UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Dr. Michàlle Mor Barak SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK SOWK 761 SPRING 2008 Course Description and Objectives: SOCIAL WORK STATISTICS This course is a continuation of SOWK 760 and will focus on a number of bi-variate and more advanced multivariate statistical methods. The overall objectives of this course are (1) to give you foundation knowledge of the strengths, limitations, and applications of quantitative analyses; and (2) to give you familiarity with statistical tools frequently used/encountered in social work research. More specifically, after completing this course, you should have gained: Texts 1. A conceptual understanding of a number of bivariate and multivariate statistical methods. This will enable you to critically assess empirically-based research and to actively participate in the design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation of on-going research; 2. Basic operational understanding of these statistical methods; 3. Skills in applying these statistical methods to answer a wide range of social science related research questions. That is, you should be able to: a. clearly state research questions and hypotheses in a statistical analysis context; b. select an appropriate statistical tool to answer the research question or to test your hypothesis; c. generate the chosen statistic utilizing SPSS-for Windows; and d. interpret your statistical findings in order to answer your research question. 4. A foundation in statistical inference which will enable you to pursue more advanced and specialized study in quantitative analysis. Required texts: Kachigan, S.K. 1987 Statistical Analysis (Radius Press) Additional Readings: Pedhazur, J. 1997. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research (Wadsworth Publishing) Cook & D. Campbell (1979) Quasi-Experimentation
Seigel, Non-parametric statistics Blalock, H.M. (1979) Social Statistics (McGraw Hills) Sage Series in Quantitative Methods: #22, 57. Assignments and Grading: Students will be graded on a number of assignments. You will have weekly homework, two inclass mid-term examinations and a final take-home examination. These assignments will be weighted as follows in determining your final course grade: Course Assignments and Examinations: Homework and presentation of articles in class 5% First mid-term exam 25% Second mid-term exam 30% Final exam 40% 100% Students will be asked to identify articles that use the methods covered in this course and present them to the class for discussion (the presentation schedule will be determined by the instructor). These presentations will help the class learn how the methods are applied in research articles. There will be three examinations. Each has been designed to assess the extent to which you have mastered the underlying conceptualization of statistical procedures as well as your ability to evaluate/interpret the use of these procedures in answering a number of social work related research questions. How, where, and when to reach me: Office: Room 341, MRF Phone: (213) 740-2002 e-mail: morbarak@usc.edu Office Hours: Tuesday, 11:00 12:30 or by appointment Grading Policy Within the School of social work, grades are determined in each class based on the following standards, which have been established by the faculty of the School: (1) Grades of A or A- are reserved for student work which not only demonstrates very good mastery of content but which also shows that the student has undertaken a complex task, has applied critical thinking skills to the assignment, and/or has demonstrated creativity in her or his approach to the assignment. The difference between these two grades would be determined by the degree to which these skills have been demonstrated by the student.
(2) A grade of B+ will be given to work which is judged to be very good. This grade denotes that a student has demonstrated a more-than-competent understanding of the material being evaluated in the assignment. (3) A grade of B will be given to student work which meets those basic requirements of the assignment. It denotes that the student has done adequate work on the assignment and meets basic course expectations. (4) A grade of B- will denote that a student s performance was less than adequate on an assignment, reflecting only moderate grasp of the content and/or expectations. (5) A grade of C would reflect a minimal grasp of the assignment, poor organization of ideas and/or several significant areas requiring improvement. (6) Grades between C- and F will be applied to denote a failure to meet minimum standards, reflecting serious deficiencies in all aspects of a student s performance on the assignment. Special Accommodations for Disability If there is any student in this course who, because of a documented disability, may have a need for special accommodations, please discuss this with me. The university s policy indicates that any student requesting academic accommodations based on a disability is required to register with the Disability Services and Programs (DSP) each semester. A letter of verification for approved accommodations can be obtained from DSP. Please be sure the letter is delivered to me as early in the semester as possible. DSP is located in STU 301 and can be contacted at (213) 740-0776.
