FOR. Mike. far out of reach. weak. Rhode. Obama wins their. Democratic base. has an inordinate. Even. Polling. when. Phone:

Similar documents
Opinion on Private Garbage Collection in Scarborough Mixed

Camas School levy passes! 69% approval! Crump! Truz! GOP homies tussle for Camas primary votes! Trump trumps with 42%, vs. 24% for Cruz!

SUMMARY REPORT MONROE COUNTY, OH OFFICIAL RESULTS PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 6, 2012 RUN DATE:03/20/12 11:03 AM STATISTICS REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

THE MAN BEHIND THE LEGEND

Copyright 2002 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Algebra 2- Semester 2 Review

Educational Attainment

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

APPENDIX 2: TOPLINE QUESTIONNAIRE

Introduction to Questionnaire Design


Short vs. Extended Answer Questions in Computer Science Exams

Lessons on American Presidents.com

Dana Chisnell, UsabilityWorks Ethan Newby, Newby Research (consultant on statistics) Sharon Laskowski, NIST Svetlana Lowry, NIST

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

SEPERAC MEE QUICK REVIEW OUTLINE

Average Number of Letters

High Performance Computing Club Constitution

Standards, Accountability and Flexibility: Americans Speak on No Child Left Behind Reauthorization. soeak

Basic: Question Words: Who, What, Where, When week 1

Simple Random Sample (SRS) & Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: A Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: Systematic Sample Best Used When

FACT: FACT: The National Coalition for Public Education. Debunking Myths About the DC Voucher Program

elearning OVERVIEW GFA Consulting Group GmbH 1

SETTING THE STAGE. News in Review January 2013 Teacher Resource Guide ROB FORD: Toronto s Controversial Mayor. Vocabulary Platform

Statistical Studies: Analyzing Data III.B Student Activity Sheet 7: Using Technology

The BG News November 5, 2012

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Sight Word Assessment

that when ONE ISSUE NUMBER e Education Chair House Rep. Harry Brooks favor. evaluations, Jim Coley of on their own evaluated

STT 231 Test 1. Fill in the Letter of Your Choice to Each Question in the Scantron. Each question is worth 2 point.

Outcome 1: Students analyze governmental institutions, political behavior, civic engagement, and their political and philosophical foundations.

The lasting impact of the Great Depression

End-of-Module Assessment Task

Junior State of America JSA. Handbook

A Diverse Student Body

MABEL ABRAHAM. 710 Uris Hall Broadway mabelabraham.com New York, New York Updated January 2017 EMPLOYMENT

Build on students informal understanding of sharing and proportionality to develop initial fraction concepts.

Career Series Interview with Dr. Dan Costa, a National Program Director for the EPA

Emergency Safety Interventions Kansas Regulations and Comparisons to Other States. April 16, 2013

Reflective Teaching KATE WRIGHT ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, SCHOOL OF LIFE SCIENCES, COLLEGE OF SCIENCE

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

The Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions

Author's response to reviews

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Grade Dropping, Strategic Behavior, and Student Satisficing

SPORT CLUBS HANDBOOK

North Carolina Community Colleges Golden LEAF Scholars Program Two-Year Colleges Student Application

Objective: Total Time. (60 minutes) (6 minutes) (6 minutes) starting at 0. , 8, 10 many fourths? S: 4 fourths. T: (Beneat , 2, 4, , 14 , 16 , 12

WHY SOLVE PROBLEMS? INTERVIEWING COLLEGE FACULTY ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF PROBLEM SOLVING

Preparing for Permanent Residency and Citizenship

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

The First Annual Survey of the Community

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Today s Agenda Welcome New Hires Updates and Notable News Show & Tell: Show & Tell: Featured Event:

Getting into top colleges. Farrukh Azmi, MD, PhD

San Francisco County Weekly Wages

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

Program Assessment and Alignment

September 21, I had expected Stewart to win the September 2 primary and planned to

Spring North Carolina Community Colleges Golden LEAF Scholars Program Two-Year Colleges

Activities for School

Creating the Student Platform Fall 2008

National Survey of Student Engagement

Financing Education In Minnesota

Genevieve L. Hartman, Ph.D.

Crucial Conversations About America s Schools

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

A Comparison of Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools in Idaho

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

evans_pt01.qxd 7/30/2003 3:57 PM Page 1 Putting the Domain Model to Work

Uncertainty concepts, types, sources

Left, Left, Left, Right, Left

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

Principal vacancies and appointments

Chapter 8. Graphing, Probability and Statistics

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

CSC200: Lecture 4. Allan Borodin

Enter Samuel E. Braden.! Tenth President

Southwood Design Proposal. Eric Berry, Carolyn Monke, & Marie Zimmerman

Managerial Decision Making

Foundations of Bilingual Education. By Carlos J. Ovando and Mary Carol Combs

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

Executive Summary. Colegio Catolico Notre Dame, Corp. Mr. Jose Grillo, Principal PO Box 937 Caguas, PR 00725

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Mathematics Success Grade 7

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Red Flags of Conflict

Board of Directors OFFICERS. John B. Smith, Jr., MD, Chairman Physician

JUNIOR HIGH SPORTS MANUAL GRADES 7 & 8

Generic Skills and the Employability of Electrical Installation Students in Technical Colleges of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.

