Benchmark Comparisons August University of Idaho

Similar documents
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

National Survey of Student Engagement

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Student Engagement and Cultures of Self-Discovery

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Measures of the Location of the Data

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

An Introduction to LEAP

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

success. It will place emphasis on:

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

Spring 2014 SYLLABUS Michigan State University STT 430: Probability and Statistics for Engineering

Shyness and Technology Use in High School Students. Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

ST. ANDREW S COLLEGE

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

What We Are Learning about Successful Programs In College Calculus

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACHIEVEMENT TEST Introduction One of the important duties of a teacher is to observe the student in the classroom, laboratory and

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

Trends in College Pricing

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

NCEO Technical Report 27

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Best Colleges Main Survey

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

AP Statistics Summer Assignment 17-18

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

Librarians of Highlights of a survey of RUL faculty. June 7, Librarians of 2023 June 7, / 11

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Probability Therefore (25) (1.33)

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Cooper Upper Elementary School

PROMOTION and TENURE GUIDELINES. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Gordon Ford College of Business Western Kentucky University

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Enhancing Students Understanding Statistics with TinkerPlots: Problem-Based Learning Approach

THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYST EXAM AS A PROGRAM ASSESSMENT TOOL: PRE-POST TESTS AND COMPARISON TO THE MAJOR FIELD TEST

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Arts, Humanities and Social Science Faculty

Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Effective practices of peer mentors in an undergraduate writing intensive course

learning collegiate assessment]

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Common Core State Standards

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

PSYCHOLOGY 353: SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN SPRING 2006

Multiple Intelligences 1

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Complete the pre-survey before we get started!

Transcription:

Benchmark Comparisons August 211

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Interpreting the Benchmark Comparisons Report To focus discussions about the importance of student engagement and to guide institutional improvement efforts, NSSE created five Benchmarks of ive Educational Practice: Level of Academic Challenge, Active and Collaborative Learning, Student-Faculty Interaction, Enriching Educational Experiences, and Supportive Campus Environment. This Benchmark Comparisons Report compares the performance of your institution with your selected comparison groups. In addition, it provides comparisons with two sets of highly engaging institutions, those with benchmarks in the top % and top 1% of all NSSE institutions. Each benchmark is an index of responses to several NSSE questions. Because NSSE questions have different response sets, each question s response set was rescaled from zero to, and students rescaled responses were then averaged. Thus a benchmark score of zero would mean that every student chose the lowest response option for every item, and would mean every student chose the highest response to every item. Although benchmarks are reported on a - scale, they are not percentages. Additional details regarding how benchmarks are created can be found on the NSSE Web site. nsse.iub.edu/links/institutional_reporting Class and Sample Means are reported for first-year students and seniors. Institutionreported class levels are used. All randomly selected or censusadministered students are included in these analyses. Students in targeted or locally administered oversamples are not included. Mean The mean is the weighted arithmetic average of the student level benchmark scores. Statistical Significance Benchmarks with mean differences that are larger than would be expected by chance alone are noted with one, two, or three asterisks, denoting one of three significance levels (p<.5, p<.1, and p<.1). The smaller the significance level, the smaller the likelihood that the difference is due to chance. Please note that statistical significance does not guarantee that the result is substantive or important. Large sample sizes (as with the NSSE project) tend to produce more statistically significant results even though the magnitude of mean differences may be inconsequential. Consult effect sizes to judge the practical meaning of the results. Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSEville State University compared with: NSSEville State Mid East Private Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Class Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a 54.4 53.7.5 53.3 *.8 54.1.2 58.6 57.3 **.9 56.9 ***.11 57.5 *.7 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and by ins titution size for comparison groups). b * p <. 5 ** p <. 1 ***p <. 1 (2 -t a ile d ). c Mean difference divided by the pooled s tandard deviatio n. Size a size indicates the practical significance of the mean difference. It is calculated by dividing the mean difference by the pooled standard deviation. In practice, an effect size of.2 is often considered small,.5 moderate, and.8 large. A positive sign indicates that your institution s mean was greater, thus showing an affirmative result for the institution. A negative sign indicates the institution lags behind the comparison group, suggesting that the student behavior or institutional practice represented by the item may warrant attention. Benchmark Description & Survey Items A description of the benchmark and the individual items used in its creation is provided. NSSEville State Mid East Private Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Box and Whiskers Key A box and whiskers chart is a concise way to summarize the variation of student benchmark scores. This display compares the distribution of scores at your institution, in percentile terms, with that of your comparison groups. The ends of the whiskers show the 5th and 95th percentile scores, while the box is bounded by the th and th percentiles. The bar inside the box indicates the median score, and the dot shows the mean score. Note: Each box and whis kers chart plots the 5th (bottom o f lo wer bar), th (bo ttom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (to p of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) Items Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing the importance of academic effort and setting high expectations for student performance. NSSEville State Mid East Private Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Hours spent preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, etc. related to academic program) Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings Number of written papers or reports of 2 pages or more, between 5 and 19 pages, and fewer than 5 pages Coursework emphasizes: Analysis of the basic elements of an idea, experience or theory Coursework emphasizes: Synthesis and organizing of ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships Coursework emphasizes: Making of judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods Coursework emphasizes: Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Working harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations Campus environment emphasizes: Spending significant amount of time studying and on academic work 95th Percentile th Percentile th Percentile/Median (Bar) Mean (Dot) th Percentile Box and Whiskers Charts A visual display of first-year and senior benchmark score dispersion for your institution and your selected comparison or consortium groups. 5th Percentile a See Contextualizing NSSE Sizes at nsse.iub.edu/pdf/effect_size_guide.pdf for additional information. 2

