UCCRN Second Assessment Report on Climate Change and Cities (ARC3 2) Midterm Authors Workshop

Similar documents
EPA RESOURCE KIT: EPA RESEARCH Report Series No. 131 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND POLICY

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT UNIT. January, By T. Ngara CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Transferable Indigenous Knowledge (TIK): Education Process and Policy

Course Syllabus Solid Waste Management and Environmental Health ENVH 445 Fall Quarter 2016 (3 Credits)

USF Course Change Proposal Global Citizens Project

DIGITAL GAMING & INTERACTIVE MEDIA BACHELOR S DEGREE. Junior Year. Summer (Bridge Quarter) Fall Winter Spring GAME Credits.

Date Re Our ref Attachment Direct dial nr 2 februari 2017 Discussion Paper PH

UNEP-WCMC report on activities to ICRI

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

ACHIEVING SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH GREEN OFFICES PRACTICES

Carleton University School of Public Policy & Administration and Faculty of Engineering. SERG 5000 Cross Disciplinary Course in Sustainable Energy

JAM & JUSTICE. Co-producing Urban Governance for Social Innovation

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

EXPO MILANO CALL Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Interview on Quality Education

Annex 4 University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

EDUCATION. Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric

REGIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING ON ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT

GRAND CHALLENGES SCHOLARS PROGRAM

SCHOOL OF CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. CP8823-NB: Impact Assessment

Indigenous Peoples in Motion: Changes, Resistance, and Globalization LACB 3005 (3 Credits / 45 hours)

New Venture Financing

College of Engineering. Executive Retreat January 23, 2015 The Penn Stater

IAB INTERNATIONAL AUTHORISATION BOARD Doc. IAB-WGA

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

Information needed to facilitate the clarity, transparency and understanding of mitigation contributions

Global Business. ICA s first official fair to promote co-operative business. October 23, 24 and 25, 2008 Lisbon - Portugal From1pmto8pm.

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

University Assessment Council Minutes Erickson Board Room September 12, 2016 Louis Slimak

INQUIMUS. Workshops. Integrating quantitative and qualitative assessment methodologies for multi-dimensional phenomena

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Global Convention on Coaching: Together Envisaging a Future for coaching

MARKETING FOR THE BOP WORKSHOP

International Environmental Policy Spring :374:315:01 Tuesdays, 10:55 am to 1:55 pm, Blake 131

TK1019 NZ DIPLOMA IN ENGINEERING (CIVIL) Programme Information

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

H2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Innovative Training Networks Informal guidelines for the Mid-Term Meeting

university of wisconsin MILWAUKEE Master Plan Report

T Seminar on Internetworking

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

PREPARED BY: IOTC SECRETARIAT 1, 20 SEPTEMBER 2017

Knowledge Sharing Workshop, Tiel The Netherlands, 20 September 2016

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

How can climate change be considered in Vulnerability and Capacity Assessments? - A summary for practitioners April 2011

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Summarizing Webinar Protocol and Guide for Facilitators

International Workshop on Indigenous Knowledge and Disaster Risk Reduction: From Practice to Policy. [Summary Report] September 2008

The Werner Siemens House. at the University of St.Gallen

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Biome I Can Statements

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

ABI11111 ABIOSH Level 5 International Diploma in Environmental Sustainability Management

INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY GEOL TUESDAY/FRIDAY, 14:10-15:25 HUNTER NORTH 1021

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

Curriculum Scavenger Hunt

Knowledge Synthesis and Integration: Changing Models, Changing Practices

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

RAMSAR Government CEPA NFP

UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM VACANCIES

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020

Data Fusion Models in WSNs: Comparison and Analysis

Writing Mentorship. Goals. Ideas and Getting Started! 1/21/14. Pamela Hallquist Viale Wendy H. Vogel

Materials Under Extreme Conditions: Effects of Temperature, High Strain Rate and Irradiation

Regional Capacity-Building on ICT for Development Item 7 Third Session of Committee on ICT 21 November, 2012 Bangkok

LANGUAGE DIVERSITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Paul De Grauwe. University of Leuven

Center for Higher Education

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

EXECUTIVE MASTER ONLINE MASTER S IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Building Extension s Public Value

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Sustainability Council minutes, February 20, Attendance: recorded at 15

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Intensive Course in Health and Human Rights

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Co-Professors: Cylor Spaulding, Ph.D. & Brigitte Johnson, APR Office Hours: By Appointment

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Read the passage above. What does Chief Seattle believe about owning land?

ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

State Parental Involvement Plan

Oregon Sea Grant POORT Community Engagement on Climate Change

Practical Learning Tools (Communication Tools for the Trainer)

University of Southern California Hayward R. Alker Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for International Studies,

STUDENT INFORMATION GUIDE MASTER'S DEGREE PROGRAMME ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES (EES) 2016/2017. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Education. Veterinary Medical Degree, University of Pennsylvania Studies focus on Public Health from a One Health, Place based perspective

Building Bridges Globally

VII Medici Summer School, May 31 st - June 5 th, 2015

INSTITUTE FOR MARINE AND ANTARCTIC STUDIES (IMAS) BUSINESS PLAN

Comparing models of first year mathematics transition and support

Transcription:

UCCRN Second Assessment Report on Climate Change and Cities (ARC3 2) Midterm Authors Workshop September 28 30, The Crystal, London, UK Summary Outcome Report The UCCRN ARC3 2 Midterm Authors Workshop took place from September 28 30, 2014 at The Crystal in London, and served as the midpoint 'check in' as the Second Assessment Report on Climate Change and Cities (ARC3 2) heads towards publication in late 2015. Participants included 80 urban climate change experts, stakeholders, and practitioners from over 40 cities in Asia, Australia, Europe, Africa and the Americas. This report serves as a synopsis of the event and the key themes that emerged. Participants were divided into chapter teams for several breakout sessions during the Workshop, to work on draft versions of their chapters while receiving real time feedback from UCCRN ARC3 2 Editors. Authors also had the chance to meet with other chapter groups, during a series of energetic and collaborative round robin discussions, to ensure integration of crosscutting themes throughout the report. Authors emerged at the end of the Workshop process with significantly improved drafts of their respective chapters. Chapter Teams at ARC3 2 Midterm Workshop Urban Planning and Design Mitigation and Adaptation Equity and Environmental Justice Economics, Finance, and the Private Sector Urban Climate Science Disasters and Risk Urban Energy Water, Wastewater, and Sanitation Urban Solid Waste 1

ARC3 2 Authors Midterm Workshop Report Housing and Informal Settlements Urban Health Urban Ecology, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services Coastal Zones Governance & Policy Goals of the ARC3 2 Midterm Workshop Specifically, the stated objectives of the ARC3 2 Midterm Workshop were to: Provide updates on the status of ARC3 2 chapters and the publication process Work in Chapter Breakout Groups and with cross cutting theme chapter authors to further develop ARC3 2 chapters Receive real time feedback on chapters from the UCCRN Co Editors and invited Review Editors Meet with invited stakeholders on stakeholder engagement strategies Re set and reiterate a timeline for drafts, reviews, and publication Discuss the status and strategies for the Case Study Docking Station and Communications & Outreach for ARC3 2 Continue refining the structure and content of ARC3 2 2

Key Themes Emerging From the ARC3 2 Workshop Some of the key themes that emerged during the Workshop were: 1) ARC3 2 can serve as a call to action and a policymaking tool. ARC3 2 has the potential to enable policy makers to take action. Authors should pay attention to stakeholder information needs in order to ensure that ARC3 2 is an accessible and relevant resource. Co production of knowledge, through side events at city stakeholder conferences, is an effective way to accomplish this goal. 2) A strategy for communications and outreach is essential. To ensure that ARC3 2 is an accessible and functional resource for cities, an ad hoc group of authors is working to address communications and outreach. This strategy is an essential component of stakeholder engagement for ARC3 2. 3) The ARC3 2 Outline was updated to reflect current thinking among authors. For Instance, changes were made to take into account that Urban Ecosystems fits more closely with Section III, as a system, and Climate Science is more akin to a cross cutting theme. 4) A shared Risk Framework will bring cohesion and clarity. The group agreed to adopt a common framework for risk based on the work of the Disasters and Risk Chapter. 5) The Workshop resulted in a reiterated and revised timeline. A final manuscript will be submitted to Cambridge University Press by the end of May 2015. 6) Progress was made towards solidified plans for an official launch of ARC3 2 and of the first UCCRN Regional Hub in Paris, at COP21. Discussions on other hub locations are ongoing. 7) Key Messages and Glossary of Definitions were collected from all chapter teams. Two types of messages emerged, which will be highlighted at the beginning of each chapter. i) Key Findings: This includes key scientific findings and other research findings. These will be the specific pieces of information that a wellinformed decision maker needs to know. These messages are descriptive, objective, and evidence based (and model based). As such, they cannot 3

