Section 1 - Program Productivity

Similar documents
Network Technology/Cisco and Linux Networking Education Report. 5, % $27.63/hr

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

The Art and Science of Predicting Enrollment

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

CAREER SERVICES Career Services 2020 is the new strategic direction of the Career Development Center at Middle Tennessee State University.

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

Full-time MBA Program Distinguish Yourself.

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

Program Change Proposal:

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Educational Attainment

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE STUDENT PLACEMENTOFFICE PROGRAM REVIEW SPRING SEMESTER, 2010

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

learning collegiate assessment]

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

How to Revitalize Your Financial Aid Compliance

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Why Graduate School? Deborah M. Figart, Ph.D., Dean, School of Graduate and Continuing Studies. The Degree You Need to Achieve TM

1. Amend Article Departmental co-ordination and program committee as set out in Appendix A.

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

Understanding and Interpreting the NRC s Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (2010)

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

Western Australia s General Practice Workforce Analysis Update

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

Financing Education In Minnesota

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Assessing the Impact of an Academic Recovery Program

Office of Planning and Budgets. Provost Market for Fiscal Year Resource Guide

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

12-month Enrollment

Grade 6: Correlated to AGS Basic Math Skills

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

NC Community College System: Overview

FTE General Instructions

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

ARTS ADMINISTRATION CAREER GUIDE. Fine Arts Career UTexas.edu/finearts/careers

Millersville University Degree Works Training User Guide

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

State Budget Update February 2016

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Best Colleges Main Survey

The Teaching and Learning Center

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics. Standards Unpacking Documents Grade 5

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

SCNS changed to MUM 2634

World s Best Workforce Plan

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Idaho Public Schools

South Dakota Board of Regents Intent to Plan for a Master of Engineering (M.Eng)

Essex Apprenticeships in Engineering and Manufacturing

How and Why Has Teacher Quality Changed in Australia?

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

E35 RE-DISCOVER CAREERS AND EDUCATION THROUGH 2020

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) WCES Why Do Students Choose To Study Information And Communications Technology?

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

A Study of the Workforce Training Needs for the Agribusiness Industry in Georgia

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

FY STATE AID ALLOCATIONS AND BUDGET POLICIES

Transcription:

Section 1 - Program Productivity Purpose: To provide program productivity trend data in terms of headcount, enrollment and graduate data. Data: The data is provided using duplicated across terms and unduplicated formats. Duplicated data counts a student every term s/he is enrolled in the program. Unduplicated data counts the student only in the first term s/he is enrolled in the program. Headcount enrollment (HC). For each term, headcount is the number of students enrolled in the program. Table 1 uses the duplicated format and each student enrolled in the program in the term is counted. Table 2 uses the unduplicated format and students are only counted in the first term they are enrolled in the program. Full Time Equivalent (FTE). 1 FTE student equates to 12 credit hours. The total credit hours taken by students enrolled in the program in the indicated term is divided by 12 to produce the FTE hours in the table. Graduates. Program graduates are based on an unduplicated format and only counted in the term that they graduated in the program. Use: Trend enrollment (Headcount, FTE, and graduate data) provides a basis for assessing the productivity and sustainability of the academic program and answer and raise such questions as: Are a sufficient number of students actively enrolling in the program to justify its continuation? Is Headcount enrollment (HC) evidencing an increase/decrease over time; is/was this an expected trend; is this something that needs to be addressed through planning/further research? Is the program producing sufficient graduates to meet job market requirements? FTE is an indicator of the number of credit hours students are taking. Are students in the program generating sufficient FTE? Is there an increasing/decreasing trend? Table 1 exhibits the program s Headcount, FTE and Graduates by term, providing a by termsnapshot of the program s overall productivity. Headcount and FTE are based on the duplicated format and Graduates are based on the unduplicated format. This table Table 2 exhibits unduplicated Headcount and FTE data for students enrolled in the program for the first time, providing an indicator of program vitality based on the trend of the influx of new students into the program. Ideally the number of new students enrolling in the program will be fairly consistent or consistently increasing over time. The FTE for the students starting the program in a given term provides an indicator of the potential time frame for that cohort of students to complete the program. Students starting out with less than a full academic load take usually take longer to graduate.