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) compared with: U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c 52.4 52.3. 53.4 -.8 53.7 -.1 56.6 57.2 -.4 56.7 -.1 57.4 -.5 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and by institution size for comparison groups). b * p<.5 ** p<.1 ***p<.1 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation. U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Note: Each box and whiskers chart plots the 5th (bottom of lower bar), th (bottom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (top of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) Items Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing the importance of academic effort and setting high expectations for student performance. Hours spent preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, etc. related to academic program) Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings Number of written papers or reports of 2 pages or more, between 5 and 19 pages, and fewer than 5 pages Coursework emphasizes: Analysis of the basic elements of an idea, experience or theory Coursework emphasizes: Synthesis and organizing of ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships Coursework emphasizes: Making of judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods Coursework emphasizes: Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Working harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations Campus environment emphasizes: Spending significant amount of time studying and on academic work 3

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL) compared with: U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c 43.7 42..1 42.2.9 43.1.3 51.7.4.7.5.7 51.3.2 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and by institution size for comparison groups). b * p<.5 ** p<.1 ***p<.1 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation. U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Note: Each box and whiskers chart plots the 5th (bottom of lower bar), th (bottom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (top of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL) Items Students learn more when they are intensely involved in their education and asked to think about what they are learning in different settings. Collaborating with others in solving problems or mastering difficult material prepares students for the messy, unscripted problems they will encounter daily during and after college. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions Made a class presentation Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) 4

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) compared with: U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c 32.5 31.8.4 33.5 -.5 34.4 -.11 42.9 39.9 ***.15 4.9 *.1 41.9.5 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and by institution size for comparison groups). b * p<.5 ** p<.1 ***p<.1 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation. U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Note: Each box and whiskers chart plots the 5th (bottom of lower bar), th (bottom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (top of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) Items Students learn firsthand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their teachers become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, life-long learning. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student-life activities, etc.) Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance Worked on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements 5

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE) compared with: U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c 27.5 24.5 **.21 28. -.4 27.8 -.2 38.3 37.2.6 39.9 * -.9 4.4 ** -.12 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and by institution size for comparison groups). b * p<.5 ** p<.1 ***p<.1 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation. U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Note: Each box and whiskers chart plots the 5th (bottom of lower bar), th (bottom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (top of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE) Items Complementary learning opportunities enhance academic programs. Diversity experiences teach students valuable things about themselves and others. Technology facilitates collaboration between peers and instructors. Internships, community service, and senior capstone courses provide opportunities to integrate and apply knowledge. Hours spent participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student gov., social fraternity or sorority, etc.) Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment Community service or volunteer work Foreign language coursework and study abroad Independent study or self-designed major Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) Serious conversations with students of different religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values Serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own Using electronic medium (e.g., listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Campus environment encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together 6

