Final Final Final Updated March 2008

Similar documents
Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

James Madison University Civic Action Plan

Program Change Proposal:

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Supplemental Focus Guide

University of Toronto

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

An Introduction to LEAP

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND GOALS

Monitoring & Evaluation Tools for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

MINUTES. Kentucky Community and Technical College System Board of Regents. Workshop September 15, 2016

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Infrastructure Issues Related to Theory of Computing Research. Faith Fich, University of Toronto

GRAND CHALLENGES SCHOLARS PROGRAM

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

State Parental Involvement Plan

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Texas Woman s University Libraries

Working with Local Authorities to Support the Localism Agenda

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Faculty governance especially the

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

ELIZABETH L. HAMEL, MSW BILINGUAL ENGLISH/SPANISH

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

AAC/BOT Page 1 of 9

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY MINUTES OF MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2008

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

California State University Long Beach Strategic Priorities and Goals

Mapping the Assets of Your Community:

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

THE WEB 2.0 AS A PLATFORM FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS, IMPROVE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND DESIGNER CAREER PROMOTION IN THE UNIVERSITY

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Meeting of the Senatus Researcher Experience Committee to be held on Thursday, 27 May 2010 at 2.15 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA

District Consultation Council Meeting. April 24, :00 p.m. Anaheim Campus Room 105 AGENDA

SUPPORTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DELIVERY OF APPRENTICESHIPS

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

State Budget Update February 2016

Promotion and Tenure Policy

Building Bridges Globally

Academic Affairs Policy #1

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Approved Academic Titles

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Options for Elementary Band and Strings Program Delivery

Eller College of Management. MIS 111 Freshman Honors Showcase

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Worldwide Online Training for Coaches: the CTI Success Story

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Transcription:

California State University, Office of the Chancellor Office of Community Service Learning Strategic Plan: 2008-2013 Service Learning in the CSU: Transforming Education Beginning in the 1990s, the California State University (CSU) began to recognize the value of service learning as a vehicle that would meet the state's changing educational needs while also imparting vital civic skills and knowledge. In 1997, with the establishment of the first of its kind strategic plan on community service learning, this systemwide effort began to take shape. Infrastructure was established at campuses and the systemwide office, the Board of Trustees passed a landmark resolution calling for the creation of service opportunities for all students, and outside funding was secured. Since that time, the CSU s reputation as a leader in community service learning has risen to national prominence due to its unique 23-campus and systemwide coordination. Faculty and student enthusiasm and involvement have soared, data collection efforts have begun, many campus and community partnerships have been established, and the breadth and depth of service learning in both general education and major-based courses have multiplied. Systemwide Office: Primary Mission and Roles In 1998, when the Office of Community Service Learning (CSL) in the Chancellor s Office of the California State University was established, the primary charge was to build capacity among faculty, students, and other practitioners to engage students in community service and service learning. The responsibilities of this one-person office included hosting meetings, visiting campuses, and representing the CSU at various meetings and conferences. As a result, the CSU was well-poised to seek out systemwide funding and was tremendously successful in securing funds, primarily from state and federal resources. In the 2000-01 academic year (AY), a strong influx of new funds added grantmaking and program coordination to the systemwide office s responsibilities resulting in the expansion of the professional office staff from 1 FTE to 2 FTE. As funding increased two additional staff members were added resulting in the office being staffed with four FTE including an office manager, AmeriCorps coordinator, service-learning coordinator, and director. During this time of growth, a mission statement for the Office of Community Service Learning was developed that reflected campus and office priorities and the Board of Trustees Resolution: The Office of Community Service Learning in the Chancellor's Office of the California State University provides leadership and coordination among the 23 campuses of the CSU to ensure that all CSU students have the chance to 1