TABLE 1- HC and FTE by Term for Accounting Duplicated Across Terms Year SEMESTER FALL SPRING SUMMER Enrolled FTE GRADS Enrolled FTE GRADS Enrolled FTE GRADS 2007 245 187.4 14 242 181.7 19 108 56.7 7 2008 251 189.7 12 261 205.2 13 132 71.3 7 2009 277 215.1 11 251 193.6 16 136 73.7 6 2010 260 199.3. 246 185.5. 124 68.5. SOURCE: CERS Official Files

TABLE 2 - HC and FTE by Start Term for Accounting Year SEMESTER FALL SPRING SUMMER Enrolled FTE Enrolled FTE Enrolled FTE 2007 83 72.2 69 55.3 22 11.2 2008 89 73.8 67 56.2 29 16.2 2009 112 87.5 52 42.4 36 18.1 2010 95 81.5 60 46.7 37 20.3 Source: CERS Official Files Note: Start term is 1st time student was in the program

Section 2 Enrollment by Courses Type PURPOSE: To provide information on the type of course mix that program students enroll in. DATA: Duplicated data counts a student every term s/he is enrolled in the program. Unduplicated data counts the student only in the first term s/he is enrolled in the program. The Course Types are defined as follows: Major Courses- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled in at least 1 major course and not enrolled in any DVS Courses. Major Courses are defined as those core discipline courses that are actually controlled by the program Major & DVS Courses - The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled in at least 1 major course and at least 1 DVS course. Total Non-Major Courses Only- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term not enrolled in any major courses. Non-Major courses are defined as courses that are not controlled by the program. Curricula Only- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled only in Non-major courses and no DVS courses. Curricula courses are defined as nondvs academic courses that are not owned by the program. Curricula and DVS Courses- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled in at least 1 Non-major and at least 1 DVS course. DVS Only Courses- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled only in DVS courses. DVS courses are defined as English, Math, and Reading courses numbered 0 or 100. USE: Table3 (duplicated) provides overall information about the courses program students are taking. The sequence of program course offerings is a large determinant of when and what courses students take. The question to ask is Does the course mix match what I expected? (i.e., Is the percentage of students enrolled and not taking any major courses higher or lower than your expectation?) Table 4 (unduplicated) provides information on the initial readiness of the students enrolled in the program for the first time. A consistent high number of students enrolled in DVS courses implies a potentially longer time for the student to graduate, a higher potential for attrition, and a higher need for support, from both the program and other college offices

TABLE 3- Enrollment of Accounting Students By Type Courses By Term Duplicated Across Terms Total HC Enrolled Major Courses Enrolled Major & DVS Total Non-Major Only Enrolled Curricula Courses Only Enrolled DVS Only Enrolled Curricula & DVS Fall 2007-08 245 151 2 92 41 16 35 Spring 2008-09 503 299 17 187 102 27 58 Summer 2008-09 240 134 4 102 77 13 12 Fall 2008-09 251 134 9 108 69 11 28 Fall 2009-10 277 164 9 104 63 19 22 Spring 2009-10 251 161 6 84 60 11 13 Summer 2009-10 136 74 1 61 49 7 5 Fall 2010-11 260 145 9 106 67 15 24 Spring 2010-11 246 148 4 94 60 11 23 Summer 2010-11 124 73 3 48 35 4 9 Category Definitions: MAJOR COURSES- Enrolled in at least 1 major course & no DVS Courses MAJOR & DVS - Enrolled in at least 1 major crse and 1 DVS course Total NON-MAJOR Only: Enrolled only in Non-major and/or DVS courses CURRICULA ONLY-Enrolled only in Non-major courses and no DVS courses CURRICULA & DVS - Enrolled in at least 1 Non-major and 1 DVS course DVS ONLY- Enrolled only in DVS courses Source:CERS Official Opening Extracts