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Supportive Campus Environment (SCE) compared with: U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c 6.6 58.8.9 61.5 -.5 62.7 -.11 59.4 55.8 ***.19 57.3 **.1 59.1.1 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and by institution size for comparison groups). b * p<.5 ** p<.1 ***p<.1 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation. U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 U Idaho Rocky Mt Public Carnegie Class NSSE 211 Note: Each box and whiskers chart plots the 5th (bottom of lower bar), th (bottom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (top of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. Supportive Campus Environment (SCE) Items Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus. Campus environment provides the support you need to help you succeed academically Campus environment helps you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Campus environment provides the support you need to thrive socially Quality of relationships with other students Quality of relationships with faculty members Quality of relationships with administrative personnel and offices 7

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons With Highly Engaging Institutions Interpreting the Top 1% and Top % Comparisons This section of the NSSE Benchmark Comparisons report allows you to estimate the performance of your average student in relation to the average student attending two different institutional peer groups identified by NSSE for their high levels of student engagement: (a) institutions with benchmark scores placing them in the top % of all NSSE schools in 211 and (b) institutions with benchmark scores in the top 1% for 211. a These comparisons allow an institution to determine if the engagement of their students differs in significant, meaningful ways from students in these high performing peer groups. Example NSSEville State compared with NSSEville State NSSE 211 Top % NSSE 211 Top 1% Mean Mean Sig size Mean Sig size LAC 57.1 55.8 *.1 6.5 *** -.28 ACL.3 45.8 ***.28.7 -.2 SFI 37.3 37.2.1 42. *** -.24 EEE 21.8 3. *** -.63 34.4 *** -.98 SCE 6.9 64.7 *** -.21 69.7 *** -.49 Based on the example above NSSEville State CAN conclude... The average score for NSSEville State first-year students is slightly above (i.e., small positive effect size) that of the average student attending NSSE 211 schools that scored in the top % on Level of Academic Challenge (LAC). The average NSSEville State first-year student is as engaged (i.e., not significantly different) as the average student attending NSSE 211 schools that scored in the top 1% on Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL). It is likely that NSSEville State is in the top % of all NSSE 211 schools for first-year students on Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) and Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL). a Based on the example above NSSEville State CANNOT conclude a... NSSEville State is in the top half of all schools on the Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) benchmark for first-year students. NSSEville State is a "top ten percent" institution on Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL) for first-year students. Additional information regarding the Top % and Top 1% section of the benchmark report can be found on the NSSE Web site. nsse.iub.edu/links/institutional_reporting a Precision-weighted means (produced by Hierarchical Linear Modeling) were used to determine the top % and top 1% institutions for each benchmark, separately for first-year and senior students. Using this method, benchmark scores of institutions with relatively large standard errors are adjusted substantially toward the grand mean of all students, while those with smaller standard errors receive smaller corrections. Thus, schools with less stable data, though they may have high scores, may not be identified among the top scorers. NSSE does not publish the names of the top % and top 1% institutions because of our commitment not to release individual school results and our policy against the ranking of institutions. 8

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons With Highly Engaging Institutions U Idaho compared with NSSE 211 NSSE 211 U Idaho Top % Top 1% Mean a Mean a Sig b size c Mean a Sig b size c LAC 52.4 56.7 *** -.34 6.6 *** -.67 ACL 43.7 48. *** -.26 52.1 *** -.48 SFI 32.5 39.3 *** -.36 43.7 *** -.53 EEE 27.5 3.5 ** -.23 33.7 *** -.45 SCE 6.6 67.4 *** -.37 71.2 *** -.59 LAC 56.6 6.5 *** -.28 64.1 *** -.57 ACL 51.7 56.2 *** -.27 6.1 *** -.48 SFI 42.9 49.3 *** -.3 56. *** -.58 EEE 38.3 46.7 *** -.47 55.3 *** -1.2 SCE 59.4 64.9 *** -.29 68.7 *** -.51 Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL) Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) Legend U Idaho Top % Top 1% This display compares your students with those attending schools that scored in the top % and top 1% of all NSSE 211 institutions on a particular benchmark. Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE) Supportive Campus Environment (SCE) Note: Each box and whiskers chart plots the 5th (bottom of lower bar), th (bottom of box), th (middle line), th (top of box), and 95th (top of upper bar) percentile scores. The dot shows the benchmark mean. See page 2 for an illustration. See pages 1 and 11 for percentile values. a Weighted by gender and enroll. status (and by inst. size for comp. groups). b * p<.5 ** p<.1 ***p<.1 (2-tailed). c Mean diff. divided by the pooled standard dev. 9