participate in service prior to graduation. Opportunities include academic service learning, community service, and national service. Fall 2000 In 2004-05 AY, the systemwide office added a rotating faculty scholar position to its team; the scholar serves as a mentor and resource for faculty members. In the midst of office restructuring, staffing levels changed from 4 FTE to 3 FTE, which meant that the office was comprised of an assistant director, faculty scholar, and director. Currently, the office is staffed with 2.5 FTE. In summary, the systemwide office has largely served in a capacity building mode to CSU practitioners by hosting meetings, serving as an information clearinghouse, and visiting campuses to promote service learning, community service, and national service. In addition, but to a lesser degree, fundraising and public relations have also been priorities. From time to time, there has also been informal communication to campus presidents, provosts, and other influential campus leaders. Current Context: Expansion to Community Engagement The CSU s community engagement roots are largely based in service learning, with a great deal of past attention in developing courses with new service-learning components. With nearly 450,000 students, the availability of 65,000 service-learning opportunities in virtually every discipline is no small feat. However, instead of simply maintaining this level of success, the opportunity and challenge before the CSU is to continue to be forward-thinking in institutionalizing academic service learning while also incorporating a broader spectrum of community engagement (also referred to as civic engagement) efforts that advance our purpose as public institutions that serve the public good. Throughout the nation and within the CSU, the community engagement movement has taken hold, resulting in expansion of the roles of service-learning offices in higher education. National organizations, such as the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU), Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), and Campus Compact, have spearhead initiatives that have elevated the importance of community engagement in higher education. From the Freshman Year Experience through Senior Capstones, service-learning plays a. prominent role in CSU community efforts and is integral to the expansion to other activities that encompass the definition of community engagement (e.g., voter registration drives, community-based research, community-centered forums, alternative spring breaks, community based internships). While there are several definitions for community engagement and each campus has the prerogative to develop a definition that represents the culture of its campus and regional community the CSU Chancellor s Office is using the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning s definition. The definition states Community Engagement describes the collaboration between higher education institutions and their larger communities (local, regional/state, national, global) for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in a context of partnership and reciprocity. 2

As the CSU began to examine ways in which it could adapt and meet a broader mission of engagement, having a clear and coherent understanding among our 23 campuses and the systemwide office was crucial. Therefore, during the 2006-2007 AY, CSL in the Chancellor s Office asked all campus service-learning offices (some of which have been renamed to reflect a community/civic engagement focus) without current plans in place to undertake a strategic planning process. In addition, CSL in the Chancellor s Office undertook a strategic planning process. Parallel to this initiative, in September 2006, the CSU launched a wide-ranging strategic planning effort, Access to Excellence, which will set the direction of the CSU for the next 10 years. Access to Excellence focuses on the intersection of [the CSU] with the economic, political, and social environment of the State of California, anticipating what the people of the State will need from the CSU in the next decade, and how best to position the institution to meet those needs 1. In the text that follows, the reader will find that the strategic directions, goals and activities set forth in the Center for Community Engagement s strategic plan are closely aligned with Access to Excellence. Our community engagement efforts play a pivotal role in securing the CSU s contribution to the public good. Office of Community Service Learning s Strategic Planning Process Dr. Kathleen Rice, a strategic planning consultant and former CSU faculty member, guided the CSL strategic planning process. A draft strategic plan was prepared by a design team 2 during the course of five meetings. Faculty feedback during the 2 nd Annual CSU Conference on Community Based Teaching and Research on strategies and barriers to community-based teaching and research efforts also helped shape the draft. New Office Name: The Office of Community Service Learning will be renamed to the Center for Community Engagement, which reflects a broader vision, mission, and set of responsibilities. Vision: In 2013, the CSU Chancellor s Office Center for Community Engagement is a full partner in the California State University s service to the public good through the work of its 23 campuses and its local and global communities. 1 Access to Excellence, CSU s March 11-12, 2008 draft, page 5 2 Members of the strategic plan design team: 1) a campus community partner; 2) a student/alumni; 3) a faculty member; 4) two state and national partners; 5) two campus service-learning directors; 6) two Chancellor s Office colleagues; 7) and two staff members from OCSL. For names and contact information, please see Appendix A. 3

