Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Kindergarten

Similar documents
Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students

Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

Georgia Department of Education

Data-Based Decision Making: Academic and Behavioral Applications

Using SAM Central With iread

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Aimsweb Fluency Norms Chart

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

The Effects of Super Speed 100 on Reading Fluency. Jennifer Thorne. University of New England

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Clarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Progress Monitoring & Response to Intervention in an Outcome Driven Model

PROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS. Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Dibels Next Benchmarks Kindergarten 2013

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL LOCAL SCHOLARSHIP PORTFOLIO CLASS OF

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Florida Reading for College Success

Tools and. Response to Intervention RTI: Monitoring Student Progress Identifying and Using Screeners,

Tests For Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics

Meta-Cognitive Strategies

Reading Horizons. A Look At Linguistic Readers. Nicholas P. Criscuolo APRIL Volume 10, Issue Article 5

J j W w. Write. Name. Max Takes the Train. Handwriting Letters Jj, Ww: Words with j, w 321

Pyramid. of Interventions

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

The State and District RtI Plans

Cuero Independent School District

Natchitoches Parish School Board Special Education Progress Monitoring Procedures

RtI Meeting 9/24/2012. # (Gabel)

Objective: Add decimals using place value strategies, and relate those strategies to a written method.

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Answer Key To Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

Recent advances in research and. Formulating Secondary-Level Reading Interventions

Laura A. Riffel

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC

Dibels Math Early Release 2nd Grade Benchmarks

Using CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading. Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs

This document contains materials are intended as resources for the

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Allowable Accommodations for Students with Disabilities

Evaluation of the. for Structured Language Training: A Multisensory Language Program for Delayed Readers

Trends & Issues Report

Fisk Street Primary School

How do we balance statistical evidence with expert judgement when aligning tests to the CEFR?

Pretest Integers and Expressions

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

100 Tier 2 Words For High School

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Treasures Triumphs Practice Grade 4

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

MARK 12 Reading II (Adaptive Remediation)

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

21st Century Community Learning Center

Comprehensive Progress Report

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Secondary RtII Overview

MASP: Building a System of Support for ALL Michigan s Students. Michigan Association of School Psychologists

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District February 12-14, 2014

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Office of Semester Conversion Cal Poly Pomona

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Examinee Information. Assessment Information

Selecting Accommodations: Guidance tor Individual Educational plan Teams

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

ALEKS. ALEKS Pie Report (Class Level)

Transcription:

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Kindergarten

For students who have a PRS of 0 39% or any student indicating a need for more intensive support, it is key to collect and closely monitor the formative data that comes from the Practice Book. PRS: Probability of Reading Success OPM: Ongoing Progress Monitor SWF: Sight Word Fluency ORF: Oral Reading Fluency WW: Wonderworks

Wonderworks Tier II Intervention Program (K 5) Guidance for using K 1st, Grade 2 & Grade 3 5 Flowcharts This document provides guidelines to school site personnel on the purpose and directions for usage of the K 5 Wonderworks Tier 2 decision Flowcharts. Purpose: The flowcharts address 3 key areas: 1) Which students should receive increasing levels of intensive intervention based on the FAIR screening and diagnostic assessments? 2) Which component of Wonderworks Intervention students must receive based on the intensity of the identified risk from FAIR? (In K 1, there is only one component of Wonderworks) 3) What measures of Ongoing Progress Monitoring (OPM) can schools use to determine if groups of students are making a positive response, or if there are specific students who show a lack of progress and may need to be referred to SST for Tier 3 development? Note: It is important to triangulate data by reviewing several data sources in order to make correct instructional placements for intervention.