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Detailed Statistics and Sizes a Mean Statistics Students Distribution Statistics Reference Group Comparison Statistics Percentiles d Deg. of Mean Mean SD b SEM c 5th th th th 95th Freedom e Diff. Sig. f size g LEVEL OF ACADEMIC CHALLENGE (LAC) U Idaho (N = 193) 52.4 13..9 29 44 52 62 74 Rocky Mt Public 52.3 13.8.2 3 43 52 62 74 4,167..982. Carnegie Class 53.4 13.2.1 31 45 53 62 74 19,122-1..294 -.8 NSSE 211 53.7 13.3. 32 45 54 63 116,637-1.3.166 -.1 Top % 56.7 12.9.1 35 48 57 66 77 42,762-4.3. -.34 Top 1% 6.6 12.4.2 4 52 61 69 8 6,523-8.3. -.67 ACTIVE AND COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ACL) U Idaho (N = 216) 43.7 14.3 1. 24 33 43 52 71 Rocky Mt Public 42. 17.1.3 14 29 43 52 71 248 1.7.95.1 Carnegie Class 42.2 16.6.1 19 29 42 52 71 221 1.4.147.9 NSSE 211 43.1 16.9. 19 33 43 52 71 216.5.592.3 Top % 48. 16.8.1 24 38 48 57 76 219-4.3. -.26 Top 1% 52.1 17.9.2 24 38 52 62 83 237-8.5. -.48 STUDENT-FACULTY INTERACTION (SFI) U Idaho (N = 196) 32.5 17.1 1.2 11 22 28 44 67 Rocky Mt Public 31.8 17.9.3 6 17 28 39 67 4,195.6.626.4 Carnegie Class 33.5 18.3.1 11 22 28 44 67 19,336-1..451 -.5 NSSE 211 34.4 18.6.1 11 22 33 44 72 117,993-2..137 -.11 Top % 39.3 19.3.1 11 27 39 78 198-6.9. -.36 Top 1% 43.7 21.3.3 11 28 4 56 83 217-11.2. -.53 ENRICHING EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES (EEE) U Idaho (N = 189) 27.5 12..9 11 18 26 35 47 Rocky Mt Public 24.5 13.9.2 6 15 22 32 48 4,73 2.9.4.21 Carnegie Class 28. 13.4.1 8 19 27 36 51 18,581 -.6.568 -.4 NSSE 211 27.8 13.5. 8 18 26 36 51 189 -.3.7 -.2 Top % 3.5 13.3.1 11 21 29 39 53 54,39-3.1.2 -.23 Top 1% 33.7 13.9.2 12 24 33 43 57 2-6.3. -.45 SUPPORTIVE CAMPUS ENVIRONMENT (SCE) U Idaho (N = 186) 6.6 16.3 1.2 31 61 69 89 Rocky Mt Public 58.8 19..3 47 58 72 89 211 1.8.1.9 Carnegie Class 61.5 18.9.1 31 61 94 19 -.9.441 -.5 NSSE 211 62.7 19..1 31 64 94 186-2.1.76 -.11 Top % 67.4 18.4.1 36 56 69 81 97 188-6.8. -.37 Top 1% 71.2 18..2 39 58 72 83 199-1.6. -.59 a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b Standard deviation is a measure of the amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c Standard Error of the Mean: Use SEM to compute a confidence interval (CI) around the sample mean. For example, the 95% CI is the range of values that is 95% likely to contain the true population mean, equal to the sample mean +/- 1.96 * SEM. d A percentile is the point in the distribution of student-level benchmark scores at or below which a given percentage of benchmark scores fall. e Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values vary for the total Ns due to weighting and whether equal variances were assumed. f Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. g size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation. IPEDS: 142285 1