TABLE 4- Enrollment of Accounting Students By Type Course By Start Term Total HC Enrolled Major Course Enrolled Major & DVS Total Non-Major Only Enrolled Curricula Courses Only Enrolled DVS Only Enrolled Curricula & DVS Fall 2007-08 83 30 1 52 11 12 29 Spring 2008-09 136 59 6 71 27 18 26 Summer 2008-09 51 22 3 26 15 8 3 Fall 2008-09 89 31 7 51 25 8 18 Fall 2009-10 112 53 5 54 20 19 15 Spring 2009-10 52 28 2 22 11 5 6 Summer 2009-10 36 10 1 25 16 6 3 Fall 2010-11 95 40 6 49 23 12 14 Spring 2010-11 60 34 2 24 10 6 8 Summer 2010-11 37 16 2 19 11 3 5 Category Definitions: MAJOR COURSES- Enrolled in at least 1 Major course & no DVS Courses MAJOR & DVS - Enrolled in at least 1 Major and 1 DVS course Total NON-MAJOR Only: Enrolled only in Non-major and/or DVS courses CURRICULA ONLY-Enrolled only in Non-major courses and no DVS courses CURRICULA & DVS - Enrolled in at least 1 Non-major and 1 DVS course DVS ONLY- Enrolled only in DVS courses Source:CERS Official Opening Extracts

Section 3 Program Course Section Size PURPOSE: To provide information on the use of faculty and classroom resources based on the section size of courses offered in the referenced terms. DATA: Major courses are defined as those courses that are discipline specific and owned by the program. In most cases the 3 character prefix for the course is identified with the Associate Degree program; for example the ACCounting program owns the courses beginning with the ACC prefix; therefore table 5 for the Accounting program would only include the ACC courses. In those programs where the prefixes are shared by multiple programs, the specific courses are assigned to the correct major. The Computer Technology and Telecommunications Management programs both own CPT and IST prefix courses. Only the courses than each program owns is considered a MAJOR course. USE: The data provides a mechanism for reviewing course offerings and identifying potentials for improving the use of resources based on section sizes. If there is a trend of multiple sections of the same course with small enrollments being offered in the same term, it may indicate a needed analysis to determine the reasons. Table 5-A provides a display of the Average section size for each course by term. The standard is 12-20 students per section. This table provides a quick reference to evaluate your overall section loads. Table 5-B provides a display of the exact section size. This table will quickly indicate if there is a trend in offering sections with smaller numbers and please note, there are situations where it is necessary to conduct sections with smaller than standard sizes. Sometimes the course may be a clinical or worksite course and thus the smaller numbers are justified.

