Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Similar documents
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention

School Leadership Rubrics

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

Denver Public Schools

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Collaborative Classroom Co-Teaching in Inclusive Settings Course Outline

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Comprehensive Progress Report

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

Student Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts

EQuIP Review Feedback

Brandon Alternative School

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

CAFE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS O S E P P C E A. 1 Framework 2 CAFE Menu. 3 Classroom Design 4 Materials 5 Record Keeping

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

CDS Code

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

What Am I Getting Into?

What does Quality Look Like?

School-Wide Restorative Practices: Step by Step

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

The State and District RtI Plans

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

Philosophy of Literacy. on a daily basis. My students will be motivated, fluent, and flexible because I will make my reading

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

State Parental Involvement Plan

George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

Community Based Participatory Action Research Partnership Protocol

Questions to Consider for Small Parent Groups/Parent Cafés

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Social and Emotional Learning Talking Points - November 2011

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

SY School Performance Plan

RDGED 722: Reading Specialist Practicum Field Experience Handbook

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Strategic Improvement Plan

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Transcription:

Short Term Action Plan (STAP) 10/14/2017 1

Managing Complex Change Vision Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Meaningful Change Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Confusion Vision Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Anxiety Vision Skills Resources Action Plan Assessment Gradual Change Vision Skills Incentives Action Plan Assessment Frustration Vision Skills Incentives Resources Assessment False Starts Vision Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Unknown Results Adapted from Delores Ambrose, 1987

Overview of the Session Establish the need for effective leadership teams to function as the foundation for STAP review meetings Understand the purpose of STAP review meetings Define a process for implementing STAP review meetings Determine the results for implementing STAP review meetings 10/14/2017 3

STAP Learning Target Effective Leadership System Georgia School Performance Standards (GSPS) Leadership teams will monitor implementation of the school improvement plan and make adjustments, as needed. Planning and Organization 3 10/14/2017 4

STAP defined by GSPS Effective Leadership System Leadership teams will use processes to systematically analyze data to improve student achievement. Leadership 4 Leaders will build leadership capacity through shared decision-making and problem solving. Leadership 5 Leaders will establish and support a data-driven school leadership team that is focused on student learning. Leadership 6 10/14/2017 5

Essential Question How does the school leadership team know if the actions, strategies, or interventions are being implemented with fidelity and have an impact on the school s progress towards increasing student achievement? 10/14/2017 6

Establish the need for effective leadership teams to function as the foundation for STAP review meetings 10/14/2017 7

Why the need for an effective school leadership team? The team approach is a more effective and efficient method to address the many diverse tasks needed to successfully accomplish school goals. 10/14/2017 8

Why the need for an effective school leadership team? Such teams can provide leadership in the areas of problem-solving, communication with colleagues, motivation, professional development, and coaching. 10/14/2017 9

Who should be on a leadership team? An effective leadership team includes members with diverse skills and perspectives that will impact the desired results. The diversity of the staff, students, and community as well as all grade levels, content areas, departments, and specialty areas should be represented. Chenoweth and Everhart (2002) 10/14/2017 10

Who should be on a leadership team? Members should be committed to school-wide change; be respected by colleagues; possess leadership potential; demonstrate effective interpersonal skills; and be able to start projects and get things done. Chenoweth and Everhart (2002) 10/14/2017 11

What does a leadership team do? School Leadership Teams identify: Problems Root Causes Roadblocks Solutions The ultimate goal is to choose the most effective research-based practices and strategies to solve identified problems. 10/14/2017 12

Let s Reflect 10/14/2017 13

Click Know your why video 14

Let s Reflect 10/14/2017 15

How do leadership teams implement the STAP? Effective Leadership System Georgia School Performance Standards Leadership teams will monitor implementation of the school improvement plan and make adjustments, as needed. Planning and Organization 3 10/14/2017 16

Understand the purpose of STAP review meetings 10/14/2017 17

How do leadership teams Implement short term action plans? Determine Needs and Focus Effective Leadership Coherent Instructional System Professional Capacity Supportive Learning Environment Family & Community Engagement CNA SIP Set Goals and Long Term Actions Goal CNA Structure(s) Action Steps Funding Sources Timeline Monitoring Methods Position Responsible Set Short-Term Goals and Interim Monitoring Attendance Behavior/ Discipline Content Achievement Processes and Adult Actions STAP 10/14/2017 18

Task: 1. Consider the following analogy: Capacity building is to accountability what finance is to accounting. 1. Talk with your elbow partner about the meaning behind this analogy. 2. Do you agree or disagree with the comparison? 3. How does this analogy relate to the work of the leadership team? 10/14/2017 19

