Community Outreach and Engagement

Similar documents
New Graduate Program Proposal Review Process. Development of the Preliminary Proposal

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Academic Affairs Policy #1

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

GOING GLOBAL 2018 SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL

Assessment and Evaluation

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Day 1 Note Catcher. Use this page to capture anything you d like to remember. May Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved.

Community engagement toolkit for planning

CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICATION TIMELINE

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

University of Toronto

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

State Parental Involvement Plan

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

GRADUATE APPLICATION GRADUATE SCHOOL. Empowering Leaders for the Fivefold Ministry. Fall Trimester September 2, 2014-November 14, 2014

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

February 16. Save $30 on Registration: Designed for Managers and Staff of After School Programs. Early Bird Deadline: January 26, 2017

Thoughtful Commitment: How the Greece Teachers Association (GTA) Advances Social Justice, Student Centered Advocacy and Collaboration ADV400

Cambridge English Empower: bringing Learning Oriented Assessment into the classroom

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Keeping our Academics on the Cutting Edge: The Academic Outreach Program at the University of Wollongong Library

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Texas Woman s University Libraries

New Start Procedures for Starting a Kairos Ministry in a New Institution

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

CHAPTER 2: COUNTERING FOUR RISKY ASSUMPTIONS

Should a business have the right to ban teenagers?

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

University of Toronto

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

The Teaching and Learning Center

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

UNDERGRADUATE APPLICATION. Empowering Leaders for the Fivefold Ministry. Fall Trimester September 2, 2014-November 14, 2014

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Environmental Advisory Council Initial Meeting Thursday, November 8, :30 am PP Conference Room.

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

University of the Free State Language Policy i

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

ASMC PROGRAM REVIEW

GRADUATE SCHOOL DOCTORAL DISSERTATION AWARD APPLICATION FORM

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Somerset Progressive School Planning, Assessment, Recording & Celebration Policy

Person Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8

Henderson State University. Admin-Dean of Students

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA COMMUNITY: SALMO, BRITISH COLUMBIA

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

Meta-Cognitive Strategies

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Assessment of Philosophy for Children (P4C) in Catalonia

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

Summary results (year 1-3)

Contract Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion a Web Based Faculty Resource

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Bilingual Staffing Guidelines

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

Recognition of Prior Learning

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

November 17, 2017 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. ADDENDUM 3 RFP Digital Integrated Enrollment Support for Students

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

ELP in whole-school use. Case study Norway. Anita Nyberg

Transcription:

Community Outreach and Engagement Staff Guidance Document ***Insert Project Title Here*** Distribution Distribute copies of this completed document to the following staff upon completion of the project or completion of the initial outreach for a program or initiative: Director with accountability for the project Community Relations & Communications Director All project planning team members, including the Manager of Community Relations

ENGAGEMENT PLANNING TEAM The following interests should be represented on the engagement planning team: project leader/manager (with decision making authority) *mandatory Manager of Community Relations Communications Department representative representation from all divisions which have a key role external stakeholders when the level of engagement is collaborate or empower Date of initial project team meeting: List your engagement planning team members below: Project lead*: 2

PROJECT OVERVIEW! Please ensure this page is completed accurately as this information informs all key messages and communication both internally and externally. Project name Name the project for public communications purpose. The name needs to be clear and accessible, and specific enough for residents to know whether they will be impacted. Location If the project is place-based, the project lead should specify the location. If it is not location-specific, for example a policy, plan or bylaw, then the region of application should be specified. Decision maker The decision maker for the project is the person or authority making the final decision. Decision statement / Intent of the initiative The decision statement includes three important pieces of information: the decision maker, the intent of the project and the anticipated timeline. Project brief Brief description of the background and current status of the project. 3

LEVEL OF STAKEHOLDER IMPACT The engagement planning team completes this checklist to determine the level of stakeholder impact and the appropriate level of engagement plan. Levels of impact Yes No There is a legal requirement to engage the community and/or stakeholders. *If yes, this engagement level is at Inform. Aspects of the policy may be implemented only at the discretion of the Divisional Director. Have all aspects of this project been decided by the project lead? *If yes, this engagement level remains at Inform. Can the public provide input and influence on an aspect of this project? *If yes, this engagement level is Consult or higher. Stakeholders may be interested in or impacted by this project. This project is high-profile and the community may care deeply about the project and the potential impacts. There is a difficult history relating to this type of project in the community. There are direct (real or perceived) impacts on a identifiable group. There are direct impacts (real or perceived) on neighbourhoods. There are direct impacts (real or perceived) on the entire community. 4

STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION The engagement planning team must identify the stakeholders impacted by this project or plan, determine the level of anticipated impact, and confirm the appropriate level of engagement using the Spectrum of Engagement Chart on page 6. *Additional copies of this page may be necessary in order to identify all affected stakeholders. Affected stakeholder group or individual Identified impacts (direct and indirect) Engagement level as determined by the project planning team Affected stakeholder group or individual Identified impacts (direct and indirect) Engagement level as determined by the project planning team Affected stakeholder group or individual Identified impacts (direct and indirect) Engagement level as determined by the project planning team 5

SPECTRUM OF ENGAGEMENT INFORM CONSULT This is one way sharing of information about a District plan, project or policy decision. Use this approach when staff have prepared a draft plan, project or policy with options for input by the community and/or stakeholders. It has been determined by the decision maker or project lead that all aspects of the plan, project or policy have been decided and community input is not required. The District provides the community and/or stakeholders with information about a project or decision in order to raise awareness and create understanding. Consult the community on items identified in the draft plan for the purpose of receiving input and feedback. This will assist in identifying the projects strengths and weaknesses, as well as any unforeseen impacts/consequences. Community input is gathered before developing a draft and their input will be directly reflected in the draft. The community s role is to fully participate in the process, provide insights and help staff consider short, medium and long-term impacts and opportunities. The scope of the delegation is defined by a set of givens and negotiables or Terms of Reference (TOR). If TOR are respected, the community decision is advanced to the staff decision maker. POSSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS TACTICS POSSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS TACTICS Tactics also include those listed under Inform and Consult ENGAGEMENT TECHNIQUES Online survey Open house Focus group Participation at community events Workshop The community s role is to participate fully in the process, respect all parties viewpoints and to participate in the best interests of the community as a whole. Customized communications tactics Tactics also include those listed under Inform ENGAGEMENT TECHNIQUES The decision has been made and does not require public input. Information is being provided for the purpose of raising awareness. Use this approach to empower the community, which is delegated to make all or part of a decision on a project, plan or policy. POSSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS TACTICS Information boards in municipal facilities Community event activation EMPOWER Use this approach to collaborate directly with the community and/or stakeholders to develop a draft plan, project or policy. The community s role is to provide input as requested. POSSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS TACTICS Online (website/social media) Mailouts Communications via neighbourhood associations Bus shelter advertising Site signage North Shore News COLLABORATE ENGAGEMENT TECHNIQUES Working group Workshop Charrette Advisory committee Task force ENGAGEMENT TECHNIQUES Study circles Techniques also include those listed under Collaborate 6

FOLLOW UP MEETINGS Project name: Date: Project lead: 7

EVALUATE WORK TO DATE Date: Next Steps: Date: Next Steps: 8