Mcgraw Hill 2nd Grade Math

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Transcription:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 28, 2011 CONTACT: TOM JENSENN 919-744-6312 Obama romping in Rhode Island Raleigh, N.C. In PPP s first look at next year s presidential contest in Rhode Island, Mike Huckabee and neighboring Massachusetts Mitt Romney come closer than did to defeating. But closer is a relative term. lost by 28 points, so thatt still puts the eternally blue state unsurprisingly far out of reach. At 53-39, Rhode Island gives the president his fifth highest approval rating of the 43 statess in which PP PP has measured him in the last 13 months. But though they are the strongest of the four against the president in every state, Romney and Huckabee are still weak enough candidates that a sizeable chunk of those who disapprove of Obama s job performance still plan to vote for him. As in most states, all of the candidates are personally disliked, and lag by more than Obama s approval-disapproval margin. Romney almost halves s deficit, lagging 54-37. He is the only of the four Republicans tested to come close to breaking even onn the favorability front in Rhode Island. 41% see him favorably and 42% unfavorably. That compares to Huckabee s 32-44, Newt Gingrich s 20-59, and Sarah Palin s 24-69. Romney iss the best liked across the board the only one about whom the plurality independents have positive feelings, and the only one better liked in his own party than disliked by Democrats. Doing just slightly better than, Huckabee is behind, 56-31. But, as usual, Gingrich and Palin both do worse than the 2008 nominee, with the former at a 60-27 deficit, and the latter at -24. Despite only a 48-43 approval margin with independents, Obama wins their support in every matchup, by one point over Romney, 12 over Huckabee, 25 over Gingrich, and 32 over Palin. Andd despite more Democrats disapproving of his job performance than Republicans approving, the president attracts more GOP support than all the Republicans but Romney and Huckabee do from the Democratic base. Palin also drives Democrats toward the president in droves only 3% are undecided when he is matched against her, versuss 8-10% against the others. She also has an inordinate 28% of the GOP on the fence, versus 8-13% in the other horseraces. Even though a Mitt Romney nominationn might cut into the Democrats usual lofty leads in Northeastern states, he d have to hope for some sort of cosmicc shift in public sentimen in order to win Rhode Island,, said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. The last two times it went red were in the Nixon 1972 and Reagan 1984 landslides, when the Democratic candidates each carried one state and the District of Columbia. PPP surveyed 544 Rhode Island voters from Februaryry 16 th to 22 nd. The survey s margin of error is +/-4.2% %. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify. Publi c Policy Polling Phone: 888 621-6988 Web: www.publicpolicypolling.com Email: information@publicpolicypolling.com

Rhode Island Survey Results Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Do you approve or disapprove of President s job performance? Approve...53% Disapprove...39%... 8% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Newt Gingrich?...20%...59%...20% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mike Huckabee?...32%...44%...24% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Sarah Palin?...24%...69%... 7% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mitt Romney?...41%...42%...17% If the candidates for President next year were Democrat and Republican Newt Gingrich, who would you vote for?...60% Newt Gingrich...27% Undecided...13% Q7 Q8 Q9 If the candidates for President next year were Democrat and Republican Mike Huckabee, who would you vote for?...56% Mike Huckabee...31% Undecided...13% If the candidates for President next year were Democrat and Republican Sarah Palin, who would you vote for?...% Sarah Palin...24% Undecided... 11% If the candidates for President next year were Democrat and Republican Mitt Romney, who would you vote for?...54% Mitt Romney...37% Undecided...10% Q10 Who did you vote for President in 2008?...31%...58% Someone else/don't...12% Q11 If you are a woman, press 1. If a man, press 2. Woman...55% Man...% Q12 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican, press 2. If you are an independent or identify with another party, press 3. Democrat...41% Republican...14% Independent/Other...% February 16-22, 2011 Survey of 544 Rhode Island voters

Q13 If you are white, press 1. If other, press 2. White...86% Other...14% Q14 If you are years old, press 1. If, press 2. If, press 3. If you are older, press 4....12%...30%...40%...18% February 16-22, 2011 Survey of 544 Rhode Island voters

Obama Approval Gingrich Favorability Approve 53% 14% 80% 18% 20% 47% 7% 13% Disapprove 39% 82% 11% 64% 59% 32% 74% 60% 8% 3% 9% 18% 20% 22% 19% 26% Huckabee Favorability 32% 60% 19% 27% 44% 20% 58% 39% 24% 20% 23% 34% Palin Favorability 24% 57% 6% 27% 69% 38% 89% 55% 7% 5% 6% 17%

Romney Favorability 41% 71% 25% 39% 42% 20% 56% 30% 17% 9% 18% 31% Obama/Gingrich Newt Gingrich Undecide d 60% 16% 90% 32% 27% 68% 4% 31% 13% 16% 6% 37% Obama/Huckabee Mike Huckabee Undecide d 56% 13% 86% 19% 31% 72% 7% 42% 13% 15% 7% 39% Obama/Palin Sarah Palin % 23% 92% 38% 24% 58% 4% 33% Undecide d 11% 18% 4% %