According to Michael Fullan in The Principal Three Keys to Maximizing Impact Finance is about how people organize and invest their assets; if you have only accounting you are merely keeping careful records while you go out of business! In the same way, there is more to accountability than measuring results; you need also to develop people s capacity to achieve the results. Extreme pressure without capacity results in dysfunctional behavior. 10/14/2017 20

Short Term Action Plans Are aligned to the SIP goals and strategies Break down broad strategies of the SIP into manageable and achievable steps Clearly define the adult actions that need to occur Support the Georgia Systems of Continuous Improvement or are viewed through the systems lens Go beyond gathering data Are inclusive of and build capacity of team members 10/14/2017 21

Benefits of the STAP process: Keeps the School Improvement Plan alive Builds momentum and keeps it going Engages stakeholders, builds consensus Creates ownership and accountability Sets clear expectations and outlines the steps to achieve them Clarifies timelines Eliminates surprises Allows for reflection and inquiry Allows for timely revisions Creates opportunities to celebrate incremental achievements Transforms talk into action (Actions speak louder than words) 10/14/2017 22

School Improvement Process 10/14/2017 23

School Improvement Process Determine if the staff can formally study the effects of the intervention and share with others in the field Monitor implementation and progress against defined goals Define reasonable expectations for success Identify and track progress and performance Develop a plan for how knowledge about the intervention will be shared with others Use the evidence to determine whether the intervention should continue as is, be modified, or be discontinued 10/14/2017 24

Define a process for implementing STAP review meetings 10/14/2017 25

Coherent Instructional System Coherent Instructional System School System: School District School: Middle School Date: 8-14-17 thru 9-22-17 Person(s) present: Leadership Team(See Sign-In Sheet) SIP Goal(s): Increase the achievement of identified subgroups by 3% on all Georgia Milestones by the end of spring 2018. GSCI Systems and Structures Example of a STAP document Action Steps Resources Timeline Research and develop the collaborative planning process. Collaborative planning process Person(s) Responsible 8-18-17 Instructional Coach Evaluation of Implementation and Impact on Student Learning Data for Monitoring Collaborative planning process Status Train teachers on utilizing the collaborative planning process. Collaborative planning process, Protocols, Collaborative planning form 8-25-17 Instructional Coach Collaborative planning agenda, meeting minutes and sign-in sheets 10/14/2017 26

Coherent Instructional System Coherent Instructional System School System: School District School: Middle School Date: 8-14-17 thru 9-22-17 Person(s) present: Leadership Team(See Sign-In Sheet) SIP Goal(s): Increase the achievement of identified subgroups by 3% on all Georgia Milestones by the end of spring 2018. GSCI Systems and Structures Example of a STAP document Action Steps Resources Timeline Train teachers on utilizing curriculum documents (i.e. pacing guides, teaching units, assessments) to plan daily instruction. Lesson plan, Pacing guide, Lesson plan template, Sample lesson plan template Person(s) Responsible 9-8-17 Grade level or Department Chairs Evaluation of Implementation and Impact on Student Learning Data for Monitoring Collaborative planning agenda, meeting minutes and sign-in sheets, Lesson plan Status Conduct calibrated observations of collaborative planning to create consistency of feedback for administrative staff. Collaborative planning observation forms and data Feedback forms 9-15-17 Curriculum AP Collaborative planning observation data and feedback Collaborative planning agenda, meeting minutes, and sign-sheets 10/14/2017 27

Process for STAP review meetings Develop STAP from SIP Develop Next 30 to 45-day STAP Summarize Current Data Utilize a Problemsolving Process Assess Fidelity of Implementation An effective leadership team is the foundation for STAP review meetings. 10/14/2017 28

STAP Process STEP 1 Develop the STAP from the SIP and monitor every 30 days. Prioritize actions, identify person(s) responsible, timelines, data sources, artifacts, and outcomes. STAP TEAM Leadership Team District Personnel State Coach 10/14/2017 29

STAP Process STEP 2 Summarize (aggregate/disaggregate) current data (i.e. process, achievement, demographic, and perception data) and identify the patterns and trends. School-wide Grade level Content area Subgroup Class level Student level 10/14/2017 30

STAP Process STEP 3 Assess fidelity of implementation of initiatives in the SIP and impact on student learning, based on the timelines identified in the SIP GOAL of Fidelity of Implementation Reduce variability in instruction Reduce academic failures 10/14/2017 31

STAP Process STEP 3 Assess fidelity of implementation of initiatives in the SIP and impact on student learning, based on the timelines identified in the SIP Retrieved from Hillsborough County Public School GOAL of Fidelity of Implementation EXAMPLE Reduce variability in instruction Reduce academic failures 10/14/2017 32

STAP Process STEP 4 Utilize problem-solving processes to celebrate successes, identify barriers, and determine research-based practices and possible solutions/next steps. Root Cause Analysis 10/14/2017 33