NSSE 211 Benchmark Comparisons Detailed Statistics and Sizes a Mean Statistics s Distribution Statistics Reference Group Comparison Statistics Percentiles d Deg. of Mean Mean SD b SEM c 5th th th th 95th Freedom e Diff. Sig. f size g LEVEL OF ACADEMIC CHALLENGE (LAC) U Idaho (N = 548) 56.6 13.5.6 36 47 57 66 78 Rocky Mt Public 57.2 14..2 34 48 57 67 79 6,981 -.6.317 -.4 Carnegie Class 56.7 14.2.1 33 47 57 67 79 39,632 -.1.92 -.1 NSSE 211 57.4 14.2. 33 48 58 67 8 215,318 -.8.214 -.5 Top % 6.5 13.6.1 37 51 61 7 82 64,195-3.9. -.28 Top 1% 64.1 13..1 42 56 65 73 84 11,228-7.5. -.57 ACTIVE AND COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ACL) U Idaho (N = 581) 51.7 16.9.7 24 38 52 62 81 Rocky Mt Public.4 17.6.2 24 38 48 62 81 7,232 1.2.16.7 Carnegie Class.5 17.7.1 24 38 48 62 81 42,197 1.2.18.7 NSSE 211 51.3 17.7. 24 38 52 62 81 227,564.4.59.2 Top % 56.2 17.1.1 29 43 57 67 86 61,29-4.5. -.27 Top 1% 6.1 17.8.2 33 48 62 71 9 647-8.5. -.48 STUDENT-FACULTY INTERACTION (SFI) U Idaho (N = 553) 42.9 2..8 17 28 39 56 8 Rocky Mt Public 39.9 2.5.3 11 27 39 53 78 7,16 3..1.15 Carnegie Class 4.9 21..1 11 27 39 56 83 39,993 2.1.22.1 NSSE 211 41.9 21.2. 11 28 39 56 83 555 1..2.5 Top % 49.3 21.7.1 17 33 67 89 568-6.4. -.3 Top 1% 56. 22.5.3 22 39 56 72 94 665-13.. -.58 ENRICHING EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES (EEE) U Idaho (N = 536) 38.3 16.6.7 11 26 38 67 Rocky Mt Public 37.2 17.5.2 11 23 36 68 6,848 1.1.149.6 Carnegie Class 39.9 18.1.1 11 26 39 52 71 553-1.6.27 -.9 NSSE 211 4.4 18.2. 12 27 4 53 72 539-2.1.3 -.12 Top % 46.7 17.8.1 17 34 47 59 76 544-8.3. -.47 Top 1% 55.3 16.6.2 26 44 56 67 82 1,541-17.. -1.2 SUPPORTIVE CAMPUS ENVIRONMENT (SCE) U Idaho (N = 53) 59.4 17..7 31 58 69 89 Rocky Mt Public 55.8 19..2 23 44 56 69 89 647 3.6..19 Carnegie Class 57.3 19.6.1 44 58 7 92 549 2..6.1 NSSE 211 59.1 19.5. 47 58 72 92 532.3.716.1 Top % 64.9 18.9.1 33 53 67 78 97 541-5.5. -.29 Top 1% 68.7 18.6.2 36 56 69 83 598-9.4. -.51 a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b Standard deviation is a measure of the amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c Standard Error of the Mean: Use SEM to compute a confidence interval (CI) around the sample mean. For example, the 95% CI is the range of values that is 95% likely to contain the true population mean, equal to the sample mean +/- 1.96 * SEM. d A percentile is the point in the distribution of student-level benchmark scores at or below which a given percentage of benchmark scores fall. e Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values vary for the total Ns due to weighting and whether equal variances were assumed. f Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. g size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation. IPEDS: 142285 11