Mission: The CSU Chancellor s Office Center for Community Engagement, as a driving and innovative force, advances the California State University s systemwide and multicampus commitment to serving the economic, public policy and social needs of our state. Barriers The Strategic Planning Design Team and feedback from faculty identified ten (10) key barriers existing on CSU campuses, the Chancellor s Office and beyond. These barriers are keeping our vision from being a current reality. While these barriers seem daunting, the acknowledgement of their existence was instrumental in shaping the Center for Community Engagement s strategic directions. There are many different terms and philosophies of this work (e.g. academic service learning, community service, public service, civic engagement, community based research, field work, international service learning, community based internships and practica). Infrastructure levels that support this work are uneven and frequently changing. Higher education is often slow to respond to community needs. Experience and knowledge of community partners and students are often overlooked by institutions of higher education. Students juggle many competing demands on their time. Engagement in civic, social and political issues is not always viewed as a core strategy in achieving the CSU s mission and priorities. Funding needed to support the work is inadequate and unstable. Current hiring, retention, tenure and promotion criteria do not encourage faculty involvement and leadership. Collaboration necessary for quality partnerships is fragmented. Some CSU policies and procedures inhibit community engagement. Strategic Directions, Goals, and Possible Action Steps The design team created four strategic directions, which are broad directions or proposals that impact the future. They are innovative, substantial actions designed to 4

respond to the barriers and catapult the organization closer to its vision 3. To achieve each strategic direction, five-year goals have been identified as well as some possible action steps. Success indicators for each strategic direction will be developed and available online. Based on stakeholder feedback, each year the Center for Community Engagement staff will develop a one-year implementation plan to determine the key actions and measurable outcomes that will build momentum behind each strategic direction and their corresponding goals. Strategic Direction 1 - Build CSU-wide capacity to advance community engagement Goal 1: Support the leadership of campus offices in institutionalizing and elevating the role of community engagement on campuses and in the CSU. Offer a range of ongoing networking and professional development opportunities that respond to the very diverse strengths, needs and interests of service learning and community engagement leaders Design a more efficient means of supporting and training new leaders, including student leaders. Identify new strategies for recognizing community engagement champions throughout the system. Goal 2: Foster partnerships with administrative leaders Provide provosts and other key academic leaders who champion service learning and community engagement with specific opportunities to engage in discussions and initiatives with campus and system stakeholders. Regularly update presidents with specific information about their campus community engagement efforts and encourage them to use the information in presentations to internal and external audiences. Collaborate with statewide Academic Senate members to promote community engagement at campus Academic Senates. Goal 3: Promote recognition and reward of faculty community scholarship at the individual faculty level Coordinate and publicize publishing opportunities for faculty. Offer community engagement workshops through various forums (e.g. CSU Community-Based Teaching and Research Conference and campus-based workshops). Connect faculty with statewide organizations and programs seeking evaluation and research on public policy issues. Create a cohort of CSU faculty who conduct collaborative research on specific community-based issues and identify the collective impact of their research. 3 Technology of Participation: Participatory Strategic Planning published by the Institute for Cultural Affairs, 2005 in Phoenix, AZ 5

Goal 4: Promote recognition and reward of community scholarship at the department/college/institutional/systemwide levels Partner with the Chancellor s Office of Human Resources to host systemwide meetings that encourage campus teams (department chairs, college deans, faculty on RTP committees, etc.) to have discussions on the changing roles for faculty and on methods for assessing and acknowledging community engagement in faculty RTP files. Explore the feasibility and usefulness of a CSU or external Review Board to assist faculty in documenting their Scholarship of Engagement. Strategic Direction 2 - Raise awareness and visibility for the importance of community engagement and its connection to CSU priorities Goal 1: Introduce key stakeholders to campus and system-wide strategic plans that outline the visions and strategic directions for community engagement throughout the system. Publish a white paper to make the case for community engagement efforts as critical to the mission of the CSU. Articulate the shared themes and distinctions between offices for service learning and community engagement strategic plans, the Chancellor s Office Center for Community Engagement strategic plan, and the Access to Excellence plan, including areas of academic preparation for Pre K-12 youth, a high priority area in the Chancellor s Office. Goal 2: Expand public relations efforts Design branding and marketing materials to publicize the new name, vision and mission of the systemwide office Explore recognition opportunities for CSU campuses and community members, including students. Goal 3: Improve systemwide mechanisms to gather data on the impact of all forms of community engagement on students, faculty, the community, and institutions Explore how new data collection measurements from organizations, such as American Association of State Colleges and Universities, can be integrated into the CSU s efforts. Determine the type of data that should be collected. Identify ways to integrate data collection with Peoplesoft and other institutional databases. Strategic Direction 3 - Mobilize Partnerships to fuel and expand community engagement 6