TABLE 5-A - Average Section Size for ACC Courses COURSE ACC101 ACC102 ACC110 ACC111 ACC112 ACC115 ACC124 ACC150 ACC201 N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg 20071 9 22 3 10 1 7 9 21 7 12 3 9 2 12 2 11 2 10 20072 10 20 5 8.. 8 22 6 13 2 13 2 14 1 10 3 8 20073 4 20 3 20.. 4 11 3 8 1 5 1 7 1 7 1 6 20081 9 23 3 13.. 10 19 4 11 2 9 2 8 2 13 2 9 20082 10 24 4 12.. 8 25 5 17 2 10 1 17 1 17 1 16 20083 3 21 4 14.. 4 15 4 11 1 17.. 1 13 1 6 20091 10 25 3 12.. 9 24 6 14 2 12 2 11 2 12 2 14 20092 10 22 4 13.. 8 21 5 17 2 12 1 20 2 13 2 11 20101 9 25 4 13.. 9 19 5 13.. 2 15 1 15 1 19 20102 10 25 7 16.. 6 25 3 23.. 2 11 2 10 2 11 20103 5 22 5 18.. 7 9 2 7.. 1 11.. 1 11 20111 10 22 6 14.. 9 18 5 13.. 1 14 3 10 2 8 COURSE ACC202 ACC203 ACC224 ACC230 ACC240 ACC245 ACC246 ACC260 ACC265 N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg N Avg 20071 2 10.... 2 15.. 2 12 2 7 1 9 2 11 20072 1 11 1 8.. 2 10.. 3 9 2 13 2 15.. 20073 1 10 1 7.. 1 12.. 1 11 2 10.... 20081 1 13.... 1 11.. 1 16 1 14 2 15 1 6 20082 2 11.... 1 22.. 2 14 2 12 1 17 1 14 20083 1 8.... 1 13.. 1 10.. 1 10.. 20091 1 10.... 1 14.. 2 12 2 11 1 18 1 14 20092 1 23.... 1 29.. 2 11 1 16 1 22.. 20101 1 20.... 2 9.. 2 12 1 14 1 21 1 9 20102 1 17.... 1 9 2 13 2 11 1 14 1 10.. 20103 2 6.... 1 5 1 8 1 9 1 16 1 10.. 20111 2 9 1 7 1 6 1 10 1 9 1 12 1 15 1 7.. Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Red numbers indicate average section size below standard.