Obama/Romney Mitt Romney Undecide d 54% 9% 83% 27% 37% 82% 11% % 10% 9% 6% 28% Obama Approval Approve Disapprove Wom an Man 53% 58% 47% 39% 32% 47% 8% 10% 6% Gingrich Favorability Wom an Man 20% 16% 25% 59% 59% 60% 20% 25% 15% Huckabee Favorability Wom an Man 32% 27% 39% 44% % 43% 24% 28% 18%

Wom an Man Wom an Man Palin Favorability Romney Favorability 24% 19% 30% 41% 39% 43% 69% 75% 63% 42% 41% 43% 7% 7% 7% 17% 19% 14% Obama/Gingrich New t Gingrich Unde cided Wom an Man 60% 66% 54% 27% 21% 34% 13% 13% 13% Wom an Man Obama/Huckabee 56% 61% 49% Mike Huckabee 31% 23% 40% Unde cided 13% 16% 10%

Wom an Man Wom an Man Obama/Palin Obama/Romney % 72% 56% 54% 60% 46% Sarah Palin 24% 17% 32% Mitt Romney 37% % % Unde cided 11% 11% 12% Unde cided 10% 10% 9% Obama Approval Approve Disapprove Democrat Republican Independent/Other 53% 73% 10% 48% 39% 18% 87% 43% 8% 9% 3% 9% Democrat Republican Independent/Other Gingrich Favorability 20% 8% 54% 21% 59% 72% 22% 59% 20% 19% 24% 20%

Democrat Republican Independent/Other Democrat Republican Independent/Other Huckabee Favorability 32% 19% 56% 37% 44% 53% 23% 42% 24% 28% 20% 21% Palin Favorability 24% 11% 55% 26% 69% 83% 35% 67% 7% 6% 9% 7% Romney Favorability Democrat Republican Independent/Other 41% 23% % 49% 42% 54% 20% 38% 17% 23% 16% 12% Democrat Republican Independent/Other /Gingrich 60% 84% 9% 54% Newt Gingrich 27% 7% 79% % Undecided 13% 8% 12% 17%

Democrat Republican Independent/Other Obama/Huckabee 56% 80% 9% 48% Mike Huckabee 31% 10% 78% 36% Undecided 13% 10% 13% 16% Democrat Republican Independent/Other /Palin % 88% 12% 59% Sarah Palin 24% 9% 60% 27% Undecided 11% 3% 28% 14% Democrat Republican Independent/Other /Rom ney 54% 78% 7% % Mitt Romney 37% 13% 85% 44% Undecided 10% 9% 8% 11% Obama Approval Approve Disapprove White Other 53% 52% 61% 39% 42% 20% 8% 6% 19%

White Other White Other Gingrich Favorability 20% 21% 12% 59% 59% 61% 20% 19% 28% Huckabee Favorability 32% 33% 25% 44% 44% 46% 24% 23% % Palin Favorability White Other 24% 24% 20% 69% 68% 78% 7% 8% 2% White Other Romney Favorability 41% 42% 36% 42% 42% 42% 17% 16% 22%

White Other White Other Obama/Gingrich Obama/Huckabee 60% 59% 68% 56% 54% 66% New t Gingrich 27% 28% 19% Mike Huckabee 31% 32% 24% Unde cided 13% 13% 13% Unde cided 13% 14% 10% Obama/Palin Sarah Palin Unde cided White Other % 63% 74% 24% 25% 19% 11% 12% 7% White Other Obama/Romney 54% 52% 66% Mitt Romney 37% 39% 23% Unde cided 10% 9% 10%

Obama Approval Gingrich Favorability Approve 53% 53% 53% 54% 50% 20% 17% 18% 20% 26% Dis approve 39% 33% 41% 38% 40% 59% 53% 59% % 52% 8% 13% 5% 8% 10% 20% 30% 23% 15% 21% Huckabee Favorability 32% 28% 39% 28% 34% 44% 52% 39% 49% 39% 24% 21% 22% 24% 27% Palin Favorability 24% 13% 27% 23% 26% 69% 80% 67% 68% 68% 7% 7% 5% 8% 6%

Romney Favorability Obama/Gingrich 41% 23% 49% 38% % 60% 70% 60% 60% 55% 42% 50% 36% 46% 38% New t Gingrich 27% 23% 27% 26% % 17% 27% 15% 16% 17% Undecide d 13% 7% 13% 14% 16% Obama/Huckabee Mike Huckabee Undecide d 56% 67% 53% 57% 51% 31% 23% 36% 28% 34% 13% 10% 12% 14% 15% Obama/Palin Sarah Palin % 77% 63% 63% 62% 24% 13% 26% 24% 26% Undecide d 11% 10% 11% 12% 12%

Obama/Romney Mitt Romney 54% 67% 49% 57% % 37% 27% 42% 35% 39% Undecide d 10% 7% 8% 8% 16%