be prescriptive. There is no specific number of Key Findings per chapter. Rather, the most salient pieces of information should be selected. ii) Major Messages for City Leaders: This list includes the most relevant points that will interpret Key Findings for an urban decision maker. The message should convey what the Key Findings mean, how to apply them, and why they are important and relevant. These messages necessarily reach beyond the Key Findings to figure out how to act accordingly or put the Key Findings into practice. The messages might or might not be prescriptive, but if they are prescriptive they ought to include context and rationale. There is no specific number of such messages per chapter. Rather, the goal is to give city leaders a practical snapshot of the chapter themes. 8) Authors were provided standardized style guidelines to ensure consistency throughout ARC3 2. 9) The UCCRN Case Study Docking Station (CSDS) will be launched simultaneously with the ARC3 2 report. During the workshop, authors were asked to upload the case studies of their chapter into the CSDS. There was also a case study auction, where authors looked through the first version of CSDS to find additional case study they could use in their chapter. The CSDS will be a web based, extractable database to inform both research and practice on climate change and cities. It will enable scientifically valid comparisons across a range of social, bio physical, cultural, economic, and political contexts. Important Points from ARC3 2 Midterm Workshop Discussions Stakeholder Engagement primarily refers to the way each chapter works with stakeholders to write their chapter and to gather knowledge. A summary of these methods will be included in the report. A stakeholder is also a broad term that refers to users, key audiences, and co creators of knowledge. UCCRN is a burgeoning network that ought to include private sector and civil society. The Network Diagram was updated to reflect this. The Highlights listed in the report outline do not need to be included in each chapter. The question was raised about how policy prescriptive the ARC3 Reports should be. The answer was that each chapter should include suggestions for policy. A key component of ARC3 2 will be a Summary for City Leaders, drawing from chapter recommendations. There was an important discussion about use of developed vs. developing and low, medium, high income countries. ARC3 2 is committed to looking at all types of cities. 4

There is an ongoing discussion on how and where to include GHG emissions. Potential options are to include GHGs in the Mitigation & Adaptation Chapter or Energy Chapter. Timeline and Next Steps The following timeline will guide the ARC3 2 writing process following the Midterm Workshop. December 1, 2014: Third Order Drafts due Third Review: Co Editors, Stakeholders, and Institutional Review March 1, 2015: Fourth Order Drafts due Fourth Review: Co Editors, Stakeholders, and Institutional Review May 1, 2015: Fifth Order Drafts due May 2015: Review and Polishing May 29, 2015: Submission Drafts due; submission to Cambridge University Press December 2015: Publication and launch at COP21 in Paris 2016: International launches on all continents. 5

Updated Outline Front Matter: Co Editor Bios, Pull Out Quotes, Title Page, Table of Contents, Forewords, Preface Summary for City Decision Makers Introduction Chapter 1 Urbanization of Climate Change Solutions Chapter 2 Disasters and Risk in Cities Section I: Cross Cutting Themes Chapter 3 Urban Climate Science Chapter 4 Mitigation and Adaptation: Barriers, Bridges, and Co Benefits Chapter 5 Economics, Finance, and the Private Sector Chapter 6 Equity and Environmental Justice Section II: Urban Ecosystems and Human Services Chapter 7 Ecosystems and Biodiversity Chapter 8 Coastal Zones Chapter 9 Health Chapter 10 Housing and Informal Settlements Section III: Urban Infrastructure Systems Chapter 11 Energy Chapter 13 Transportation Chapter 12 Water and Sanitation Chapter 14 Solid Waste Section IV: Governance and Urban Futures Chapter 15 Planning and Design Chapter 16 Governing Carbon and Climate in Cities Appendix 1 UCCRN Case Study Docking Station End Matter: Case Studies and Topics; Acronyms and Abbreviations; UCCRN Steering Group, ARC3 2 Authors, and Reviewers; Index 6

IPCC Assessment Report and ARC3 Series Sessions ARC3 2 Midterm Workshop Presenters and Session Topics Day 1: Stakeholder Information Needs Sam Bickersteth, CDKN Day 2: Tom Bowman, Bowman Change Inc. Oswaldo Lucon, São Paulo State Environment Secretariat Marcus Mayr, UN Habitat Nathalie Jean Baptiste, UFZ Leipzig Michael Stevns, Siemens IPCC Assessment Reports and ARC3 Series David Satterthwaite, IIED Shobhakar Dhakal, Asian Institute of Technology Anthony G. Bigio, George Washington University Day 3: DFID and Cities Current Thinking on Climate and Economic Development Simon Ratcliffe, DFID 7