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL ACC101 6. 1.......... 7....... 1.... 8... 1..... 1.. 9 1......... 1. 10.. 1......... 11 1... 1....... 12. 1..... 1.... 13........... 1 14... 1 1. 1.... 2 16..... 1.. 1 1.. 17 1 1.. 1...... 1 18....... 1.... 19. 2..... 1.... 20. 1 1... 2 1 1.. 1 21 2 1 1. 1.. 1.. 1. 22...... 1.. 1.. 23... 1. 1.. 1. 1. 24... 2 1 1... 1.. 25... 1.. 1. 1... 26........... 1 27........ 1. 1 1 28. 1.... 1 1.... (Continued) Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC101 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 29 3 1. 1 2. 2. 2 2. 2 30. 1 1 2 2. 2 3 2 3. 1 31 1... 1.... 1 1. ACC102 3.... 1....... (Continued) 4....... 1.... 5. 1......... 1 6 1......... 1. 7... 1........ 8. 1.... 1.... 1 9. 3.. 1.... 1.. 10....... 1... 1 11........ 1... 12 1.... 2 1. 1. 1. 13 1. 1 1.... 1... 14.... 1 1... 2.. 15...... 1..... 16........ 1... 17..... 1.... 1. 18....... 1. 1.. 19.. 1...... 2. 2 20... 1... 1.... 21......... 1.. Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC102 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 22.... 1...... 1 25.......... 1. 27.. 1......... 31.......... 1. ACC110 7 1........... ACC111 3.......... 1. (Continued) 6.......... 2. 7.......... 2. 8..... 1...... 9.. 1......... 10.. 1......... 11.. 1.. 1...... 12 1....... 1.. 1 13 1.. 1.... 2 1.. 14 1 1. 1... 1.... 15.. 1 1. 1.... 1 1 16... 2 1. 2.... 1 17 1 1..... 1 1.. 3 18... 1.. 1.... 1 19... 1 1.. 2 1. 1. 20. 1.......... 21........ 1... Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC111 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 22.... 1.. 1... 1 23 1 1.... 1 1.... 24. 2. 1... 1. 1.. 25 1.... 1 1. 1.. 1 26... 1.... 1... 27 2 1...... 1 2.. 28 1... 3.... 1.. 29. 1.... 4 1. 1.. 30... 1 2....... ACC112 4.. 1....... 1. (Continued) 6...... 1.... 1 7. 1 1......... 8 1.. 3... 1.... 9..... 1.. 1.. 1 10. 1... 1 1. 1. 1. 11 3........... 12. 2 1. 2 2...... 13 1....... 1.. 2 14...... 1..... 15........ 1... 16 2 1.. 1. 1 1 1... 17....... 1. 1.. Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC112 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 18.... 1. 1..... 19... 1... 1.... 20. 1.......... 21...... 1..... 22........... 1 24......... 1.. 26....... 1.... 29.... 1.... 1.. ACC115 5 1. 1. 1....... 7... 1........ 10 1........... 11 1 1. 1.. 1 1.... 13...... 1 1.... 14. 1.. 1....... 17..... 1...... ACC124 6. 1....... 1.. (Continued) 7.. 1 1.. 1..... 9 1.. 1........ 11.......... 1. 12........ 1... 14 1.......... 1 15...... 1.. 1.. Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC124 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 17.... 1... 1... 20....... 1.... 21. 1.......... ACC150 6........... 1 7.. 1......... 9... 1........ 10 1 1....... 2. 1 11 1..... 1 1.... 13..... 1 1.... 1 15....... 1 1... 16... 1........ 17.... 1....... ACC201 6 1. 1.. 1. 1.... (Continued) 7. 2......... 1 8... 1........ 9. 1.... 1.. 1. 1 10... 1........ 11.......... 1. 13......... 1.. 14 1........... 15....... 1.... 16.... 1....... Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC201 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 18...... 1..... 19........ 1... ACC202 5.......... 1. 6.......... 1. 8 1... 1 1..... 1 10.. 1... 1.... 1 11 1 1.......... 13... 1........ 14.... 1....... 17......... 1.. 20........ 1... 23....... 1.... ACC203 7.. 1........ 1 8. 1.......... ACC224 6........... 1 ACC230 5........ 1. 1. (Continued) 6. 1.......... 9......... 1.. 10........... 1 11... 1........ 12.. 1..... 1... 13..... 1...... Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC230 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 14 1 1.... 1..... 16 1........... 22.... 1....... 29....... 1.... ACC240 8.......... 1. 9......... 1. 1 17......... 1.. ACC245 6. 1.......... 8........ 1... 9......... 1 1. 10 1 1... 1 1 1.... 11.. 1......... 12. 1..... 1. 1. 1 13 1... 1. 1..... 14.... 1....... 15........ 1... 16... 1........ ACC246 6 1........... (Continued) 7 1. 1......... 8...... 1..... 10. 1.. 1....... 13.. 1. 1. 1..... Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Table 5-B Number of Sections by Section Size for ACC Sections Course / Section Size ACC246 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR SUM FALL SPR FALL SPR SUM FALL 14... 1.... 1 1.. 15. 1......... 1 16....... 1.. 1. ACC260 7........... 1 9 1........... 10..... 1... 1 1. 12. 1. 1........ 17... 1 1....... 18. 1.... 1..... 21........ 1... 22....... 1.... ACC265 5 1........... 6... 1........ 9........ 1... 14.... 1. 1..... 16 1........... Source: CERS Official Opening Files Note: Number in Section Size Column is the size of the section. Numbers in the term column indicate how mant section of that size were taught that term

