content during conversations with stakeholders Expectations for learning and achievement are conveyed about most learners during conversations with stakeholders Expects that most students can learn Focus is balanced between the content and the learner during conversations with stakeholders Expectations for learning and achievement are conveyed about all learners during conversations with stakeholders, Expects that all students can learn Focus of conversations with stakeholders is clearly on learners engagement with content

Standard #3: Learning Environments: Critical Dispositions 3.1 The teacher candidate seeks to foster respectful communication among all members of the learning community through thoughtful and responsive listening and observations to establish a positive learning environment. Exhibits little respect when communicating or interacting with students, faculty, and/or staff; relates with others in a negative demeaning, or sarcastic manner Communicates and interacts appropriately with some students, faculty, and/or staff: shows appropriate level of respect Demonstrates an ability to communicate and interact effectively and professionally with most students, faculty, and staff; maintains cordial relationships with colleagues Consistently communicates and interacts effectively and professionally with all students, faculty, and staff; establishes a positive rapport

Standard #4: Content Knowledge: Critical Dispositions 4.1 The teacher candidate believes that content knowledge is not a fixed body of facts but is complex, culturally situated, and ever evolving. As a demonstration of this belief, s/he keeps abreast of new ideas and understandings in the field*. (*could include but is not limited to the following: attending staff/professional development, participating in conferences, reading professional literature in the field, blogging on professional topics) Expectations Shows no interest in the continuing process of learning about his/her content area(s) Periodically shows interest in the continuing process of learning about his/her content area(s) Fulfills Expectation Consistently engages in the continuing process of learning about his/her content area(s) Independently commits time and energy to the continuing process of learning about his/her content area(s)

8.1 The teacher candidate is committed to exploring how the use of new and emerging technologies can support and promote student learning. Little to no understanding demonstrated about the use of technology to promote effective learning Progressing Beginning to demonstrate an understanding about how technology can be used to promote effective learning Fulfills Demonstrates understanding about how the use of technology can promote effective learning Exceeds Understands how the use of technology can engage students in self-directed, interactive learning 8.2 The teacher candidate values flexibility and reciprocity (give and take) in the teaching process as necessary for adapting instruction to learner responses, ideas, and needs. Does not recognize that flexibility is necessary in teaching during conversations with stakeholders Progressing Begins to recognize that flexibility is necessary in teaching during conversations with stakeholders Fulfills Recognizes that flexibility is necessary in teaching during conversations with stakeholders Exceeds Recognizes that flexibility is necessary in teaching, and can anticipate changes that will enhance the lesson during conversations with stakeholders

Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice: Critical Dispositions 9.1 The teacher candidate respects and upholds ethical behavior and professional standards*; is honest and forthright; maintains confidentiality; demonstrates diplomacy*. (*to include but is not limited to the following: reliable attendance, timeliness, professional dress/appearance, positive and proactive attitude, calm and confident composure and initiative, non-judgmental language, strong integrity). Expectations Does not display respect and/or uphold ethical behavior and/or abide by professional standards. Significant improvement is necessary in several of these areas (i.e., is frequently late or leaves early or does not attend as scheduled, is not dependable, dresses unprofessionally or poorly groomed, shows little self-confidence or has critical or negative attitude, little enthusiasm, shows little respect for professional standards) May display respect and/or uphold ethical behavior and/or abide by professional standards. Significant improvement is necessary in one or more of these areas (i.e., periodically late and/or periodically does not attend as scheduled, dresses appropriately or is well-groomed only occasionally, shows emerging self-confidence or can be critical or negative at times, limited enthusiasm, emerging respect for professional standards) Is successful in respecting and upholding ethical behavior and in abiding by professional standards with minimal exception (i.e., attends regularly and seldom absent, arrives on time, dresses appropriately for classroom and is well-groomed, shows enthusiasm and energy in classroom, respects professional standards). Is highly successful in respecting and upholding ethical behavior and in abiding by professional standards that yields effective practice (i.e., arrives prior to and remains until task is completed, is dependable and attends activities beyond expectations, consistently dresses professionally and is well-groomed, self-assured and is consistently positive and professional, enthusiastic about participating, respects and upholds ethical professional standards).

Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration: Critical Dispositions 10.1 The teacher candidate takes initiative to grow and develop with colleagues through interactions that enhance practice and support student learning. Shows little to no interest in participating in professional interactions (e.g. discussions with cooperating teacher, paraprofessionals, administrators, etc.) that arise to improve development as a future educator Progressing Participates in some interactions (e.g. discussions with cooperating teacher, paraprofessionals, administrators, etc.) that arise to enhance development as a future educator. Fulfills Appreciates opportunities to learn and participates in multiple interactions (e.g. discussions with cooperating teacher, paraprofessionals, administrators, etc.) that arise to enhance development as a future educator. Exceeds Intentionally seeks out opportunities to learn and participates actively in interactions (e.g. discussions with cooperating teacher, paraprofessionals, administrators, etc.) that arise to enhance development as a future educator, and solicits constructive feedback from multiple sources and consistently works to refine his or her development as a future educator.