Goal 1: Seek out new external partnerships to expand public participation and political engagement opportunities Initiate systemwide conversations with organizations that promote public participation on policy issues and examine suitable roles or resources for the CSU. Provide resources to campuses interested in engaging in community/campus dialogue, public issue forums, and/or political engagement education for students and community. Goal 2: Explore partnerships with other Chancellor s Office programs that expand engagement efforts Identify ways community engagement currently is in alignment with emerging state and federal priorities (e.g. veterans social and economic issues, academic preparation for pre K-12 youth), with the goal of preparing funding proposals and encouraging new and/or strengthened alliances. Advocate for shared decision-making on risk management policies between Divisions of Academic Affairs and Business and Finance. Strategic Direction 4 Seek new, stable, sustainable financial resources Goal 1: Pilot new ways to secure additional resources that support the efforts of CSU campuses and the Chancellor s Office Encourage campuses to become lead applicants in consortia grant proposals. Investigate the feasibility of a systemwide advisory board to assist in funddevelopment. Advocate for the inclusion of community engagement efforts in CSU budget proposals. Invest in networking opportunities for advancement officers and community engagement leaders. Explore opportunities to collaborate with other Chancellor s Office programs on grants. Conclusion In the last ten years, an educational revolution has occurred that has expanded our traditional notions of where learning takes place. Service learning is now widely practiced in the CSU as a vehicle to prepare our next generation of leaders to be active, informed, and committed to community issues. Ultimately, it is the nexus between this historic momentum, with service learning at the core, and the limitless potential ahead that serve as the driving force behind the Center for Community Engagement s vision to be a full partner with the CSU in serving the public good. 7

Appendix A Strategic Planning Design Team We would like to thank the members of the design team who generously gave their time and feedback in helping to develop a new strategic plan for the CSU systemwide center for community engagement. Colleen Bentley Director, Special Projects CSU Chancellor s Office Executive Long Beach, CA 90802-4210 Phone: 562-951-4801 E-Mail: cbentley@calstate.edu Deanna Berg Director of Civic Engagement Office of the Provost CSU, Chico 1st and Normal Streets Chico, CA 95929-110 Phone: 530-898-5486 E-Mail: dberg@csuchico.edu Richard Berrett Service Learning Faculty Scholar Community Service Learning Long Beach, CA 90802-4210 Phone: 562-951-4797 Cell: 559-284-3769 E-Mail: richardb@csufresno.edu Judy Botelho Assistant Director Community Service Learning CSU Chancellor s Office Long Beach, Ca 90802-4210 Phone: 562-951-4749 E-Mail: jbotelho@calstate.edu Carolina Cardenas Associate Director, Academic Outreach & Enrollment Management Student Academic Support Long Beach, CA 90802-4210 Phone: 562-951-4724 E-Mail: ccardenas@calstate.edu Season Eckardt Administrative Director Community Service Learning CSU Chancellor s Office Long Beach, Ca 90802-4210 Phone: 562-951-4787 E-Mail: seckardt@calstate.edu Jean Egan President, Founder Long Beach Blast 957 ½ Via Carmelitos Long Beach, CA 90805 Phone: 562-728-9200 E-Mail: lbblast@aol.com Tom Ehrlich Senior Scholar Carnegie Foundation 51 Vista Lane Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: 650-566-5137 E-Mail: ehrlich@carnegiefoundation.org Elaine Ikeda Executive Director CA Campus Compact 1600 Holloway Avenue, Pacific Plaza Building Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94132-4027 Phone: 415-338-3342 E-Mail: elaine@cacampuscompact.org Diane Podolske Director of Community University Partnerships and Service Learning Community University Partnerships, TO-43 CSU, San Bernardino 5500 University Parkway San Bernardino, CA 92407-2397 Phone: 909-537-7483 Email: dpodolsk@csusb.edu Jaime Thompson Student, Humboldt State University Facilitator Kathleen Rice Consultant K.L Rice Consulting E-Mail: klrice61@earthlink.net 8