Section 4 Post Graduate Opportunities PURPOSE: To provide information on post graduate success in terms of employment and continued education and employment projections. DATA: The Graduate follow-up survey (GFUS) provides data on program graduates and post graduate employment The state requires that 50% of all graduates be employed in a job related to their degree or be enrolled in college full-time in the fall term following graduation. The MTC standard is 90%. This percentage is based on the number of the program graduates who respond favorably to the survey divided by the total number of program graduates. Employment Projections: The employment projection and salary data is derived from multiple sources- EMSI and state and federal agencies. The college contracts EMSI, an econometric modeling company, for the development of industry and occupational projections within the MTC service area. The data is reliable but all forecast models are based on past events and anticipated future events; unforeseen events can negate the validity of projections. EMSI uses over 90 regional, state and federal data sources and updates their projections whenever new data is available, at least twice a year. USE: Table 6A provides information from the GFUS to answer the questions: (1) Are a sufficient percent of the graduates of the program securing employment in their field? If not, why not? (Jobs in this field being eliminated; recession; graduates need different skill sets than what they are getting;.) (2) If a large percent of the program graduates are continuing their education, is it an expected event or do the graduates need additional skill sets to gain employment? Employment Projections: The employment projections provide a picture of future employment and salary and projected salary information. This data answers questions about the programs future viability. Is the job market for graduates of this program increasing, decreasing or static? Is the salary ( projected salary) for program graduates sufficient to encourage students to spend the resources to get a degree/diploma in this program?

Table 6A Placement Rate Information for ACC Graduates Number and Percentage of Graduates Employed or Continuing Education Year Unduplicate d Count Available for Employmen t and Cont. Educ. Employed in Related Field No. No. No Percent No. Continuing Education Percen t Employed or Cont. Educ. No. Percent 2004-2005 27 26 16 61.6% 2 7.7% 18 69.3% 2005-2006 35 35 19 54.3% 9 25.8% 28 80.0% 2006-2007 27 27 24 88.9% 2 7.4% 26 96.3% 2007-2008 36 36 30 83.4% 2 5.6% 32 88.9% 2008-2009 32 31 15 48.4% 5 16.2% 20 64.6% 2009-2010 34 33 15 45.5% 7 20.6% 22 66.7% Source: MTC Job Placement Report

Employment Projections Summary Selected Occupations Occupation Accountants and auditors (SOC 13-2011) Budget analysts (SOC 13-2031) Credit analysts (SOC 13-2041) Financial analysts (SOC 13-2051) Personal financial advisors (SOC 13-2052) Education Level Bachelor's degree Bachelor's degree Bachelor's degree Bachelor's degree Bachelor's degree Executive Summary Basic Information 2011 Occupational Jobs 6,608 2021 Occupational Jobs 8,174 Total Change 1,566 Total % Change 23.73% Openings 2,577 2011 Median Hourly Earnings $21.10 Economic Indicators 2011 Location Quotient 0.78 2021 Location Quotient 0.76 Occupational Change Summary Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 2011.4

Region 2011 Jobs 2021 Jobs Change % Change Openings 2011 Median Hourly Earnings Regional Total 6,608 8,174 1,566 24% 2,577 $21.10 State Total 33,960 44,239 10,279 30% 15,411 $17.91 National Total 3,493,99 7 4,538,09 3 1,044,09 6 30% 1,562,880 $21.38 Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 2011.4 Occupational Breakdown SOC Code Description 2011 Jobs 2021 Jobs Openings 2011 Median Hourly Earnings 13-2011 Accountants and auditors 3,428 3,890 1,041 $22.69 13-2031 Budget analysts 122 131 31 $28.12 13-2041 Credit analysts 198 189 44 $26.14 13-2051 Financial analysts 637 844 322 $18.61 13-2052 Personal financial advisors 2,222 3,121 1,139 $18.52 Total 6,608 8,174 2,577 $21.10 Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 2011.4 Occupation Distribution

County 2011 Jobs Richland, SC (45079) 4,209 Lexington, SC (45063) 2,308 Fairfield, SC (45039) 90 Data Sources and Calculations Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 2011.4 Occupation Data Organizing regional employment information by occupation provides a workforce-oriented view of the regional economy. EMSI's occupation data are based on EMSI's industry data and regional staffing patterns taken from the Occupational Employment Statistics program (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Wage information is partially derived from the American Community Survey. The occupation-to-program (SOC-to-CIP) crosswalk is based on one from the U.S. Department of Education, with customizations by EMSI. Location Quotient Location quotient (LQ) is a way of quantifying how concentrated a particular industry, cluster, occupation, or demographic group is in a region as compared to the nation. It can reveal what makes a particular region unique in comparison to the national average. State Data Sources This report uses state data from the following agencies: South Carolina Employment Security Commission, Labor Market Information Department.

