UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Developing second-language listening comprehension: Effects of training lower-order skills versus higher-order strategy. Poelmans, P. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Poelmans, P. (2003). Developing second-language listening comprehension: Effects of training lower-order skills versus higher-order strategy. Utrecht: LOT international series General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) Download date: 24 Nov 2017
References Anderson, J. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, New York: Erlbaum. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Anderson, J. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, New York: Erlbaum. Aylett, M. & Turk, A. (2003). Stochastic suprasegmentals: the relationship between redundancy, prosodic prominence and care of articulation in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech (under review). Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11), 417-423. Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed), The Psychology of learning and motivation. (pp. 48-79). New York: Academic Press. Berendsen, E. (1986). The phonology of cliticization. Dordrecht: Foris. Berne, J. (1998). Examining the relationship between L2 listening research, pedagogical theory, and practice. Foreign Language Annals, 31 (2), 169-190. Bezooijen, R. van (2002, August). Distances among language varieties: subjective versus objective reality. Paper presented at Methods XI. The eleventh International Conference on Methods in Dialectology. University of Joensuu, Finland.
138 REFERENCES Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: the science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York: Basic Books. Bloomfield, L. (1942). Outline guide for the practical study of foreign languages. (pp. 115). Baltimore MD: Linguistic society of America. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (1996). PRAAT: A system for doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org. Bongaerts, Th., Summeren, C. van, Planken, B. & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in second language acquisition, 19, 447-465. Bransford, J., Franks, J., Morris, C. & Stein, B.S. (1979). Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In L. Cermak & F. Craig (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. (pp. 331-354). Hillsdale, New York: Erlbaum. Bransford, J. & Johnson, M. (1973). Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In W. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. (pp. 383-438). New York: Academic Press. Brown, J. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listener. In D. Mendelsohn & J, Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening. (pp. 113-131). San Diego: Dominie Press. Carlson, R., Sullivan, M. & Schneider, W. (1989). Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 517-526. Carroll, D. (1994). Psychology of language. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing company.
REFERENCES 139 Chaudron, C. (1985). A method for examining the input/intake distinction. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. Cheng, P. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts for skills acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 414-423. Cherry, E. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 25, 975-979. Churchland, P. (1999). Learning and conceptual change: the view from neurons. In A. Clark & P. Millican (Eds.), Connectionism, concepts and folk psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cook, V. (1990). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold. Cutler, A. (1976). Phoneme monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 55-60. Cutler, A. (2001). Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44 (2), 171-195. Cutler, A. & Darwin, C. (1981). Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 217-224. Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466. Darwin, C. (1975). On the dynamic use of prosody in speech perception. In A. Cohen & S. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and process in speech perception. (pp. 178-193). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
140 REFERENCES Dijkstra, T. & Heuven, W. van (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. (pp. 189-225). Mahwah, New York: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. Dijkstra, T., Heuven, W. van & Grainger, J. (1998). Simulating competitor effects with the bilingual interactivation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 177-196. Ellis, R. (2000). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fearch, C. & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257-274. Flege, J. (1987). A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 8, 162-177. Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gathercole, S. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 23, 83-94. Gathercole, S. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of shortterm memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (11), 410-419. Gathercole, S. & Baddeley, A. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gathercole, S., Pickering, S., Hall, M. & Peaker, S. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A (1), 1-30. Gathercole, S. & Thorn, A. (1998). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign
REFERENCES 141 language learning. Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. (pp. 141-157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaums. Geva, E. & Ruan, E. (1993). Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43, 5-42. Goldinger, S. (1996). Auditory lexical decision. In F. Grosjean & U. Frauenfelder (Eds.), A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms. Language and Cognitive Processes (1996), 11 (6), 553-558. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283. Grosjean, F. (1988). Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language sand Cognitive Processes, 3, 233-274. Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed languages: Issues, findings and models. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. (pp. 225-254). New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Grosjean, F. & Frauenfelder, U. (1997). (Eds.), A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms. Sussex: Psychology Press. Harley, T. (1998). The Psychology of language. Sussex: Psychology Press, Ltd. Publishers. Hayward, K. (2000). Experimental phonetics. Harlow: Longman. Hazenberg, S. (1994). Een keur van woorden. De wenselijke en feitelijke receptieve woordenschat van anderstalige studenten. Diss. Amsterdam VU. Heuven, V. van (1998). Effects of focus distribution and accentuation on the temporal and melodic organisation of word groups in Dutch. In S. Barbier, J. Rooryck & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Small words in the big picture. (pp. 37-42). Leiden: HIL.