UCCRN ARC3 2 Team at Midterm Workshop Workshop Agenda Day 1 10:00am 10:05am 10:05am 10:40am 10:50am 11:05am 11:05am 12:20pm 12:40pm 1:30pm 1:30pm 1:40pm Opening Remarks David Simon, Royal Holloway Chair of Local Organizing Committee Welcome, Introductions, UCCRN Activities, Progress on ARC3 2, and Workshop Goals ARC3 2 Co Editors: Cynthia Rosenzweig, William Solecki, Shagun Mehrotra, Paty Romero Lankao, Shobhakar Dhakal ARC3 2 Outline and Chapter Templates Shobhakar Dhakal, Asian Institute of Technology Paty Romero Lankao, National Center for Atmospheric Research ARC3 2 Chapter Progress Lightning Round 3 slides per team 1) Status of Chapter and Stakeholder Interactions 2) Key Messages so far 3) Challenges Stakeholder Information Needs Panel and Discussion Sam Bickersteth, CDKN Tom Bowman, Bowman Change Inc. Oswaldo Lucon, São Paulo State Environment Secretariat Marcus Mayr, UN Habitat Questions: a) What information do stakeholders need now, about climate change and cities? b) How do information needs differ as the implementation phase gets going? c) How can communication between stakeholders and scientists be improved? Nuts and Bolts Chapter Team Guidelines Somayya Ali Ibrahim, UCCRN 1:40pm 3:30pm 3:50pm 5:00pm Chapter Working Groups Address Reviewer comments and inputs What are the main reviewer comments, and how will chapter teams address these? Reconvene and Report Back William Solecki and Cynthia Rosenzweig 8

Day 2 9:30am 9:45am UFZ Video from Dar es Salaam Introduction by Nathalie Jean Baptiste, UFZ Leipzig 9:45am 10:00am Goals for the Day ARC3 2 Co Editors 10:00am 10:20am Siemens Talk Michael Stevns, Siemens 10:20am 10:50am IPCC Assessment Reports and UCCRN ARC3 Reports David Satterthwaite, IIED William Solecki, CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities, Hunter CUNY Shobhakar Dhakal, Asian Institute of Technology Anthony G. Bigio, George Washington University 11:00am 11:30am Case Study Docking Station Purpose and Progress Patrick Driscoll, Aalborg University William Solecki, CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities 11:30am 1:30pm Chapter Working Groups Case Studies and Case Study Auction 2:00pm 4:00pm Cross Cutting Themes Working Groups (Round 1) 4:15pm 5:30pm Reconvene and Report Back William Solecki, CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities 7:00pm Joint Stakeholder Knowledge Provider Reception with MunichRe/Siemens Creating Resilient Cities Conference Day 3 9:30am 9:50am DFID and Cities Current Thinking on Climate and Economic Development Simon Ratcliffe, DFID 9:50am 10:15am Chapter Overlaps and Gaps in ARC3 2 10:30am 12:30pm Cross Cutting Themes Working Groups (Round 2) 1:15pm 2:45pm Working Group Final Presentations 2:45pm 3:15pm Discussion and Feedback from Co Editors and Steering Group 3:15pm 3:45pm Timeline, Review Process, and Next Steps 3:45pm 4:00pm ARC3 2 Midterm Authors Workshop Wrap Up 9

Context The UCCRN s first major publication, Climate Change and Cities: First Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (ARC3) was published in 2011 by Cambridge University Press. ARC3 was the first ever global, interdisciplinary, cross regional, science based assessment to address climate risks, adaptation, mitigation, and policy mechanisms relevant to cities. The UCCRN Leadership disseminated complimentary copies to developing country scholars and practitioners in Asia, Latin America, and Africa, and at urban climate change conferences and meetings held on these continents. The ARC3 report has been used in graduate level courses and by urban officials to shape city mitigation and adaptation plans. Building upon several well attended and active scoping sessions held at major conferences around the world, and positive feedback from both city decision makers and researchers, the UCCRN embarked on the process of writing the Second UCCRN Assessment Report on Climate Change and Cities (ARC3 2). The UCCRN hosted the ARC3 2 International Initiating Workshop from September 17 19, 2013 at Columbia University in New York City. With ARC3 2, UCCRN has begun a process for an on going, sustained global city focused climate change knowledge assessment and solutions program. The Second Assessment Report is based on comments and feedback from the existing readership of ARC3, which has sold over 1,650 copies, as well as from city stakeholders. ARC3 2 is focused on new topics crucial to urban decision makers as they take on the challenges associated with adapting to the already changing climate and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, the root cause of climate change. These topics include housing and informal settlements, sanitation, urban ecology and biodiversity, urban finance and the private sector, and coastal zones. Urban sector topics covered in the first ARC3 report (Urban Energy, Water and Wastewater, Urban Transportation Systems, and Human Health) are updated in ARC3 2 to reflect new research findings since 2010. Four cross cutting themes will be addressed in all of the chapters: Urban Planning and Design; Mitigation and Adaptation: Barriers, Bridges, and Co Benefits; Equity and Environmental Justice; and Economics, Finance, and Private Sector. 10