DIRECTIONS: KINDERGARTEN & 1 ST GRADE: Access and analyze the Class Status Report and the Class Targeted Diagnostic Report from FAIR (Florida s for Instruction in Reading). The screening and diagnostic data from these reports will be used to place students into Wonderworks. The primary data point used to determine the level of risk for both K & 1 st grade is the PRS (Probability of Reading Success). For First Grade, Targeted Passage data is also factored in the decision making. (First Grade Target Passage for AP1=1.1, AP2=1.3, AP3=1.5) (A) Row 1 of Flowchart answers the question: Who gets what? Place students into the recommended 4 PRS ranges. The first two ranges PRS above 85% & PRS 40 84% are for students with the LEAST risk who can be considered for intervention based on additional data or available resources. The last two ranges PRS of 16 39%, and PRS below 16% are for students with GREATEST risk who must receive Wonderworks. (B) Row 2 of Flowchart answers the question: What do students receive? The Wonderworks intervention program is the curriculum designated for all students who receive the 30 minutes of daily intervention (in addition to their 90 minute Reading Program Wonders). The intervention materials include a Teacher s Edition, Teaching Chart, Practice Books, Book, Decodable Readers, as well as Photo cards, Letter cards, High Frequency Word cards etc. Daily lessons are designed to follow the scope and sequence of the core program Wonders by one week. Several opportunities exist each week for quickchecks, re teaching, corrective feedback, formal & informal assessments. (C) Row 3 of Flowchart answers the question: What tools will be used to monitor growth of groups of students or indicate a lack of growth of individual students?

K: The OPM tool is the 3 wk unit test from core program Wonders located in the Wonders book. Mastery is correct. Teachers/interventionists must administer & collect this data using the attached Spreadsheet (or one of choice). After each 3 week collection period, RtI Tier II teams meet to analyze the data for two purposes: One, determining positive responses in groups and two, determining if there is a lack of progress in individual students. If approximately 70% of the students group is showing a positive response, data is reviewed to see which individual student or students are not on track and these students may be referred to SST Tier 3. If approx. 70% of the group is not on track, the school RtI team should determine what support or changes need to be initiated for the group. If there is a need for additional information on an individual student, formative ongoing data collected during the daily 90 min reading instructional block as well as the 30 minute reading intervention block should be used. 1 st grade: OPM tools are as follows: The OPM tool is the 6 wk unit test from program located in the book. Mastery is correct. Additionally, at 6 week intervals, students in the most at risk profiles (PRS below 16%, and PRS 16 39%) must be given an Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) or a Sight Word Fluency (SWF) probe to determine if there is a positive increase in general reading outcomes. SWF is recommended if students are not ready for connected text reading. These probes are located in the 1 st grade book. Each probe has its own Target rates for expected level of student performance. Teachers/interventionists must administer & collect the above data using the attached Spreadsheet (or one of choice). After each 6 week collection period, RtI Tier II teams meet to analyze the data for two purposes: One, determining positive responses in groups and two, determining if there is a lack of progress in individual students. If approximately 70% of the students group is showing a positive response, data is reviewed to see which individual student or students are not on track and these students may be referred to SST Tier 3. If approx. 70% of the group is not on track, the school RtI team should determine what support or changes need to be initiated for the group. If there is a need for additional information on an individual student, formative ongoing data collected during the daily 90 min reading instructional block as well as the 30 minute reading intervention block should be used.

Kindergarten Tier 2 Ongoing Progress Monitoring Schedule s found in Wonders Unit Book Ongoing Progress Monitoring occurs at the end of each unit Ongoing Progress Monitor Page Number Goal Ongoing Progress Monitor 1 Unit 1 from Wonders Pg. 1 Ongoing Progress Monitor 2 Unit 2 from Wonders Pg. 15 Ongoing Progress Monitor 3 Unit 3 from Wonders Pg. 29 Ongoing Progress Monitor 4 Unit 4 from Wonders Pg. 43 Ongoing Progress Monitor 5 Unit 5 from Wonders Pg. 57 Ongoing Progress Monitor 6 Unit 6 from Wonders Pg.71 Ongoing Progress Monitor 7 Unit 7 from Wonders Pg. 85 Ongoing Progress Monitor 8 Unit 8 from Wonders Pg. 99 Ongoing Progress Monitor 9 Unit 9 from Wonders Pg. 113 Ongoing Progress Monitor 10 Unit 10 from Wonders Pg. 127

Kindergarten Tier 2 Ongoing Progress Monitoring Data s found in Wonders Unit Book Interventionist: Date Student Name OPM 1 OPM 2 OPM 3 OPM 4 OPM 5 OPM 6 OPM 7 OPM 8 OPM 9 OPM 10 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6 Unit 7 Unit 8 Unit 9 Unit 10 Sample 70% 75% 72% 70% 70% 50% 75% 65% 75% 70%