Section 5 Retention Purpose: To provide program retention data to help evaluate the program s productivity, success and problems with moving students to completion. Data: The data is cohort based. Both the Fall and Spring cohorts are determined by the first time a student is enrolled in the program. Each cohort is tracked through the Fall 2008 semester. Each cohort contains categories reflecting categorized by the type courses the students took in their 1 st semester in the program. Categories: Major Courses- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled in at least 1 major course and not enrolled in any DVS Courses. Major Courses are defined as those core discipline courses that are actually controlled by the program Major & DVS Courses - The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled in at least 1 major course and at least 1 DVS course. Total Non-Major Courses Only- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term not enrolled in any major courses. Non-Major courses are defined as courses that are not controlled by the program. Curricula Only- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled only in Nonmajor courses and no DVS courses. Curricula courses are defined as non-dvs academic courses that are not owned by the program. Curricula and DVS Courses- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled in at least 1 Non-major and at least 1 DVS course. DVS Only Courses- The total number of students enrolled in the program that term enrolled only in DVS courses. DVS courses are defined as English, Math, and Reading courses numbered 0 or 100. Retention events tracked are: (1)Enrolled (still in the major), (2)Graduated ( in the major), (3) Changed major, (4) Graduated ( in non-cohort major). The starting cohort is adjusted for any students who change majors or graduate in another major (Adjusted Cohort = Starting Cohort- Change Major Grad other major). The total retention ratio for each term is calculated as Graduated in major + Enrolled in major Adjusted Cohort Notes: Each student is counted in only one category and one retention event per term. Students changing major (including grads) are removed from the cohort. However, if a student who was removed from the cohort re-enrolls and graduates from the cohort program, s/he is reentered into the cohort and counted as a graduate. Graduate counts are cumulative. Use: Trend analysis. Are the grad/retention rates consistent across time? Are there certain categories of students who have lower grad/retention rates? Where are the largest decreases in the retention rates? FTE is an indicator of the number of credit hours students are taking. Are students in the program generating sufficient FTE? Is there an increasing/decreasing trend?

Table 7- Retention Tracking for - ACC Cohort= 20071 Start Cohort New Major Grad in New Adjusted Cohort Retain in Grad in Major % Retain+G rad Major Major in Major Fall 07 to Spring 08 Fall 07 to Fall 08 Fall 07 to Spring 09 Fall 07 to Fall 09 Fall 07 to Spring 10 Fall 07 to Fall 10 Fall 07 to Spring 11 Fall 07 to Fall 11 Major Only 30 2 0 28 19 0 68 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 1 0 100 Curriculm 11 1 0 10 7 0 70 Curric & DVS 29 2 0 27 17 0 63 DVS Only 12 0 0 12 10 0 83 Major Only 30 4 0 26 13 1 54 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Curriculm 11 2 0 9 7 0 78 Curric & DVS 29 5 0 24 9 0 38 DVS Only 12 3 0 9 6 0 67 Major Only 30 5 1 24 12 1 54 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 1 0 100 Curriculm 11 2 0 9 6 0 67 Curric & DVS 29 5 0 24 5 0 21 DVS Only 12 2 0 10 4 0 40 Major Only 30 3 3 24 9 2 46 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Curriculm 11 3 0 8 2 0 25 Curric & DVS 29 5 1 23 9 0 39 DVS Only 12 2 0 10 4 0 40 Major Only 30 4 3 23 8 3 48 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Curriculm 11 3 0 8 2 0 25 Curric & DVS 29 6 1 22 6 0 27 DVS Only 12 2 0 10 3 0 30 Major Only 30 4 4 22 4 6 45 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Curriculm 11 3 0 8 3 0 38 Curric & DVS 29 7 1 21 4 0 19 DVS Only 12 2 0 10 1 0 10 Major Only 60 8 8 44 1 12 59 Maj & DVS 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 Curriculm 22 10 0 12 2 0 33 Curric & DVS 58 17 2 39 4 0 20 DVS Only 24 4 0 20 3 0 30 Major Only 30 4 4 22 2 6 36 Maj & DVS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Curriculm 11 5 0 6 1 0 17 Curric & DVS 29 9 1 19 4 0 21 DVS Only 12 2 0 10 2 0 20