142 REFERENCES Hulme, C., Maughan, S. & Brown, G. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 685-701. Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M. & Raumond, W. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in Lexical Production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Kerkhoff, A. (1997). Mededelingen uit de staatsexamencommissie Nederlands als tweede taal. Les 87, 26. Kerkhoff, A. (2002). Berichten uit de Staatsexamencommissie Nederlands als tweede taal. Les 117. Kleijn, P. de & Nieuwborg, E. (1983). Basiswoordenboek Nederlands. Leuven: Wolters. Kleijn, P. de & Nieuwborg, E. (1996). Basiswoordenboek Nederlands. Leuven: Wolters. Koster, C. (1987). Word recognition in foreign and native language. Effects of context and assimilation. Diss. Universiteit Utrecht. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman. Lieberman, Ph. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6, 172-187. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In W. Hardscastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling. (pp. 403-439). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
REFERENCES 143 Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. Marsel-Wilson, W. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63. Matter, F. (1986). A la recherche des frontières perdues. Amsterdam: Editions De Werelt. McClelland, J. & Elman, J. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86. McCusker, L.X., Hillinger, M.L. & Bias, R.G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 217-245. McCusker, L.X., Holley-Wilcox, P. & Hillinger, M.L. (1979). Frequency effects in auditory and visual word recognition. Paper presented to the Southwestern Psychological Association (cited in McCusker et al., 1981). Mendelsohn, D. (1994). Learning to listen: A strategy-based approach for the second-language learner. San Diego: Dominie Press. Mendelsohn, D. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101. Miller, G., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt. Miyake, A. & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning. Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. (pp. 339-364) Mahwah, New York: Erlbaums.
144 REFERENCES Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (1999). Models of Working Memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D. & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178. Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11-28. Nooteboom, S. (1997). The prosody of speech: melody and rhythm. In W. Hardcastle & J. Laver. (Eds.), The handbook of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 640-673). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Nooteboom, S. & Eefting, W. (1992). To what extent is speech production controlled by speech perception? Some questions and some experimental evidence. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure.(pp. 439-450). Amsterdam: IOS Press Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234. Norris, D., McQueen, J. & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370. Obusek, C. & Warren, R. (1973). Relation of the verbal transformation and the phonemic restauration effects. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 97-107. Poelmans, P. & Jong, N. de (2002). Authorware and E-prime, two authoring applications. Glot International 6 (1), 26-29.
REFERENCES 145 Posner, M. & Snyder, C. (1975). Attention and Cognitive Control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: the Loyola Symposium. (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, New York. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532. Rietveld, T & Heuven, V. van (2001). Algemene fonetiek. Bussum: Coutinho. Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. Applied linguistics and language study. New York: Longman. Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Applied linguistics in action. London: Longman. Samuel, A. (1990). Using perceptual-restoration effects to explore the architecture of perception. In G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing. (pp. 295-314). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Schneider, W. & Detweiler, M. (1988). The role of practice in dual-task performance: Toward workload modeling in a connectionist /control architecture. Human factors, 30, 539-566. Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax & Semantics: Vol. 3 Speech acts. (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency. (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Segalowitz, N. & Gatbonton, E. (1995). Automaticity and lexical skills in second language fluency: Implications for computer assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 8 (2), 129-149.
146 REFERENCES Segalowitz, N. & Segalowitz, S. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Linguistics 14, 369-385. Segalowitz, S., Segalowitz, N. & Wood, A. (1998). Assessing the development of automaticity in a second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics 19, 53-67. Segalowitz, N., Watson, V. & Segalowitz, S. (1995). Vocabulary skill: single case assesment of automaticity of word recognition in a timed lexical decision task. Second Language Research 11, 121-136. Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A (1) 21-50. Service, E., Simola, M., Metsänheimo, O. & Maury, S. (2002). Bilingual working memory span is affected by language skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14 (3), 383-408. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B298, 199-209. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension vs. acquisition: two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239-256. Staatsexamencommissie (1993). Besluit van 14 oktober 1993, houdende vaststelling van het Staatsexamenbesluit Nederlandse als tweede taal. Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 569. Stanovich, K. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental review, 10, 72-100. Sulin, R. & Dooling, D. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 255-262.
REFERENCES 147 Tsui, A. & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics 19 (4), 432-451. Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zwitserlood, C. (1989). Words and sentences: the effects of sentential semantic context on spoken word processing. Diss. Nijmegen University.