Problem-Solving/ Decision- Making Process (PSDM) 10/14/2017 34 Kowalski, T.J., Lasley, T.J., & Mahoney, J. (2008). Data-driven decisions and school leadership: Best practices for school improvement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Problem-Solving/ Decision- Making Process Stage 1: Understanding Stage 2: Formulating Stage 3: Applying Stage 4: Reflecting Stage 5: Improving Step 1: Frame the problem Step 2: Analyze the problem Step 3: Identify possible solutions; all solutions not just the obvious Select the preferred solution Step 4: Apply the solution appropriately and correctly to prevent failure Step 5: Assess objectively to measure adequacy of solution Evaluate to determine if the problem was solved and can the solution be improved. Step 6: Make a decision - Problem resolved - Adjust preferred solution and repeat application -Solution ineffective repeat problem cycle 10/14/2017 35 Kowalski, T.J., Lasley, T.J., & Mahoney, J. (2008). Data-driven decisions and school leadership: Best practices for school improvement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

PSDM - Activity PSDM Step 3: Identify possible solutions; all solutions not just the obvious Select the preferred solution

PSDM - Activity SIP Goal: By 2018, increase proficiency rates by 5% for each subgroup as measured by the EOG/EOC state exam. STAP action step: Conduct observations of cotaught classes. Frame the Problem: Across multiple grade levels and content areas, PSDM the Step students 3: with disabilities (SWD) are demonstrating minimal progress in using strategies to access and master Identify grade possible level standards. solutions; One all SWD teacher, new to the school, solutions coteaches not just with the two obvious general education teachers for the students in these grade levels. The master schedule allows Select time the for preferred the SWD teacher solution to plan with one of the two teachers. 2016 Proficiency Rates 2017 Proficiency Rates ELA 7.143 6.098 MATH 7.143 11.25 SCI 2.381 9.756 SS 5.952 8.537

Problem-Solving/ Decision- Making Process Stage 1: Understanding Stage 2: Formulating Stage 3: Applying Stage 4: Reflecting Stage 5: Improving Step 1: Frame the problem Step 2: Analyze the problem Step 3: Identify possible solutions; all solutions not just the obvious Select the preferred solution Step 4: Apply the solution appropriately and correctly to prevent failure Step 5: Assess objectively to measure adequacy of solution Evaluate to determine if the problem was solved and can the solution be improved. Step 6: Make a decision - Problem resolved - Adjust preferred solution and repeat application -Solution ineffective repeat problem cycle 10/14/2017 38 Kowalski, T.J., Lasley, T.J., & Mahoney, J. (2008). Data-driven decisions and school leadership: Best practices for school improvement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

STAP Process STEP 5 Develop next STAP based on the solutions/next steps discussed in step 4. Repeat STAP process every 30 days. 10/14/2017 39

STAP Review in Action 10/14/2017 40

STAP Review Noticings OBSERVABLE Leadership capacity External partners Demographics, attendance, and student achievement SIP process Etc. NOT OBSERVABLE Process and perception data External partners Artifacts Problem-solving and decision-making process Presentation for Stakeholders Etc. 10/14/2017 41

Determine the results for implementing the STAP review meetings 10/14/2017 42

Where are we going? Proposed ESSA Click here to view Georgia s draft ESSA plan The goal of Georgia s new target structure is to incentivize continuous, sustainable improvement. Each year, schools will be expected to meet the improvement target based on the prior year s performance. pg.20 10/14/2017 43

Proposed ESSA Closing the GAP 10/14/2017 44

Where are we? 2017 Subgroup Graduation Rates Students with Disabilities (58.9%) ELL (59%) All Students (80.6%) Multi-Racial (81.5%) Asian/Pacific Islander (91.2%) Hispanic Students (73.6%) Black Students (77.8%) Economically Disadvantaged (76.4%) White Students (84%) 10/14/2017 45

Where are we? 2017 Subgroup Graduation Rates Number of Students who Did Not Graduate 25,117 1 OUT 5 OF 10/14/2017 46

Table Talk 10/14/2017 47

Session Resources: Strengthening your leadership team Guide to High Impact Practice (HIP) Rubric for Leadership Teams High Impact Practice Leadership Team (LT) Rubric High Impact Practice LT Rubric Feedback Form Leadership Team Agenda STAP Review Feedback (for use by State Coach) STAP Template and Example 10/14/2017 48

You can do what I cannot do. I can do what you cannot do. Together we can do great things. -Mother Teresa 10/14/2017 49

50 Contact Information Mary McArthur Lead School Improvement Specialist mary.mcarthur@mresa.org Ateshia Lester School Improvement Specialist ateshia.lester@mresa.org Tara Ross School Improvement Specialist tara.ross@mresa.org 10/14/2017 50