Table 7- Retention Tracking for - ACC Cohort= 20081 Fall 08 to Spring 09 Fall 08 to Fall 09 Fall 08 to Spring 10 Fall 08 to Fall 10 Fall 08 to Spring 11 Fall 08 to Fall0 11 Start New Grad in Adjusted Retain in Grad in % Cohort Major Major Cohort Major Major in Major Major Only 31 3 0 28 23 0 82 Maj & DVS 7 2 0 5 2 0 40 Curriculm 25 4 0 21 9 0 43 Curric & DVS 18 0 0 18 14 0 78 DVS Only 8 5 0 3 2 0 67 Major Only 31 4 0 27 9 0 33 Maj & DVS 7 3 0 4 0 0 0 Curriculm 25 5 0 20 3 0 15 Curric & DVS 18 0 0 18 10 0 56 DVS Only 8 4 0 4 2 0 50 Major Only 31 5 0 26 7 0 27 Maj & DVS 7 3 0 4 0 0 0 Curriculm 25 5 0 20 3 0 15 Curric & DVS 18 0 0 18 8 0 44 DVS Only 8 4 0 4 2 0 50 Major Only 31 5 0 26 3 1 15 Maj & DVS 7 3 0 4 0 0 0 Curriculm 25 6 1 18 4 1 28 Curric & DVS 18 0 0 18 5 1 33 DVS Only 8 4 0 4 1 0 25 Major Only 31 5 0 26 4 1 19 Maj & DVS 7 3 0 4 0 0 0 Curriculm 25 7 1 17 1 1 12 Curric & DVS 18 0 0 18 5 1 33 DVS Only 8 4 0 4 1 0 25 Major Only 31 5 0 26 3 1 15 Maj & DVS 7 3 0 4 0 0 0 Curriculm 25 8 1 16 0 1 6 Curric & DVS 18 0 0 18 4 1 28 DVS Only 8 5 0 3 0 0 0

Table 7- Retention Tracking for - ACC Cohort= 20091 Fall 09 to Spring 10 Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 09 to Spring 11 Fall 09 to Fall 11 Start New Grad in Adjusted Retain in Grad in % Cohort Major Major Cohort Major Major in Major Major Only 53 7 1 45 33 0 73 Maj & DVS 5 1 0 4 4 0 100 Curriculm 20 3 1 16 9 0 56 Curric & DVS 15 4 0 11 6 0 55 DVS Only 19 3 0 16 12 0 75 Major Only 53 10 2 41 18 0 44 Maj & DVS 5 1 0 4 1 0 25 Curriculm 20 2 1 17 6 0 35 Curric & DVS 15 5 0 10 2 0 20 DVS Only 19 6 0 13 6 0 46 Major Only 53 12 2 39 16 0 41 Maj & DVS 5 1 0 4 1 0 25 Curriculm 20 3 1 16 3 0 19 Curric & DVS 15 6 0 9 2 0 22 DVS Only 19 6 0 13 4 0 31 Major Only 53 12 2 39 11 0 28 Maj & DVS 5 1 0 4 1 0 25 Curriculm 20 4 1 15 3 0 20 Curric & DVS 15 7 0 8 1 0 13 DVS Only 19 7 0 12 2 0 17