SCHEDULE OF CLASSES Session 1 Jan. 23, 2008 Introduction: Course objectives, assignments, and grading (Jan 16 class members travel to SSWR go listen to presentations that include advanced statistics!) Models, Experimental designs and ANOVA Brief review of ANOVA and Two-Way ANOVA Required: Cook and Campbell, Ch. 4 (pp. 147-152 and 182-187) Lab: Generating two-way ANOVA Non-parametric Alternatives to ANOVA Required: Siegel, chapter 8 (pp. 184-193) Example of K-W application: Gratias, E.J., Krowchuk, D.P., Lawless, M.R., and Durant, R.H., 1999. Middle school students sources of acquiring cigarettes and requests of proof of age. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25: 276-283. Recommended: Blalock, chapter 16 (pp. 367-375) Lab: Review: ANOVA, Two-Way review, Kruskal Wallis ANOVA Session 2 and 3 Correlation analysis Jan. 30, & Feb. 6 2008 Required: Kachigan, chapter 10 (pp. 195-226) Optional: Blalock, chapter 17 (pp. 296-412) Non-parametric Alternatives to Pearson s Required: Seigel, chapter 9 Example of application Spearman rank-order correlation: Jung, H.P., Wensing, M., de Wilt, A., Olesen, F. and Grol, R. 2000. Comparison of patients preferences and evaluations regarding aspects of general practice care. Family Practice, 17(3): 236-242.
Simple linear regression Required: Kachigan, chapter 11 (pp. 238-257) Examples of simple linear regression applications: Felton, J. Mitchell, J. Stinson, M. 2004. Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1):91-108 Smith, P.F. et. Al. 1990. A comparison of alcohol data with survey data on self-reported alcohol use in 21 states, American Journal of Public Health, 80(3), 309-312. Session 4 & 5 Simple Linear Regression, Partial Correlation and Multiple Regression Feb. 13, & Feb. 20, 2008 Required: Lewis-Beck, Sage #22 Kachigan, Chapter 10 (pp. 226-233) Chapter 11 (pp. 259-271) Examples of Applications Multiple Regression: Taft, C.T., O Farrelle, T.J., Rorres, S.E., Panuzio, J., Monson, C.M., Murphy, M., Murphy, C.M. 2006. Examining the correlates of psychological aggression among a community sample of couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(4): 581-588. Luk, D.M. and Shaffer, M.A. 2005. Work and Family Domain Stressors and Support: Within and Cross-domain Influences on Work-Family Conflict. Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78: 489-508. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/joop/2005/00000078/0000 0004/art00001 Nugent, W.R. and Williams, M. 2001. The relationship between the comorbidity of depression with problems in psychosocial functioning and the severity of suicidal ideation, Social Service Review, 75(4), 581-604. Recommended: Pedhazur, Chapters 3 and 5 Session 6 Feb. 27, 2008 First mid-term examination Session 7 & 8 Multiple Regression (cont d) and Multiple Correlation
March 5 & March. 12, 2008 Lab: Multiple regression procedures March 19, 2008 SPRING RECESS Session 9 Analysis of Covariance March 26, 2008 Required: Kachigan, chapter 12 (pp. 331-341) Pedhazur, chpater 9 (dummy coding) Recommended: Pedhazur, chapter 13 Application of ANCOVA: Busch, N.B. 2004. Domestic violence and social work education comparisons of moral reasoning levels between battered and non-battered women. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(1): 57-71. Lab: Analysis of covariance procedures Session 10 & 11 April 2 & 9, 2008 Factor Analysis Introduction to Factor Analysis Required: Kachigan, chapter 15 Recommended: Agresti & Agresti, chapter 15 (pp. 504-508) Applications: Resnick, S.G., Fontana, A., Lehman, A.F., and Rosenheck, R.A. 2005. An empirical conceptualization of the recovery orientation. Schizophrenia Research, 75: 119-128. Flores, L.Y., Carrubba, M.D. and Good, G.E. 2006. Feminism and Mexican American Adolescent Women: Examining the psychometric properties of two measures. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(1): 48-64.
Buss, A.H. and Perry M. 1992. The aggression questionnaire, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. Mor Barak, M.E., Cherin, D.A. and Berkman, S. 1998. Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(1), 82-104. Lab: Factor analysis procedures Session 13 Second Mid-term April 16, 2008 Session 14 April 23, 2008 Applications and Introduction to Path Analysis and Discriminat Function Analysis Required: Agresti & Agresti, chapter 15 (pp. 500 504) additional readings to be provided. Recommended: Pedhazur, chapter 15. Session 15 April 30, 2008 Wrap-up Introduction to advanced statistical methods HAND OUT FINAL EXAM Final exam due Thursday May 8 th by 12:00 Noon